This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
jojomk1
- Posts: 5673
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
- Been Liked: 981 times
- Has Liked: 654 times
Post
by jojomk1 » Sun May 19, 2024 8:23 am
burnleymik wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 8:15 am
I am just not sure Trafford has the ability to play the style VK wants.
So why sign him in the first place ?
Not sure either has the true ability required, but you would have thought VK had done some homework on Trafford
You would have thought so !
-
Rick_Muller
- Posts: 6876
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2894 times
- Has Liked: 7084 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Post
by Rick_Muller » Sun May 19, 2024 8:36 am
The major aspect Trafford lacked was confidence in him by the back four. That is all. He is just as, if not more than capable than Muric but it was a mistake to throw him in too early.
-
Tricky Trevor
- Posts: 10835
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 2542 times
Post
by Tricky Trevor » Sun May 19, 2024 8:47 am
Rick_Muller wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 8:36 am
The major aspect Trafford lacked was confidence in him by the back four. That is all. He is just as, if not more than capable than Muric but it was a mistake to throw him in too early.
I agree with that but it reflects more on him than it does on them. They had no confidence in him being at that level. His lack of physicality was his other major negative but hopefully that will be sorted before next term.
These 2 users liked this post: Rick_Muller cockneyclaret
-
Steve-Harpers-perm
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 2122 times
- Has Liked: 991 times
Post
by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sun May 19, 2024 9:10 am
If we can get our money back on Trafford this summer it will be the best outcome for all parties.
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17694
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3981 times
- Has Liked: 4933 times
Post
by NewClaret » Sun May 19, 2024 9:13 am
RVclaret wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 8:20 am
Who knows, the lad is 21, I’ve said this on here before but at the same age Raya was poor with his feet (Rovers mate), average at Brentford at first and then improved massively in the past season or two, getting a move to Arsenal for that reason. He’s got the ‘raw tools’ for it in my opinion. I’m happy either way in the Champ so I guess it boils down to who attracts the bids and the largest of them.
He’s definitely got the raw ability to be an elite keeper.
Remember the first half of last season when our fans were criticising Muric for not commanding his area? Then he improved second half of the season. This season everyone calling for his return because he commands his area so much better (amongst other reasons).
Young players improve aspects of their game. It’s crazy how fans on here write obviously-talented players off on the basis of what they’ve seen in their first season.
-
Ric_C
- Posts: 2859
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
- Been Liked: 1022 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Post
by Ric_C » Sun May 19, 2024 9:15 am
Well Newcastle definitely want a keeper. There are also rumours of them wanting to sell Pope. Feel like his injuries are costing him now.
-
Darthlaw
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1293 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Post
by Darthlaw » Sun May 19, 2024 9:18 am
Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 9:10 am
If we can get our money back on Trafford this summer it will be the best outcome for all parties.
Sadly, this.
Lad needs games to develop and an element of BFC fans won’t allow that.
-
RVclaret
- Posts: 16521
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
- Been Liked: 4552 times
- Has Liked: 3058 times
Post
by RVclaret » Sun May 19, 2024 9:19 am
Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 9:10 am
If we can get our money back on Trafford this summer it will be the best outcome for all parties.
Depends which view you take. If Newcastle are interested in him and willing to pay that kind of money, you have got to question why we’d be happy to lose a player who’s thought so highly of?
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17694
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3981 times
- Has Liked: 4933 times
Post
by NewClaret » Sun May 19, 2024 9:29 am
RVclaret wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 9:19 am
Depends which view you take. If Newcastle are interested in him and willing to pay that kind of money, you have got to question why we’d be happy to lose a player who’s thought so highly of?
I wouldn’t be happy to lose him for the reason stated, but assuming a few things (maybe a euros place, Liverpool also interested as reported), there’s a chance we could make a decent profit on what we paid - depending how the clauses worked - in which case I would rather that than sell Berge, Odobert, Koleosho, etc.
Only if we were extending Muric on a long term deal though.
