This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
Bigbopper
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:21 pm
- Been Liked: 121 times
- Has Liked: 18 times
Post
by Bigbopper » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:17 am
Apparently Andrew is resisting a move from the Royal Lodge to Frogmore Cottage because he does not want to "downsize". Frogmore has 10 bedrooms

-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:25 am
Hes lived in the other place for decades hasn't he?
-
BennyD
- Posts: 3603
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
- Been Liked: 1338 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
- Location: Nantwich
Post
by BennyD » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:30 am
It’s good to see he can resist something.
This user liked this post: basil6345789
-
Nori1958
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
- Been Liked: 1112 times
- Has Liked: 347 times
Post
by Nori1958 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:33 am
......yawn.......
-
Steve1956
- Posts: 17888
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6634 times
- Has Liked: 3071 times
- Location: Fife
Post
by Steve1956 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:42 am
He should be in prison nevermind Frogmore cottage.
-
Bosscat
- Posts: 28789
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 9634 times
- Has Liked: 20695 times
Post
by Bosscat » Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:30 pm
Thought the Toad would jump at the chance to live in Frogmore
-
dougcollins
- Posts: 9146
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2373 times
- Has Liked: 2344 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Post
by dougcollins » Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:55 pm
Are the ferrets still in Toad Hall?
-
HiThere
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2022 5:59 pm
- Been Liked: 274 times
- Has Liked: 505 times
Post
by HiThere » Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:57 pm
Frogmarched out of Frogmore.
-
HahaYeah
- Posts: 3441
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:33 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 475 times
Post
by HahaYeah » Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:21 pm
On a lighter note, the Markles have been evicted to make way for him.

-
Steve1956
- Posts: 17888
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6634 times
- Has Liked: 3071 times
- Location: Fife
Post
by Steve1956 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:22 pm
HahaYeah wrote: ↑Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:21 pm
On a lighter note, the Markles have been evicted to make way for him.
Markles

This user liked this post: HahaYeah
-
Clarets4me
- Posts: 5427
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
- Been Liked: 2590 times
- Has Liked: 1108 times
- Location: Ightenhill,Burnley
Post
by Clarets4me » Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:26 pm
This is a 63 year old man who screamed and berated a member of staff for arranging the Teddy Bears on his bed in the " wrong " way ..... He was offered a route to redemption, following blueprint of John Profumo, who after resigning from the War Office, working quietly and without fuss, devoting most of the rest of his life to Toynbee Hall, a London charity devoted to poverty relief. Prince Andrew refused.
In the days of Empire, he'd have been fired off to be Governor General of Bermuda, or some such .... he's an entitled waste of DNA !
-
Stayingup
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
- Been Liked: 985 times
- Has Liked: 2981 times
Post
by Stayingup » Thu Mar 02, 2023 8:56 pm
Steve1956 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:42 am
He should be in prison nevermind Frogmore cottage.
What?
-
Steve1956
- Posts: 17888
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6634 times
- Has Liked: 3071 times
- Location: Fife
Post
by Steve1956 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 8:59 pm
Sorry..don't you understand that simple sentence?
-
Stayingup
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
- Been Liked: 985 times
- Has Liked: 2981 times
Post
by Stayingup » Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:36 pm
Steve1956 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 02, 2023 8:59 pm
Sorry..don't you understand that simple sentence?
Probably more than you do. In jail for what? Has been on trial?
-
Steve1956
- Posts: 17888
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6634 times
- Has Liked: 3071 times
- Location: Fife
Post
by Steve1956 » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:24 pm
Stayingup wrote: ↑Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:36 pm
Probably more than you do. In jail for what? Has been on trial?
Ok

