You said this originally: '45 good minutes out of 16 games'
That's certainly wrong.
You then shifted the goalposts - no I can't name an equal or better performance from him than his excellent and best performance today.
You said this originally: '45 good minutes out of 16 games'
Can I "like" this post more than once?
You gave him a rating of 7 against Sheff Utd. 7 on the thread is specifically defined as 'good'. You asked when else he has played 'good' for 45 mins other than today. Your rating of good was based on 90+ mins.
I could of said the usual of his performance for the first 45. Despite keeping us in the game he was at fault for the goal.
I don’t think people are worshipping him. If you read the posts he had a few dodgy moments with his distribution in the first half that potentially could have cost us.Westleigh wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 9:53 pmFor all you Trafford worshippers please read the ratings ,even those who said he was man of the match ( and he was) most of them said he was MOM but his distribution let him down ,I don’t think anybody who saw all the match can argue that his distribution is pretty poor.
Sheffield United for 90 minutes
I don't have a dislike of him I'd love him to succeed the only thing I want is the club to survive and unfortunately bedding Trafford in for the first 15 games was a mistake that has cost us survival. If he performs until the end of the season he gets sold in the summer after relegation so my question would be, why?KRBFC wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:37 pmSheffield United for 90 minutes
Wolves he was fine.
Newcastle away
United home
Cba going through more with you, I’m surprised fans act like he’s been throwing them in his own net all season, he was definitely struggling at corners but that has seemingly improved (I don’t dread it every time we concede a corner anymore anyway).
This clear biased dislike of Trafford is weird to me, I think he’s a really good shot stopper, a bit flappy at crosses from set pieces and fine with the ball at his feet when playing short but a bit way ward when chipping into midfield.
How old is he though? 21? Typically goalkeepers aren’t even first choice at that age never mind playing PL football. He’s got years to develop and seems a nice lad, yet his supposed own fans can’t even support him.
Let’s go champ!CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 6:09 pmYou’re unhinged for emotional outbursts calling people pricks on a messageboard for daring to have an opinion!
What’s next, offer me out at 3 in the morning like you did to Spiral like the unhinged person that you are?
A) he won’t be sold in summerbumba wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:09 amI don't have a dislike of him I'd love him to succeed the only thing I want is the club to survive and unfortunately bedding Trafford in for the first 15 games was a mistake that has cost us survival. If he performs until the end of the season he gets sold in the summer after relegation so my question would be, why?
I'd have had no issue with Muric starting the season then Trafford working his way in to the team, they could have done all this work with him behind the scenes then started to introduce him now. We've thrown games away just to allow Trafford time but it's games and points we couldn't afford to lose.
Your saying he's only 21 which is my point entirely your even saying yourself he's too young so why not bed him in slowly at the teams pace when games allow?
It was only yesterday I'd seen any shot stopping ability, his crossing ability is terrible and his passing is average at best when we are team trying to play out from the back.
VK can have it one way or another not both if he wants Trafford for shot stopping then stop messing about with it at the back and trying to play that style, if he wants possession from the back style then nobody can argue Muric is the best at the club for it.
I stopped reading when I got to point F when I realised you don't even have any idea how your own club is currently being runHoltyclaret wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:43 amA) he won’t be sold in summer
B) he is not to blame anymore than any other player for our poor start
C) what games have you seen against prem opposition to base your muric views on? Everton in cup this year? Did BPF play against Utd , Bournemouth and city last year?
D) he’s now tangibly improving each game as are others
E) think Brightons Verbruggen might be slightly younger
F) isn’t end of world if we’re relegated, they’ll be no fire sale just continued development of players
G) we’ve moved away gradually from ‘tippy tappy’ all the time and ditched the Cullen ‘quarterback’ role of last year so less options to pass to (plus playing against the some of the best players and teams in the WORLD)
H) he’s not required to cross the ball, he leaves that to the wingers
I) the last 5-6 games behind a more settled side he’s come on leaps and bounds and we’ve stopped shipping goals in large numbers. Hardly traffs fault it took so long for vk to find a preferred 11, that is massive for a keeper. In turn that’s not entirely vk’s fault due to form, injuries and suspensions
Really boring the Muric/Traff debate and largely pointless. Both have lots of developing to do, we’re lucky to have both and we need both.
What facts have I got wrongHoltyclaret wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 6:01 pmSays the author of one of the most factually wrong posts this year (beating some of your other whoppers which wasn’t an easy feat)![]()
Thought you’d pop up sooner or later you walloperSuperjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 6:57 pmHes turned a corner his goals conceeded per game is down to 2.125
Why are you so angry about factual posts seek help
If they were factual I wouldn’t be angry,you crack on like traffords pumped your mrs or something tho.Give the young lad credit where it’s due.Superjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:54 pmWhy are you so angry about factual posts seek help
I have given him credit he has reduced his conceeded goals from 2.5 per game to 2.125 whats the problem?Robbie_painter wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:08 pmIf they were factual I wouldn’t be angry,you crack on like traffords pumped your mrs or something tho.Give the young lad credit where it’s due.
