
Lyle Foster
-
- Posts: 9259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2747 times
- Has Liked: 2737 times
-
- Posts: 3284
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 737 times
- Has Liked: 64 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Show me this set up and see how foster performs with Flemming in his more natural position .
Trafford
Roberts cj Steve Humphreys
Cullen bronwhill
Anthony Flemming hannibal
Foster
Trafford
Roberts cj Steve Humphreys
Cullen bronwhill
Anthony Flemming hannibal
Foster
-
- Posts: 8517
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2259 times
- Has Liked: 1241 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Yes-worthy of a try.As I said above we need to persevere with Foster as Barnes and Rodriguez don’t offer any threatHedontplayforyou wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 10:53 pmShow me this set up and see how foster performs with Flemming in his more natural position .
Trafford
Roberts cj Steve Humphreys
Cullen bronwhill
Anthony Flemming hannibal
Foster
Re: Lyle Foster
Did you see his goal? He missed an absolute sitter, it bounced up, hit him on the arse and gave him a second bite at it.Stonehouse wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 7:35 pmThought his best game was against Reading where he attacked really well and had quite a few shots ,don’t know if that was the real Lyle Foster or because Reading weren’t very good.
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 187 times
Re: Lyle Foster
We've tried Foster up front without Fleming but he doesn't play with his back to goal well and bully centre halves so the ball doesn't stick. Flemming is much better at it than Lyle although not great.Hedontplayforyou wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 10:53 pmShow me this set up and see how foster performs with Flemming in his more natural position .
Trafford
Roberts cj Steve Humphreys
Cullen bronwhill
Anthony Flemming hannibal
Foster
It's worth a try but I think Parker plays him where he does for a reason.
-
- Posts: 8517
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2259 times
- Has Liked: 1241 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Silly me-I was confusing it with his cameo few minutes at Plymouth. It goes to show he is so ineffective these days you cant recall whether he played or not
Re: Lyle Foster
its a repetitive message - keep playing a sole striker will result in zero goals scored by this team in quite a few games.
Foster not up to that role and loses heart after an hour.
This makes us very easy to defend against, including very average opposition.
Foster not up to that role and loses heart after an hour.
This makes us very easy to defend against, including very average opposition.
Re: Lyle Foster
Interesting comment about Barnes as we've only seen about 10 seconds of him so far.warksclaret wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 11:15 pmYes-worthy of a try.As I said above we need to persevere with Foster as Barnes and Rodriguez don’t offer any threat
-
- Posts: 3284
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 737 times
- Has Liked: 64 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Foster wouldn’t have to play with his back to goal all the time if Flemming is supportingClaretPete001 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:05 amWe've tried Foster up front without Fleming but he doesn't play with his back to goal well and bully centre halves so the ball doesn't stick. Flemming is much better at it than Lyle although not great.
It's worth a try but I think Parker plays him where he does for a reason.
-
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 125 times
- Has Liked: 152 times
Re: Lyle Foster
He has scored 25 goals in 154 apps - not good enough.
Re: Lyle Foster
See my post on the first page of this thread.snapcrackleandpop wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:08 amHe has scored 25 goals in 154 apps - not good enough.
Look at his record over several years and it's poor for a supposed 'striker.'
Folk will eventually stop making excuses for him and come to the conclusion he's just not that good.
Re: Lyle Foster
Shite again from the supposed best forward in the division
-
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:54 pm
- Been Liked: 409 times
- Has Liked: 55 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Another terrible piece of business by ALK. Just not good enough and will leave for a fraction of the money we spent on him. One goal all season is proper rubbish.
-
- Posts: 9259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2747 times
- Has Liked: 2737 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Maybe it wasn’t just the purchase from ALK, in the previous MTB documentary Kompany was being judged on the signing of Foster, this criticism coming from members of the board. I’m sure his words were something like. ‘Trust me, he will come good’
He’s being played out of position, we all scream play foster with Fleming behind and as yet we’ve not seen them together.
SP needs to let the handbrake off on Tuesday and provide the home crown with an emphatic performance. Fail to deliver and the crowd will be turning!!
He’s being played out of position, we all scream play foster with Fleming behind and as yet we’ve not seen them together.
SP needs to let the handbrake off on Tuesday and provide the home crown with an emphatic performance. Fail to deliver and the crowd will be turning!!
Last edited by jackobfc on Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Lyle Foster
Maybe it wasn’t just the purchase from ALK, in the previous MTB documentary Kompany was being judged on the signing of Foster, this criticism coming from members of the board. I’m sure his words were something like. ‘Trust me, he will come good’colne-claret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:19 pmAnother terrible piece of business by ALK. Just not good enough and will leave for a fraction of the money we spent on him. One goal all season is proper rubbish.