-
burnleymik
- Posts: 5743
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1300 times
- Has Liked: 3162 times
Post
by burnleymik » Sun May 19, 2024 9:33 am
RVclaret wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 9:19 am
Depends which view you take. If Newcastle are interested in him and willing to pay that kind of money, you have got to question why we’d be happy to lose a player who’s thought so highly of?
I think it's more about a risk to see if he makes it, he wouldn't go there and be their number one. We need a number one, especially with the price we paid.
As it stands he doesn't seem ready to play how VK wants him to. He might do better in a traditional keeper role, not sure, but for the fast, sweeper type role, I just don't think he is anywhere near as it stands.
-
warksclaret
- Posts: 8779
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2332 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Post
by warksclaret » Sun May 19, 2024 9:59 am
Looks like we already have clubs looking at some of our better players. For me if we can get a decent fee for players like Ekdal, Trafford,Weghorst we should take it. Ekdal is an intelligent defender, but lets face it not a regular in the Championship or PL and slow. Trafford may well be a great keeper in time but he just does not fit into our style of play, and too indecisive when he regains the ball. Lots more to go I suspect
-
Ric_C
- Posts: 2859
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
- Been Liked: 1022 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Post
by Ric_C » Sun May 19, 2024 10:08 am
Darthlaw wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 9:18 am
Sadly, this.
Lad needs games to develop and an element of BFC fans won’t allow that.
Partly agree, but I don't think we are in a position as a club to "allow a player to develop" in such a key position. Especially in the prem. Maybe if we were an established side like a Palace or a Brighton for example, we could give him 10-15 games to learn his trade, but last season was suicide.
-
Ric_C
- Posts: 2859
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
- Been Liked: 1022 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Post
by Ric_C » Sun May 19, 2024 10:10 am
warksclaret wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 9:59 am
Looks like we already have clubs looking at some of our better players. For me if we can get a decent fee for players like Ekdal, Trafford,Weghorst we should take it. Ekdal is an intelligent defender, but lets face it not a regular in the Championship or PL and slow. Trafford may well be a great keeper in time but he just does not fit into our style of play, and too indecisive when he regains the ball. Lots more to go I suspect
I actually think Ekdal (when fit) is one of our better defenders. Unfortunately, like Beyer, there are question marks over his ability to stay fit for a season.
These 2 users liked this post: summitclaret cockneyclaret
-
burnleytom
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:03 pm
- Been Liked: 78 times
- Location: Sutton
Post
by burnleytom » Sun May 19, 2024 10:15 am
I wonder if we might sell both keepers and buy Butez. Heavily linked pre-Trafford. Would be an easy way to get cash in, establish a clear number 1, and we have plenty of other options for back up/reserve.
https://ibb.co/DRCKDR4
-
summitclaret
- Posts: 4573
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1022 times
- Has Liked: 1614 times
- Location: burnley
Post
by summitclaret » Sun May 19, 2024 10:23 am
To a large extent I don't really care who is our keeper. I do care about the lack of a left back, a cd midfielder and a striker, just like I did 9 months ago. It's why we went down.
These 2 users liked this post: Ric_C Quicknick
-
Quickenthetempo
- Posts: 19796
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4203 times
- Has Liked: 2247 times
Post
by Quickenthetempo » Sun May 19, 2024 10:24 am
warksclaret wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 9:59 am
Looks like we already have clubs looking at some of our better players. For me if we can get a decent fee for players like Ekdal, Trafford,Weghorst we should take it. Ekdal is an intelligent defender, but lets face it not a regular in the Championship or PL and slow. Trafford may well be a great keeper in time but he just does not fit into our style of play, and too indecisive when he regains the ball. Lots more to go I suspect
Has Ekdal ever been outpaced for us?
I know he looks a touch slow but is so much of a better defender upstairs than any other we have, he always seems in the right place, with no chance to get outpaced.
He seemed to cope with Danny Wellbeck easily enough and there's not many faster in English football.
These 2 users liked this post: Quicknick cockneyclaret
-
bumba
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 947 times
Post
by bumba » Sun May 19, 2024 10:41 am
Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 10:24 am
Has Ekdal ever been outpaced for us?
I know he looks a touch slow but is so much of a better defender upstairs than any other we have, he always seems in the right place, with no chance to get outpaced.