being married to that Fergie for one.
-
Bosscat
- Posts: 28789
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 9634 times
- Has Liked: 20695 times
Post
by Bosscat » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:26 pm
Stayingup wrote: ↑Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:36 pm
Probably more than you do. In jail for what?
Has been on trial?
???
-
NRC
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Post
by NRC » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:27 pm
you need to keepup with events, stayingup
-
Darnhill Claret
- Posts: 3045
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 2283 times
Post
by Darnhill Claret » Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:34 pm
Mention of Toynbee Hall takes me back. In 1970 I applied to do 4 months of Voluntary Service and was interviewed by Polly Toynbee at Toynbee Hall. She gave me 4 months at Hither Green Hospital as a nursing auxiliary. Loved it and was was invited by one of the Matrons to apply for a place there as a nurse. I like to have an outlook of 'no regrets' but occasionally I wish I'd taken up the offer.
-
dermotdermot
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 207 times
Post
by dermotdermot » Thu Mar 02, 2023 11:54 pm
I thought that these sort of topics were taboo on this forum.
-
morpheus2
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
- Been Liked: 795 times
- Has Liked: 1927 times
Post
by morpheus2 » Fri Mar 03, 2023 12:01 am
I don't think he'll lose any sweat over it.
These 4 users liked this post: Bosscat HiThere StuffyClaret Bin Ont Turf
-
ŽižkovClaret
- Posts: 8143
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2430 times
- Has Liked: 3469 times
- Location: Praha
-
Contact:
Post
by ŽižkovClaret » Fri Mar 03, 2023 3:18 pm
I read that it had been given to H&M as a gift from the late Queen, not loaned. Seems a poor do that it is now being taken away, whatever your opinion of the couple, a gift, once given, shouldn't be taken back.
-
Clarets4me
- Posts: 5427
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
- Been Liked: 2590 times
- Has Liked: 1108 times
- Location: Ightenhill,Burnley
Post
by Clarets4me » Fri Mar 03, 2023 4:24 pm
ŽižkovClaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 3:18 pm
I read that it had been given to H&M as a gift from the late Queen, not loaned. Seems a poor do that it is now being taken away, whatever your opinion of the couple, a gift, once given, shouldn't be taken back.
The " Gift " was their entitlement to use it, on a lease basis .....
In any event, my " well of sympathy " dries up long before we get to those two !!

-
Spijed
- Posts: 17932
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3028 times
- Has Liked: 1324 times
Post
by Spijed » Fri Mar 03, 2023 4:32 pm
Very disturbing who they've (Charles & Co.) now offered they keys to it. Shows they have an "anything goes" attitude!
This user liked this post: ŽižkovClaret
-
Claret Toni
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 207 times
- Has Liked: 123 times
Post
by Claret Toni » Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:17 pm
His current abode, Frogmore Lodge, reportedly has serious damp issues and needs a new roof, having had little spent on it in the 20 years since the pampered prince, fergie and the kids moved in.
I'd hazard a guess that the state of disrepair isn't a sudden issue - you'd have thought someone might have said there's a drip in the "saloon" and that bucket the underservant placed to catch the water last week is getting full, do you think someone should empty it, get a bigger bucket or even fix the bloody thing. Of course there's a bit of history, remember mum's wedding gift Sunningdale Park. Perhaps things are different in Royal circles.
Notwithstanding, the King realising his brother's misfortune has offered him Harry's old pad which is pretty close by. This can't have been easy for Charlie as I'm sure it won't have gone down too well with the Spare and his missus, what with them having no-other place in the UK to call home. Andy's not keen, evidently.
I can't believe he's expecting the Royal (taxpayers) Grant to cover the Frogmore Lodge repairs and the RN pension probably won't stretch to it. Sadly (and I do mean that) his mum and dad have passed away recently and you'd have thought they might have left him a bob or too, perhaps not, so he's probably in the midst of arranging one of those equity release loans. Trouble is the Royals do have a bit of a habit for hanging on a bit after pension age so that might be an issue or there could be a problem with the credit score, given the reported problems he had not paying the mortgage on time for the Ski Chalet. Just my opinion like, but these things often do come back to bite when you least expect them.
Of course downsizing to Frogmore Cottage does present it's own issues. A man of his reputation surely has an ongoing need for 7 bedrooms, but I guess when he comes to terms with no longer using all those military uniforms, it frees up some wardrobe space.
Anyway I'm pretty sure he'll get what he deserves.
-
Claretitus
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
- Been Liked: 444 times
- Has Liked: 278 times
Post
by Claretitus » Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:48 pm
The guy is a complete waste of fresh air. 7 bedrooms? How many teddy bears does this clown have?
-
Dark Cloud
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2281 times
- Has Liked: 4046 times
Post
