He was first choice until last season
Muric to Ipswich
-
- Posts: 14924
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3528 times
- Has Liked: 6428 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
-
- Posts: 5513
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1478 times
- Has Liked: 3255 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Usually happens to me when after posting a message, I go back to the thread and I don't refresh the page, I don't see my new post and repost it.
-
- Posts: 13300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Ramsdale was first choice. Same as Trafford.
Both fell away
-
- Posts: 18784
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7701 times
- Has Liked: 1594 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Fair enough if that’s how you see it. But under Garlick we had consistently one of the lowest spends and bought unfashionable British and Irish players and prioritised on-field success above all else. Under the new regime the priority appears to be making a return from trading huge numbers of players bought for a significant outlay. I don’t think the idea is to get 2 goals from each of our 8 wingers across a season, I think it’s to buy 8 young wingers and hope that 1 or 2 of them are a success and soar in value.Conroy92 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 9:24 pmNot entirely sure I agree with you Riley. I think the aspect of money ball we tried to encapture the most was the spread. Money ball encompassed stats based on players ability's to score, get on first base ect. Not too dissimilar to targeting stats like goals and assists and trying to work out an average over the season saying we need to score x amount and concede X amount.
Personally I think we money balled it with our choices out wide. We took multiple wide men and maximised the squad out with players who maybe only had a spattering of appearances over there careers but maybe brought 2/3 goals and 4/5 or assists a season. I think we probably were well aware players like Benson might, in minutes, play something like only ten games across the season. But his contribution adding a few goals and assists would be enough providing all the squad achieved there anticipated goals and assists targets.
It would also make sense as to why we overloaded the squad so much.
I can see why a lot of people think we operated a money ball system under the last regime. But a large part of money ball is the contribution of the squad as a whole. It's not something we ever maximised under the previous regime which is why we had such a consistent first 11.
Id compare it like this. Under Dyche we looked for the best value but someone who could provide the need to the first team.
We'd sign players that would play for 30-40 games a season and aim to get as high as stats out of them as possible.
Under Kompany we had three players that might play that one position all 10/15 games a season and be happy with a split of a couple of goals and assists from each of them.
I see no similarity whatsoever with Moneyball and how we now operate. If I recall correctly, the player trades made in that example were purely made to give the team on-field success.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I wouldn't be nervous with Trafford in the Championship. I'm sure he will come good with enough time and experience.
But, I don't think it matters, he won't be here either when the window shuts.
But, I don't think it matters, he won't be here either when the window shuts.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
We've had better, but we've had much much worse. We all know he should have started last season as no.1, but didn't, and that was the start of the end.
He played really well at the tail end of the season, but we can't forget he was also at fault for the worst two goals we conceded all season (and that's saying something!). We'll no doubt see more of the same at Ipswich. He'll be 9/10 one week and 3/10 the next. That's Muric, and why I really don't think he would have worked under Parker. He strikes me as a Manager who would take a solid 7/10 every week over an erratic goalkeeper.
Thanks for the memories Aro; his outrageous passing range gave me more than a few heart attacks, but there's no denying he was a class act in the Championship and will be fondly remembered.
He played really well at the tail end of the season, but we can't forget he was also at fault for the worst two goals we conceded all season (and that's saying something!). We'll no doubt see more of the same at Ipswich. He'll be 9/10 one week and 3/10 the next. That's Muric, and why I really don't think he would have worked under Parker. He strikes me as a Manager who would take a solid 7/10 every week over an erratic goalkeeper.
Thanks for the memories Aro; his outrageous passing range gave me more than a few heart attacks, but there's no denying he was a class act in the Championship and will be fondly remembered.
This user liked this post: Hipper
-
- Posts: 17386
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3569 times
- Has Liked: 7848 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
For a while, he was.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 9:51 pmRamsdale was first choice. Same as Trafford.
Both fell away
-
- Posts: 5293
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2964 times
- Has Liked: 837 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Muric is a decent enough championship/bottom half of the PL keeper, no more than that. Some incredible passing at times, better than the vast majority of keepers at that level and great fun to have when he's in a team that is miles better than the rest. Erratic as they come though and miles below the level of the 3 amigos we had under dyche. Fun while he lasted and we've got the money side of it pretty spot on with him.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I keep reading about ‘we’ll tear the championship up with this team” hardly, they’ll have all left before we kick a ball. I think we’re in for a tough season.
