Lyle Foster
-
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3168 times
- Has Liked: 3163 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Purpose of the thread well and truly gone.
We all know he hasn't scored at the rate required - the thread is about identifying if there's a position / role on the pitch perhaps he's better suited to, because there's no denying that his work rate / strength / speed / link play is good enough for our side in the PL.
We all know he hasn't scored at the rate required - the thread is about identifying if there's a position / role on the pitch perhaps he's better suited to, because there's no denying that his work rate / strength / speed / link play is good enough for our side in the PL.
Re: Lyle Foster
I’m not even sure his link play is good enough for League One. He’s so scruffy and sloppy. He hasn’t got the work rate or concentration to play in midfield, he was offside like 4 times Yesterday for no reason. He’s a powerful runner, I think he’d be decent at Rugby.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:05 pmPurpose of the thread well and truly gone.
We all know he hasn't scored at the rate required - the thread is about identifying if there's a position / role on the pitch perhaps he's better suited to, because there's no denying that his work rate / strength / speed / link play is good enough for our side in the PL.
Re: Lyle Foster
It's a good idea CC. If we persist with the 523 system, I've posted before that I can see Foster being used on the left of the front line. He clearly has some attributes that are very useful at Premier League level, so that role where he can step back into midfield and then hopefully carry the ball on transition might be worth exploring.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:05 pmPurpose of the thread well and truly gone.
We all know he hasn't scored at the rate required - the thread is about identifying if there's a position / role on the pitch perhaps he's better suited to, because there's no denying that his work rate / strength / speed / link play is good enough for our side in the PL.
My reservation is that I didn't feel he was that effective when SP used him from the left wing on a few occasions last season, although that was different tactical setup.
This user liked this post: CoolClaret
-
- Posts: 10999
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1345 times
- Has Liked: 894 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Well he is supposed to be a striker even though you could be forgiven for mistaking that. If you did shuffle him into another position you then have the problem accommodating him at the expense of another player who would be naturally preferred. Something has to give.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:05 pmPurpose of the thread well and truly gone.
We all know he hasn't scored at the rate required - the thread is about identifying if there's a position / role on the pitch perhaps he's better suited to, because there's no denying that his work rate / strength / speed / link play is good enough for our side in the PL.
-
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3168 times
- Has Liked: 3163 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Yeah, more of a 'left forward' vs a 'left winger' or 'inverted winger'.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:12 pmIt's a good idea CC. If we persist with the 523 system, I've posted before that I can see Foster being used on the left of the front line. He clearly has some attributes that are very useful at Premier League level, so that role where he can step back into midfield and then hopefully carry the ball on transition might be worth exploring.
My reservation is that I didn't feel he was that effective when SP used him from the left wing on a few occasions last season, although that was different tactical setup.
A role that can have him driving in space, in the lines between midfield and defence - a bit like how Amorim has in his system with Cunha & Mbeumo.
-
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3168 times
- Has Liked: 3163 times
Re: Lyle Foster
If you think we have players better suited to carry the ball at pace and contest outballs (often against multiple defenders) then I'm all ears.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:13 pmWell he is supposed to be a striker even though you could be forgiven for mistaking that. If you did shuffle him into another position you then have the problem accommodating him at the expense of another player who would be naturally preferred. Something has to give.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 10999
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1345 times
- Has Liked: 894 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Personally I would have got shut a long time ago & bought somebody else for that exact purpose you are proposing.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:17 pmIf you think we have a players better suited to carry the ball at pace and contest outballs / 50-50s then I'm all ears.
-
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3168 times
- Has Liked: 3163 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Ok, no offers came in, and we have him for another two years.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:19 pmPersonally I would have got shut a long time ago & bought somebody else for that exact purpose you are proposing.
Would it be wise to let him rot, or perhaps try and get a tune out of him, to benefit the team?
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 10999
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1345 times
- Has Liked: 894 times
Re: Lyle Foster
It is what it is. You buy duds & then have the problem that you can't shift. Might be a radical idea but try not to buy duds in the first place. This isn't an overnight thing he's had no productive output for ages.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:21 pmOk, no offers came in, and we have him for another two years.
Would it be wise to let him rot, or perhaps try and get a tune out of him, to benefit the team?
-
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3168 times
- Has Liked: 3163 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Genius idea - have you ever thought about running for PM, Jakub?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:24 pmMight be a radical idea but try not to buy duds in the first place.
Re: Lyle Foster
The trouble is that people start eulogising about him (he was declared the best striker in the championship at the start of the season, he had a great game against spurs, etc) and then others go further the other way to offset that.roamingclaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 9:52 pmHaving read plenty of comments on both this site & the uptheclarets fb page (not sure if they're related) I would argue that it is personal from some posters !