He’s being played out of position, we all scream play foster with Fleming behind and as yet we’ve not seen them together.
SP needs to let the handbrake off on Tuesday and provide the home crown with an emphatic performance. Fail to deliver and the crowd will be turning!!
Re: Lyle Foster
Bronwhill a new signing thenHedontplayforyou wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 10:53 pmShow me this set up and see how foster performs with Flemming in his more natural position .
Trafford
Roberts cj Steve Humphreys
Cullen bronwhill
Anthony Flemming hannibal
Foster
-
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:54 pm
- Been Liked: 409 times
- Has Liked: 55 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Yeah fair point. We paid like 10 mil for him didn’t we? Remember saying Kompany he would turn out to be a bargain. Sadly, his mental health issues didn’t help, there’s nothing that we can do about that though. They seemed to support him well through that. Just not sure that he’s a natural goalscorer. He’s certainly not a left winger. I hope he comes good, just can’t see it.jackobfc wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:27 pmMaybe it wasn’t just the purchase from ALK, in the previous MTB documentary Kompany was being judged on the signing of Foster, this criticism coming from members of the board. I’m sure his words were something like. ‘Trust me, he will come good’
He’s being played out of position, we all scream play foster with Fleming behind and as yet we’ve not seen them together.
SP needs to let the handbrake off on Tuesday and provide the home crown with an emphatic performance. Fail to deliver and the crowd will be turning!!
-
- Posts: 6503
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1246 times
- Has Liked: 292 times
Re: Lyle Foster
We are 30 games in and we haven’t had Hannibal in his best position (next to Cullen) flemming in his best position (no 10) and foster in his best position (number 9) all start the same game
-
- Posts: 9805
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3095 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Hasn't kicked on like I'd have hoped this season which is a shame, he showed glimpses last year of having everything you need to be a top striker but... just hasn't happened this year.
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Il stick by the point of view
The system we are playing you could literally have Haaland up front and it wouldn’t matter
It’s everything, the style, the build play, the tempo. All of it is not conclusive for scoring goals.
On the flip side it’s also why our cbs look great. The longer the season is going on the more I am starting to think Parker doesn’t trust the CBs.
The system we are playing you could literally have Haaland up front and it wouldn’t matter
It’s everything, the style, the build play, the tempo. All of it is not conclusive for scoring goals.
On the flip side it’s also why our cbs look great. The longer the season is going on the more I am starting to think Parker doesn’t trust the CBs.
-
- Posts: 6503
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1246 times
- Has Liked: 292 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Edwards flemming AnthonyCoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:34 pmHasn't kicked on like I'd have hoped this season which is a shame, he showed glimpses last year of having everything you need to be a top striker but... just hasn't happened this year.
Foster
That should be the front 4 for the foreseeable with the run of games we have. You can have brownhill next to Cullen in games where we are going to dominate the ball
-
- Posts: 6503
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1246 times
- Has Liked: 292 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Our CBs are passing the ball to each other deeper and deeper as the games go onNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:37 pmIl stick by the point of view
The system we are playing you could literally have Haaland up front and it wouldn’t matter
It’s everything, the style, the build play, the tempo. All of it is not conclusive for scoring goals.
On the flip side it’s also why our cbs look great. The longer the season is going on the more I am starting to think Parker doesn’t trust the CBs.
Re: Lyle Foster
Stick Foster in Michael Carrick’s Boro up top and he’d look special in this league. It’s fair to say our (lack of) chance creation, for one reason or another, and general ‘focus’ on defensive structure (I feel this amazing defensive record has mentally got to the players and manager, understandably to some degree) is a bit of a hinderance for a striker.
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Lyle Foster
I am genuinely convinced at this point that Parker doesn’t actually rate them that highly.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:38 pmOur CBs are passing the ball to each other deeper and deeper as the games go on
Hes sacrificing nearly every aspect of forward play to ensure they are protected 90% of the time.
The tracking back that our wingers are doing is getting ridiculous. I was comparing heat maps of our wide players and other teams like Sheffield, Leeds and our average position has got to be nearly 15 yards further back
Re: Lyle Foster
Foster doesn't look good because Foster isn't goodRVclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:38 pmStick Foster in Michael Carrick’s Boro up top and he’d look special in this league. It’s fair to say our (lack of) chance creation, for one reason or another, and general ‘focus’ on defensive structure (I feel this amazing defensive record has mentally got to the players and manager, understandably to some degree) is a bit of a hinderance for a striker.
These 2 users liked this post: Dark Cloud Silkyskills1
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Think you’re 100% right.RVclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:38 pmStick Foster in Michael Carrick’s Boro up top and he’d look special in this league. It’s fair to say our (lack of) chance creation, for one reason or another, and general ‘focus’ on defensive structure (I feel this amazing defensive record has mentally got to the players and manager, understandably to some degree) is a bit of a hinderance for a striker.
