This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
winsomeyen
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
- Been Liked: 138 times
- Has Liked: 519 times
- Location: brittany France
Post
by winsomeyen » Sun Jan 19, 2025 4:51 pm
Newchurch Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 2:19 pm
Leeds and Sunderland are streets ahead of us as attacking forces. I don’t necessarily think they have better players overall, though our lack of pace all over the pitch was frightening on Friday (particularly Laurent, Roberts, Brownhill and Cullen, who all are as quick as a road roller), I just think that Parker’s tactics are horrendous. It’s so boring to watch, so slow, so negative and I think it will cost us in the second half of the season.
Leeds, Sunderland and Sheff U set up to win and actually try to do so. The way they play, Leeds and Sunderland in particular, has fans off their seat and it’s exiting to watch. Everything Parkerball isn’t. Look at the positive change the Sunderland manager made on Friday: 10 to go, 0-0 away from home. Settle for that? No, go two up front, go for it and two penalties (however dubious) and significant pressure resulted.
What did our manager do? Subs yes but changed absolutely nothing. Pass, pass, pass, sideways, backwards.
I hope I’m wrong but I’ve a feeling Monday’s match is going to be excruciating, which is so frustrating because I firmly believe that if we go for it we’ll overwhelm them, as with many other games I’ve witnessed home and away this season.
Half way through, the season just feels like a missed opportunity. We’re 3rd, which is great but with a tiny bit of ambition we’d have been ahead of the pack. Incredibly frustrating.
We could have Alan Shearer at his best and still not score under parkerball.
The problem lies with the manager and his setting up not to lose rather than the players.
This user liked this post: Newchurch Claret
-
Newcastleclaret93
- Posts: 13254
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1973 times
- Has Liked: 386 times
Post
by Newcastleclaret93 » Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:06 pm
Fairly confident Leeds and Sheffield go up as top two (as the squad currently stands) but things can change quickly.
-
mdd2
- Posts: 6963
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1839 times
- Has Liked: 760 times
Post
by mdd2 » Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:08 pm
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:06 pm
Fairly confident Leeds and Sheffield go up as top two (as the squad currently stands) but things can change quickly.
Agree with that unless we can start scoring goals
-
Blyclaret
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
- Been Liked: 374 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Post
by Blyclaret » Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:15 pm
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:06 pm
Fairly confident Leeds and Sheffield go up as top two (as the squad currently stands) but things can change quickly.
How can you say that with over 20games left
-
Blyclaret
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
- Been Liked: 374 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Post
by Blyclaret » Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:16 pm
Murger wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 3:57 pm
We won’t beat Leeds.
Thats it i like your confidence.
-
equinox
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:56 pm
- Been Liked: 386 times
- Has Liked: 69 times
Post
by equinox » Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:21 pm
If we could just stop giving away silly goals.
-
Goodclaret
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:44 pm
- Been Liked: 584 times
- Has Liked: 1794 times
Post
by Goodclaret » Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:27 pm
I don't get the "it's costing us" claims. We've conceded 9 goals in 27 games which is insane. We are 3rd, 3 points behind DL. We've lost 2 games all season. We've beaten both DL and Sheffield Utd. I get it we "could" be well clear without the 0-0's at the Turf but it's not like we are miles behind even playing as awful as some make it out on here. Statistically, if we continue as we have and don't lose against DL and SU, then the chances are we finish in the top two. Have a bit of faith guys - I know we aren't walking it like we did under VK but I fancy our chances more if we do go up under Parker than Kompany.
-
IanMcL
- Posts: 34720
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
- Been Liked: 6935 times
- Has Liked: 10350 times
Post
by IanMcL » Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:34 pm
To win the league, you play with intent to score, knowing you will usually score more than the other team. Leeds to that. Sheffield U, although not very good, do that. We play not to concede and then hope we score.
The other 2 knock over modt lesser teams. We often can't.
We cut back and pass back, dar to often. The opposition put up tents, waiting for our return!
There were signs that we are getting players forward, against Sunderland but not decisively., as yet.
-
Goodclaret
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:44 pm
- Been Liked: 584 times
- Has Liked: 1794 times
Post
by Goodclaret » Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:49 pm
IanMcL wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:34 pm
To win the league, you play with intent to score, knowing you will usually score more than the other team. Leeds to that. Sheffield U, although not very good, do that. We play not to concede and then hope we score.
The other 2 knock over modt lesser teams. We often can't.
We cut back and pass back, dar to often. The opposition put up tents, waiting for our return!
There were signs that we are getting players forward, against Sunderland but not decisively., as yet.
Totally get that Ian and, definitely Leeds, are much better at going forward than us BUT then concede 3 against Plymouth, for example! The fact is, after 27 games we are all so close meaning, whichever style being played, is getting similar results overall and that is the situation over a 46 game season.
-
Stonehouse
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2024 5:56 pm
- Been Liked: 421 times
- Has Liked: 429 times
Post
by Stonehouse » Sun Jan 19, 2025 6:01 pm
IanMcL wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:34 pm
To win the league, you play with intent to score, knowing you will usually score more than the other team. Leeds to that. Sheffield U, although not very good, do that. We play not to concede and then hope we score.