-
- Posts: 4933
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1252 times
- Has Liked: 1489 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Sad to see Muric leave but part of me would like to see some 'normality' in our goalkeepers and put the three ring circus into posterity.
This user liked this post: longsidepies
-
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
- Been Liked: 299 times
- Has Liked: 569 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
The way he was treated at start of last season doesn't surprise me if he wants to leave and maybe a few more might follow..
-
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2024 7:02 am
- Been Liked: 219 times
- Has Liked: 484 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
That's the spirit. You continue to get behind the team.
This user liked this post: beddie
-
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:50 am
- Been Liked: 497 times
- Has Liked: 571 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Fully agree.burnley007 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 2:23 pmI will have to see who we replace him with before I decide how I feel about this.
I'm guessing we have another young keeper lined up...
The success of this deal can only be assessed on who we replace him with.
As someone else has mentioned, Michael Cooper at Plymouth is a very good young keeper but not sure on his ability to play out from the back.
At 24 he would fit our buy and sell on for a profit strategy.
This may also mean we keep Trafford?
-
- Posts: 11030
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
They'll have nothing lined up or if they do it'll be nothing of any note, wayne Henderson was supposed to be solving problems he lasted a very short time, BPF wasn't properly assessed. After Pope Heaton Hart it's all scrag ends a club that's runs properly shouldn't be having these sort of problems where 2 keepers are likely to leave & for whatever reason a elbow & arsehole couldn't make it's mind up who got the jersey. A keeper should already be established & bedded in.
-
- Posts: 8777
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2332 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Just an observation-we have been talking about signing Cooper at Plymouth for some time, in fact since before VK joined us. If he is such a good prospect why has not a PL side signed himbillyhamilton82 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 10:34 pmFully agree.
The success of this deal can only be assessed on who we replace him with.
As someone else has mentioned, Michael Cooper at Plymouth is a very good young keeper but not sure on his ability to play out from the back.
At 24 he would fit our buy and sell on for a profit strategy.
This may also mean we keep Trafford?
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I'm not sure you've quite mastered the best use of this phrase yet, Jakub.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 10:43 pm& for whatever reason a elbow & arsehole couldn't make it's mind up who got the jersey.

This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 11030
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
-
- Posts: 9419
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2446 times
- Has Liked: 2415 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Muric to Ipswich
You just need to learn your arse from your elbow.
-
- Posts: 11030
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I do I couldn't edit henderson & hennessey due to the timeout & predictive text earlier about dean henderson but pick me up on my spelling mistakes & not why 2 keepers are potentially leaving. You are the masters & I'm the willing pupil in the art of anatomy arrangement.
This user liked this post: claretskeith
-
- Posts: 17691
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3980 times
- Has Liked: 4933 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Just catching up on this news and haven’t read the whole thread, but a few thoughts:
- Whoever leaves in the summer this’ll be the hardest one for me to take. I think we’ve wasted a talent here. Who knows what went on behind closed doors but it looks Kompany’s fault from the outside. I’ve not said much bad about him but I called for Muric from the first game and he didn’t get it right until game 29; his biggest mistake.
- I’m probably alone but I think the reported fees are ridiculously cheap. They’re paying a fortune for other average players. That sort of doubles the blow. Feel Oace has been weak here.
- I thought he’d end up somewhere bigger than Ipswich. Unlikely I know but I sort of hope this news triggers a last minute bid from someone better.
- I think his contribution to our Championship winning side is hugely underestimated. How he pushed up in the back line and made a 12th man, and his ability to start attacks by finding a threaded pass into a midfielder when most keepers would play a safe ball to FB, his movement immediately after his first pass to make an option to receive again, etc. have we had better traditional goalkeepers? Yes. Have we had a better modern goalkeeper? Absolutely not.
- If we’re not going to play that style under Parker we won’t miss him as much. But I personally think if we don’t play that style under Parker we’ll find and immediate return much harder. We won’t breeze it anyway, it’ll be a slog.
- I personally hope Trafford stays now and we all get behind him. He’s a lot to learn but this is the league he should’ve done it in in the first place.
- I hope to feck the club know what they’re doing and have replacements lined up for BPF, Muric and most likely Vigeroux. Oh, and a coach about now would be nice too.
