Osmajic
Re: Osmajic
It’s the Lancashire Post who revealed the news today via their PNE reporter:
- Attachments
-
- IMG_1173.jpeg (332.95 KiB) Viewed 4273 times
-
- Posts: 8726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1877 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Osmajic
Fao ClaretTony this fiasco has gone on far too long it should have been sorted inside a month after the event.The FA and their stance on racism has been shown to be seriously flawed. Hannibal has been totally let down in this situation.
-
- Posts: 11026
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
Re: Osmajic
You could actually argue it's osmajic that's been let down if he's innocent with it hanging over his head. It cannot just be assumed that osmajic is guilty a lot of people seem to be forgetting that's he actually denied the allegation & it's not been proven. Without knowing the truth it's reasonable to conclude the FA is letting 1 of them down for sure just not sure which 1.Woodleyclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 21, 2025 7:13 pmFao ClaretTony this fiasco has gone on far too long it should have been sorted inside a month after the event.The FA and their stance on racism has been shown to be seriously flawed. Hannibal has been totally let down in this situation.
-
- Posts: 77829
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38072 times
- Has Liked: 5778 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Osmajic
Not sure why you started this with an fao for me but have you considered that the FA's stance on racism is so strong that it has forced them into a long investigation? And, as has previously been said, is it not possible that Osmajic is telling the truth and that it is he who would be let down and not Hannibal?Woodleyclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 21, 2025 7:13 pmFao ClaretTony this fiasco has gone on far too long it should have been sorted inside a month after the event.The FA and their stance on racism has been shown to be seriously flawed. Hannibal has been totally let down in this situation.
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret
-
- Posts: 7721
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1934 times
- Has Liked: 4302 times
Re: Osmajic
No matter how you look at it, it has no impact on Burnley whatsoever, but the timing of this could not be worse for PNE.
It's dragged on to the point where the transfer window will be closed, so selling him will be difficult whilst this hangs over him, and if he does get a lengthy ban the window is closed so they can't replace him.
FWIW I'm pretty sure he's guilty, but whether guilty or not this lengthy process, whilst the FA have gone through due process, has not helped PNE or the player very much.
It's dragged on to the point where the transfer window will be closed, so selling him will be difficult whilst this hangs over him, and if he does get a lengthy ban the window is closed so they can't replace him.
FWIW I'm pretty sure he's guilty, but whether guilty or not this lengthy process, whilst the FA have gone through due process, has not helped PNE or the player very much.
-
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1456 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Osmajic
Preston finished 1 point above relegation last season and Osmajic scored goals in two draws after the incident so this takes some working outnil_desperandum wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:49 amNo matter how you look at it, it has no impact on Burnley whatsoever, but the timing of this could not be worse for PNE.
-
- Posts: 7721
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1934 times
- Has Liked: 4302 times
Re: Osmajic
I certainly agree with that - and said so at the time, but once the season had ended then the scenario that I described above became active.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:01 pmPreston finished 1 point above relegation last season and Osmajic scored goals in two draws after the incident so this takes some working out
Re: Osmajic
Surely it's not about what's good for which club, it's about justice for Hannibal and the fact that he was racially abused (alleged)nil_desperandum wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:49 amNo matter how you look at it, it has no impact on Burnley whatsoever, but the timing of this could not be worse for PNE.
It's dragged on to the point where the transfer window will be closed, so selling him will be difficult whilst this hangs over him, and if he does get a lengthy ban the window is closed so they can't replace him.
FWIW I'm pretty sure he's guilty, but whether guilty or not this lengthy process, whilst the FA have gone through due process, has not helped PNE or the player very much.
