Chelski v Scousers
Chelski v Scousers
How was that not a red for Chukwuemeka ?
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Great goal by the bin dippers
-
- Posts: 34440
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6266 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Chelski v Scousers
some pass from Salah
-
- Posts: 7951
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1196 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
If the gossip rumours are to be believed Chelski will be spending £160m plus on adding the 2 midfielders also chased by Liverpool from Brighton and Southampton.
-
- Posts: 13028
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3666 times
- Has Liked: 2112 times
- Contact:
Re: Chelski v Scousers
As was the pass from Mac Alistair to him
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Helter-skelter sort of game at the moment. Think we can keep the ball better than these two on this showing! The goal was very good, some excellent couple of passes. Open game, especially down Chelsea's left, Salah been free a few times.
And... He bags.
And... He bags.
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Chelsea look like they need to spend another 500m tbh.
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Chelsea could end up below us if they don't sort it out 

-
- Posts: 9819
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3109 times
- Has Liked: 3103 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Chelsusa have spent around a billion to put together that motley crew.
Some god awful signings and have arguably weakened despite spending big bucks - mount/kovacic are better than what they have in the middle right now
Some god awful signings and have arguably weakened despite spending big bucks - mount/kovacic are better than what they have in the middle right now
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
- Been Liked: 424 times
- Has Liked: 336 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
How long has Poch got?
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Turned it round.
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Offside
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Looks like Chelsea have hologram badges on their shirts.
Probably to make it harder to fake.
Probably to make it harder to fake.
Last edited by jos on Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Just switched it on as Chelsea scored twice - 2nd disallowed - is it my eyes, my tv or have Chelsea not got any sponsor on their shirts?
-
- Posts: 13028
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3666 times
- Has Liked: 2112 times
- Contact:
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen on the bench for Chelsea.
-
- Posts: 3159
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 918 times
- Has Liked: 2552 times
- Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100
Re: Chelski v Scousers
First time watching a game on sky sports for a while. They have more advert breaks than when watching NFL on US TV don’t they?!
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Would that have been a pen against us? I’m sure it would have.
-
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 721 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Already look a million times better Chelsea. They’ll be a force this season.
-
- Posts: 7951
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1196 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
When they’ve invested another £150m on bringing in 2 more midfield players they’ll look one hundred and fifty million times better than they do right now.PremierLeagueClass wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:49 pmAlready look a million times better Chelsea. They’ll be a force this season.

-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
- Been Liked: 355 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
That Chelsea kit looks really well with no sponsors blurb all over it.
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen coming on,
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen coming on
-
- Posts: 4498
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Before Curcuralla. Think that's that then.
-
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 721 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen on, surely time to give up and pull the trigger on one of the other LB targets.
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Unless Maatsen comes on as more of a winger, which he's played in preseason.
Re: Chelski v Scousers
He hasn't been playing left back for Chelsea though. Chelsea bring in a left winger or two and Maatsen could be available again.PremierLeagueClass wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:14 pmMaatsen on, surely time to give up and pull the trigger on one of the other LB targets.
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Fair play to Brighton for getting so much for the dud Curcuralla.
-
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:02 pm
- Been Liked: 174 times
- Has Liked: 132 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
I normally zone out on the games involving the so called big clubs, I tend to find the football boring, both sides side to side, standing off, too chess like, cancelling each other out.
I've enjoyed this game though, a bit of bite from both sides, actually going at each other from the off.
Agree on Chelsea looking decent, very quick and aggressive on and off the ball, Jackson looks like he'll cause teams few problems this season. Thiago Silva cruising with Pipe an slippers, he's brilliant
I've enjoyed this game though, a bit of bite from both sides, actually going at each other from the off.
Agree on Chelsea looking decent, very quick and aggressive on and off the ball, Jackson looks like he'll cause teams few problems this season. Thiago Silva cruising with Pipe an slippers, he's brilliant
-
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 977 times
- Has Liked: 354 times
- Location: Halifax
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen handball, should be a pen for Liverpool, not given.
-
- Posts: 34440
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6266 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen struggling, looks completely lost at this level, I suggest Chelsea cut their losses on him and give him to us for 2 million
These 3 users liked this post: CrosspoolClarets Guller Bull roperclaret
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2023 2:55 pm
- Been Liked: 12 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen looking pretty sloppy so far
-
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1973 times
- Has Liked: 504 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen would have given away a pen then if it wasn’t offside.
So far he has played centre attacking midfield and right midfield in 10 minites. Missed a chance to win the game by snatching, a bit like our youngsters on Friday.
He isn’t an attacker, he is a defender who can attack, but one a bit too vulnerable for Chelsea at the back with their aspirations. So he won’t play more than 200 minutes under Poch, whereas he would get 3,000 minutes for us. Interesting to see which he feels is best for his development.
So far he has played centre attacking midfield and right midfield in 10 minites. Missed a chance to win the game by snatching, a bit like our youngsters on Friday.
He isn’t an attacker, he is a defender who can attack, but one a bit too vulnerable for Chelsea at the back with their aspirations. So he won’t play more than 200 minutes under Poch, whereas he would get 3,000 minutes for us. Interesting to see which he feels is best for his development.
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen been pretty poor since coming on
-
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 721 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Hasn’t done himself any favours since coming on Maatsen. Very harsh to say after should a short spell but at this level you have to take every chance you get if you want to make it. Maybe we have a chance after all 