- Whoever leaves in the summer this’ll be the hardest one for me to take. I think we’ve wasted a talent here. Who knows what went on behind closed doors but it looks Kompany’s fault from the outside. I’ve not said much bad about him but I called for Muric from the first game and he didn’t get it right until game 29; his biggest mistake.
- I’m probably alone but I think the reported fees are ridiculously cheap. They’re paying a fortune for other average players. That sort of doubles the blow. Feel Oace has been weak here.
- I thought he’d end up somewhere bigger than Ipswich. Unlikely I know but I sort of hope this news triggers a last minute bid from someone better.
- I think his contribution to our Championship winning side is hugely underestimated. How he pushed up in the back line and made a 12th man, and his ability to start attacks by finding a threaded pass into a midfielder when most keepers would play a safe ball to FB, his movement immediately after his first pass to make an option to receive again, etc. have we had better traditional goalkeepers? Yes. Have we had a better modern goalkeeper? Absolutely not.
- If we’re not going to play that style under Parker we won’t miss him as much. But I personally think if we don’t play that style under Parker we’ll find and immediate return much harder. We won’t breeze it anyway, it’ll be a slog.
- I personally hope Trafford stays now and we all get behind him. He’s a lot to learn but this is the league he should’ve done it in in the first place.
- I hope to feck the club know what they’re doing and have replacements lined up for BPF, Muric and most likely Vigeroux. Oh, and a coach about now would be nice too.
This user liked this post: RammyClaret61
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Muric at best was an average keeper. Prone to a mistake. He made 2 horror mistakes in what 10 games that possibly would have kept us up. Il take 10 million
-
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1432 times
- Has Liked: 1585 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Nonayforever I'll apologise for that childish comment I made to you.
Not an excuse but a reason to why I did that is anything to do with my mother is a raw subject, just over 2 years ago out of the blue she suffered a brain hemorrhage and that changed her life and ours for ever.
Even though she was 81 at the time she walked from Harle syke everyday to the St Peter's centre in Burnley to swim for an hr then walk home again, she was a very physical fit lady for her age, The hemorrhage kept her in hospital for over a year and she now lives in a nursing home with hardly any memory and in a wheelchair, she's an ex nurse and knows more than most what this did to her.
The reason I've said all this is I know I come out with stupid things at time but we all need to think before we post.
Once again I opologise I shouldn't of bitten.
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat longsidepies
-
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1432 times
- Has Liked: 1585 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
One mistake was a million to one rebound off a player the other was poor control of a ball that should never be passed back to the keeper on target, it's taught to be passed back wide just incase of that exact thing.
What could of kept us up was many many thing's other than Muric's last 10 game's
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 947 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
The previous management has gone so I don't see why Muric should want to leave because of last season. It should give him a new opportunity to prove himself.
I suspect it's more likely that either Parker is OK with him going or Muric wants another go at The Premier League - and who can blame him for that. He'll also likely get more money presumably, and another few years contract.
I suspect it's more likely that either Parker is OK with him going or Muric wants another go at The Premier League - and who can blame him for that. He'll also likely get more money presumably, and another few years contract.
-
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
- Been Liked: 385 times
- Has Liked: 288 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Can we also just accept that Ipswich are now in the PL and it’s considered a move up for him.
He has an opportunity to stay in the Premier League
I’ll be gutted if he’s going but I wish him the very best
Ipswich play attractive football so I see exactly why they want him.
If they don’t stay up though - I think he could end up being a less attractive purchase to PL teams next time
UTC
He has an opportunity to stay in the Premier League
I’ll be gutted if he’s going but I wish him the very best
Ipswich play attractive football so I see exactly why they want him.
If they don’t stay up though - I think he could end up being a less attractive purchase to PL teams next time
UTC
-
- Posts: 3697
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 791 times
- Has Liked: 185 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Thank you for the apology. It is gratefully accepted.AGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 6:47 amNonayforever I'll apologise for that childish comment I made to you.
Not an excuse but a reason to why I did that is anything to do with my mother is a raw subject, just over 2 years ago out of the blue she suffered a brain hemorrhage and that changed her life and ours for ever.
Even though she was 81 at the time she walked from Harle syke everyday to the St Peter's centre in Burnley to swim for an hr then walk home again, she was a very physical fit lady for her age, The hemorrhage kept her in hospital for over a year and she now lives in a nursing home with hardly any memory and in a wheelchair, she's an ex nurse and knows more than most what this did to her.