-
- Posts: 7721
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1934 times
- Has Liked: 4302 times
-
- Posts: 11621
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2291 times
- Has Liked: 1379 times
Re: Osmajic
No reason why we should benefit but if case is proven then PNE and player should be the ones punished
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
Re: Osmajic
We're back to the scope of the info at hand which we all agree is very narrow. I think it would be fairer to all parties involved if this could have been resolved sooner rather than a needless overhang.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:18 amNot sure why you started this with an fao for me but have you considered that the FA's stance on racism is so strong that it has forced them into a long investigation? And, as has previously been said, is it not possible that Osmajic is telling the truth and that it is he who would be let down and not Hannibal?
-
- Posts: 77829
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38072 times
- Has Liked: 5778 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Osmajic
I’m sure it would have been much better had it been resolved earlier. We will never know the reasons for it taking this length of time.
-
- Posts: 4341
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 809 times
Re: Osmajic
Are they potentially putting new processes in place to deal with this kind of incident? Perhaps could be the delay?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 1:15 pmI’m sure it would have been much better had it been resolved earlier. We will never know the reasons for it taking this length of time.
I'm guessing this will crop up more and more.
Re: Osmajic
Precisely- it is not fair on either of them.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:13 amYou could actually argue it's osmajic that's been let down if he's innocent with it hanging over his head. It cannot just be assumed that osmajic is guilty a lot of people seem to be forgetting that's he actually denied the allegation & it's not been proven. Without knowing the truth it's reasonable to conclude the FA is letting 1 of them down for sure just not sure which 1.
If (and it’s a big if being as his defence is that he called Hannibal ‘a bad man’- I mean..come on..) Osmajic is innocent then it’s an awful thing to be tarred with for this length of time.
As for Hannibal apart from the fact that if he’s telling the truth it must be absolutely soul destroying to be racially abused and wait this long for any justice there’s also the issue that he is a divisive/sh!thouse type of player anyway so with this hanging over him it’s likely he will get even more abuse from opposition racist/meathead fans this season on top of what he usually gets if they feel he has made a fraudulent claim of racial abuse.
Just really really hope it can be cleared up soon without any doubt and not turn out like the Jayrod case in which I don’t believe either player was at fault- it was just a case of jay being misheard but because it couldn’t be proven one way or another both players ended up getting stick.
I have to say though the length of time it’s taken that’s looking less and less likely.
-
- Posts: 20227
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3307 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Osmajic
Signed Lewis Dobbin from Aston Villa on a year long loan tonight - need a striker but certainly provides the cover should a lengthy ban ensuenil_desperandum wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 11:49 amNo matter how you look at it, it has no impact on Burnley whatsoever, but the timing of this could not be worse for PNE.
It's dragged on to the point where the transfer window will be closed, so selling him will be difficult whilst this hangs over him, and if he does get a lengthy ban the window is closed so they can't replace him.
FWIW I'm pretty sure he's guilty, but whether guilty or not this lengthy process, whilst the FA have gone through due process, has not helped PNE or the player very much.
-
- Posts: 7593
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2301 times
- Has Liked: 4095 times
Re: Osmajic
I'd be extremely surprised if Osmajic faces any punishment. Ultimately I believe he said something extremely derogatory because I was there and Hannibal reacted immediately and was clearly incandescent for quite some time. However, nobody else appeared to hear it or corroborate it, otherwise the ref would have acted and so it surely can't ever be proved, even beyond reasonable doubt, unless he admits it which he clearly isn't going to. Two sides with conflicting stories and no independent evidence, so no punishment I'd assume.
This user liked this post: Spike
-
- Posts: 11026
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
Re: Osmajic
That's quite a reasonable & balanced view on things & I agree. I think MO said something but can't be sure. I find it quite uncomfortable & disturbing to a degree the people harboring extreme views that's he's outright guilty without compelling evidence. It's quite a stark contrast to the views embedded on the forum previously regarding fair trials & presumption of innocence until proven guilty. A strange set of affairs.Dark Cloud wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 7:20 pmI'd be extremely surprised if Osmajic faces any punishment. Ultimately I believe he said something extremely derogatory because I was there and Hannibal reacted immediately and was clearly incandescent for quite some time. However, nobody else appeared to hear it or corroborate it, otherwise the ref would have acted and so it surely can't ever be proved, even beyond reasonable doubt, unless he admits it which he clearly isn't going to. Two sides with conflicting stories and no independent evidence, so no punishment I'd assume.