He seemed to cope with Danny Wellbeck easily enough and there's not many faster in English football.
Yes his first game away at Norwich by Pukki
This user liked this post: mybloodisclaret
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17694
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3981 times
- Has Liked: 4933 times
Post
by NewClaret » Sun May 19, 2024 11:06 am
Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 10:24 am
Has Ekdal ever been outpaced for us?
I know he looks a touch slow but is so much of a better defender upstairs than any other we have, he always seems in the right place, with no chance to get outpaced.
He seemed to cope with Danny Wellbeck easily enough and there's not many faster in English football.
I’m terrible at remembering games but I seem to remember Fulham at home. Could be completely wrong on that. He’s been exposed a few times but I agree he reads the game so well it’s rare he has to rely on it. Great defender I’d like to keep.
Certainly at Champ level I thought he looked better than THB (who also lacked pace) when he came in Jan and THB was injured… and City want £20m for him!
-
Spijed
- Posts: 18062
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3055 times
- Has Liked: 1327 times
Post
by Spijed » Sun May 19, 2024 11:12 am
Ric_C wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 9:15 am
Well Newcastle definitely want a keeper. There are also rumours of them wanting to sell Pope. Feel like his injuries are costing him now.
If only we could get Pope and cash in return as part of a swap deal

-
Goliath
- Posts: 4071
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
- Been Liked: 784 times
- Has Liked: 291 times
Post
by Goliath » Sun May 19, 2024 11:22 am
Ric_C wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 9:15 am
Well Newcastle definitely want a keeper. There are also rumours of them wanting to sell Pope. Feel like his injuries are costing him now.
Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest. His distribution is probably one of the worst in professional football. The rest of his game is world class but we've seen how important distribution can be, especially when they are trying to break into the elite teams of English football.
-
ecc
- Posts: 6352
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
- Been Liked: 2161 times
- Has Liked: 1780 times
Post
by ecc » Sun May 19, 2024 11:31 am
The Saudis would be crazy to let Nick go. I'd be happy to see it though.
-
Darthlaw
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1293 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Post
by Darthlaw » Sun May 19, 2024 11:37 am
Ric_C wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 10:08 am
Partly agree, but I don't think we are in a position as a club to "allow a player to develop" in such a key position. Especially in the prem. Maybe if we were an established side like a Palace or a Brighton for example, we could give him 10-15 games to learn his trade, but last season was suicide.
Certainly chucking him in against the top 8 teams in England (including some of the best teams in world football) was brainless.
But I’m thinking going forwards. All you players need games to develop and Trafford will have a section on his back from the first kick off.
-
Spijed
- Posts: 18062
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3055 times
- Has Liked: 1327 times
Post
by Spijed » Sun May 19, 2024 11:39 am
Goliath wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 11:22 am
Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest. His distribution is probably one of the worst in professional football. The rest of his game is world class but we've seen how important distribution can be, especially when they are trying to break into the elite teams of English football.
And as a result we now see goal keepers who can't make proper saves, or catch crosses because they are better with their feet.
And it'll get worse as time goes on.
-
NL Claret
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 pm
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 343 times
Post
by NL Claret » Sun May 19, 2024 11:40 am
Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 8:47 am
I agree with that but it reflects more on him than it does on them. They had no confidence in him being at that level. His lack of physicality was his other major negative but hopefully that will be sorted before next term.
The confidence issue can work both ways, Trafford and VK to a certain extent had no confidence in an ever changing back 4, none of whom were of the required quality. The GK position really is not the issue, its the rest of the squad and manager that's not quite PL standard.
-
Jakubs Tash
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Post
by Jakubs Tash » Sun May 19, 2024 12:05 pm
bumba wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 10:41 am
Yes his first game away at Norwich by Pukki
I remember this very well and Ekdal wasn’t really outpaced. He was actually let down by teammates allowing a ball to get through that never should and this then meant he was chasing down Pukki after he had got a head start on him.
There’s been far too much made about this incident and also that Ekdal is ‘slow’.
