we can all ignore contextJakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 6:54 pmHanging on the teams I've mentioned are around 46pts even if you give forest the 4 back that's 33pts you are talking over 10 points buffer that's not hanging on that's smashing it easy.
Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
-
- Posts: 34960
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12721 times
- Has Liked: 6328 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
We are miles away because we aren't boxing clever enough. Wharton/olise cost similar to trafford & tresor.
-
- Posts: 3922
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1876 times
- Has Liked: 2737 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
There is next seasonJakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 6:59 pmIf we wasn't servicing debt loans & worked smarter in the transfer market there's nothing stopping us competing with the likes of brentford & Bournemouth.



-
- Posts: 34960
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12721 times
- Has Liked: 6328 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
and they were dropped into a side who had 1000s of games of PL experience. To even compare them tells me all I need to knowJakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 7:03 pmWe are miles away because we aren't boxing clever enough. Wharton/olise cost similar to trafford & tresor.
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
So now palace are established because 5 mins ago they wasn't. Make your mind up!Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 7:20 pmand they were dropped into a side who had 1000s of games of PL experience. To even compare them tells me all I need to know
-
- Posts: 4261
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 3056 times
- Has Liked: 343 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Strong correlation with another posters early replies on new threads….ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:09 pmSeems the OP just didn’t like Dyche. Astonishing first post.
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
I did like dyche , although surely you didn’t enjoy his last season ? It was time for him to go his ideas and tactics had gone stale . It was time to move with the times and for ALK to come and take the team and club in a new direction .ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:09 pmSeems the OP just didn’t like Dyche. Astonishing first post.
-
- Posts: 9559
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2823 times
- Has Liked: 2814 times
-
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 2122 times
- Has Liked: 991 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
‘ALK/Kompany have taken us backwards.’ As I said I know you struggle with facts.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 6:59 pmPromotion back into a league we were already in haha![]()
This user liked this post: Gp99
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Maybe I’m from a younger generation who prefers to watch actual football instead of it being like a rugby match .
All these moaning wasn’t saying the same this time last year
That’s for sure .
-
- Posts: 9559
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2823 times
- Has Liked: 2814 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Classic deflection tactic.
The more discerning of us know who you are.
This user liked this post: Wo Didi
-
- Posts: 3795
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1488 times
- Has Liked: 365 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Going back to the OP in what way is the club more modern ?
Is it the modern way of screwing fans and putting up season ticket prices ?
The modern way of charging £6 a pint ?
The modern way of prioritising corporate hospitality over “normal” fans ?
The modern way of borrowing £100m plus without putting any of your own money in ?
Or is just this Dude Perfect nonsense that 99% of our fans don’t have the first clue about ?
I’m so glad we are down with the kids now.
Is it the modern way of screwing fans and putting up season ticket prices ?
The modern way of charging £6 a pint ?
The modern way of prioritising corporate hospitality over “normal” fans ?
The modern way of borrowing £100m plus without putting any of your own money in ?
Or is just this Dude Perfect nonsense that 99% of our fans don’t have the first clue about ?
I’m so glad we are down with the kids now.
These 2 users liked this post: k90bfc Wo Didi
-
- Posts: 34960
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12721 times
- Has Liked: 6328 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
where did I say they were established ? Like I said, and you ignored, context is everything and even in your own example you ignored it. With that I'm out.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 7:23 pmSo now palace are established because 5 mins ago they wasn't. Make your mind up!
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
ALK if I wanted a sledgehammer taking to something.
Garlick if I wanted something running sensibly and making good progress, but with an eye on an ulterior motive.
Can I choose Kilby please?

Garlick if I wanted something running sensibly and making good progress, but with an eye on an ulterior motive.
Can I choose Kilby please?
These 2 users liked this post: Gp99 k90bfc
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
and they were dropped into a side who had 1000s of games of PL experience. To even compare them tells me all I need to knowVegas Claret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 7:54 pmwhere did I say they were established ? Like I said, and you ignored, context is everything and even in your own example you ignored it. With that I'm out.
