Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 948 times
Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
I get why the shortage of quality players but I don't understand why Egan-Riley (1 Premier and 3 Championship appearances) was chosen ahead of McNally (60 Championship appearances).
For those who saw the match and seen McNally play, have you any comments to make?
For those who saw the match and seen McNally play, have you any comments to make?
-
- Posts: 1750
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 451 times
- Has Liked: 631 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Thought he was one of the ‘better’ players tbh
-
- Posts: 3079
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
- Been Liked: 649 times
- Has Liked: 155 times
- Location: the ghost in the atom
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
McNally going to Coventry i believe
-
- Posts: 6757
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1274 times
- Has Liked: 329 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
For me Parker should of gone to a back 3, even if he didn’t want to throw Humphreys in then go with eganriley mcnally and esteve with roberts and pires
-
- Posts: 3413
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1290 times
- Has Liked: 449 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
At a guess (and going from SP's comments about players who dont want to be here), the squad is being factored into 3 bands:
1. Players that want to be here.
2. Players who are still applying a good work ethic and may/may not leave.
3. Those who want out or are one foot out the door.
I think McNally probably falls into the second category, whereas Egan-Riley is in the first, ergo he got first shout at the starting place. Applying that logic however does leave me intrigued as to where Trafford stands.
It does explain the lack of O'shea, Weghorst, etc.
1. Players that want to be here.
2. Players who are still applying a good work ethic and may/may not leave.
3. Those who want out or are one foot out the door.
I think McNally probably falls into the second category, whereas Egan-Riley is in the first, ergo he got first shout at the starting place. Applying that logic however does leave me intrigued as to where Trafford stands.
It does explain the lack of O'shea, Weghorst, etc.
These 2 users liked this post: boatshed bill Hipper
-
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2269 times
- Has Liked: 1372 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Where is as Worrall ? Surely we signed him exactly for a situation like today ? In his signing interview he said he was fit and raring to go !!! Not even on the bench
-
- Posts: 12231
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 6022 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Easy to say but how far out did he know O'Shea wouldn't be involved? Changing personnel late in the week is one thing, changing the formation is much more difficult.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 9:13 pmFor me Parker should of gone to a back 3, even if he didn’t want to throw Humphreys in then go with eganriley mcnally and esteve with roberts and pires
-
- Posts: 12231
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 6022 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Where has SP said players don't want to be here?Darthlaw wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 9:14 pmAt a guess (and going from SP's comments about players who dont want to be here), the squad is being factored into 3 bands:
1. Players that want to be here.
2. Players who are still applying a good work ethic and may/may not leave.
3. Those who want out or are one foot out the door.
I think McNally probably falls into the second category, whereas Egan-Riley is in the first, ergo he got first shout at the starting place. Applying that logic however does leave me intrigued as to where Trafford stands.
It does explain the lack of O'shea, Weghorst, etc.
Edit- just seen the clip of his press conference on the post-match thread. I'd only seen his interview
-
- Posts: 17329
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3557 times
- Has Liked: 7809 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Knowing the situation with O'Shea they may have been working on the selected back four before the Worrall signing.
This user liked this post: Tricky Trevor
-
- Posts: 6757
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1274 times
- Has Liked: 329 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Yes it is and maybe the fact koleosho was with the squad it was a decision made extremely last minute that he was going to be fit.TheFamilyCat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 9:16 pmEasy to say but how far out did he know O'Shea wouldn't be involved? Changing personnel late in the week is one thing, changing the formation is much more difficult.
-
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2528 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
It’s early days, but our attacking strategy appears to be to consistently knock the ball about across the back 4 and launch a ball in behind to the oppo who we’ve tried to lure forward.
It worked well vs Luton and Cardiff, but it looked predictable today and the approach wasn’t helped by a downgrade in ability and pace compared to those opening games.
I hope we’ve got more variety up our sleeve than tiki-whacka.
It worked well vs Luton and Cardiff, but it looked predictable today and the approach wasn’t helped by a downgrade in ability and pace compared to those opening games.
I hope we’ve got more variety up our sleeve than tiki-whacka.
-
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
- Been Liked: 451 times
- Has Liked: 283 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Who sanctioned the signing of Houtondji? Serious question, coz we have spunked £3M -£4M on this pup. I’ve seen better quality in the National League. We’ve seriously had our kecks down on this deal. And why in Gods name did he start today? Was SP making a point?
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 948 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
How far off being fit is Redmond?
Desperately need more attacking options
Desperately need more attacking options
-
- Posts: 6413
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3169 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Let's settle down. This is a young boy moving to a different country and a higher level making his debut out of position.Claretitus wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 10:37 pmWho sanctioned the signing of Houtondji? Serious question, coz we have spunked £3M -£4M on this pup. I’ve seen better quality in the National League. We’ve seriously had our kecks down on this deal. And why in Gods name did he start today? Was SP making a point?