Just look at chance creation stats, they are a joke
Re: Lyle Foster
:
It’s no wonder every striker we’ve tried this season has looked poor. They don’t stand a chance.
You’re right about the wide players average positions but I don’t think it’s just because they’re forced to track back. It’s also because they very, very rarely make runs ahead of the ball behind the defence, and they also have to come very deep to allow us to cycle the ball around the back so often.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:42 pmI am genuinely convinced at this point that Parker doesn’t actually rate them that highly.
Hes sacrificing nearly every aspect of forward play to ensure they are protected 90% of the time.
The tracking back that our wingers are doing is getting ridiculous was comparing heat maps of our wide players and other teams like Sheffield, Leeds and our average position has got to be nearly 15 yards further back
It’s no wonder every striker we’ve tried this season has looked poor. They don’t stand a chance.
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Lyle Foster
You’re totally right it’s all about system. The average position of our wide players and strikers tells you absolutely everything you need to know about us.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:50 pm:
You’re right about the wide players average positions but I don’t think it’s just because they’re forced to track back. It’s also because they very, very rarely make runs ahead of the ball behind the defence, and they also have to come very deep to allow us to cycle the ball around the back so often.
It’s no wonder every striker we’ve tried this season has looked poor. They don’t stand a chance.
We are compact side that very rarely pushes players forward.
There has got to be a reason Parker is making us play this way. What’s your thoughts on my CB theory?
Re: Lyle Foster
Not sure it’s much to do with him not rating the CBs that highly. Objectively they’re amongst the best in the league when it comes to duels, recovery pace, and positioning.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:53 pmYou’re totally right it’s all about system. The average position of our wide players and strikers tells you absolutely everything you need to know about us.
We are compact side that very rarely pushes players forward.
There has got to be a reason Parker is making us play this way. What’s your thoughts on my CB theory?
Parker has a bit of a history of playing negative football but has always had a striker who was way, way too good for the league to rely on. I think it’s his nature and preference to have us playing this way.
Re: Lyle Foster
I think you might have a point but in my opinion it's the full backs he doesn't rate not the centre backs. He's brought Sonne in surely to eventually take Roberts spot and he's showed no real confidence in our left back options either.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:42 pmI am genuinely convinced at this point that Parker doesn’t actually rate them that highly.
Hes sacrificing nearly every aspect of forward play to ensure they are protected 90% of the time.
The tracking back that our wingers are doing is getting ridiculous. I was comparing heat maps of our wide players and other teams like Sheffield, Leeds and our average position has got to be nearly 15 yards further back
-
- Posts: 9805
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3095 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Yeah if Edwards signs I agree.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:37 pmEdwards flemming Anthony
Foster
That should be the front 4 for the foreseeable with the run of games we have. You can have brownhill next to Cullen in games where we are going to dominate the ball
-
- Posts: 6709
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Play him in a two up top, for crying out loud.
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 438 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Lyle, like the other forwards we have, isn’t good enough.
People can moan all they want about Parker and his tactics, but our front 3 are bang average.
People can moan all they want about Parker and his tactics, but our front 3 are bang average.
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin
-
- Posts: 20415
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4516 times
- Has Liked: 2032 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Sorry, don't like saying this about a Claret, but he's practically f***ing useless.
-
- Posts: 6584
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1929 times
- Has Liked: 2869 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Lyle Foster
What has Foster achieved in two years here to convince you his best position is at centre forward?123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:33 pmWe are 30 games in and we haven’t had Hannibal in his best position (next to Cullen) flemming in his best position (no 10) and foster in his best position (number 9) all start the same game
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 610 times
- Has Liked: 438 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Flemming may be better suited playing with a partner, but I’ve seen nothing to suggest he’s any kind of ‘number 10.’123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:33 pmWe are 30 games in and we haven’t had Hannibal in his best position (next to Cullen) flemming in his best position (no 10) and foster in his best position (number 9) all start the same game
Foster, bar the odd game, has looked poor both up front and as a wide forward to me.
-
- Posts: 6503
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1246 times
- Has Liked: 292 times
Re: Lyle Foster
It’s clearly his best position, that’s not to say he’s actually that good but it’s his best positionSilkyskills1 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 10:50 pmWhat has Foster achieved in two years here to convince you his best position is at centre forward?
Re: Lyle Foster
Fleming plays deeper so it may be that their games would suit each other perfectly. Fleming coning short and doing most of the back to goal stuff. Foster stretching the play and trying to get in behindhelmclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 10:53 pmFlemming may be better suited playing with a partner, but I’ve seen nothing to suggest he’s any kind of ‘number 10.’