He was ok against spurs, some players better, plenty played worse.
-
- Posts: 13219
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1966 times
- Has Liked: 386 times
Re: Lyle Foster
If anyone wants to know how hard this league is for strikers, look at how the 70m Gyokeres played yesterday. He looked like an absolute donkey
Re: Lyle Foster
He’s vastly overrated. Although tried and tested in the championship and excelled in a weak league with the best team.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 18, 2025 7:18 amIf anyone wants to know how hard this league is for strikers, look at how the 70m Gyokeres played yesterday. He looked like an absolute donkey
Foster hasn’t even proven to be championship level. He offers nothing in football terms. Iv no idea why people are obsessing about getting him in the side and wanting him to play wide left. Anthony is levels beyond Foster.
Re: Lyle Foster
Anyone would have thought Foster was the £70m signing if they’d not known, out of Gyokeres & him this weekend, that’s for sure.
-
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
- Been Liked: 276 times
- Has Liked: 66 times
- Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg
Re: Lyle Foster
I'm not taking sides on this one, but we do seem to have a bloated squad that are not up to PL standard.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:26 pmGenius idea - have you ever thought about running for PM, Jakub?
Of the current squad, only Dub and kyle could be classed as PL standard, and yet, they both probably have a couple of years left at this level.
The rest of our squad are good championship players, which is where we should be.
As for Foster he is supposedly a CF, but he has a goals to games ratio of 1 to 8 for me that's no good enough.
-
- Posts: 11755
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4771 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Of course a lot of our squad are Championship players, we have just come out the Championship.brexit wrote: ↑Mon Aug 18, 2025 8:20 amI'm not taking sides on this one, but we do seem to have a bloated squad that are not up to PL standard.
Of the current squad, only Dub and kyle could be classed as PL standard, and yet, they both probably have a couple of years left at this level.
The rest of our squad are good championship players, which is where we should be.
As for Foster he is supposedly a CF, but he has a goals to games ratio of 1 to 8 for me that's no good enough.
Weird how 2 year ago it was shocking we binned off the players from the Championship squad, now the annoyance seems to be we haven't binned off most from the Championship squad.
Some from the Championship squad are now the new targets for the boo boys
-
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 137 times
- Has Liked: 139 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Some football fans (and people in general) enjoy being miserable.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 18, 2025 8:26 amSome from the Championship squad are now the new targets for the boo boys
So it's literally impossible for them to be happy or even content as it's not something that floats their boat. They get nothing out of it.
Re: Lyle Foster
Happy clapper alert.ollieclarets8 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 18, 2025 8:33 amSome football fans (and people in general) enjoy being miserable.
So it's literally impossible for them to be happy or even content as it's not something that floats their boat. They get nothing out of it.
You are incorrect. Some people can actually see and accept reality.
There is a difference between being miserable and pointing out things which are not good. If all you do is happy clap and blow smoke up the proverbial then you never find the problem. An Alcoholic cannot heal until they admit they have a problem.
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret
Re: Lyle Foster
Shaggy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 18, 2025 8:49 amHappy clapper alert.
You are incorrect. Some people can actually see and accept reality.
There is a difference between being miserable and pointing out things which are not good. If all you do is happy clap and blow smoke up the proverbial then you never find the problem. An Alcoholic cannot heal until they admit they have a problem.
You haven't mentioned Sean Dyche yet in this thread, or have I missed it??

-
- Posts: 6627
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1943 times
- Has Liked: 2889 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Lyle Foster
I do support the players we have. Paid for 5 of my family to attend the game at Spurs on Saturday. Is that good enough? However, I will not put up and shut up when I regularly see a player/ players I believe to be out of their depth. That view is based on 30 months of watching Lyle Foster. I'm urging him to score with any opportunity that arises but 30 months of nothingness has taken its toll. We need to score goals to have the remotest chance in this league.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Sun Aug 17, 2025 10:08 pmIn an ideal world you are right.
But this is Burnley FC, punching a way above our weight.
Support the players we have because we really are very unlikely to field much better.
-
- Posts: 10999
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1345 times
- Has Liked: 894 times
Re: Lyle Foster
If you can't hack it don't back it. It's been apparent for some considerable time now that lyle has backed something he can't hack it's not completely his fault he doesn't asked to get picked. It would be nice at some point if lyle could score just 1 goal & at least pretend to be a striker.
Re: Lyle Foster
Out of interest, being that you were there, how many chances did he miss on Saturday?Silkyskills1 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 18, 2025 9:55 amI do support the players we have. Paid for 5 of my family to attend the game at Spurs on Saturday. Is that good enough? However, I will not put up and shut up when I regularly see a player/ players I believe to be out of their depth. That view is based on 30 months of watching Lyle Foster. I'm urging him to score with any opportunity that arises but 30 months of nothingness has taken its toll. We need to score goals to have the remotest chance in this league.