The reason I've said all this is I know I come out with stupid things at time but we all need to think before we post.
Once again I opologise I shouldn't of bitten.
I am so sorry to hear about your mother.
My mother is 85 and thankfully in good health and follows Burnley with a passion still.
We are all Burnley fans and should stick together not bicker.
Difference of opinion is good, it sometimes needs phrasing better in some cases and I am probably guilty of this just like many others.
Onwards and upwards.
These 4 users liked this post: AGENT_CLARET Bosscat longsidepies Middle-agedClaret
-
- Posts: 8777
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2332 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Reading posts on here in the last few days I hope Scotty can steady the ship and morale within-probably for me his biggest initial task, as we have some very talented players. We want to see the potential of these players developed in our team rather than them go to our competitors. Having said that we have a few that need to find other clubs and I hope Jackson can provide constructive feedback for Scotty on players like Twine, McNally, Obefemi and Roberts to name a few
-
- Posts: 13300
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1990 times
- Has Liked: 391 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Your right,
Specifically at premier league level. That league is dominated with the best keepers in the world and if I’m honest I think Muric has found his level.
Somewhere like an Ipswich fighting relegation is probably right.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I think this is a bad move from us and also maybe a bad one for Muric.
I think had he featured more last year/had the full season he would have got a much better move and a much bigger fee.
I appreciate he made two very costly errors. But out of the 10 games or so that he played I thought he was MOM or close to in the other 8. I just don't think 8-10m is fair value for him personally.
I think had he featured more last year/had the full season he would have got a much better move and a much bigger fee.
I appreciate he made two very costly errors. But out of the 10 games or so that he played I thought he was MOM or close to in the other 8. I just don't think 8-10m is fair value for him personally.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
10m rising to 15m seems like a fair price to me.
Cooper from Plymouth or Rushworth on loan from Brighton would be two very good replacements for 5m/loan fee.
Cooper from Plymouth or Rushworth on loan from Brighton would be two very good replacements for 5m/loan fee.
-
- Posts: 5293
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2964 times
- Has Liked: 837 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Once a player wants to leave you just have to get the best price you can for them so I'm not sure how its a bad nove from us. It's pretty telling Ipswich are the only ones in for him.
-
- Posts: 17691
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3980 times
- Has Liked: 4933 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
There’s no way I want our main keeper to be a loanee.
If I’m honest I don’t know a lot about either of them, but both seem highly rated by fans.
Will Rushworth ever getting in ahead of Steele and Verbruggen? If he wants a shot at being #1 in a team that has a decent chance of reaching the premier league again, maybe he’d be open to a move?
Mory Diaw previously linked. Looks Muric-esque with his feet, but I can’t see us going down that route again for whatever reason. Hope we do have a plan anyway.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I want us promoted over anything so couldn’t care less if the keeper was on loan or not.NewClaret wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 9:59 amThere’s no way I want our main keeper to be a loanee.
If I’m honest I don’t know a lot about either of them, but both seem highly rated by fans.
Will Rushworth ever getting in ahead of Steele and Verbruggen? If he wants a shot at being #1 in a team that has a decent chance of reaching the premier league again, maybe he’d be open to a move?
Mory Diaw previously linked. Looks Muric-esque with his feet, but I can’t see us going down that route again for whatever reason. Hope we do have a plan anyway.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Timing.warksclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 10:46 pmJust an observation-we have been talking about signing Cooper at Plymouth for some time, in fact since before VK joined us. If he is such a good prospect why has not a PL side signed him
Suffered an injury at back end of Plymouth's promotion season so missed the start of their Championship season - so out injured through the summer transfer window. Prior to that Plymouth didn't want to sell as he was key to promotion in their eyes and he was under long term contract, he was then key to survival during at the January window. However, they have now stayed in the Championship and he is into the final year of his contract so they have to sell.
This user liked this post: warksclaret
-
- Posts: 17691
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3980 times
- Has Liked: 4933 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
We just have the problem next year then.
I assume we’re discounting Trafford staying here, in which case we could be selling £30-£40m of keepers. If we’re doing that we should be replacing them with a permanent solution.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I me we make £30m - £40m from the keepers it would presumably also encourage the Board to invest again in permanent signings.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Sure but if Rushworth (or another) is the best possible option and he helps us get promoted then so what, replacing one or two loanees shouldn’t be an issue. Almost every single promoted squad has loanees. Next year isn’t the focus.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Big sell on fee for Man City. Not sure how much will be left for Burnley, if 8-10 m.billyhamilton82 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 10:34 pmFully agree.