The other 2 knock over modt lesser teams. We often can't.
We cut back and pass back, dar to often. The opposition put up tents, waiting for our return!
There were signs that we are getting players forward, against Sunderland but not decisively., as yet.
Oh to have 2 pacy wingers that can beat the fullbacks on the outside,the best we have his Anthony whose ok but nowhere near dynamic enough and Koleshoe whose so predictable,it’s so disappointing because we’re very effective in what we do up to a point,and like GoodClaret says we’re still up,there but last time we were here just went from strength to strength.
-
Hipper
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Post
by Hipper » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:33 am
The beauty of football is that there are many different ways of playing.
We definitely do not have the quality to play like Leeds. They look the outstanding team, particularly in attack, and if Solomon and James aren't at it they can bring on Ramazani and Gnonto, all four of whom are better then anything we have. Bogle also bombs forward effectively and they are ably supported by a good midfield. The issue is their finishing that doesn't usually reflect all their attacking. They too do not have a conventional central striker. Their defence defence, particularly Struijk and Meslier, are suspect but they are also more exposed. Overall they are a very energetic side.
To be frank, I can't see how we can stop them and I expect a defeat on Monday. I hope I'm wrong.
-
IanMcL
- Posts: 34720
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
- Been Liked: 6935 times
- Has Liked: 10350 times
Post
by IanMcL » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:44 am
Goodclaret wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:49 pm
Totally get that Ian and, definitely Leeds, are much better at going forward than us BUT then concede 3 against Plymouth, for example! The fact is, after 27 games we are all so close meaning, whichever style being played, is getting similar results overall and that is the situation over a 46 game season.
Except at the run in, the winners win and the safe sides don't always.
If you have watched us over the tears every promotion has had that intensity.
-
Goliath
- Posts: 4006
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
- Been Liked: 770 times
- Has Liked: 289 times
Post
by Goliath » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:46 am
Goodclaret wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:27 pm
I don't get the "it's costing us" claims. We've conceded 9 goals in 27 games which is insane. We are 3rd, 3 points behind DL. We've lost 2 games all season. We've beaten both DL and Sheffield Utd. I get it we "could" be well clear without the 0-0's at the Turf but it's not like we are miles behind even playing as awful as some make it out on here. Statistically, if we continue as we have and don't lose against DL and SU, then the chances are we finish in the top two. Have a bit of faith guys - I know we aren't walking it like we did under VK but I fancy our chances more if we do go up under Parker than Kompany.
You're right, it is insane and it's also part of the problem. We are now so focused on that record that it's becoming our primary focus going into games.
-
aggi
- Posts: 9701
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 2338 times
Post
by aggi » Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:09 am
Goodclaret wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:27 pm
I don't get the "it's costing us" claims. We've conceded 9 goals in 27 games which is insane. We are 3rd, 3 points behind DL. We've lost 2 games all season. We've beaten both DL and Sheffield Utd. I get it we "could" be well clear without the 0-0's at the Turf but it's not like we are miles behind even playing as awful as some make it out on here. Statistically, if we continue as we have and don't lose against DL and SU, then the chances are we finish in the top two. Have a bit of faith guys - I know we aren't walking it like we did under VK but I fancy our chances more if we do go up under Parker than Kompany.
Statiscially we're currently on target for 90 points (Sheff Utd 94 and Leeds 95) which gets you promoted a bit less than half the time looking back. Although if you extrapolate based on the results from the last 6 or last 10 games we'd be coming top (with 97 or 99 points respectively).
We're the team outperforming their xG goal difference by far the most (mainly due to how many we've conceded compared to our xG against) which,
in theory, suggests we will start to concede more as the season wears on (although obviously there is a chance of continuing to defy the odds). If that does happen, and we have conceded a freakishly low number of goals so far, then we'd really need to improve our attacking performance to stay in with a chance.
-
taio
- Posts: 12821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
- Been Liked: 3585 times
- Has Liked: 405 times
Post
by taio » Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:09 am
Goliath wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:46 am
You're right, it is insane and it's also part of the problem. We are now so focused on that record that it's becoming our primary focus going into games.
Has this primary focus on the record been confirmed by Parker?
-
Blyclaret
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
- Been Liked: 374 times
- Has Liked: 3 times
Post
by Blyclaret » Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:19 am
Goliath wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:46 am
You're right, it is insane and it's also part of the problem. We are now so focused on that record that it's becoming our primary focus going into games.
I think you assume a lot. How do you know what we focus on. This is only an opinion of yours i presume or do you actually know. Have you heard it from the manager?
-
Goliath
- Posts: 4006
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
- Been Liked: 770 times
- Has Liked: 289 times
Post
by Goliath » Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:06 pm
I meant more psychologically than through instruction. You could see it clearly against Sunderland. We went into protective mode 2nd half and then went deeper and deeper when usually you'd expect the home team to push the opposition back towards the end at 0-0.
We looked terrified to concede