-
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:10 pm
- Been Liked: 200 times
- Has Liked: 748 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
To be honest I don't think he would have had his hand in the air claiming for offside if it wasn't offside.CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:29 pmMaatsen would have given away a pen then if it wasn’t offside.
So far he has played centre attacking midfield and right midfield in 10 minites. Missed a chance to win the game by snatching, a bit like our youngsters on Friday.
He isn’t an attacker, he is a defender who can attack, but one a bit too vulnerable for Chelsea at the back with their aspirations. So he won’t play more than 200 minutes under Poch, whereas he would get 3,000 minutes for us. Interesting to see which he feels is best for his development.
-
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 977 times
- Has Liked: 354 times
- Location: Halifax
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Surprised it has not been mentioned, but Liverpool player wasn't actually offside as the ball was played via Chelsea defender, it was a penalty.addisclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:30 pmTo be honest I don't think he would have had his hand in the air claiming for offside if it wasn't offside.
-
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 668 times
- Has Liked: 1205 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
Maatsen won't be making many appearances for Chelsea once the window has closed. Judging by that showing, I should imagine.
2 sloppy looking sides who are both clearly going to be in the Euro places come the end of the season. Was the grass extra long or something? Appeared to make the ball move very slugglishly instead of zipping.
2 sloppy looking sides who are both clearly going to be in the Euro places come the end of the season. Was the grass extra long or something? Appeared to make the ball move very slugglishly instead of zipping.
-
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 668 times
- Has Liked: 1205 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
I know the rule used to be that you can't leave the field of play and come back on, like that.claretburns wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:45 pmSurprised it has not been mentioned, but Liverpool player wasn't actually offside as the ball was played via Chelsea defender, it was a penalty.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 937 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
I thought Maatsen did OK, some neat close passing, took up good positions, almost scored.
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
- Been Liked: 424 times
- Has Liked: 336 times
-
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 721 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
The last two posts sum up the blinkered nature of some fans when it comes to “favourites”.
-
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:10 pm
- Been Liked: 200 times
- Has Liked: 748 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
That was my thought as well so I've just downloaded the laws of the game. It's 230 pages so I'll get back to you sometime about the start of next season.JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:48 pmI know the rule used to be that you can't leave the field of play and come back on, like that.

This user liked this post: JimmyRobbo
-
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
No he wouldn’t. He had his hand up because he was shouting ‘Offside’ . If the player wasn’t offside he wouldn’t have had his hand up.CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:29 pmMaatsen would have given away a pen then if it wasn’t offside.
So far he has played centre attacking midfield and right midfield in 10 minites. Missed a chance to win the game by snatching, a bit like our youngsters on Friday.
He isn’t an attacker, he is a defender who can attack, but one a bit too vulnerable for Chelsea at the back with their aspirations. So he won’t play more than 200 minutes under Poch, whereas he would get 3,000 minutes for us. Interesting to see which he feels is best for his development.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 937 times
Re: Chelski v Scousers
I've thought about this and I can now say that 'I thought Maatsen did OK, some neat close passing, took up good positions, almost scored.'PremierLeagueClass wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 7:12 pmThe last two posts sum up the blinkered nature of some fans when it comes to “favourites”.