-
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3569 times
- Has Liked: 7848 times
Re: Osmajic
Apart from the PNE player who apparently went in to the Burnley changing rooms to console Hannibal (allegedly).Dark Cloud wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 7:20 pmI'd be extremely surprised if Osmajic faces any punishment. Ultimately I believe he said something extremely derogatory because I was there and Hannibal reacted immediately and was clearly incandescent for quite some time. However, nobody else appeared to hear it or corroborate it, otherwise the ref would have acted and so it surely can't ever be proved, even beyond reasonable doubt, unless he admits it which he clearly isn't going to. Two sides with conflicting stories and no independent evidence, so no punishment I'd assume.
however, I doubt anything will come of all this as it's all a bit inconclusive.
-
- Posts: 77829
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38072 times
- Has Liked: 5778 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Osmajic
Interesting and concerning is Alan Nixon claiming that the lip reading experts have been left baffled.
I don't mind Nixon having info on transfers but how on earth is he picking up information from what should be a private matter?
I don't mind Nixon having info on transfers but how on earth is he picking up information from what should be a private matter?
This user liked this post: Spike
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2022 8:00 pm
- Been Liked: 4 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Osmajic
IF thats the case perhaps they should have got a Serbian & Montenegro and lip reader?
-
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1456 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Osmajic
Although a completely different case, it's disheartening and frankly scary to look at the written reasons released for the Paqueta case for anyone who wants the FA to do a good job with this case. Dragged on forever and came to the case with no evidence and absolutely no change of him being found guilty.
Re: Osmajic
For a multi million pound organisation the FA are shamefully inadequate
-
- Posts: 10673
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4657 times
- Has Liked: 7308 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Osmajic
I’d like to think that it will crop up less and less tbh…burnley007 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 1:18 pmAre they potentially putting new processes in place to deal with this kind of incident? Perhaps could be the delay?
I'm guessing this will crop up more and more.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 10673
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4657 times
- Has Liked: 7308 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Osmajic
The multi millions are probably spent in the wrong areas. Like massive wages for incompetents and huge bonuses for the unworthy.
If you’ve ever watched “Mike Bassett - England manager” the way the FA is depicted in that film can’t possibly be a million miles away from the reality considering the “progress” they make every year.
-
- Posts: 10822
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3141 times
- Has Liked: 2536 times
Re: Osmajic
If he said anything in Serbo-Croat and Hannibal understood him I’ll plait fog.Taffys milkman wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 12:35 pmIF thats the case perhaps they should have got a Serbian & Montenegro and lip reader?
This user liked this post: fidelcastro
Re: Osmajic
Knobend newspaper reckons case will be this month and that the Kings Counsel Osmajic has employed thinks they have a good case.
I wonder if it’s the same one he used to minimise his driving penalties.
I wonder if it’s the same one he used to minimise his driving penalties.
-
- Posts: 5358
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2892 times
- Has Liked: 3250 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: Osmajic
Haven't you got a roundabout to paint somewhere?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 5:12 pma big deals been made out of it. People get racially abused on a daily basis & get on with their lifes.
These 5 users liked this post: CoolClaret claret5 Stevie Morgan fidelcastro northeastclaret
-
- Posts: 11026
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
Re: Osmajic
Whoosh!Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Fri Sep 05, 2025 11:00 pmNo idea what you are going on about there's only 1 person on this fictitious roundabout & it ain't me.
-
- Posts: 11026
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
-
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:24 am
- Been Liked: 203 times
- Has Liked: 231 times
Re: Osmajic
This has gone on forever but looking at it objectively I think it will be very difficult to prove. You cant read his lips and it then becomes one players word against another. Unless the FA have a better camera angle thats not been public.
