Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Vegas Claret
Posts: 34967
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12721 times
Has Liked: 6328 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon May 13, 2024 7:01 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 6:54 pm
Hanging on the teams I've mentioned are around 46pts even if you give forest the 4 back that's 33pts you are talking over 10 points buffer that's not hanging on that's smashing it easy.
we can all ignore context

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 7:03 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 7:01 pm
we can all ignore context
We are miles away because we aren't boxing clever enough. Wharton/olise cost similar to trafford & tresor.

Ashingtonclaret46
Posts: 3926
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 1876 times
Has Liked: 2738 times
Location: Ashington, Northumberland

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Ashingtonclaret46 » Mon May 13, 2024 7:17 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 6:59 pm
If we wasn't servicing debt loans & worked smarter in the transfer market there's nothing stopping us competing with the likes of brentford & Bournemouth.
There is next season :D :D :D

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34967
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12721 times
Has Liked: 6328 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon May 13, 2024 7:20 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 7:03 pm
We are miles away because we aren't boxing clever enough. Wharton/olise cost similar to trafford & tresor.
and they were dropped into a side who had 1000s of games of PL experience. To even compare them tells me all I need to know

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 7:23 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 7:20 pm
and they were dropped into a side who had 1000s of games of PL experience. To even compare them tells me all I need to know
So now palace are established because 5 mins ago they wasn't. Make your mind up!

dandeclaret
Posts: 4261
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3056 times
Has Liked: 343 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by dandeclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 7:29 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:09 pm
Seems the OP just didn’t like Dyche. Astonishing first post.
Strong correlation with another posters early replies on new threads….

Gp99
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon May 13, 2024 12:42 pm
Been Liked: 2 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Gp99 » Mon May 13, 2024 7:37 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:09 pm
Seems the OP just didn’t like Dyche. Astonishing first post.
I did like dyche , although surely you didn’t enjoy his last season ? It was time for him to go his ideas and tactics had gone stale . It was time to move with the times and for ALK to come and take the team and club in a new direction .

fidelcastro
Posts: 9559
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2814 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by fidelcastro » Mon May 13, 2024 7:40 pm

Gp99 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 7:37 pm
I did like dyche , although surely you didn’t enjoy his last season ? It was time for him to go his ideas and tactics had gone stale . It was time to move with the times and for ALK to come and take the team and club in a new direction .
Okay Frank 😉

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 6539
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 2122 times
Has Liked: 991 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Mon May 13, 2024 7:43 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 6:59 pm
Promotion back into a league we were already in haha 🤦‍♂️
‘ALK/Kompany have taken us backwards.’ As I said I know you struggle with facts.
This user liked this post: Gp99

Gp99
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon May 13, 2024 12:42 pm
Been Liked: 2 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Gp99 » Mon May 13, 2024 7:44 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 7:40 pm
Okay Frank 😉
Maybe I’m from a younger generation who prefers to watch actual football instead of it being like a rugby match .
All these moaning wasn’t saying the same this time last year
That’s for sure .

fidelcastro
Posts: 9559
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2823 times
Has Liked: 2814 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by fidelcastro » Mon May 13, 2024 7:47 pm

Gp99 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 7:44 pm
Maybe I’m from a younger generation who prefers to watch actual football instead of it being like a rugby match .
All these moaning wasn’t saying the same this time last year
That’s for sure .
Classic deflection tactic.

The more discerning of us know who you are.
This user liked this post: Wo Didi

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3796
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 365 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Big Vinny K » Mon May 13, 2024 7:49 pm

Going back to the OP in what way is the club more modern ?
Is it the modern way of screwing fans and putting up season ticket prices ?
The modern way of charging £6 a pint ?
The modern way of prioritising corporate hospitality over “normal” fans ?
The modern way of borrowing £100m plus without putting any of your own money in ?

Or is just this Dude Perfect nonsense that 99% of our fans don’t have the first clue about ?