This user liked this post: summitclaret
-
Quickenthetempo
- Posts: 19796
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4203 times
- Has Liked: 2247 times
Post
by Quickenthetempo » Sun May 19, 2024 12:40 pm
bumba wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 10:41 am
Yes his first game away at Norwich by Pukki
https://youtu.be/7gYOE3jFSfY?si=t8Yn7KqdKENVw2jd
1min 8 sec on the video
Ekdal is covering the right back and Pukki runs off the other Centre Half.
He catches him up.
Great run by Pukki though
This user liked this post: Jakubs Tash
-
bumba
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 947 times
Post
by bumba » Sun May 19, 2024 2:12 pm
Jakubs Tash wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 12:05 pm
I remember this very well and Ekdal wasn’t really outpaced. He was actually let down by teammates allowing a ball to get through that never should and this then meant he was chasing down Pukki after he had got a head start on him.
There’s been far too much made about this incident and also that Ekdal is ‘slow’.
Ekdal is slow there no debating or hiding from it
-
FeedTheArf
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 442 times
- Has Liked: 180 times
Post
by FeedTheArf » Sun May 19, 2024 2:17 pm
bumba wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 2:12 pm
Ekdal is slow there no debating or hiding from it
John McGreal was slow and he did great. In the Championship you don’t often come up against raw pace matched with ability. Ekdal’s footballing brain will see him through just fine.
IF we are promoted again next summer then there’s probably a question mark over him but not next season.
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
jojomk1
- Posts: 5673
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
- Been Liked: 981 times
- Has Liked: 654 times
Post
by jojomk1 » Sun May 19, 2024 2:57 pm
FeedTheArf wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 2:17 pm
John McGreal was slow and he did great. In the Championship you don’t often come up against raw pace matched with ability. Ekdal’s footballing brain will see him through just fine.
IF we are promoted again next summer then there’s probably a question mark over him but not next season.
There's a question mark over all of our squad at Prem level
He, Esteve, O'Shea and Al-Dakhil would be fine for the Championship - assuming Beyer, Delcroix and McNally go
-
JimmyRobbo
- Posts: 3502
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 684 times
- Has Liked: 1258 times
Post
by JimmyRobbo » Sun May 19, 2024 3:10 pm
FeedTheArf wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 2:17 pm
John McGreal was slow and he did great. In the Championship you don’t often come up against raw pace matched with ability. Ekdal’s footballing brain will see him through just fine.
IF we are promoted again next summer then there’s probably a question mark over him but not next season.
I agree with this summary, FTA.
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17694
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3981 times
- Has Liked: 4933 times
Post
by NewClaret » Mon May 20, 2024 2:48 pm
That report also says we didn’t spend big after winning promotion
Doubt there’s anything in this at all.
-
Quickenthetempo
- Posts: 19796
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4203 times
- Has Liked: 2247 times
Post
by Quickenthetempo » Mon May 20, 2024 3:22 pm
NewClaret wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 2:48 pm
That report also says we didn’t spend big after winning promotion
Doubt there’s anything in this at all.
It comes from Nixon
-
Woodleyclaret
- Posts: 8755
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1882 times
- Has Liked: 2243 times
Post
by Woodleyclaret » Mon May 20, 2024 3:54 pm
£100m is peanuts to build a Premier league team that was part of the problem. Its getting harder and harder to compete unless you spend North of £500m
-
jojomk1
- Posts: 5673
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
- Been Liked: 981 times
- Has Liked: 654 times
Post
by jojomk1 » Mon May 20, 2024 3:55 pm
Spijed wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 11:12 am
If only we could get Pope and cash in return as part of a swap deal
We would need a load of cash just to pay his current Prem League wages
Ramsdale being linked with Newcastle as well
-
ArmchairDetective
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:16 am
- Been Liked: 694 times
- Has Liked: 668 times
Post
by ArmchairDetective » Mon May 20, 2024 5:35 pm
Not often Celtic spend big. The most they've ever spent on a keeper is £5m. If they are interested in him it's likely for a fraction of the price people have been quoting on other threads.
