The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
-
- Posts: 10590
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 5400 times
- Has Liked: 1020 times
- Location: Leeds
The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
I’ve not seen this posted anywhere else and I wanted to keep it away from the Hannibal thread, because it’s more to do with refereeing.
I could completely be misinterpreting the situation but when Hannibal‘s number was put up, Brownhill, who was stood very close to the referee, went straight to him and started pointing towards the Burnley bench.
Hannibal was nearer to the far touchline and the referee was asking him to leave at the nearest point, which of course was the far side. Brownhill was insistent, I think, that Hannibal should be allowed to leave through the pitch, probably highlighting his safety as a result.
Whilst we can now laugh at the Hannibal heroics, as he went around the perimeter, giving it back to the frothing Leeds fans, Is it fair to say that a potentially nasty situation could have arisen there, easily preventable by the referee?
All of this, bearing in mind, that our goalkeeper had been hit by something thrown from the crowd as well, just previous?
I know that the referee was exercising the rules to the letter, but for me, just go to Hannibal and say jog off the pitch in this direction… No wasting time because you are already on a yellow card… Something like that.
I could completely be misinterpreting the situation but when Hannibal‘s number was put up, Brownhill, who was stood very close to the referee, went straight to him and started pointing towards the Burnley bench.
Hannibal was nearer to the far touchline and the referee was asking him to leave at the nearest point, which of course was the far side. Brownhill was insistent, I think, that Hannibal should be allowed to leave through the pitch, probably highlighting his safety as a result.
Whilst we can now laugh at the Hannibal heroics, as he went around the perimeter, giving it back to the frothing Leeds fans, Is it fair to say that a potentially nasty situation could have arisen there, easily preventable by the referee?
All of this, bearing in mind, that our goalkeeper had been hit by something thrown from the crowd as well, just previous?
I know that the referee was exercising the rules to the letter, but for me, just go to Hannibal and say jog off the pitch in this direction… No wasting time because you are already on a yellow card… Something like that.
These 4 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin bfcjg NewClaret Rick_Muller
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Spot on John 
-
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
- Been Liked: 973 times
- Has Liked: 593 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
If you watch the beginning of his walk off the pitch he was taking it in jest but someone must have said something as he turned round and did a step back to the crowd, couldn't see any more as the camera than went back onto the pitch. As with all rules, we as a footballing community need to be able to allow refs to ref with common sense. Problem is that there will always be the .01% which disagree with a refs decision and make it more difficult for them
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
You're right, John. It wasn't the best of ideas. Whilst part of me, I must admit, enjoyed seeing him "communicating" with the locals it's surprising nobody chucked something at him. We'd all be complaining if he'd copped a bottle or a coin.
-
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2943 times
- Has Liked: 829 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Absolutely could have been avoided, especially seeing as that ‘leave by the nearest exit’ rule is hardly ever enforced.
-
- Posts: 20415
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4516 times
- Has Liked: 2032 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
My main concern would be him picking up a second yellow with his antics and thus a suspension, as someone posted on the Hannibal thread.
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
I suspect Hannibal was more than happy to leave the pitch where he did and enjoy his lap of abuse. But yes, referees could use their common sense.
-
- Posts: 5424
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 977 times
- Has Liked: 354 times
- Location: Halifax
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Whilst I agree with the sentiment that the ref could have let Hannibal leave across the pitch and straight to the bench, Hannibal himself, whilst us as fans enjoyed it, could have been more restraint with his antics when walking through a situation like that.jdrobbo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:23 amI’ve not seen this posted anywhere else and I wanted to keep it away from the Hannibal thread, because it’s more to do with refereeing.
I could completely be misinterpreting the situation but when Hannibal‘s number was put up, Brownhill, who was stood very close to the referee, went straight to him and started pointing towards the Burnley bench.
Hannibal was nearer to the far touchline and the referee was asking him to leave at the nearest point, which of course was the far side. Brownhill was insistent, I think, that Hannibal should be allowed to leave through the pitch, probably highlighting his safety as a result.
Whilst we can now laugh at the Hannibal heroics, as he went around the perimeter, giving it back to the frothing Leeds fans, Is it fair to say that a potentially nasty situation could have arisen there, easily preventable by the referee?
All of this, bearing in mind, that our goalkeeper had been hit by something thrown from the crowd as well, just previous?
I know that the referee was exercising the rules to the letter, but for me, just go to Hannibal and say jog off the pitch in this direction… No wasting time because you are already on a yellow card… Something like that.
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
I think there is a very simple solution. Players run to their dugout when substituted unless clearly injured. Failure to do so and waste time yellow card and if they continue dragging their feet, a second yellow.
