Mike Dean

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Stonehouse
Posts: 1665
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Mike Dean

Post by Stonehouse » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:24 pm

Sorry to be posting again but the Spurs player drags a man back and Dean says it’s not a second card because in effect the games done ,so how did Zaroury get sent off against City when we were 3 down with not long to go?

Rileybobs
Posts: 18784
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7701 times
Has Liked: 1594 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:25 pm

Another ridiculous comment from Mike Dean. No wonder our referees are so poor when they feel it is acceptable to make things up as they go along.
This user liked this post: tarkys_ears

Rileybobs
Posts: 18784
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7701 times
Has Liked: 1594 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:27 pm

Also, the incident was nothing like Zaroury’s which was a straight red card.

Ric_C
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 1022 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Ric_C » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:28 pm

I guess in the old fashioned terms, it is the equivalent of "applying common sense" which seems to have gone out of the window in the last 10-20 years.

As for the player, I've watched him twice in the last week and he could have walked quite easily in both games.

fatboy47
Posts: 5364
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2892 times
Has Liked: 3254 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Mike Dean

Post by fatboy47 » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:30 pm

I'll not hear a word against Deano.

Stonehouse
Posts: 1665
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Stonehouse » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:31 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:27 pm
Also, the incident was nothing like Zaroury’s which was a straight red card.
It was that much a straight red that the ref didn’t give it but VAR picked it up.

Spijed
Posts: 18061
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3055 times
Has Liked: 1327 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Spijed » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:39 pm

Ric_C wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:28 pm
I guess in the old fashioned terms, it is the equivalent of "applying common sense" which seems to have gone out of the window in the last 10-20 years.

As for the player, I've watched him twice in the last week and he could have walked quite easily in both games.
Surely though, if a player commits a bookable offence it should be a yellow card regardless of the score or how long left in the game.

ksrclaret
Posts: 8073
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 3060 times
Has Liked: 867 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:40 pm

Just shows that refs really can’t win.

I dread to think of the comments on here if we’d have had a player sent off for what Bergvall did in the other half in added time when the game is already lost.

How many times are refs asked to use common sense? That’s what happened there and Mike Dean tried to articulate that, although rather badly.
This user liked this post: summitclaret

Stonehouse
Posts: 1665
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Stonehouse » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:45 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:40 pm
Just shows that refs really can’t win.

I dread to think of the comments on here if we’d have had a player sent off for what Bergvall did in the other half in added time when the game is already lost.

How many times are refs asked to use common sense? That’s what happened there and Mike Dean tried to articulate that, although rather badly.
Totally agree with Mike Dean it’s a pity that things preached aren’t practiced ,can remember Inchy being sent off for time wasting for chipping the ball over Shaka Hislop when we were losing ,all we want is a common sense approach.

Spijed
Posts: 18061
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3055 times
Has Liked: 1327 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Spijed » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:47 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:40 pm
Just shows that refs really can’t win.

I dread to think of the comments on here if we’d have had a player sent off for what Bergvall did in the other half in added time when the game is already lost.
But what happens if a player doesn't get a second yelllow card at the end of a game "because the game is already lost" and then goes on to score the winning goal in the next match, when they should really be suspended?

Is that common sense, or even fair?
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 12250
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 6028 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:48 pm

I don't think common sense should come into it. A bookable offence is a bookable offence, whatever minute of the game and whatever the score.

How would you feel if a key Leeds or Sheffield United player was "let off" and avoiding suspension in the game before we played them?
These 2 users liked this post: bobinho Goodclaret

Rileybobs
Posts: 18784
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7701 times
Has Liked: 1594 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:49 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:40 pm
Just shows that refs really can’t win.

I dread to think of the comments on here if we’d have had a player sent off for what Bergvall did in the other half in added time when the game is already lost.

How many times are refs asked to use common sense? That’s what happened there and Mike Dean tried to articulate that, although rather badly.
That’s inconsistently applying the laws of the game though. There was enough time in the game for Bergvall to score a goal which has an impact on the league table. He is also now available for their next match which not only gives Spurs an advantage they shouldn’t have had but gives their opponents a disadvantage

I think Dean’s last couple of controversial comments (the other being the daft comment about there being a different bar for a foul because a game was a local derby) are really quite concerning - if indeed the same views are held by the PGMOL, which they may not be.
This user liked this post: Goodclaret

ksrclaret
Posts: 8073
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 3060 times
Has Liked: 867 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:51 pm

If Hamer scores the winner on Wednesday, but it turned out he shouldn’t really have been playing because he kicked the ball out in added time in the previous game, I don’t think there would be much fuss, aside from a handful of nerds on the internet.

Common sense is fine.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18784
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7701 times
Has Liked: 1594 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:52 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:51 pm
If Hamer scores the winner on Wednesday, but it turned out he shouldn’t really have been playing because he kicked the ball out in added time in the previous game, I don’t think there would be much fuss, aside from a handful of nerds on the internet.