I’m so glad we are down with the kids now.
These 2 users liked this post: k90bfc Wo Didi

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34967
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12721 times
Has Liked: 6328 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon May 13, 2024 7:54 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 7:23 pm
So now palace are established because 5 mins ago they wasn't. Make your mind up!
where did I say they were established ? Like I said, and you ignored, context is everything and even in your own example you ignored it. With that I'm out.

ksrclaret
Posts: 8073
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 3060 times
Has Liked: 867 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by ksrclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 7:57 pm

ALK if I wanted a sledgehammer taking to something. :lol:

Garlick if I wanted something running sensibly and making good progress, but with an eye on an ulterior motive.

Can I choose Kilby please?
These 2 users liked this post: Gp99 k90bfc

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 8:18 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 7:54 pm
where did I say they were established ? Like I said, and you ignored, context is everything and even in your own example you ignored it. With that I'm out.
and they were dropped into a side who had 1000s of games of PL experience. To even compare them tells me all I need to know

If palace have played 1000s of games of PL experience it would suggest it's not happened overnight palace have been about for awhile meaning they are established. Your words not mine.

roperclaret
Posts: 975
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 417 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by roperclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 8:22 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:56 pm
Some people are blinded by faith that they can’t see what’s right in front of them.

We were an established club, we have regressed to a Yo Yo club with a worse academy.

The question is, what’s next?
That was always going to happen at some point. We didn’t then and still don’t have the resources to be an established Premier league club. Mid table championship is probably our true level - but I do think we’ll continue to punch above our weight.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 8:37 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 8:22 pm
That was always going to happen at some point. We didn’t then and still don’t have the resources to be an established Premier league club. Mid table championship is probably our true level - but I do think we’ll continue to punch above our weight.
We do have the resources the problem is the resources aren't utilized correctly.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34967
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12721 times
Has Liked: 6328 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon May 13, 2024 8:49 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 8:18 pm
and they were dropped into a side who had 1000s of games of PL experience. To even compare them tells me all I need to know

If palace have played 1000s of games of PL experience it would suggest it's not happened overnight palace have been about for awhile meaning they are established. Your words not mine.
the players, not the club

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 8:55 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 8:49 pm
the players, not the club
Such as who? Ward ayew, clyne been out injured a lot I can't remember the last time Tompkins played & schullps a sub. It's got a mix. Surely the players & the club go together. Palace have been in the PL since Holloway was last there & that's awhile ago. For all intent & purposes palace are established within the last 5 years anyway.

roperclaret
Posts: 975
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 417 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by roperclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 8:56 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 8:37 pm
We do have the resources the problem is the resources aren't utilized correctly.
No we don’t. 100 million gets you nowhere in the premier league

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 8:58 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 8:56 pm
No we don’t. 100 million gets you nowhere in the premier league
It doesn't when you waste money like we are doing.

roperclaret
Posts: 975
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 417 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by roperclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:02 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 8:58 pm
It doesn't when you waste money like we are doing.
Go on, I’m bored so I’ll play. Tell me, what money have we wasted?

boatshed bill
Posts: 17394
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3570 times
Has Liked: 7848 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by boatshed bill » Mon May 13, 2024 9:02 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 8:56 pm
No we don’t. 100 million gets you nowhere in the premier league
I doubt we really had as much as 100 million euros.

roperclaret
Posts: 975
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 417 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by roperclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:04 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:02 pm
I doubt we really had as much as 100 million euros.
I’m including wages
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:05 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:02 pm
Go on, I’m bored so I’ll play. Tell me, what money have we wasted?
I've named 2 players which have cost the same as olise & Wharton. Actually I think i was generous olise was over £8m from reading. Do you think the 2 Ts represent better value for money than them & I'll let you keep the change?

roperclaret
Posts: 975
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 417 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by roperclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:11 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:05 pm
I've named 2 players which have cost the same as olise & Wharton. Actually I think i was generous olise was over £8m from reading. Do you think the 2 Ts represent better value for money than them & I'll let you keep the change?
Time will tell, but I bet both those will be on higher wages than our two.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77979
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38128 times
Has Liked: 5785 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by ClaretTony » Mon May 13, 2024 9:12 pm

Enola Gay wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 5:53 pm
Maybe, but you're the one saying we were established in the Premier League.

