a roman burnley?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
yTib
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 701 times
Location: Château d'If

a roman burnley?

Post by yTib » Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:46 pm

going back to the heckenhurst ave thread, is there any evidence that there was a bigger roman influence in the area?

gorple road seems to be roman, as do the structures just to the north.

st. james's street is rumoured to be prehistoric as is ightenhill park lane leading to altham.

has any significant archaeology been done around the main town?

Pickles
Posts: 4267
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1626 times
Has Liked: 1416 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by Pickles » Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:48 pm

This just reminded me of Pavlyuchenko.

Rowls
Posts: 14648
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5644 times
Has Liked: 5864 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by Rowls » Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:12 pm

Pickles just reminded me of Pavyluchenko.

It's all too distressing.

yTib
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 701 times
Location: Château d'If

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by yTib » Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:17 pm

i doubt rowls has ever stood on gorple road or park lane ;)

exilecanada
Posts: 1213
Joined: Sat May 12, 2018 4:08 pm
Been Liked: 311 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by exilecanada » Wed Jul 02, 2025 7:17 pm

Sorry to hijack your Roman thread but Gorple Rd brings back fond memories. There was longish almost perfectly straight stretch of road where we could open up our cars. I had a '64 MG Midget and '68 MG 1300 which, for the period, could move along quite well. Good fun. :D
This user liked this post: yTib

Volvoclaret
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:45 pm
Been Liked: 710 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by Volvoclaret » Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:32 pm

Sorry to burst the Roman Rd bubble, but there is no evidence that Gorple was Roman. It is possibly an iron age track that later became a pack horse route. The bottom half was later cinder tracked when the reservoirs were being built and wooden buildings were erected that housed the Navvies.

Fez
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:06 am
Been Liked: 64 times
Has Liked: 142 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by Fez » Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:42 pm

Only possibility is roads passing through to Ribchester I think.

dougcollins
Posts: 9142
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 2371 times
Has Liked: 2343 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by dougcollins » Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:57 pm

exilecanada wrote:
Wed Jul 02, 2025 7:17 pm
and '68 MG 1300 which, for the period, could move along quite well. Good fun. :D
Was that the MGBGT?

elwaclaret
Posts: 9569
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2203 times
Has Liked: 3102 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by elwaclaret » Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:22 pm

One of my pet subjects… the A59 Ribchester was a major crossroads in the northwest, hence the fort. It linked York Blackburn and Preston mini forts (eg Walton Summit) to Lancaster and Cumbria. Along the A59 were around thirteen watchtowers between Ribchester and Colne. Above A59 Bowland was largely unoccupied away from the road to Lancaster. Up to about 100ad the Cumbri celts where hostile to Rome and attacked Ribchester led by Cartimandia’s estranged husband. Allied to Cumbri was another former Brigantia Confederation tribe the Setantii… they had been pushed from the North west coast by the Roman advance up the west coast, east, in all likelyhood these Celts settled in the forest of Blackborne… which included Pendle, Trawden and Rossendale forests.
This forest was not cut down until King John to King Henry VIII. Names likes Pendle Hill (three languages translation = hillhill hill) and other local names like Top Barr= top crest of hill… suggest Celtic roots along with later influences. The lack of roman finds away from thoroughfares suggests at no time was our part of east Lancs settled by romans, but was by Bryathian Celts… possibly the little known Satantii.
These 5 users liked this post: Fez mybloodisclaret JimmyRobbo evensteadiereddie yTib

Awayfromburnley
Posts: 804
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 8:08 am
Been Liked: 365 times
Has Liked: 70 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by Awayfromburnley » Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:31 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:22 pm
One of my pet subjects… the A59 Ribchester was a major crossroads in the northwest, hence the fort. It linked York Blackburn and Preston mini forts (eg Walton Summit) to Lancaster and Cumbria. Along the A59 were around thirteen watchtowers between Ribchester and Colne. Above A59 Bowland was largely unoccupied away from the road to Lancaster. Up to about 100ad the Cumbri celts where hostile to Rome and attacked Ribchester led by Cartimandia’s estranged husband. Allied to Cumbri was another former Brigantia Confederation tribe the Setantii… they had been pushed from the North west coast by the Roman advance up the west coast, east, in all likelyhood these Celts settled in the forest of Blackborne… which included Pendle, Trawden and Rossendale forests.
This forest was not cut down until King John to King Henry VIII. Names likes Pendle Hill (three languages translation = hillhill hill) and other local names like Top Barr= top crest of hill… suggest Celtic roots along with later influences. The lack of roman finds away from thoroughfares suggests at no time was our part of east Lancs settled by romans, but was by Bryathian Celts… possibly the little known Satantii.