Common sense is fine.
What’s the common sense though?

ksrclaret
Posts: 8073
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 3060 times
Has Liked: 867 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:59 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:52 pm
What’s the common sense though?
Let’s call it the context of the game. It’s not definable but we all know when we we’ve seen a daft decision that has applied the rules of the game to the letter when it really wasn’t necessary.

Anyway, it’s just my opinion that I prefer them to ref that way. No biggie.

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 12250
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 6028 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:01 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:59 pm
Let’s call it the context of the game. It’s not definable but we all know when we we’ve seen a daft decision that has applied the rules of the game to the letter when it really wasn’t necessary.

Anyway, it’s just my opinion that I prefer them to ref that way. No biggie.
You may as well do away with rules and let refs make it up as they go along then.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18784
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7701 times
Has Liked: 1594 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:04 pm

ksrclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:59 pm
Let’s call it the context of the game. It’s not definable but we all know when we we’ve seen a daft decision that has applied the rules of the game to the letter when it really wasn’t necessary.

Anyway, it’s just my opinion that I prefer them to ref that way. No biggie.
Yeah, not looking for an argument, I just feel the exact opposite. The referee should not be able to judge at what point they feel that a decision is necessary. Where do you draw the line? Should they not give a clear penalty to a team that is winning 3-0 in injury time? Should they let a player off for violent conduct after the final whistle?

ksrclaret
Posts: 8073
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 3060 times
Has Liked: 867 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:05 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:01 pm
You may as well do away with rules and let refs make it up as they go along then.
Lol. This has got great “we might as well cancel Christmas” vibes when they don’t have the right cranberry sauce in Tesco.

taio
Posts: 12832
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by taio » Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:05 pm

The rules are the rules - the timing and circumstances ought to be irrelevant

ClaretTony
Posts: 77915
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38093 times
Has Liked: 5779 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Mike Dean

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:38 pm

Stonehouse wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:24 pm
Sorry to be posting again but the Spurs player drags a man back and Dean says it’s not a second card because in effect the games done ,so how did Zaroury get sent off against City when we were 3 down with not long to go?
Hardly comparable when one is a potential yellow and the other a straight red

Dark Cloud
Posts: 7596
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2301 times
Has Liked: 4099 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Dark Cloud » Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:42 pm

Dean is actually a good ref, but still should be applying the rules properly right up to (and sometimes beyond) the final whistle. Sending someone off with the game virtually over might appear unnecessary in terms of that game, but the player will get a suspension etc which could affect the next game and beyond.
These 2 users liked this post: Stonehouse Whitgord

Stonehouse
Posts: 1665
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
Been Liked: 421 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Stonehouse » Sun Dec 22, 2024 8:57 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:38 pm
Hardly comparable when one is a potential yellow and the other a straight red
Unfortunately we don’t know what a straight red is ,as I said before the ref didn’t deem it so and if the current set of tv pundits looked at it today would they say that there was intent or enough force used if it was a City or Arsenal player and also they might say Zaroury was really good to his mother and hadn’t got a nasty bone in his body. :D

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 10833
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 3143 times
Has Liked: 2541 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Tricky Trevor » Sun Dec 22, 2024 11:55 pm

More sh1te from Mike Dean. A yellow card is a yellow card minute 1 or minute 99. It is not the refs decision whether a player should pick up a ban for two yellows or not, he/she is there to enforce the laws of the game irrelevant of consequences.

RammyClaret61
Posts: 3473
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1225 times
Has Liked: 319 times
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Re: Mike Dean

Post by RammyClaret61 » Mon Dec 23, 2024 12:27 am

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:01 pm
You may as well do away with rules and let refs make it up as they go along then.
Referees are allowed to make it up in the context of the game. Many times they will play advantage.

The laws also use to say “in the opinion of the referee”. But we’ve gone so far the other way now, refereeing is virtually an impossible job. People want 1mm toenails flagged offside! Because the attacking player with size 11 feet is obviously gaining an unfair advantage over the size 9 defender!

Football is just crazily boring now.

dsr
Posts: 16283
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4883 times
Has Liked: 2597 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by dsr » Mon Dec 23, 2024 1:54 am

Is it actually a rule that the referee must book a player for pulling another man back? As far as I was aware, the referee had discretion in these matters.

Stanbill05
Posts: 603
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:48 pm
Been Liked: 167 times
Has Liked: 59 times

Re: Mike Dean

Post by Stanbill05 » Mon Dec 23, 2024 3:52 am

I thought Mike Dean was a decent ref, but talks rubbish more often than not when he's asked to comment. Not sure if he believes what he says every time or just wants to support the ref.

turfytopper
Posts: 1372
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:19 am
Been Liked: 436 times
Has Liked: 3589 times
Location: Crawley West Sussex

Re: Mike Dean

Post by turfytopper » Mon Dec 23, 2024 7:30 am

The referee got that one right. It wasn't as if the player was heading in on goal... So a free kick and a quiet word from the referee was enough.

Post Reply