The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
chekhov
Posts: 3341
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
Been Liked: 882 times
Has Liked: 1684 times
Location: France

The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by chekhov » Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:27 pm

Latest video from HITCSevens (Alfie Potts-Hamer).
Interesting…🤔

Claretfanatic1982
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2025 3:03 pm
Been Liked: 19 times
Has Liked: 74 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Claretfanatic1982 » Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:31 pm

chekhov wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:27 pm
Latest video from HITCSevens (Alfie Potts-Hamer).
Interesting…🤔
It would be if we could see the video ;)

https://youtu.be/48_3EIohoQA?si=LnaHPXRTUEcXjr4B

ollieclarets8
Posts: 1201
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
Been Liked: 251 times
Has Liked: 228 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by ollieclarets8 » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:01 pm

A lot of comments on there from people who have ignored the fixtures played so far and just had a quick look at the current table.
This user liked this post: chekhov

chekhov
Posts: 3341
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
Been Liked: 882 times
Has Liked: 1684 times
Location: France

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by chekhov » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:27 pm

Claretfanatic1982 wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:31 pm
It would be if we could see the video ;)

https://youtu.be/48_3EIohoQA?si=LnaHPXRTUEcXjr4B
Thanks, Claretfanatic!

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11105
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 901 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Jakubclaret » Wed Oct 01, 2025 5:30 pm

ollieclarets8 wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:01 pm
A lot of comments on there from people who have ignored the fixtures played so far and just had a quick look at the current table.
Or people carefully considering what our relegation rivals have done so far against the same fixtures we have played. You can't have it both ways play the hard fixture card while ignoring what the likes of brentford & bournemouth have done. If we want to stay in this division all this will come to reckoning not now but at the end.

ollieclarets8
Posts: 1201
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
Been Liked: 251 times
Has Liked: 228 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by ollieclarets8 » Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:51 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 5:30 pm
Or people carefully considering what our relegation rivals have done so far against the same fixtures we have played.
As this is all about Leeds, Sunderland and Burnley, in what world have Sunderland and Leeds had the same fixtures that we have played?

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11105
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 901 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Jakubclaret » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:05 pm

ollieclarets8 wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:51 pm
As this is all about Leeds, Sunderland and Burnley, in what world have Sunderland and Leeds had the same fixtures that we have played?
It doesn't make a difference brentford & bournemouth are in that same pool & I'd add wolves west ham before nuno. It's extremely important we take care of our own results but when other teams match & above it needs to be considered. It's not all about Leeds & Sunderland because there's every possibility other teams will feature. Even if we are trying to discredit them & align them with our fixtures both have so far done equally as good & measurably better. A point at palace & 3 away to forest which is good & 3 at home & 3 away. Talking about hard fixtures where is our away win that the other 2 have achieved.

dougcollins
Posts: 9584
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 2496 times
Has Liked: 2443 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by dougcollins » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:09 pm

We're the worst performing of the three, so far.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11105
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 901 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Jakubclaret » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:10 pm

dougcollins wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:09 pm
We're the worst performing of the three, so far.
We are but let's not dress it up with the hard fixture bo**ocks.

ollieclarets8
Posts: 1201
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
Been Liked: 251 times
Has Liked: 228 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by ollieclarets8 » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:14 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:05 pm
It's not all about Leeds & Sunderland
The whole thread and video is literally about us, Leeds and Sunderland. It's regarding the 3 promoted clubs.

warksclaret
Posts: 8860
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2352 times
Has Liked: 1308 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by warksclaret » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:17 pm

Appreciate fixtures have been tough for us but they were three seasons ago under VK. We had a hard run of really tough initial fixtures then, but when easier games came along there was little or no improvement.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11105
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 901 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Jakubclaret » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:22 pm

ollieclarets8 wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:14 pm
The whole thread and video is literally about us, Leeds and Sunderland. It's regarding the 3 promoted clubs.
I'm not interested in Leeds & Sunderland. I've looked at all the fixtures & results & performances & drawn my own conclusions.

ollieclarets8
Posts: 1201
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
Been Liked: 251 times
Has Liked: 228 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by ollieclarets8 » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:24 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:22 pm
I'm not interested in Leeds & Sunderland.
:lol: Then you're on the wrong thread. It's a thread about us, Leeds and Sunderland. Over and out.
These 4 users liked this post: Juan Tanamera Enola Gay THEWELLERNUT70 evensteadiereddie