Foster, bar the odd game, has looked poor both up front and as a wide forward to me.
It's definitely worth a try over Sarmiento
Re: Lyle Foster
Where did Millwall play Flemming, when the my were getting the most out of him?
Re: Lyle Foster
That's spot on. Like the old Vokes and Ings partnership, Flemming coming deeper and providing a physical target with Foster making runs behind and drifting in from the left channel would surely get more out of both than the current set up.
But I would bet my house that for the rest of the season, Parker will not give this most logical of selection choices even a 1 minute outing.
Re: Lyle Foster
To be fair, that's probably not far off what we are aiming for at the moment. But Foster is caught in between. We seem to be a bit caught between systems and styles at the moment.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 11:06 pmThat's spot on. Like the old Vokes and Ings partnership, Flemming coming deeper and providing a physical target with Foster making runs behind and drifting in from the left channel would surely get more out of both than the current set up.
But I would bet my house that for the rest of the season, Parker will not give this most logical of selection choices even a 1 minute outing.
I'd even be tempted to give Koleosho another go on the left in a 442 with Edwards (presuming he signs) on the right with Fleming and Foster up top.
Re: Lyle Foster
So it’s still everyone else’s fault for his lack of ability even after two years
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin
-
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1741 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: Lyle Foster
If he didn’t trust the CBs, he’d have brought in the experience of Worrall and/or Egan a long time ago. Both CBs are clearly showing they are highly impressive operators. It’s just the way the manager plays - he’s terrified of losing. He was similarly cautious at Bournemouth and Fulham, as their fans have testified, but he had Premier League quality centre forwards in Solanke and Mitrovic to rely on. He doesn’t have that here - to compound that, he seems insistent on playing our main striker on the left and a player who has predominantly played in the 10 position up top.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:53 pmYou’re totally right it’s all about system. The average position of our wide players and strikers tells you absolutely everything you need to know about us.
We are compact side that very rarely pushes players forward.
There has got to be a reason Parker is making us play this way. What’s your thoughts on my CB theory?
Re: Lyle Foster
Solanke had been average - poor at Bournemouth until Parker arrived. The season before he got 14 goals in 46 and before that was regarded as an expensive flop in the Prem. Calling him a Premier League quality forward seems quite ‘after the fact’, when it was, ironically, under Parker where he had his breakout season.Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:56 amIf he didn’t trust the CBs, he’d have brought in the experience of Worrall and/or Egan a long time ago. Both CBs are clearly showing they are highly impressive operators. It’s just the way the manager plays - he’s terrified of losing. He was similarly cautious at Bournemouth and Fulham, as their fans have testified, but he had Premier League quality centre forwards in Solanke and Mitrovic to rely on. He doesn’t have that here - to compound that, he seems insistent on playing our main striker on the left and a player who has predominantly played in the 10 position up top.
As for ‘insistent’ on playing our ‘main striker’ on the left, it’s been what, 4/5 games, of which 2 he’s done quite well? Many had commented on Foster struggling with his back to goal and would be better with space to run into… it’s been worth a try, in my view.
This user liked this post: CoolClaret
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Lyle Foster
I don’t think it is the way the manager plays though.Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:56 amIf he didn’t trust the CBs, he’d have brought in the experience of Worrall and/or Egan a long time ago. Both CBs are clearly showing they are highly impressive operators. It’s just the way the manager plays - he’s terrified of losing. He was similarly cautious at Bournemouth and Fulham, as their fans have testified, but he had Premier League quality centre forwards in Solanke and Mitrovic to rely on. He doesn’t have that here - to compound that, he seems insistent on playing our main striker on the left and a player who has predominantly played in the 10 position up top.
If you look at his two promotion teams none of them were this cautious. Even the creativity stats were considerably better in those sides.
So none of what you’re saying really lines up.
He may think the two CBs are quality, but his system and strategy in games is starting to tell me something completely different. Even under Dyche we didn’t protect our cbs as much as we do now.
Re: Lyle Foster
It seems that way doesn't it. Anyone with eyes can see that 8 goals in 56 appearances isn't a blip. We're not suddenly going to see a new Lyle Foster burst out of the traps between now and May. He's never been a consistent goalscorer at any level, and there's a very good reason for that! We all want our players to succeed, but sometimes not even blind faith is enough. He's not an Ings type, he's not a Blake type, he's not a Payton type, he's not a Wood type, he's not a Gray (Andy or Andre!) type... I genuinely don't know what he is. I do know he's not a Champsonship striker though, and never will be.
This user liked this post: Steve-Harpers-perm
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2025 8:59 pm
-
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1474 times
- Has Liked: 1462 times
Re: Lyle Foster
He can play wide left then. A danger throughout the game , just needs a goal boost
This user liked this post: Pearcey