If palace have played 1000s of games of PL experience it would suggest it's not happened overnight palace have been about for awhile meaning they are established. Your words not mine.
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
That was always going to happen at some point. We didn’t then and still don’t have the resources to be an established Premier league club. Mid table championship is probably our true level - but I do think we’ll continue to punch above our weight.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:56 pmSome people are blinded by faith that they can’t see what’s right in front of them.
We were an established club, we have regressed to a Yo Yo club with a worse academy.
The question is, what’s next?
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
We do have the resources the problem is the resources aren't utilized correctly.roperclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 8:22 pmThat was always going to happen at some point. We didn’t then and still don’t have the resources to be an established Premier league club. Mid table championship is probably our true level - but I do think we’ll continue to punch above our weight.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 34960
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12721 times
- Has Liked: 6328 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
the players, not the clubJakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 8:18 pmand they were dropped into a side who had 1000s of games of PL experience. To even compare them tells me all I need to know
If palace have played 1000s of games of PL experience it would suggest it's not happened overnight palace have been about for awhile meaning they are established. Your words not mine.
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Such as who? Ward ayew, clyne been out injured a lot I can't remember the last time Tompkins played & schullps a sub. It's got a mix. Surely the players & the club go together. Palace have been in the PL since Holloway was last there & that's awhile ago. For all intent & purposes palace are established within the last 5 years anyway.
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
No we don’t. 100 million gets you nowhere in the premier leagueJakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 8:37 pmWe do have the resources the problem is the resources aren't utilized correctly.
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
It doesn't when you waste money like we are doing.roperclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 8:56 pmNo we don’t. 100 million gets you nowhere in the premier league
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Go on, I’m bored so I’ll play. Tell me, what money have we wasted?
-
- Posts: 17394
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3570 times
- Has Liked: 7848 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
I doubt we really had as much as 100 million euros.roperclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 8:56 pmNo we don’t. 100 million gets you nowhere in the premier league
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
I've named 2 players which have cost the same as olise & Wharton. Actually I think i was generous olise was over £8m from reading. Do you think the 2 Ts represent better value for money than them & I'll let you keep the change?roperclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:02 pmGo on, I’m bored so I’ll play. Tell me, what money have we wasted?
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Time will tell, but I bet both those will be on higher wages than our two.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:05 pmI've named 2 players which have cost the same as olise & Wharton. Actually I think i was generous olise was over £8m from reading. Do you think the 2 Ts represent better value for money than them & I'll let you keep the change?
-
- Posts: 77965
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38123 times
- Has Liked: 5785 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
And as I posted, I was responding to the suggestion of the new owners plan to establish us as a Premier League club.
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Olise wouldn't have started out on better. Time will tell & my top tip for today on the 2 Ts don't hold your breath.roperclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:11 pmTime will tell, but I bet both those will be on higher wages than our two.
-
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2224 times
- Has Liked: 3121 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
A league we were already sliding out of due to Dyche and/or Garlick refusing to put the good of their club before their egos. The lack of investment int the team since COVID was the reason when Garlick found his golden goose the pen that was built to contain it was already collapsing.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 6:59 pmPromotion back into a league we were already in haha![]()
Edited for clarity
-
- Posts: 77965
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38123 times
- Has Liked: 5785 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
He’d had two years of not being able to bring in the players he wanted. Yes it went stale, that was inevitable.
This user liked this post: Gp99
-
- Posts: 13300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
ALK had three windows to address it.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:14 pmA league we were already sliding out of due to Dyche and/or Garlick refusing to put the good of their club before their egos. The lack of investment int the team since COVID was the reason when Garlick found his golden goose the pen that contained it was already collapsing.
If they gave Dyche the 100m they have just ****** up the wall we wouldn’t have been in this mess in the first place
-
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 417 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Time will tell, but I bet both those will be on higher wages than our two.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:05 pmI've named 2 players which have cost the same as olise & Wharton. Actually I think i was generous olise was over £8m from reading. Do you think the 2 Ts represent better value for money than them & I'll let you keep the change?