Dyched
Posts: 6576
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:34 am
Been Liked: 2062 times
Has Liked: 467 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Dyched » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:28 pm

If you’re putting in the same “pool” as teams that finished in the top 10 last season, you’re in for a pretty disappointing season.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11105
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 901 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Jakubclaret » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:28 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:17 pm
Appreciate fixtures have been tough for us but they were three seasons ago under VK. We had a hard run of really tough initial fixtures then, but when easier games came along there was little or no improvement.
Exact same script eerily almost identical, faith was held on some of a upturn but nothing positive happened. But then wood had left & some sort of misguided resurgence on the scoring front was left to WW. I don't need to say anymore good evening.

fidelcastro
Posts: 9615
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2838 times
Has Liked: 2824 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by fidelcastro » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:31 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:28 pm
Exact same script eerily almost identical, faith was held on some of a upturn but nothing positive happened. But then wood had left & some sort of misguided resurgence on the scoring front was left to WW. I don't need to say anymore good evening.
How often did Wood and Weghorst play for Kompany, ablue? :shock:
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

boatshed bill
Posts: 17442
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3578 times
Has Liked: 7863 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Oct 01, 2025 8:56 pm

Started watching it but got bored :D

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11105
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 901 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Jakubclaret » Wed Oct 01, 2025 9:10 pm

Dyched wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:28 pm
If you’re putting in the same “pool” as teams that finished in the top 10 last season, you’re in for a pretty disappointing season.
I agree but previously upon forum discussion bournemouth were mentioned amongst the likes of palace as possible relegation candidates it's not me personally placing them in that pool. That considering it's fair to list them.

Goliath
Posts: 4115
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
Been Liked: 789 times
Has Liked: 293 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Goliath » Wed Oct 01, 2025 9:32 pm

I genuinely think we are the best of the 3. There's been periods in every game where we've moved the ball with real quality and intensity. Our fixtures have just been ridiculous.

We need a win now so we don't lose confidence, if we can get one soon then I think we might just be OK. Could do with more goals in the side though. I think Brownhill is a huge miss for us. He creates, scores and presses really well. We haven't replaced those assets.

Spijed
Posts: 18088
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3055 times
Has Liked: 1328 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Spijed » Wed Oct 01, 2025 10:04 pm

How come we struggled against Spurs when Wolves, without a point, nearly got a win?

Looking like we gave them too much respect.

RVclaret
Posts: 16569
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4558 times
Has Liked: 3075 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by RVclaret » Wed Oct 01, 2025 10:07 pm

Spijed wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 10:04 pm
How come we struggled against Spurs when Wolves, without a point, nearly got a win?

Looking like we gave them too much respect.
First game nerves from us probably. Started with Laurent in centre mid.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11105
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 901 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Jakubclaret » Wed Oct 01, 2025 10:14 pm

Spijed wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 10:04 pm
How come we struggled against Spurs when Wolves, without a point, nearly got a win?

Looking like we gave them too much respect.
Word of caution it's only acceptable to talk about Leeds & Sunderland nobody else are relegation candidates & seemingly it's irrelevant what anybody else does.

Enola Gay
Posts: 958
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 am
Been Liked: 755 times
Has Liked: 833 times
Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Enola Gay » Wed Oct 01, 2025 11:09 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 10:14 pm
Word of caution it's only acceptable to talk about Leeds & Sunderland nobody else are relegation candidates & seemingly it's irrelevant what anybody else does.
It’s irrelevant in the context of a thread literally entitled “The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?”

Unless you’re lacking in comprehension skills or being wilfully obtuse.

Neither of which is a particularly good look.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

Foshiznik
Posts: 3277
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 943 times
Has Liked: 2659 times
Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Foshiznik » Wed Oct 01, 2025 11:10 pm

Sunderland have genuinely impressed. I don’t think anyone can argue that but many of the comments on the video suggest that both them and Leeds will comfortably stay up and we will be relegated because of how poor we’ve been, without context of the opposition faced. I think that’s what most on this thread are saying and fairly so. If the current table order is the same in 10 games time then maybe they will be right but as of now, it’s harsh.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11105
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 901 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Jakubclaret » Thu Oct 02, 2025 5:04 am

Enola Gay wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 11:09 pm
It’s irrelevant in the context of a thread literally entitled “The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?”