I was just saying that beyond 7-or-so clubs, being established is pretty much a myth.
I've certainly never met anyone who'd describe us in that way.
And as I posted, I was responding to the suggestion of the new owners plan to establish us as a Premier League club.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:12 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:11 pm
Time will tell, but I bet both those will be on higher wages than our two.
Olise wouldn't have started out on better. Time will tell & my top tip for today on the 2 Ts don't hold your breath.

elwaclaret
Posts: 9625
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2224 times
Has Liked: 3121 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by elwaclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:14 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 6:59 pm
Promotion back into a league we were already in haha 🤦‍♂️
A league we were already sliding out of due to Dyche and/or Garlick refusing to put the good of their club before their egos. The lack of investment int the team since COVID was the reason when Garlick found his golden goose the pen that was built to contain it was already collapsing.

Edited for clarity

ClaretTony
Posts: 77979
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38128 times
Has Liked: 5785 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by ClaretTony » Mon May 13, 2024 9:15 pm

Gp99 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 7:37 pm
I did like dyche , although surely you didn’t enjoy his last season ? It was time for him to go his ideas and tactics had gone stale . It was time to move with the times and for ALK to come and take the team and club in a new direction .
He’d had two years of not being able to bring in the players he wanted. Yes it went stale, that was inevitable.
This user liked this post: Gp99

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13300
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon May 13, 2024 9:16 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:14 pm
A league we were already sliding out of due to Dyche and/or Garlick refusing to put the good of their club before their egos. The lack of investment int the team since COVID was the reason when Garlick found his golden goose the pen that contained it was already collapsing.
ALK had three windows to address it.

If they gave Dyche the 100m they have just ****** up the wall we wouldn’t have been in this mess in the first place

roperclaret
Posts: 975
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 417 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by roperclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:17 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:05 pm
I've named 2 players which have cost the same as olise & Wharton. Actually I think i was generous olise was over £8m from reading. Do you think the 2 Ts represent better value for money than them & I'll let you keep the change?
Time will tell, but I bet both those will be on higher wages than our two.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:21 pm

roperclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:17 pm
Time will tell, but I bet both those will be on higher wages than our two.
Won't be much in it & like I said with olise he would have been behind & so what if you end up selling doubling/trebling your money probably more than quadruple in olises case in contrast to us losing money.

elwaclaret
Posts: 9625
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2224 times
Has Liked: 3121 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany

Post by elwaclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:24 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:16 pm
ALK had three windows to address it.

If they gave Dyche the 100m they have just ****** up the wall we wouldn’t have been in this mess in the first place
Three windows?

One when they were moving in and getting to understand what they had, one they brought in an international centre forward that didn’t work out… a winger full of flair that spent most of his time in the treatment room. From memory. Who else knows who they failed to bring in they thought hey were getting… without much experience of how the transfer system worked?

Investors have been sourced to be able to offer that money… are you suggesting they should have put the club in another £100m (your figure) to give SD that pot?

Goliath
Posts: 4071
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
Been Liked: 784 times
Has Liked: 291 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Goliath » Mon May 13, 2024 9:47 pm

The big problem with ALK for me is they don't seem to carry any risk. Of course it's an exciting plan to sign the best youngsters and sell on. But if it goes t*ts up then they just swan off back to America whilst we are left with our club up **** creek without a paddle.
If we were a bigger club there'd be less risk but we are the absolute typical example of the type of club that gets absolutely screwed by this type of thing when losing the Premier league money.

elwaclaret
Posts: 9625
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2224 times
Has Liked: 3121 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by elwaclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:51 pm

Goliath wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:47 pm
The big problem with ALK for me is they don't seem to carry any risk. Of course it's an exciting plan to sign the best youngsters and sell on. But if it goes t*ts up then they just swan off back to America whilst we are left with our club up **** creek without a paddle.
If we were a bigger club there'd be less risk but we are the absolute typical example of the type of club that gets absolutely screwed by this type of thing when losing the Premier league money.
To be fair I think AP is a lot more invested in Burnley than most give him credit for.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:56 pm