The problem is that you’ve no idea what you’re on about.The defence in front of him takes most of the blame for the goals conceded.Superjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:11 pmI have given him credit he has reduced his conceeded goals from 2.5 per game to 2.125 whats the problem?
yeah i agree all the defences fault and the crowd and the fansRobbie_painter wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:20 pmThe problem is that you’ve no idea what you’re on about.The defence in front of him takes most of the blame for the goals conceded.
Just read your paragraph out of respect, point H are you actually being serious? He isn't required to cross the ball that's for wingers???Holtyclaret wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:43 amA) he won’t be sold in summer
B) he is not to blame anymore than any other player for our poor start
C) what games have you seen against prem opposition to base your muric views on? Everton in cup this year? Did BPF play against Utd , Bournemouth and city last year?
D) he’s now tangibly improving each game as are others
E) think Brightons Verbruggen might be slightly younger
F) isn’t end of world if we’re relegated, they’ll be no fire sale just continued development of players
G) we’ve moved away gradually from ‘tippy tappy’ all the time and ditched the Cullen ‘quarterback’ role of last year so less options to pass to (plus playing against the some of the best players and teams in the WORLD)
H) he’s not required to cross the ball, he leaves that to the wingers
I) the last 5-6 games behind a more settled side he’s come on leaps and bounds and we’ve stopped shipping goals in large numbers. Hardly traffs fault it took so long for vk to find a preferred 11, that is massive for a keeper. In turn that’s not entirely vk’s fault due to form, injuries and suspensions
Really boring the Muric/Traff debate and largely pointless. Both have lots of developing to do, we’re lucky to have both and we need both.
Apart from Bournemouth and Arsenal which goal has he been at fault for?Superjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:22 pmyeah i agree all the defences fault and the crowd and the fans![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Deja vuRobbie_painter wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:43 pmApart from Bournemouth and Arsenal which goal has he been at fault for?
Yawn
Fairly sure it’s aimed at you as I rarely post on here because of whoppers like youSuperjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 9:12 pmIt’s always the same few posters just arguing, seems there is little to no moderation on here.
You wrote the book on how to be a whopper, go and spray your hair Green for VK and JamesRobbie_painter wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 9:37 pmFairly sure it’s aimed at you as I rarely post on here because of whoppers like you
Yeah you’ve lost me with that oneSuperjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 9:52 pmYou wrote the book on how to be a whopper, go and spray your hair Green for VK and James![]()
You have a serious lack of self awareness.Superjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 9:12 pmIt’s always the same few posters just arguing, seems there is little to no moderation on here.
And you have a serious lack of understanding
Point being that Nick wouldn’t attempt those passes and it wouldn’t matter with his accuracy because he’d be kicking it long and wouldn’t for example be mishitting paces into midfield when we have men committed forward/wide and a pretty open field.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:52 pmApologies for interrupting the usual idiots fighting on here. But I find some of the appraisals of Trafford’s performance peculiar. How many superb games did Nick Pope have for us where he kept us in games with match-winning or match-saving saves? The answer is a lot. And how many times did the critics mark him down for his wayward distribution? I bet not many. And Nick Pope could not, and can not, pass a ball with anywhere near the accuracy that Trafford does.
I think a lot of this comes from a desire to see Muric in the side - and also because minds have been made up and some people will absolutely not shift from their view. But I doubt anyone can honestly believe that we would have taken a point yesterday with Muric in the sticks.
Obviously joking based on your poorly written postbumba wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:24 pmJust read your paragraph out of respect, point H are you actually being serious? He isn't required to cross the ball that's for wingers???
Talking about a goalkeeper and you think crossing ability means him crossing the ball in, jesus wept!
Talking about goalkeepers it obviously means his ability to deal with crosses in to his box.
I wouldn't say he's come on leaps and bounds at all, his passing is still putting us under unnecessary pressure a lot of matches.
His shot stopping was miles better yesterday but everything else was still average or below.
That is exactly what is it is. Muric has a few cult style followers who have never got over him not starting the 1st game and have spent the season with a desire to hammer Trafford at any time a chance arises. Any slight positive moment they have to make is then outweighed by something negative added to that same praise.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:52 pmApologies for interrupting the usual idiots fighting on here. But I find some of the appraisals of Trafford’s performance peculiar. How many superb games did Nick Pope have for us where he kept us in games with match-winning or match-saving saves? The answer is a lot. And how many times did the critics mark him down for his wayward distribution? I bet not many. And Nick Pope could not, and can not, pass a ball with anywhere near the accuracy that Trafford does.
I think a lot of this comes from a desire to see Muric in the side - and also because minds have been made up and some people will absolutely not shift from their view. But I doubt anyone can honestly believe that we would have taken a point yesterday with Muric in the sticks.
I don't mind people having different opinions to mine, it's how the world works, what I don't agree with is the ones on here who post made up stats as facts to push their opinions and hate it when it's pointed out. They even edit other users posts to make it read like it agrees with them,then repost it so they comment on it...that shouldn't be allowedclaretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 8:01 amThat is exactly what is it is. Muric has a few cult style followers who have never got over him not starting the 1st game and have spent the season with a desire to hammer Trafford at any time a chance arises. Any slight positive moment they have to make is then outweighed by something negative added to that same praise.
It seems what we shouldn't have done is started the season with Trafford in their eyes as he had no top flight experience and we should have gone with Muric, makes sense to some I guess.
Still we have to remember their is no agenda.