-
- Posts: 9127
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3454 times
- Has Liked: 5692 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Lyle Foster
Lyle Foster has everything, apart from the finish. His history indicates a human being lacking confidence/composure, I do believe sometimes you can try too hard. He keeps getting selected, and without proof he seems to be a player who hits the net 19/20 on the training ground, but puts it wide 19/20 on a match day.
Even the best strikers miss sitters, what makes them great is they never let it bother them, they'll bury the next one. Lyle on the other hand will let one miss affect the next chance and it snowballs.
The solution is difficult, because if the problem is in his head then people react differently to stimuli. He certainly doesn't need the added pressure of getting on his back, but SP has to fix it.
Even the best strikers miss sitters, what makes them great is they never let it bother them, they'll bury the next one. Lyle on the other hand will let one miss affect the next chance and it snowballs.
The solution is difficult, because if the problem is in his head then people react differently to stimuli. He certainly doesn't need the added pressure of getting on his back, but SP has to fix it.
-
- Posts: 6627
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1943 times
- Has Liked: 2889 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Lyle Foster
Don't be crass. I'm talking about Lyle Foster as a goalscorer in the relatively long time he's been here. If you wany to use that pitiful argument how many chances did we create last season and how many did he score? Some incredibly outrageous arguments developing on his behalf on this thread. Comparing him with Gyokeres, and looking the more likely £70m striker for instance. Just waiting for 'there's a player in there somewhere' or have we already done that one? He doesn't score goals or remotely look likely to get one. That is what I see and saw on Saturday and on many Saturdays for over 2 years now( a couple of times in a successful side).
Re: Lyle Foster
Looking likely Foster will be the UTC MOM yet he's subject to the usual UTC unpopularity and singled out by many. There were far worse than him on Saturday yet they are free from criticism.
What would be the response if Foster had a poor game?
FWIW, is Foster the answer? Probably not.
Do I want Foster to be the answer, yes however there are some on here who would answer no to that question.
Trolls / hijackers please don't quote me. Thanks.
What would be the response if Foster had a poor game?
FWIW, is Foster the answer? Probably not.
Do I want Foster to be the answer, yes however there are some on here who would answer no to that question.
Trolls / hijackers please don't quote me. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 8653
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2304 times
- Has Liked: 1272 times
Re: Lyle Foster
Jeez-hes not scoring many goals but as he showed on Saturday he put in a great shift against a side who were 2-0 up v PSG a few days earlier. Then we have a guy in our squad who cost more than Foster and has played for 20 minutes in the last 16 months getting away scott free and drawing a wage. If you want to vent your anger at players do it at him
Lets support Foster and let the manager decide if he plays. After Saturday Walker, Hartmann, Cullen and Foster should be the first names on the team sheet v Sunderland. If we can get him playing like Saturday and accomodate him in the team with Broje, we will create teams problems. For me we have ample "no 10's", but for me he is the one to be playing there with Broje upfront
Lets support Foster and let the manager decide if he plays. After Saturday Walker, Hartmann, Cullen and Foster should be the first names on the team sheet v Sunderland. If we can get him playing like Saturday and accomodate him in the team with Broje, we will create teams problems. For me we have ample "no 10's", but for me he is the one to be playing there with Broje upfront
-
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 743 times
- Has Liked: 792 times
- Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Re: Lyle Foster
Logged in to post something very similar, tbh.
Anyone who can look at Saturday and think Foster was the (or really even 'a') problem really wasn't paying attention.
These 2 users liked this post: NL Claret warksclaret
-
- Posts: 6627
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1943 times
- Has Liked: 2889 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Lyle Foster
There were worse than him on Saturday and yes I would love to eat humble pie and see him succeed. I'm leaving it alone at that. Nowhere else to go.NL Claret wrote: ↑Mon Aug 18, 2025 11:20 amLooking likely Foster will be the UTC MOM yet he's subject to the usual UTC unpopularity and singled out by many. There were far worse than him on Saturday yet they are free from criticism.
FWIW, is Foster the answer? Probably not.
Do I want Foster to be the answer, yes however there are some on here who would answer no to that question.
Trolls / hijackers please don't quote me. Thanks.
Re: Lyle Foster
You've literally slated Foster who had a good game this weekend, how is that for not being able to see and accept reality?Shaggy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 18, 2025 8:49 amHappy clapper alert.
You are incorrect. Some people can actually see and accept reality.
There is a difference between being miserable and pointing out things which are not good. If all you do is happy clap and blow smoke up the proverbial then you never find the problem. An Alcoholic cannot heal until they admit they have a problem.