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Won't be much in it & like I said with olise he would have been behind & so what if you end up selling doubling/trebling your money probably more than quadruple in olises case in contrast to us losing money.roperclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:17 pmTime will tell, but I bet both those will be on higher wages than our two.
-
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2224 times
- Has Liked: 3121 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany
Three windows?Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:16 pmALK had three windows to address it.
If they gave Dyche the 100m they have just ****** up the wall we wouldn’t have been in this mess in the first place
One when they were moving in and getting to understand what they had, one they brought in an international centre forward that didn’t work out… a winger full of flair that spent most of his time in the treatment room. From memory. Who else knows who they failed to bring in they thought hey were getting… without much experience of how the transfer system worked?
Investors have been sourced to be able to offer that money… are you suggesting they should have put the club in another £100m (your figure) to give SD that pot?
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
The big problem with ALK for me is they don't seem to carry any risk. Of course it's an exciting plan to sign the best youngsters and sell on. But if it goes t*ts up then they just swan off back to America whilst we are left with our club up **** creek without a paddle.
If we were a bigger club there'd be less risk but we are the absolute typical example of the type of club that gets absolutely screwed by this type of thing when losing the Premier league money.
If we were a bigger club there'd be less risk but we are the absolute typical example of the type of club that gets absolutely screwed by this type of thing when losing the Premier league money.
-
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2224 times
- Has Liked: 3121 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
To be fair I think AP is a lot more invested in Burnley than most give him credit for.Goliath wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:47 pmThe big problem with ALK for me is they don't seem to carry any risk. Of course it's an exciting plan to sign the best youngsters and sell on. But if it goes t*ts up then they just swan off back to America whilst we are left with our club up **** creek without a paddle.
If we were a bigger club there'd be less risk but we are the absolute typical example of the type of club that gets absolutely screwed by this type of thing when losing the Premier league money.
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Far too many people are conditioned into thinking resources are an hindrance stopping progression. it's an easy excuse to use hiding behind mismanagement.
-
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2224 times
- Has Liked: 3121 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Some over the worst managers in business and public service disregard finance when spending money other than their own.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:56 pmFar too many people are conditioned into thinking resources are an hindrance stopping progression. it's an easy excuse to use hiding behind mismanagement.
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
I'm sure he is. But if it all goes wrong then he will just go and find something else to do whilst the town tries to help pick up the pieces.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:51 pmTo be fair I think AP is a lot more invested in Burnley than most give him credit for.
It's what he'd do if we don't go up for a few seasons which is the potential problem. Would he just settle for life in the Champ or would he 'bet the ranch' to try and get back up. My guess is the latter.
-
- Posts: 13300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany
Stop bending the narrative and let’s work with facts.elwaclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:24 pmThree windows?
One when they were moving in and getting to understand what they had, one they brought in an international centre forward that didn’t work out… a winger full of flair that spent most of his time in the treatment room. From memory. Who else knows who they failed to bring in they thought hey were getting… without much experience of how the transfer system worked?
Investors have been sourced to be able to offer that money… are you suggesting they should have put the club in another £100m (your figure) to give SD that pot?
ALK had three full windows to address the issues. Dyche operated on minimal funds throughout them three windows. Whilst also having his star striker sold.
Let’s be really honest, if Dyche had the kind of money VK has had to throw around we would be staying up comfortably and i think most fans will agree we wouldn’t have gone down back then either.
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany
To be fair Dyche had a 45m transfer spend that season combined with a 95m wage bill - a club record. This seasons won’t be in that vicinity.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 10:12 pmStop bending the narrative and let’s work with facts.
ALK had three full windows to address the issues. Dyche operated on minimal funds throughout them three windows. Whilst also having his star striker sold.
Let’s be really honest, if Dyche had the kind of money VK has had to throw around we would be staying up comfortably and i think most fans will agree we wouldn’t have gone down back then either.
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
That’s it in a nutshell. I’m sure some people just don’t get that.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:15 pmHe’d had two years of not being able to bring in the players he wanted. Yes it went stale, that was inevitable.