The success of this deal can only be assessed on who we replace him with.
As someone else has mentioned, Michael Cooper at Plymouth is a very good young keeper but not sure on his ability to play out from the back.
At 24 he would fit our buy and sell on for a profit strategy.
This may also mean we keep Trafford?
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1293 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I did ask who with a decent budget would be in for Muric and here’s the answer.
I did think we’d fetch £10m+ for him but once a player starts the missing training shenanigans they force your hand.
Interesting Wout is vilified by some but he at least had the good grace to come back to pre season training.
I did think we’d fetch £10m+ for him but once a player starts the missing training shenanigans they force your hand.
Interesting Wout is vilified by some but he at least had the good grace to come back to pre season training.
-
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1457 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Muric to Ipswich
It's quickly become an article of faith on here that Muric has refused to come back to pre season training. Given Trafford doesn't seem to be there either, and given their international commitments in June ended one day apart, does this not seem like a bit of a rush to judgement?
-
- Posts: 19796
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4202 times
- Has Liked: 2247 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
It's a little bizarre that we would be looking for loans when we have the biggest squad in our history.
-
- Posts: 8597
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2687 times
- Has Liked: 2381 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I'll not lose any sleep with this one, I liked him in the way we played under VK, arguably one of the best keepers in the world with his feet, but still scared me to death
Re: Muric to Ipswich
It doesn’t matter if he did or didn’t return to pre-season training. Muric has or is leaving. He is the past.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 11:02 amIt's quickly become an article of faith on here that Muric has refused to come back to pre season training. Given Trafford doesn't seem to be there either, and given their international commitments in June ended one day apart, does this not seem like a bit of a rush to judgement?
Not sure why Trafford gets brought into the equation.
Hopefully Trafford is out of door too and we can move on from Muric v Trafford debate.
This user liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Is Andy Farrell still registered? Did a fine job as a sub goalkeeper in one match. Think he played all 11 positions in his time with us
-
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:50 am
- Been Liked: 497 times
- Has Liked: 571 times
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Excluding add ons for both buying and selling and based on the lowest figure quoted.
Bought for 3 m Euros and sold for (£8m) 9.3m Euros
9.3m - 3m = Profit of 6.3m Euros
Man City 25% sell on profit receive 1.575 Euros.
Therefore BFC receive 4.725m Euros as profit.
Approximately £4m profit.
Obviously if it is based on £10m as has been suggested we receive more.
If we wanted to, from figures mentioned it would suggeest we could buy Michael Cooper with the profit generated from the Muric deal alone.
Good business IMO
-
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1457 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I think it does matter a bit if people are slagging him off for something he might not have actually done.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Posters all season have slagged off players for something they have not actually done. That appears to be fair game however the slightest criticism of Muric and some posters go into meltdown.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 12:53 pmI think it does matter a bit if people are slagging him off for something he might not have actually done.
I really don’t care, Muric is no longer a Claret and does not want to be a Claret. It’s goodbye from me.
As I said, I hope both go.
Re: Muric to Ipswich
I've not got too many examples in my mind of relegated clubs not selling players.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 2:51 pmWe don’t have to sell
We have parachute payments
We will most likely have relegation clauses so wages aren’t a problem
He probably wants to go, that’s the only thing
Re: Muric to Ipswich
Hi quoonbeatz
"Some incredible passing at times, better than the vast majority of keepers at that level .... and great fun to have when he's in a team that is miles better than the rest. "
I think the end of your sentence best sums him up.
He made a number of clangers in the Championship but we scored so many it usually didn't matter. That was obviously completely different last season.
We need a "standard" experienced keeper. No frills. One who does the essentials and can command his defence.
"Some incredible passing at times, better than the vast majority of keepers at that level .... and great fun to have when he's in a team that is miles better than the rest. "
I think the end of your sentence best sums him up.
He made a number of clangers in the Championship but we scored so many it usually didn't matter. That was obviously completely different last season.
We need a "standard" experienced keeper. No frills. One who does the essentials and can command his defence.
This user liked this post: Quicknick