The non-penalty on Flemming
The non-penalty on Flemming
How did Flemming end up being ajudged to have fouled the marker when the Rover was pulling his shirt off in the box?
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
No idea , strange one .
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
That's the most ever shirt pulls i've ever seen in any live game
These 5 users liked this post: longsidepies S0S-1971 tarkys_ears frankinwales k90bfc
-
- Posts: 34432
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6263 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
The ref was abysmal for both sides, embarrassing from the PGMOL to stick him in for that game
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Ref didn't have the bottle to give a penalty against the home team, had to make a decision though so the cop out is to give a freekick the other way so the Burnley players then have to get back to defend and can't hassle him as much.
These 3 users liked this post: Cubanforever Juan Tanamera IanMcL
-
- Posts: 6516
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1248 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
One of the worst decisions I’ve seen that, the game was to big for the ref today
This user liked this post: IanMcL
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
The shirt pulling is rife in the Championship
These 2 users liked this post: k90bfc AfloatinClaret
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
And, if he gives it, he would have to send Batth off. Totally bottled it.
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 140 times
- Has Liked: 39 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Sarimento was pulling one of their players which is what the ref blew for
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Says who? Didn’t look that way from what he pointed at.Ilkley claret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:41 pmSarimento was pulling one of their players which is what the ref blew for
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Even one of the Rovers fans said 'that's a penalty' when it happened.
-
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:11 am
- Been Liked: 253 times
- Has Liked: 74 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Looked like Sarmiento was the one being pulled about to me.
This user liked this post: bfcjg
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Would VAR have got involved, had it been available?
Genuinely don't know.
Obviously it should it these circumstances but would it have done?
Genuinely don't know.
Obviously it should it these circumstances but would it have done?
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2024 6:28 pm
- Been Liked: 28 times
- Has Liked: 2 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
What are the linesman their for,all those fowls on our players,were in front of their eyes,yet did not flag once,to assist what the Ref,cant see,baffling.
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Unbelievable decision.
-
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
- Been Liked: 421 times
- Has Liked: 429 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Don’t know if that was supposed to be a pun K90 but fowls are chickens should be fouls .
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
- Been Liked: 421 times
- Has Liked: 429 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Don’t know if you were being funny but fowls are chickens not fouls that bring free kicks.



This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 34432
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6263 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Game was too big for the ref, he missed loads for both sides. Laurent could easily have seen red, Cantwell could have been booked 47 times in the first half alone. PGMOL need to do better
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:26 pm
- Been Liked: 42 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
I understand refs not giving the pen there but at the same time a foul the other way is not good. No Burnley player committed a foul so not good. The non bookings were understandable but he left it too long, he will learn but VAR would have helped him. Hey ho I am not that bothered as I an just having a pint of Smug in the Gloaters Arms!
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2022 10:28 pm
- Been Liked: 129 times
- Has Liked: 6 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
I would love to ask Howard Webb or someone at the FA how that is a Blackburn free kick, but I know they will just come out with the “contact with consequence” boll@cks that actually doesn’t mean anything and actually isn’t said once in the laws of the game.
Refereeing seems like a racket. No consistency, awful decisions and making up laws and rules to please them and cover themselves. And it only seems to be getting worse.
Refereeing seems like a racket. No consistency, awful decisions and making up laws and rules to please them and cover themselves. And it only seems to be getting worse.
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Anyone got a video link?
Have to say it looked a blatant penalty live but haven't seen it back
Have to say it looked a blatant penalty live but haven't seen it back
-
- Posts: 13026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3666 times
- Has Liked: 2111 times
- Contact:
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
The full match is on the club web siteRoosterbooster wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 11:07 pmAnyone got a video link?
Have to say it looked a blatant penalty live but haven't seen it back
The incident is on the 1hr mark
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Because the ref blew for a foul by Flemming. Did you not know it is an offence to put your shirt in an opponents hand and make him appear pull it and making it look as if you are dragged to the ground.
You need to read the rule book on what constitutes a foul when playing WR positive football team (Wassermann Reaction-look it up).
-
- Posts: 1851
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
- Been Liked: 551 times
- Has Liked: 407 times
- Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
- Contact:
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
There was a similar event at Leeds a few years back. Meslier cleaned out Mee for a clear penalty and Barnes smashed the rebound home. The ref gave a foul to Leeds. Totally baffling but very similar to the clear foul on Flemming today. Perhaps refs are unofficially taught to do this when it's a potentially contentious decision, in a big match.