-
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
- Been Liked: 393 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
-
- Posts: 11026
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1351 times
- Has Liked: 897 times
Re: Osmajic
I miss the days where people said it how it was instead of the snowflake culture prevalent. Anyhow wish granted it's my last post on this subject.northeastclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 9:49 amNot surprising that Zebedees post where he professes to be the Uptheclarets resident racism expert has been deleted.
A white male of the Basil Fawlty generation obviously has all the correct credentials![]()
These 2 users liked this post: northeastclaret HahaYeah
-
- Posts: 8726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1877 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Osmajic
Time to bin this post it's getting into the realms of fantasy expecting solutions from the FA.
-
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 394 times
- Has Liked: 219 times
Re: Osmajic
The realms of fantasy in this issue are reserved for the people on the Preston side who have assumed innocence and the ones who have assumed guilty on the Burnley side without any evidence to support either apart from what both players have said.Woodleyclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 10:44 amTime to bin this post it's getting into the realms of fantasy expecting solutions from the FA.
Let’s be clear from the onset this was always going to be difficult to prove or disprove without independent corroborating evidence and I suspect the only reason this has gone as long as it has is that the FA are trying to get the correct verdict and they are struggling to get any evidence. The most likely verdict will be not proven which will lead to more questions I guess, although from what we know that’s the only verdict they can come to sadly.
-
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1456 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Osmajic
Are you not in the realms of fantasy thinking there is no evidence when you have no idea what evidence there is?JarrowClaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 2:36 pmThe realms of fantasy in this issue are reserved for the people on the Preston side who have assumed innocence and the ones who have assumed guilty on the Burnley side without any evidence to support either apart from what both players have said.
Let’s be clear from the onset this was always going to be difficult to prove or disprove without independent corroborating evidence and I suspect the only reason this has gone as long as it has is that the FA are trying to get the correct verdict and they are struggling to get any evidence. The most likely verdict will be not proven which will lead to more questions I guess, although from what we know that’s the only verdict they can come to sadly.
-
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
- Been Liked: 393 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Osmajic
There is plenty of incriminating factors , if it was just one word against another or photos of him plunging his teeth into his victim, it would have been dealt with already.JarrowClaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 2:36 pmThe realms of fantasy in this issue are reserved for the people on the Preston side who have assumed innocence and the ones who have assumed guilty on the Burnley side without any evidence to support either apart from what both players have said.
Let’s be clear from the onset this was always going to be difficult to prove or disprove without independent corroborating evidence and I suspect the only reason this has gone as long as it has is that the FA are trying to get the correct verdict and they are struggling to get any evidence. The most likely verdict will be not proven which will lead to more questions I guess, although from what we know that’s the only verdict they can come to sadly.
It doesnt have to be proven , it’s about the balance of
probabilities and the outcome will depend on how the FA come to a decision about the probability it actually happened.
-
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 394 times
- Has Liked: 219 times
Re: Osmajic
No not really I was on about fans assuming guilt or innocence with no evidence other than what is available to us at the minute. I never actually said there was no evidence as you are correct I have no idea what is available although I do SUSPECT it is dragging because there isn’t much evidence, but I could be wrong on that.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 2:46 pmAre you not in the realms of fantasy thinking there is no evidence when you have no idea what evidence there is?
-
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 394 times
- Has Liked: 219 times
Re: Osmajic
No idea on this all I will say is is buying someone an incriminating factor in somebody being racist or saying something racist? I think it points to him not being a very nice person 100% but surely has no relevance to this maybe I am wrong I’m not sure.northeastclaret wrote: ↑Sat Sep 06, 2025 2:50 pmThere is plenty of incriminating factors , if it was just one word against another or photos of him plunging his teeth into his victim, it would have been dealt with already.
It doesnt have to be proven , it’s about the balance of
probabilities and the outcome will depend on how the FA come to a decision about the probability it actually happened.