-
- Posts: 9182
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3477 times
- Has Liked: 5725 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
Why can you not have a plan or a project, and not be passionate about the club.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:54 pmWe were established as a Premier League club when they came in. They've now taken us out of it twice. And it's a football club that we are passionate about, not a plan, not a project.
Being passionate, and having no plan would be a disaster.
We did amazing under Dyche/Garlick, but it was starting to sour, whatever the reason. The squad had too many old players, and we couldn't afford to buy the number of new players we needed, had we stayed up.
The last season in the Championship was pure joy, now we've been relegated some want to wipe it from history as if it never happened. It did, and when the pain of relegation is forgotten, it will be recalled in the same way as 73 is. Don't rewrite history because your upset at this season's failure.
-
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2224 times
- Has Liked: 3121 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
I’m not sure that is IT in a nutshell. For one I think it went on longer than Dyche’s final two years. The relationship with Garlick went south before ALK started sniffing around. Why did ALK offer SD a long contract, it makes no sense if they did so and then withheld funds in the same way Garlick had for a few seasons; and IF this magical £100m people throw about was available. We knew Tarks was holding out for a free, we knew Pope would only consider re-signing if we stayed up and we knew Wood was unhappy his goal return had not inspired bidders. None of this began under AP’s watch.
Garlick wanted shut, and closed the purse but there was no queue to buy the club… that HAD started a downward spiral that needed to be checked. I was furious with Dyche AND Garlick because they let ego trump the good of the club. How else was that going to be resolved? Garlick sacks SD… that would have led to Teasdale like protests.
I hoped Dyche would muscle us through and benefit from new owners keen to push on. It just did not happen that final season. Very few people could argue watching that final few months of SD things were heading south ripidly and something had to change quickly. AP had the guts to try one last roll of the dice to keep up (though at the time I like many others was still shocked when Pace fired the bullet).
What could AP then do once the upturn under Jackson was not enough; ask Dyche to come back?
It is therefore not a simple AP should have backed SD. It is nothing to do with hindsight or personal grievances. It has nothing to do for favouring SD or VK… AP dealt with matters as they presented themselves… what else was he expected to do?
You had an option of a Chairman looking to sell and unwilling to spend, or AP who was not then in a position to for a season… there was no other option on the table. People refuse to acknowledge Burnley was running out of options… AP and ALK borrowing to was not ideal but if there was a queue waiting to save the club from looking at its naval as we sank I did not see it.
People have short and selective memories.
This user liked this post: Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 13300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
-
- Posts: 11868
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4814 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
This is Olise's 3rd season in this division. I know will come up with some weird response but what was his contribution in his first 2 seasons.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:21 pmWon't be much in it & like I said with olise he would have been behind & so what if you end up selling doubling/trebling your money probably more than quadruple in olises case in contrast to us losing money.
Considering you have written our players off it is fair to say you would have done the same with Olise had we signed him.
-
- Posts: 11032
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 898 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
I remember him scoring a goal against Leicester & a blinding last minute freekick at SP securing an unlikely point he probably scored others I'd have to look I just remember them. The first season he didn't do much but I don't think he played or hodgson used him sparingly. That's as weird as it gets for a Tuesday morning.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 8:21 amThis is Olise's 3rd season in this division. I know will come up with some weird response but what was his contribution in his first 2 seasons.
Considering you have written our players off it is fair to say you would have done the same with Olise had we signed him.
-
- Posts: 3795
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1488 times
- Has Liked: 365 times
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
He got Palace’s player of the season and goal of the season last season. He broke the palace record for number of assists in one season in the EPL. And he bagged himself a new 4 year contract. That’s sounds like a pretty good season to me.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 8:21 amThis is Olise's 3rd season in this division. I know will come up with some weird response but what was his contribution in his first 2 seasons.
Eze and Olise look fantastic players to me. Look at Palace’s results with and without them.
Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?
exactly he spent about a million in 2 years, Garlic made him look badClaretTony wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 9:15 pmHe’d had two years of not being able to bring in the players he wanted. Yes it went stale, that was inevitable.