What happened with Hannibal was silly IMO. Mercifully it didnt happen against the Rovers, but the slow walk off the pitch is an irritation, as it never happens when the team is losing. (Unless it is us playing City in a bid to keep the goal difference down)
What happened with Hannibal was silly IMO. Mercifully it didnt happen against the Rovers, but the slow walk off the pitch is an irritation, as it never happens when the team is losing. (Unless it is us playing City in a bid to keep the goal difference down)
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
They were abusing Koleosho when he went off before Hannibal (the ref did the same thing of sending him off the opposite side to the dugout) too.claretburns wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:49 amWhilst I agree with the sentiment that the ref could have let Hannibal leave across the pitch and straight to the bench, Hannibal himself, whilst us as fans enjoyed it, could have been more restraint with his antics when walking through a situation like that.
-
- Posts: 2567
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 409 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Excellent pantomime villain gave it to them loads.
-
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1460 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Watching it back I was surprised one of the Leeds fans did not run on the pitch and go for him.
We are not talking about a normal set of fans here.
The referee used zero common sense as he must have known the Leeds fans reputation and to be fair he should have been more than aware that Hannibal is also no shrinking violet.
We are not talking about a normal set of fans here.
The referee used zero common sense as he must have known the Leeds fans reputation and to be fair he should have been more than aware that Hannibal is also no shrinking violet.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 937 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Did Trafford actually get hit bon the head? It wasn't shown or mentioned on TV, only Trafford rubbing his head and the ref coming over.
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 80 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Koleosho also had objects thrown towards him from the Leeds fans, just like Trafford and Hannibal got
When Leeds was last in the Prem this happened at Bellend Road on more than one occasion
They received zero punishment from the powers that be, Nothing will happen about the throwing objects onto the pitch once again by Leeds fans
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
It looked like it. Certainly went down in the second half. Too far away to tell what he might have been hit by. He didn't seem too troubled by it.
-
- Posts: 1995
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
- Been Liked: 290 times
- Has Liked: 531 times
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 937 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
A bit more here:
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/sport/leed ... r-29938923
...where they also say it was a ball and Trafford made a lot of it, which I can believe.
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/sport/leed ... r-29938923
...where they also say it was a ball and Trafford made a lot of it, which I can believe.
-
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2662 times
- Has Liked: 2357 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
You say jog off but I've never understood why players are told to hurry up, nobody would bat an eyelid if it was 5 minutes into the game and a player walked off.jdrobbo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:23 amI’ve not seen this posted anywhere else and I wanted to keep it away from the Hannibal thread, because it’s more to do with refereeing.
I could completely be misinterpreting the situation but when Hannibal‘s number was put up, Brownhill, who was stood very close to the referee, went straight to him and started pointing towards the Burnley bench.
Hannibal was nearer to the far touchline and the referee was asking him to leave at the nearest point, which of course was the far side. Brownhill was insistent, I think, that Hannibal should be allowed to leave through the pitch, probably highlighting his safety as a result.
Whilst we can now laugh at the Hannibal heroics, as he went around the perimeter, giving it back to the frothing Leeds fans, Is it fair to say that a potentially nasty situation could have arisen there, easily preventable by the referee?
All of this, bearing in mind, that our goalkeeper had been hit by something thrown from the crowd as well, just previous?
I know that the referee was exercising the rules to the letter, but for me, just go to Hannibal and say jog off the pitch in this direction… No wasting time because you are already on a yellow card… Something like that.
Just stop the watch
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Taking an age to leave the pitch near the end when perhaps under the cosh stops the momentum of the game. We see this when players go down "injured" near the end of a game too.
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Just imagine if a dirty Leeds player was made to leave the pitch like Hannibal did at the Turf. I'm sure the Clarets fans would applause him all the way round to the dugout. 

-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Trafford was hit with the ball
This user liked this post: NewClaret
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Trafford was hit in the back of the head by a ball thrown from the crowd. He didn’t see it coming so it must have come as a bit of a surprise, but he dropped to the ground and milked it for a few seconds before thinking better of it.
This user liked this post: NewClaret
-
- Posts: 17424
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3926 times
- Has Liked: 4893 times
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
Re: the OP, completely agree with John and was considering posting something myself after we’d all enjoyed Hannibal’s ****housery to the maximum.
Sending an ex Man United player around the touch line at Elland Road is just brainless refereeing and definitely a player welfare issue.
I’m glad Hannibal gave it to them - a lesser player might not and instead had to unnecessarily suffer a load of abuse or got hurt - and hopefully the authorities reflect on it and avoid it in future.
Regarding Trafford, I agree it was a shock and he wasn’t to know it was a ball, but he got up pretty quickly thereafter.
Sending an ex Man United player around the touch line at Elland Road is just brainless refereeing and definitely a player welfare issue.
I’m glad Hannibal gave it to them - a lesser player might not and instead had to unnecessarily suffer a load of abuse or got hurt - and hopefully the authorities reflect on it and avoid it in future.
Regarding Trafford, I agree it was a shock and he wasn’t to know it was a ball, but he got up pretty quickly thereafter.
Re: The Hannibal substitution (player welfare)
And yet when teams want to make a swift change, because they are chasing the game, players just step off on the far side.quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:31 amAbsolutely could have been avoided, especially seeing as that ‘leave by the nearest exit’ rule is hardly ever enforced.