-
- Posts: 2078
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:16 am
- Been Liked: 655 times
- Has Liked: 637 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Shocking refereeing. I don't know who he was but it came across that the game was too big for him. Surprised our lads still had shirts to play in by the end.
As for the non-penalty. Looked like he bottled it.
As for the non-penalty. Looked like he bottled it.
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Absolutely extraordinary
At the time it looked like a blatant penalty
On further viewing, you can see the ref had an even better view , and is less than 10yds away, and gets it barn door wrong
To see that as a foul by Flemming tells you everything you need to know about the ref's competence. Like most refs this season, he just wasn't good enough.
I can forgive making genuine mistakes. But that's not a genuine error. You can't give that decision without wanting to preemptively penalise Burnley
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
The ball was out of play at the time but had to laugh when that guy actually pulled Cullen shirt off.
-
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 178 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Wow we posted the exact same thing at the same time, FTA!.
-
- Posts: 2603
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 367 times
- Has Liked: 975 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Yes yellow card that for scoring and taking off, so yellow for their playerFeedTheArf wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:36 pmDid have to laugh when Cullen got his shirt pulled clean off at a corner

-
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
- Been Liked: 775 times
- Has Liked: 126 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
I've never seen a player fouled as many times and not get free kicks...Flemming was pushed, dragged and kicked all over the place without any protection...last laugh though..
-
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 897 times
- Has Liked: 270 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
They’re clearly desperate to get their hands on a Burnley shirt - at one point in the second half a Blackburn player fully removed Cullen’s shirt while tussling for a corner!ArmchairDetective wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 11:11 amShocking refereeing. I don't know who he was but it came across that the game was too big for him. Surprised our lads still had shirts to play in by the end.
As for the non-penalty. Looked like he bottled it.
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Wouldn't it have been an early Batth for Danny, too? Already on a yellow. So the ref saved himself from two big decisions with that one.
-
- Posts: 11477
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 1357 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Baker would have got a red for the late bad foul on Sarmiento in first 5 mins if VAR was in operation
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Hi mdd2,mdd2 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 11:09 amBecause the ref blew for a foul by Flemming. Did you not know it is an offence to put your shirt in an opponents hand and make him appear pull it and making it look as if you are dragged to the ground.
You need to read the rule book on what constitutes a foul when playing WR positive football team (Wassermann Reaction-look it up).
I'm not sure how to interpret your post.
I've just looked up Wassermann Reaction and you've lost me there.
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
The Wasserman Reaction (WR) was a test for syphilis and if you were WR positive it meant you had or had had active syphilis which is a venereal disease that has three phases, if untreated and can take tens of years to cause death. At all stages treatment cures the disease but if you are in stage 3 then quite of few of your organs like brain and heart will have been damaged beyond repair. I found it amusing that the "crudeness" of comments over many years about horses and incest, Rovers should unwittingly be positive for WR as emblazoned on their shirts-and felt I should point it out-but as you can see it has died a death
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2023 12:15 pm
- Been Liked: 160 times
- Has Liked: 119 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Quite amusing how cleanly it came off - couldn't do that again if they tried!FeedTheArf wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:36 pmDid have to laugh when Cullen got his shirt pulled clean off at a corner
-
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
- Been Liked: 740 times
- Has Liked: 1923 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
The current VAR situation is particularly disadvantageous to teams like Burnley:
When in the Championship (without VAR) we are a club who would likely see an overall benefit, being a 'footballing' side with lots (relative to our opponents) of fast, skilful players who their defenders struggle to deal with; those shirt-tugs are becoming a regular thing. However, when we get promoted back to the EPL, the opposite becomes true and we're the ones more often struggling to keep pace with the opposition, but doing so under VAR's all-seeing eye.
-
- Posts: 4912
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1215 times
- Has Liked: 1894 times
Re: The non-penalty on Flemming
Gotta say Fair Play to Castore. Their shirts sure are durable!Andreshotboots wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 4:04 pmI've never seen a player fouled as many times and not get free kicks...Flemming was pushed, dragged and kicked all over the place without any protection...last laugh though..