Far too many people are conditioned into thinking resources are an hindrance stopping progression. it's an easy excuse to use hiding behind mismanagement.

elwaclaret
Posts: 9625
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2224 times
Has Liked: 3121 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by elwaclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 9:59 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:56 pm
Far too many people are conditioned into thinking resources are an hindrance stopping progression. it's an easy excuse to use hiding behind mismanagement.
Some over the worst managers in business and public service disregard finance when spending money other than their own.

Goliath
Posts: 4071
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
Been Liked: 784 times
Has Liked: 291 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Goliath » Mon May 13, 2024 10:11 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:51 pm
To be fair I think AP is a lot more invested in Burnley than most give him credit for.
I'm sure he is. But if it all goes wrong then he will just go and find something else to do whilst the town tries to help pick up the pieces.

It's what he'd do if we don't go up for a few seasons which is the potential problem. Would he just settle for life in the Champ or would he 'bet the ranch' to try and get back up. My guess is the latter.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13300
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon May 13, 2024 10:12 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:24 pm
Three windows?

One when they were moving in and getting to understand what they had, one they brought in an international centre forward that didn’t work out… a winger full of flair that spent most of his time in the treatment room. From memory. Who else knows who they failed to bring in they thought hey were getting… without much experience of how the transfer system worked?

Investors have been sourced to be able to offer that money… are you suggesting they should have put the club in another £100m (your figure) to give SD that pot?
Stop bending the narrative and let’s work with facts.

ALK had three full windows to address the issues. Dyche operated on minimal funds throughout them three windows. Whilst also having his star striker sold.

Let’s be really honest, if Dyche had the kind of money VK has had to throw around we would be staying up comfortably and i think most fans will agree we wouldn’t have gone down back then either.

RVclaret
Posts: 16521
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3058 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany

Post by RVclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 10:14 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 10:12 pm
Stop bending the narrative and let’s work with facts.

ALK had three full windows to address the issues. Dyche operated on minimal funds throughout them three windows. Whilst also having his star striker sold.

Let’s be really honest, if Dyche had the kind of money VK has had to throw around we would be staying up comfortably and i think most fans will agree we wouldn’t have gone down back then either.
To be fair Dyche had a 45m transfer spend that season combined with a 95m wage bill - a club record. This seasons won’t be in that vicinity.

beddie
Posts: 6386
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1786 times
Has Liked: 675 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by beddie » Mon May 13, 2024 10:18 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:15 pm
He’d had two years of not being able to bring in the players he wanted. Yes it went stale, that was inevitable.
That’s it in a nutshell. I’m sure some people just don’t get that.

NewClaret
Posts: 17696
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3981 times
Has Liked: 4933 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany

Post by NewClaret » Mon May 13, 2024 10:31 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 10:14 pm
To be fair Dyche had a 45m transfer spend that season combined with a 95m wage bill - a club record. This seasons won’t be in that vicinity.
That’s a very fair point. Would be good to know what it is.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9182
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3477 times
Has Liked: 5725 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Colburn_Claret » Mon May 13, 2024 11:33 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 3:54 pm
We were established as a Premier League club when they came in. They've now taken us out of it twice. And it's a football club that we are passionate about, not a plan, not a project.
Why can you not have a plan or a project, and not be passionate about the club.
Being passionate, and having no plan would be a disaster.

We did amazing under Dyche/Garlick, but it was starting to sour, whatever the reason. The squad had too many old players, and we couldn't afford to buy the number of new players we needed, had we stayed up.