by Dark Cloud » Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:50 pm
It's bigger than Ghislane's pad! Maybe he should remember that.
-
dermotdermot
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 207 times
Post
by dermotdermot » Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:45 am
Claret Toni wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:17 pm
His current abode, Frogmore Lodge, reportedly has serious damp issues and needs a new roof, having had little spent on it in the 20 years since the pampered prince, fergie and the kids moved in.
I'd hazard a guess that the state of disrepair isn't a sudden issue - you'd have thought someone might have said there's a drip in the "saloon" and that bucket the underservant placed to catch the water last week is getting full, do you think someone should empty it, get a bigger bucket or even fix the bloody thing. Of course there's a bit of history, remember mum's wedding gift Sunningdale Park. Perhaps things are different in Royal circles.
Notwithstanding, the King realising his brother's misfortune has offered him Harry's old pad which is pretty close by. This can't have been easy for Charlie as I'm sure it won't have gone down too well with the Spare and his missus, what with them having no-other place in the UK to call home. Andy's not keen, evidently.
I can't believe he's expecting the Royal (taxpayers) Grant to cover the Frogmore Lodge repairs and the RN pension probably won't stretch to it. Sadly (and I do mean that) his mum and dad have passed away recently and you'd have thought they might have left him a bob or too, perhaps not, so he's probably in the midst of arranging one of those equity release loans. Trouble is the Royals do have a bit of a habit for hanging on a bit after pension age so that might be an issue or there could be a problem with the credit score, given the reported problems he had not paying the mortgage on time for the Ski Chalet. Just my opinion like, but these things often do come back to bite when you least expect them.
Of course downsizing to Frogmore Cottage does present it's own issues. A man of his reputation surely has an ongoing need for 7 bedrooms, but I guess when he comes to terms with no longer using all those military uniforms, it frees up some wardrobe space.
Anyway I'm pretty sure he'll get what he deserves.
There is no such place as Frogmore Lodge. Andrew has been living in The Royal Lodge. He can’t maintain it. It has fallen into disrepair. His last house, Sunninghill, fell into disrepair and was sold so that someone else could salvage it. He is totally incapable of doing anything. He was alone at Windsor Castle when it was virtually burnt down. If he is being offered Frogmore Cottage, he should be quite grateful.
If they can remove him, who will then live there? And who will live in FROGMORE HOUSE? Take a gander. A really nice looking place. Who has been living there all these years? I’m quite surprised that there are so many of these houses that are suddenly appearing on the Windsor Estate. Apparently William and Kate live in Adelaide Cottage, yet another large establishment in the grounds.
-
wbfc
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2022 7:04 am
- Been Liked: 112 times
Post
by wbfc » Sat Mar 04, 2023 6:50 am
When the Queen went there should have been a referendum on whether we keep this entitled lot...
Should be given to the homeless is my view...
-
timshorts
- Posts: 2809
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 467 times
- Has Liked: 353 times
Post
by timshorts » Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:12 am
I'm sure that it would be cheaper to get taylor wimpey to build him a new 10-room house on one of their estates. Sure, half the bedrooms would be poky, only one would have any storage space, there would be negligible space between it and the neighbours and it would need to have a block of social housing flats over the back fence, but hey, it would be under 16 years old, so what's not to like?
Slough is quite close to Windsor, isn't it?
-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:18 am
wbfc wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 6:50 am
When the Queen went there should have been a referendum on whether we keep this entitled lot...
Should be given to the homeless is my view...
They generate more than they cost though
-
fatboy47
- Posts: 5302
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2852 times
- Has Liked: 3210 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Post
by fatboy47 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:22 am
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:18 am
They generate more than they cost though
So do cigarettes.
-
timshorts
- Posts: 2809
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 467 times
- Has Liked: 353 times
Post
by timshorts » Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:28 am
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:18 am
They generate more than they cost though
Probably not so much recently when you factor in things like lost gdp when the country gets extra days off for funerals, coronations etc.
-
StuffyClaret
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:15 am
- Been Liked: 152 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Post
by StuffyClaret » Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:31 am
morpheus2 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 12:01 am
I don't think he'll lose any sweat over it.
Definitely deserves more than a couple of likes

