Lyle Foster

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
basil6345789
Posts: 3055
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 531 times
Has Liked: 2435 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by basil6345789 » Sat Aug 30, 2025 7:35 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sat Aug 30, 2025 7:24 pm
Pathetic tbh. Dubravka was clear MOM and it wasn’t even close .

Foster was at best 7/10 today and the +1 because he scored. We need better
Why have mom in a team game?

Row x
Posts: 2374
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:51 am
Been Liked: 627 times
Has Liked: 124 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by Row x » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:11 pm

GetIntoEm wrote:
Sat Aug 30, 2025 7:26 pm
He's certainly got something in the prem hasn't he. Great again today.

I'm sure they'll still be 5's in the player rating post tho
I haven't looked, but you're probably right, hope you're not. I don't do ratings, if I did hed be a 7/8, today

boatshed bill
Posts: 17356
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3563 times
Has Liked: 7823 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:12 pm

basil6345789 wrote:
Sat Aug 30, 2025 7:35 pm
Why have mom in a team game?
And what exactly defines av 7/10?

boyyanno
Posts: 2232
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 762 times
Has Liked: 168 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by boyyanno » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:15 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sat Aug 30, 2025 7:24 pm
Pathetic tbh. Dubravka was clear MOM and it wasn’t even close .

Foster was at best 7/10 today and the +1 because he scored. We need better
Foster has been one of our best players this season, right now he'd be one of my first names on the teamsheet.

He's made a few people look very silly so far :lol:
These 5 users liked this post: RVclaret GetIntoEm scouseclaret Clive 1960 cockneyclaret

JohnMcGreal
Posts: 2498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 1476 times
Has Liked: 469 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by JohnMcGreal » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:19 pm

Just like the start of the 23/24 season, Lyle has looked excellent at this level. Long may it continue.
This user liked this post: JimmyRobbo

NewClaret
Posts: 17673
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3977 times
Has Liked: 4931 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by NewClaret » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:22 pm

Lyle looking excellent, as I thought he would. Toom to improve, but three good games in a row now.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 6535
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 2119 times
Has Liked: 991 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:23 pm

Never really rated him but thought again he was good today.

warksclaret
Posts: 8744
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2328 times
Has Liked: 1291 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by warksclaret » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:35 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sat Aug 30, 2025 7:24 pm
Pathetic tbh. Dubravka was clear MOM and it wasn’t even close .

Foster was at best 7/10 today and the +1 because he scored. We need better
How would you set us up differently-its clear you feel he should not be starting. Bear in mind the window closes in two days, we have probably used our budget, and Broje is far from match fit as he showed v Derby

Bow
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2024 8:15 pm
Been Liked: 142 times
Has Liked: 2 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by Bow » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:36 pm

I was the first to suggest he needed shipping out, but so far he’s been proving me completely wrong

agreenwood
Posts: 4613
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2558 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by agreenwood » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:43 pm

Willing runner with little success first half, but he was excellent second half.

Not getting carried away just yet, but there’s hope that he might actually be the player Kompany said he would be when he signed two and a half years ago.

claretlegend
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:11 am
Been Liked: 161 times
Has Liked: 61 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by claretlegend » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:44 pm

I remember on the first documentary one of the board members (or VK) suggesting he'll be better in the premier league than the championship. It's so true, but I don't understand why. Maybe playing football on the break rather than final third intricacy? He's powerful and not short of pace. Really pleased for him that he's started well.

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3940
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 1016 times
Has Liked: 1204 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by Boss Hogg » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:48 pm

Unusually does look better in the Premier League but it is more suited to his style of play. Early days but he deserved that goal today after having others cruelly ruled out.

blatherwickstattoos
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
Been Liked: 457 times
Has Liked: 643 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by blatherwickstattoos » Sat Aug 30, 2025 9:08 pm

Better than any United striker. He works his socks off. So happy for him , I’ve doubted him many a time but always thought there’s a player in there
This user liked this post: warksclaret

Fretters
Posts: 3058
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:56 am
Been Liked: 1215 times
Has Liked: 656 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by Fretters » Sat Aug 30, 2025 9:12 pm

Started this season like he started the last PL season. He even had a goal wrongly chalked off too, at Forest. VAR hates him.

Belial
Posts: 1800
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
Been Liked: 433 times
Has Liked: 377 times
Location: On a crazy train

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by Belial » Sat Aug 30, 2025 11:02 pm

He should be on three goals from 3 games so far, and that's with not a whole lot of chances. Plus his hold up play and strength has been spot on. Hopefully this will he his season

Goody1975
Posts: 3396
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 1195 times
Has Liked: 288 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by Goody1975 » Sat Aug 30, 2025 11:24 pm

Belial wrote:
Sat Aug 30, 2025 11:02 pm
He should be on three goals from 3 games so far, and that's with not a whole lot of chances. Plus his hold up play and strength has been spot on. Hopefully this will he his season
IMO, just like Edwards suits a team that dominates games and plays most of the ninety minutes in the oppositions half, Fosters struggles more in tight spaces, he needs grass to run into and is an excellent ball carrier. He will be far more effective at this level than the one below.

JimmyRobbo
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
Been Liked: 684 times
Has Liked: 1256 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by JimmyRobbo » Sat Aug 30, 2025 11:27 pm

He has started really well. Just like last time under VK.

Strange how certain skill sets are more aligned with the prem rather than the league below.

Goalposts
Posts: 3093
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 155 times
Location: the ghost in the atom

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by Goalposts » Sat Aug 30, 2025 11:38 pm

Foster is suited to the prem , purely. Because he has more freedom and the ball over the top . Having said that he still has the foster flaws - heading - holding - passing off but i do think he’s a ten goal a season striker .

Rileybobs
Posts: 18747
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7697 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Aug 30, 2025 11:45 pm

He’s playing well, he took his two chances very well today and was unlucky with the second. We could do with his hold up play and nuisance-causing to improve, but the early signs this season are promising.
This user liked this post: ecc

ecc
Posts: 6322
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 2155 times
Has Liked: 1772 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by ecc » Sun Aug 31, 2025 6:13 am

So, so important for Lyle to start scoring after beginning the season well.

We can prevail.

Up The Clarets.

roamingclaret
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:01 pm
Been Liked: 43 times
Has Liked: 278 times

Re: Lyle Foster

Post by roamingclaret » Sun Aug 31, 2025 1:59 pm

The guy scored 2 perfectly valid goals at OT yesterday, infront of the Stretford End...what more can he do? Lets get behind him, the same as we do the rest of the team.
This user liked this post: Burnleyareback2

Post Reply