These 3 users liked this post: wilks_bfc RVclaret Swizzlestick
-
- Posts: 13241
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3725 times
- Has Liked: 2144 times
- Contact:
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
It never ceases to surprise me how quick some people are writing off players based on 1 or 2 games, especially when as you say playing out of positionclaretspice wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 10:53 pmLet's settle down. This is a young boy moving to a different country and a higher level making his debut out of position.
I thought he was the only one up of the forward players looking to find some space, which he often did, but nobody was making the pas to him
-
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1432 times
- Has Liked: 1585 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Biggest mystery was playing Jay Rod when Zeki is on the bench
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
It's not a mystery if he's sold in the coming days.AGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 9:48 amBiggest mystery was playing Jay Rod when Zeki is on the bench
-
- Posts: 13241
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3725 times
- Has Liked: 2144 times
- Contact:
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
The way Zeki was warming up during half time I was expecting him to be on from the break tbhAGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 9:48 amBiggest mystery was playing Jay Rod when Zeki is on the bench
-
- Posts: 4175
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1432 times
- Has Liked: 1585 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Probably, but would still explain the mysteryAGENT_CLARET wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 9:55 amHe wouldn't have been on the bench if he's being sold just like O'Shea wasn't
-
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
- Been Liked: 608 times
- Has Liked: 212 times
- Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Realistically Parker didn’t have a lot of options with two keepers and six players on the bench who have never made a start for us.
As he said himself afterwards the situation is changing by the hour and he hadn’t given any thought at all to the Wolves game as presumably he has no idea who will be available.
His most telling remarks though were about the performance or lack of it of the eleven he did put out.
As he said himself afterwards the situation is changing by the hour and he hadn’t given any thought at all to the Wolves game as presumably he has no idea who will be available.
His most telling remarks though were about the performance or lack of it of the eleven he did put out.
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Zeki should have been on at half time. Ridiculous he wasn’t.
This user liked this post: AGENT_CLARET
-
- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1745 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
He should’ve started. He’s our player, and if we’re that bothered about sorting a sale to Benfica, he shouldn’t have been on the squad.
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Yep I also accept both comments that he should have started.
-
- Posts: 4549
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1020 times
- Has Liked: 1606 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Amdouni and McNally should have started.
With no wingers available he should have played 532, with the 2 being Foster and Amdouni. We still don't seem to understand the importance of controlling cm.
Why was Dodgson not on the bench instead of 1 of the younger kids?
With no wingers available he should have played 532, with the 2 being Foster and Amdouni. We still don't seem to understand the importance of controlling cm.
Why was Dodgson not on the bench instead of 1 of the younger kids?
-
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
- Been Liked: 608 times
- Has Liked: 212 times
- Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
I wondered about this, maybe he is in the next shipment out of the club?summitclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:15 am
Why was Dodgson not on the bench instead of 1 of the younger kids?
-
- Posts: 4005
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 1919 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
I thought it was likely we had credible offers for McNally and AmdouniHipper wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 9:04 pmI get why the shortage of quality players but I don't understand why Egan-Riley (1 Premier and 3 Championship appearances) was chosen ahead of McNally (60 Championship appearances).
For those who saw the match and seen McNally play, have you any comments to make?
Not for CJER
-
- Posts: 4005
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 1919 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
SameClaretLoup wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:20 amI wondered about this, maybe he is in the next shipment out of the club?
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Hopefully Parker has a plan B, or can adapt a bit.
Im Not sure why we didn't go 442 sure up with 2 bsnks of 4, get someone around foster, and play for 2nds and/or set peices
Then see how it goes
We had 3 RB and 3 Strikers on the pitch playing in all sorts of positions, and they looked like no plan at all, just players thrown together and a get out there
Dare I say it, it was a very Southgate type selection and performance.
Hlin no way am i blaming Parker for the result, i think the fans and players were beaten at 2pm when yhe team sheet came out, however hopefully it was a bump in the road, and Parker shows he can adapt, set up and have a plan per opponent/game.
The very least I expect to see is maximum effort from all, I don't think I did yesterday and that was my concern.
Im Not sure why we didn't go 442 sure up with 2 bsnks of 4, get someone around foster, and play for 2nds and/or set peices
Then see how it goes
We had 3 RB and 3 Strikers on the pitch playing in all sorts of positions, and they looked like no plan at all, just players thrown together and a get out there
Dare I say it, it was a very Southgate type selection and performance.
Hlin no way am i blaming Parker for the result, i think the fans and players were beaten at 2pm when yhe team sheet came out, however hopefully it was a bump in the road, and Parker shows he can adapt, set up and have a plan per opponent/game.
The very least I expect to see is maximum effort from all, I don't think I did yesterday and that was my concern.
Re: Parker's Team Selection against Sunderland
Said the same myself - poor tactics from the manager when so short of experience in central midfieldsummitclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:15 amAmdouni and McNally should have started.
With no wingers available he should have played 532, with the 2 being Foster and Amdouni. We still don't seem to understand the importance of controlling cm.
I get he knows little from day to day re what players are going to be available (injuries or transfers) but you make the best of what you've got - two centre backs on the bench
Tactical formations are often changed within a game and these guys are professional enough to deal with changes even if forced upon them at the last moments