-
CaptJohn
- Posts: 1851
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
- Been Liked: 551 times
- Has Liked: 407 times
- Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
-
Contact:
Post
by CaptJohn » Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:50 am
"The Grand Old Duke of York,"
"He gave 12 million quid,"
"To someone he had never met,"
"For something he never did!"
This user liked this post: ŽižkovClaret
-
fatboy47
- Posts: 5302
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2852 times
- Has Liked: 3210 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Post
by fatboy47 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 9:10 am
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:18 am
They generate more than they cost though
That's why all the Republican countries are skint I imagine.
-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:10 am
timshorts wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:28 am
Probably not so much recently when you factor in things like lost gdp when the country gets extra days off for funerals, coronations etc.
Only a small dent.
Plus the amount of interest those events generate also help keep the money flowing, so they probably balance each other out.
People cry and whinge about the royal family, yet their daily lives generally aren't interfered with by the existence of said royal family.
We'd probably be worse off without them when you look at the alternatives.
Do we want a president and PM like France?
Or a president like the USA has?
-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:14 am
fatboy47 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:22 am
So do cigarettes.
Tax revenue from tobacco products - £11 billion
NHS costs for smokers - £3 billion
Cost to the economy when smokers are more likely to be ill or die younger - £13 billion.
I'd rather keep the royal family tbh.
-
Rileybobs
- Posts: 18559
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7616 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Post
by Rileybobs » Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:19 am
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:10 am
Only a small dent.
Plus the amount of interest those events generate also help keep the money flowing, so they probably balance each other out.
People cry and whinge about the royal family, yet their daily lives generally aren't interfered with by the existence of said royal family.
We'd probably be worse off without them when you look at the alternatives.
Do we want a president and PM like France?
Or a president like the USA has?
It’s a bit dismissive to describe people who don’t agree with having a monarchy in the 21st century as whinging or crying. They don’t affect my life in any way, but I’m still fundamentally opposed to this archaic system.
-
Spijed
- Posts: 17932
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3028 times
- Has Liked: 1324 times
Post
by Spijed » Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:51 am
Do some really believe that if we became a Republic the tourist numbers in London would drop like a stone?
Where would they go instead?
Paris perhaps?
-
Claret Toni
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 207 times
- Has Liked: 123 times
Post
by Claret Toni » Sat Mar 04, 2023 11:12 am
dermotdermot wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:45 am
There is no such place as Frogmore Lodge. Andrew has been living in The Royal Lodge. He can’t maintain it. It has fallen into disrepair. His last house, Sunninghill, fell into disrepair and was sold so that someone else could salvage it. He is totally incapable of doing anything. He was alone at Windsor Castle when it was virtually burnt down. If he is being offered Frogmore Cottage, he should be quite grateful.
If they can remove him, who will then live there? And who will live in FROGMORE HOUSE? Take a gander. A really nice looking place. Who has been living there all these years? I’m quite surprised that there are so many of these houses that are suddenly appearing on the Windsor Estate. Apparently William and Kate live in Adelaide Cottage, yet another large establishment in the grounds.
Thanks for the corrections DD. I'm clearly not an expert on the Royal properties. I don't believe, however, it takes anything away from the points I was making about how entitled he feels. As an aside I see the porky prince's former residence at Sunninghill was sold to Timur Kulibayev the son in law of the former Kazakh president for a reported £3m over the asking price. No other bids were on the table or had been for the several years the property had been up for sale. Unusual.
I see it's reported today the entitled one is demanding a residence fit for a king, and it's suggested he takes over the running of the royal residencies as a job. The CV would make an interesting read. Perhaps he could commute between them by helicopter. Given the skills he's displayed over the years I'd suggest he's already fully occupied looking after the late Queens corgis. He really doesn't get it does he.
-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:58 pm
Spijed wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:51 am
Do some really believe that if we became a Republic the tourist numbers in London would drop like a stone?
Where would they go instead?
Paris perhaps?
People come to see the actual royal family, along with the buildings etc
It's the pomp, the guards, the tradition.
Paris doesn't have that.
The tourism numbers would most likely show a dip if we got rid of the Royal family.
I like Charles' efforts to slim it down, because it does need modernising.
-
Spijed
- Posts: 17932
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3028 times
- Has Liked: 1324 times
Post
by Spijed » Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:04 pm
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:58 pm
The tourism numbers would most likely show a dip if we got rid of the Royal family.
So if they don't visit London where would they go then?
If they still want a holiday they'd therefore have to visit a NON Royal destination.
-
daveisaclaret
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1433 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Post
by daveisaclaret » Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:07 pm
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:58 pm
The tourism numbers would most likely show a dip if we got rid of the Royal family.
Nobody can seriously believe that if Buckingham Palace fully opened up as a museum after the royals were ****** off that people would STOP going.
-
Corky
- Posts: 1457
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:37 pm
- Been Liked: 549 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
Post
by Corky » Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:10 pm
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 12:58 pm
People come to see the actual royal family, along with the buildings etc
It's the pomp, the guards, the tradition.
Paris doesn't have that.
The tourism numbers would most likely show a dip if we got rid of the Royal family.
I like Charles' efforts to slim it down, because it does need modernising.
This infantile nonsense genuinely made me laugh out loud.
-
fatboy47
- Posts: 5302
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2852 times
- Has Liked: 3210 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Post
by fatboy47 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:15 pm
Corky wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:10 pm
This infantile nonsense genuinely made me laugh out loud.
Makes you wonder if the same folk would support a shrine to Jimmy Savile if it "" brought a few bob in""
-
HahaYeah
- Posts: 3441
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:33 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 475 times
Post
by HahaYeah » Sat Mar 04, 2023 2:17 pm
Well, Jimmy Savile was of course a big mate of King Charles.

-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:06 pm
Corky wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:10 pm
This infantile nonsense genuinely made me laugh out loud.
Elaborate on that if you would/can
-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:07 pm
Spijed wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:04 pm
So if they don't visit London where would they go then?
If they still want a holiday they'd therefore have to visit a NON Royal destination.
I'm saying there would be a dip, people come here sometimes purely because of the royal family.
You and the others can deny it all you want, it's clearly making you happy to do so, but you'd be wrong.
-
GodIsADeeJay81
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Post
by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Mar 04, 2023 3:07 pm
fatboy47 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:15 pm
Makes you wonder if the same folk would support a shrine to Jimmy Savile if it "" brought a few bob in""
I'll put you down for a donation