-
AGENT_CLARET
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1432 times
- Has Liked: 1585 times
Post
by AGENT_CLARET » Mon May 20, 2024 6:39 pm
ArmchairDetective wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 5:35 pm
Not often Celtic spend big. The most they've ever spent on a keeper is £5m. If they are interested in him it's likely for a fraction of the price people have been quoting on other threads.
And that's why it won't happen and it's BS
This user liked this post: ArmchairDetective
-
burnmark
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:50 am
- Been Liked: 871 times
- Has Liked: 647 times
Post
by burnmark » Mon May 20, 2024 10:05 pm
Stoke and Huddersfield after Rodriguez- Nixon
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17694
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3981 times
- Has Liked: 4933 times
Post
by NewClaret » Mon May 20, 2024 10:20 pm
burnmark wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 10:05 pm
Stoke and Huddersfield after Rodriguez- Nixon
I’d like to hope he’ll stay with us if they’re our only options.
-
Stockbrokerbelt
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:43 am
- Been Liked: 303 times
- Has Liked: 149 times
Post
by Stockbrokerbelt » Mon May 20, 2024 10:23 pm
bumba wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 2:12 pm
Ekdal is slow there no debating or hiding from it
As Kompany said, when we signed Ekdal he was not fit & then got injured, not slow as made out.
-
Taffy on the wing
- Posts: 5659
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1219 times
- Has Liked: 3784 times
Post
by Taffy on the wing » Tue May 21, 2024 3:42 am
I was excited about Ekdal when he signed.........i still think he could be a gem, a very intelligent player who just needs a run of games & to get fit.
-
AGENT_CLARET
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1432 times
- Has Liked: 1585 times
Post
by AGENT_CLARET » Tue May 21, 2024 6:25 am
Taffy on the wing wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 3:42 am
I was excited about Ekdal when he signed.........i still think he could be a gem, a very intelligent player who just needs a run of games & to get fit.
Ekdal could play a role at CDM next to Cullen if we lose Berge
-
bumba
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 947 times
Post
by bumba » Tue May 21, 2024 6:48 am
Stockbrokerbelt wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 10:23 pm
As Kompany said, when we signed Ekdal he was not fit & then got injured, not slow as made out.
He is slow, surely you've seen him play? Players don't generally get quicker as they get fitter the speed is normally there naturally
-
TopCat
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 am
- Been Liked: 214 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Post
by TopCat » Tue May 21, 2024 7:48 am
NewClaret wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 10:20 pm
I’d like to hope he’ll stay with us if they’re our only options.
If he wasn't "one of our own" then more people would not want him retained.
A move (Huddersfield) is best for all parties.
This user liked this post: MeeActon1
-
Targetman
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:43 pm
- Been Liked: 564 times
- Has Liked: 58 times
Post
by Targetman » Tue May 21, 2024 9:04 am
TopCat wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 7:48 am
If he wasn't "one of our own" then more people would not want him retained.
A move (Huddersfield) is best for all parties.
Well you just need to let Jay know that then!
-
Swizzlestick
- Posts: 4844
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1750 times
- Has Liked: 661 times
Post
by Swizzlestick » Tue May 21, 2024 9:24 am
Outside of the truly great ones, how many CBs are actually quick? I would think physicality, awareness and positioning are more important.
This user liked this post: AGENT_CLARET
-
burnleytom
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:03 pm
- Been Liked: 78 times
- Location: Sutton
Post
by burnleytom » Tue May 21, 2024 10:50 am
Our record of buying players from Basel is not impressive, thus far.
-
jedi_master
- Posts: 8276
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4139 times
- Has Liked: 1144 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Post
by jedi_master » Tue May 21, 2024 10:58 am
He's a good player - literally the only one who was playing for Preston who looked capable any time I saw them last season. Scored a great goal against Leeds as I recall.
-
NewClaret
- Posts: 17694
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3981 times
- Has Liked: 4933 times
Post
by NewClaret » Tue May 21, 2024 10:59 am
Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 9:24 am
Outside of the truly great ones, how many CBs are actually quick? I would think physicality, awareness and positioning are more important.
I agree but in our system where they push right up, recovery pace is super important. Reason City’s back line is so fast.
Love Ekdal though, really classy defender.