The last season in the Championship was pure joy, now we've been relegated some want to wipe it from history as if it never happened. It did, and when the pain of relegation is forgotten, it will be recalled in the same way as 73 is. Don't rewrite history because your upset at this season's failure.

elwaclaret
Posts: 9625
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2224 times
Has Liked: 3121 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by elwaclaret » Mon May 13, 2024 11:50 pm

beddie wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 10:18 pm
That’s it in a nutshell. I’m sure some people just don’t get that.
I’m not sure that is IT in a nutshell. For one I think it went on longer than Dyche’s final two years. The relationship with Garlick went south before ALK started sniffing around. Why did ALK offer SD a long contract, it makes no sense if they did so and then withheld funds in the same way Garlick had for a few seasons; and IF this magical £100m people throw about was available. We knew Tarks was holding out for a free, we knew Pope would only consider re-signing if we stayed up and we knew Wood was unhappy his goal return had not inspired bidders. None of this began under AP’s watch.

Garlick wanted shut, and closed the purse but there was no queue to buy the club… that HAD started a downward spiral that needed to be checked. I was furious with Dyche AND Garlick because they let ego trump the good of the club. How else was that going to be resolved? Garlick sacks SD… that would have led to Teasdale like protests.

I hoped Dyche would muscle us through and benefit from new owners keen to push on. It just did not happen that final season. Very few people could argue watching that final few months of SD things were heading south ripidly and something had to change quickly. AP had the guts to try one last roll of the dice to keep up (though at the time I like many others was still shocked when Pace fired the bullet).

What could AP then do once the upturn under Jackson was not enough; ask Dyche to come back?

It is therefore not a simple AP should have backed SD. It is nothing to do with hindsight or personal grievances. It has nothing to do for favouring SD or VK… AP dealt with matters as they presented themselves… what else was he expected to do?

You had an option of a Chairman looking to sell and unwilling to spend, or AP who was not then in a position to for a season… there was no other option on the table. People refuse to acknowledge Burnley was running out of options… AP and ALK borrowing to was not ideal but if there was a queue waiting to save the club from looking at its naval as we sank I did not see it.

People have short and selective memories.
This user liked this post: Colburn_Claret

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13300
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue May 14, 2024 5:57 am

RVclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 10:14 pm
To be fair Dyche had a 45m transfer spend that season combined with a 95m wage bill - a club record. This seasons won’t be in that vicinity.
Pretty certain our spend including wages will be well over that.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11868
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4814 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue May 14, 2024 8:21 am

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:21 pm
Won't be much in it & like I said with olise he would have been behind & so what if you end up selling doubling/trebling your money probably more than quadruple in olises case in contrast to us losing money.
This is Olise's 3rd season in this division. I know will come up with some weird response but what was his contribution in his first 2 seasons.

Considering you have written our players off it is fair to say you would have done the same with Olise had we signed him.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11032
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Jakubclaret » Tue May 14, 2024 8:38 am

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue May 14, 2024 8:21 am
This is Olise's 3rd season in this division. I know will come up with some weird response but what was his contribution in his first 2 seasons.

Considering you have written our players off it is fair to say you would have done the same with Olise had we signed him.
I remember him scoring a goal against Leicester & a blinding last minute freekick at SP securing an unlikely point he probably scored others I'd have to look I just remember them. The first season he didn't do much but I don't think he played or hodgson used him sparingly. That's as weird as it gets for a Tuesday morning.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3796
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 365 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Big Vinny K » Tue May 14, 2024 9:06 am

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue May 14, 2024 8:21 am
This is Olise's 3rd season in this division. I know will come up with some weird response but what was his contribution in his first 2 seasons.
He got Palace’s player of the season and goal of the season last season. He broke the palace record for number of assists in one season in the EPL. And he bagged himself a new 4 year contract. That’s sounds like a pretty good season to me.
Eze and Olise look fantastic players to me. Look at Palace’s results with and without them.

Squazo
Posts: 275
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2022 8:30 pm
Been Liked: 92 times
Has Liked: 78 times

Re: Garlick / dyche or ALK/kompany ?

Post by Squazo » Tue May 14, 2024 12:17 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon May 13, 2024 9:15 pm
He’d had two years of not being able to bring in the players he wanted. Yes it went stale, that was inevitable.
exactly he spent about a million in 2 years, Garlic made him look bad

Post Reply