Love this, could read this kind of localised knowledge all day long!
This user liked this post: elwaclaret

elwaclaret
Posts: 9569
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2203 times
Has Liked: 3102 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by elwaclaret » Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:56 pm

Awayfromburnley wrote:
Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:31 pm
Love this, could read this kind of localised knowledge all day long!
Further backing the theory of the Satantii controlling the area is that they may well have morphed into the Kingdom of Elmet, so long thought to be in West Yorkshire has now been pinpointed further west… to what we would now call “Brontë Country” by a large scale genetic mapping of ancient burials by University of Central London… this Kingdom remained distinctly Brythonic in DNA makeup until around 800ad… long after Bede and King Alfred and “Unified England” we always hear about… this is because the North West was not “England” but, as Bede put it “Strangers” I.e. “Welsh” - which now makes claims for Arthurian Myths and the Battle of Brunanbagh actually taking place around Lancashire first investigated serious in the Victorian era… less far fetched than has previously been supposed.
This user liked this post: Fez

Awayfromburnley
Posts: 804
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 8:08 am
Been Liked: 365 times
Has Liked: 70 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by Awayfromburnley » Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:57 pm

I had heard Brunanbagh was potentially around Worsthorne way

elwaclaret
Posts: 9569
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2203 times
Has Liked: 3102 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by elwaclaret » Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:03 pm

Awayfromburnley wrote:
Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:57 pm
I had heard Brunanbagh was potentially around Worsthorne way
Rossendale also has a claim… and what is thought to be remains of ramparts… though an excavation in the 60’s failed to find anything… modern experts point out they didn’t go deep enough (at 6’) as any finds in our area from the period would likely be closer to 9’ under todays surface.

Volvoclaret
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:45 pm
Been Liked: 710 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by Volvoclaret » Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:13 pm

Awayfromburnley wrote:
Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:57 pm
I had heard Brunanbagh was potentially around Worsthorne way
Many years ago I read an article that made an argument that The Ridge was the site of Brunanburgh and that there's a couple of burial mounds near Waltons Spire Nelson where the dead from the battle were buried. None of which has been verified and remains conjecture.
This user liked this post: elwaclaret

elwaclaret
Posts: 9569
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2203 times
Has Liked: 3102 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by elwaclaret » Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:34 pm

Volvoclaret wrote:
Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:13 pm
Many years ago I read an article that made an argument that The Ridge was the site of Brunanburgh and that there's a couple of burial mounds near Waltons Spire Nelson where the dead from the battle were buried. None of which has been verified and remains conjecture.
The big problem we have, being part of the ancient Royal Forests of Palatine Lancs… permission for digs often needs permission from the Ruling Monarch… Something they are not keen on giving historically because it may well undermine the accepted version of history that underpins their power base. Queen Elizabeth was extremely keen on the area but also very against allowing archaeological digs on ‘her land’ eg the Trough of Bowland, it remains to be seen if the King is more inclined.

exilecanada
Posts: 1213
Joined: Sat May 12, 2018 4:08 pm
Been Liked: 311 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by exilecanada » Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:35 pm

dougcollins wrote:
Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:57 pm
Was that the MGBGT?
No, the MG 1300 was a fancied up Austin/Morris 1100 with a 1275cc engine and twin 1.5" SU carbs. I did have and MGB here in Canada, a ragtop, not a BGT.

Volvoclaret
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:45 pm
Been Liked: 710 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by Volvoclaret » Wed Jul 02, 2025 11:01 pm

elwaclaret wrote:
Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:34 pm
The big problem we have, being part of the ancient Royal Forests of Palatine Lancs… permission for digs often needs permission from the Ruling Monarch… Something they are not keen on giving historically because it may well undermine the accepted version of history that underpins their power base. Queen Elizabeth was extremely keen on the area but also very against allowing archaeological digs on ‘her land’ eg the Trough of Bowland, it remains to be seen if the King is more inclined.
Get thee metal detector and I'll bring mi spade and we'll meet at shooters and do a rest job of proving/disproving the theory. But don't let anyone know! 😉😁
These 2 users liked this post: elwaclaret evensteadiereddie

elwaclaret
Posts: 9569
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2203 times
Has Liked: 3102 times

Re: a roman burnley?

Post by elwaclaret » Thu Jul 03, 2025 12:19 am

Big Gaz posted about Richard the third and the Plantagenets in Yorkshire, and that no royalty really came to east Lancs, but somehow when I tried to reply the post got tangled with my reply and when I tried to disentangle them both were deleted.

Not sure if it was my error, but, I apologise to BigGaz in case it was something I did rather than a system glitch.

Post Reply