Have Chelsea bought into a culture of cheating...its a yes from me .
And don't get me started about the Wolves free kick...
Sorry if it's already been covered but it's sad way to play

It's been going on for 40 years.SmudgetheClaret wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:16 amAfter that debacle that cost us 2 red cards including VK and those 2 very questionable ones against MU !
Have Chelsea bought into a culture of cheating...its a yes from me .
And don't get me started about the Wolves free kick...
Sorry if it's already been covered but it's sad way to play![]()
Spot on.
Having hold of a shirt, and pulling a player back by the shirt, are 2 completely different things. In a dead ball situation a defender needs to keep his eye on the ball, whilst knowing where the lad he is marking is. The best way to do this is to grab the oppositions shirt and keep watching the ball. When he moves you know where he is going.Bobzuruncle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 11:19 amThis might be my memory playing tricks or just a personal feeling from playing but I seem to recall that shirt pulling was sort of taboo in the days of crunching and very dubious tackles. Not saying it didn’t go on but I think it was quick to be called out and not anywhere near as prevalent (maybe they didn’t have to)
Even worse is that VAR encourages diving, because if you dive and in the process of doing so the opposition player makes the most minimal of contact, the VAR is likely to give the pen, and almost certain to if the on field ref already has.
Yes, but referees are marked on every decision they make, and if they continue giving these free kicks and penalties for minimal contact, then it is because the powers that be want them to give them.Bordeauxclaret wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:24 amSides are aware now that going down after any touch is likely to be given as a foul by these horrific referees.
That’s why there has been a sharp rise in the cheating.
I agree and VAR makes the decision making process worse as well by showing on the monitor only one angle and in slow motion which always makes incidents look worse. Incidents can look very different in normal time. All helps the cheats but refs aren’t aren’t interested, the easy option most times.
Nor Michael Owen in an England shirt!
Omar Sivori.
First team I ever remember watching who used “dark arts” to con referees and win games were Leeds Utd in the seventies. Brilliant footballers some of them, a few were just bullies, and the others were constantly feigning injuries to gain an advantage.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:16 amIt's been going on for 40 years.
I'm old enough to remember when it was the cheating foreigners as Italians and Spanish perfected the art. Now we, the British, are just as bad as everyone else.
It's a contact sport, but the powers that be have forgotten it more and more over the years. Tackles that were deemed acceptable 40 years ago would be red cards today, and tackles that are deemed fouls today would be laughed at 40 years ago.
I much prefer the way it was, when men tried to stay on their feet, but it's too late to stop it now. The prima Donna's have won, and football has lost.
Should we join them and level the playing field, hell no, personally I'd rather lose than win by cheating.
Yep, you get a double chance of being rewarded.
And VAR was championed to sort all that out.. referees and pundits need to be reminded that football is a contact sport and not all contact is a foul.. all this going down cos his shin pad was brushed is embarrassing but as said above, until the standard of officiating improves, there's no deterrent.