Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
-
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:43 am
- Been Liked: 137 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
Be interested to see what posters thought about his involvement in our second goal. Was it a foul, a coming together or was it more dark arts as has been mentioned in another thread?
-
- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 936 times
- Has Liked: 1794 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
Certainly assisted the goal
These days however shirt pulling and “ barging” goes unpunished in all 4 divisions or there would be free kicks/ penalties on a much more regular basis
These days however shirt pulling and “ barging” goes unpunished in all 4 divisions or there would be free kicks/ penalties on a much more regular basis
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
I would say it was Flemm just trying to get to the ball and nudging the guy who's screening him. Six of one, for me.
These 2 users liked this post: Tricky Trevor Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 12181
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5988 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
If that was a foul by Flemming so was the one (actually even more so) on Edwards on the edge of the area in the forst half
-
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 668 times
- Has Liked: 1204 times
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
It was exactly what most players should do. An acceptable amount of force. Any more extended arms..probably a foul. I thought it is what I should expect to feel, as a defender.
Goal.
Goal.
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
I'll also note that there is no immediate complaint from the supposedly fouled defender. He looks buggered at the outcome more than anything.
-
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 152 times
- Has Liked: 23 times
- Location: Leyland
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
No more than the push which got Antony’s goal disallowed an against WBA. But slightly less obvious as it was off the ball?
Also agree the defender didn’t complain which is normally a good sign of a fair challenge.
Also agree the defender didn’t complain which is normally a good sign of a fair challenge.
-
- Posts: 10448
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3071 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
Both were moving back towards the flight of the cross but neither would have got there.
Nothing to see for me.
Nothing to see for me.
-
- Posts: 11477
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 1357 times
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
Much ado about nothing
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
I think if the defender had gone down that ref would have ruled the goal out
-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
Never a foul
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
As I said on Bluesky, if that is under VAR and against an Arsenal or Liverpool defender, that is ruled out. In the moment, I thought it was a clear push and was waiting for the whistle.
But a PL defender is going to fling himself to the floor in that situation and a Championship level one isn't.
But a PL defender is going to fling himself to the floor in that situation and a Championship level one isn't.
This user liked this post: bobinho
-
- Posts: 3265
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1086 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
Agree, and the wba defender didn't complain either I remember. Neither a foulFather Jack wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 10:55 pmNo more than the push which got Antony’s goal disallowed an against WBA. But slightly less obvious as it was off the ball?
Also agree the defender didn’t complain which is normally a good sign of a fair challenge.
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
I don't think that's a foul under any interpretation of the rules and I also don't think it influenced proceedings. Hannibal's knock back would've been behind the defender regardless.
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
Never ever a foul.
Re: Flemm’s “push” for our 2nd goal
Edwards was visibly flattened, from the back.
This user liked this post: k90bfc