Unless you’re lacking in comprehension skills or being wilfully obtuse.

Neither of which is a particularly good look.
Like it's realistically achievable or expected within the context of relegation not to deviate elsewhere in discussing other teams. But let's rigidly discuss Sunderland & Leeds who actually look a cut above (so far) than the likes of wolves.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 869 times
Has Liked: 579 times
Location: Padiham

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Somethingfishy » Thu Oct 02, 2025 6:38 am

Jakubclaret wrote:
Thu Oct 02, 2025 5:04 am
Like it's realistically achievable or expected within the context of relegation not to deviate elsewhere in discussing other teams. But let's rigidly discuss Sunderland & Leeds who actually look a cut above (so far) than the likes of wolves.
You are STILL not getting it are you? This is a thread about the relative merits of the three promoted clubs. Presumably based on stats showing we are making a better fist of it than most in the last 10 years. Where does it say it is a relegation discussion? So you have got the subject matter completely wrong and it's not the context. It's not rigidly sticking to Leeds and Sunderland it is precisely what the OP wanted to discuss. It's not all about you.
These 2 users liked this post: Guller Bull evensteadiereddie

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11105
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1358 times
Has Liked: 901 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Jakubclaret » Thu Oct 02, 2025 7:57 am

Somethingfishy wrote:
Thu Oct 02, 2025 6:38 am
You are STILL not getting it are you? This is a thread about the relative merits of the three promoted clubs. Presumably based on stats showing we are making a better fist of it than most in the last 10 years. Where does it say it is a relegation discussion? So you have got the subject matter completely wrong and it's not the context. It's not rigidly sticking to Leeds and Sunderland it is precisely what the OP wanted to discuss. It's not all about you.
In all fairness I know exactly what the discussion entails which is clearly indicated by my comments regarding Sunderland & Leeds results. I just don't see how picking 4 PTS up against palace & forest in 2 away games is easier than UTD or Spurs on current form guide & talking about Leeds who also have collected 2 wins 1 being away. Will that do you? & no mention of relegation & no mention of 17 other teams apart from palace & forest where Sunderland collected the points. It's not about me I never said it was you did!

willsclarets
Posts: 3469
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 1142 times
Has Liked: 324 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by willsclarets » Thu Oct 02, 2025 1:00 pm

I thought Sunderland were very much second best against us, but they've had some great results. Still expect them and Leeds to be in the relegation mix. For all our positives, we've not taken points where we should. As Spurs found out, there are no easy games. So while our fixture list has been tough, it's not the case that we'll pick up the points we expect elsewhere. As Sean always said, fine margins. I actually think there's very little between the 3 promoted sides, and it'll be those moments in games where you grab points or walk away with nothing.

So far, in those definitive moments, we've come up short. You never really know which teams will give you opportunities for 1 or 3 points, but regardless of the opposition you have to be ready to take them.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

Elizabeth
Posts: 5360
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1540 times
Has Liked: 1507 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Elizabeth » Thu Oct 02, 2025 9:54 pm

A tug of the shirt here, turning your back in the penalty area there. Silly errors that can be eliminated or a sign that we have a naivety that will haunt us all season? You decide.
Sunderland's bubble will eventually burst but when? Looking forward to their game at Old Trafford at the weekend so some kind of comparison can be made.
Leeds survival, not unlike ours,will more than likely depend on their home form.

I still think 2 of the 3 are actually good enough to survive

Hibsclaret
Posts: 4388
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1410 times
Has Liked: 510 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Hibsclaret » Thu Oct 02, 2025 10:10 pm

I still think Sunderland go down. They have been incredibly lucky with the fixtures and more specifically when those games were played. They should have lost points to Brentford who missed a pen and Palace who missed an open goal. They beat West Ham with about 0.6 xg. They played Forest after a European trip in the midweek before and scored from a non free kick. Their best performance was with ten men against a poor Villa. They haven’t played a big 6 team whilst we have played 4.

No doubt they will get to play the big teams after European trips where we have had Liverpool and City after free weeks or international breaks or a season opener with a new manager (Spurs). They couldn’t have hand picked the start to the season any better.

Spijed
Posts: 18088
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3055 times
Has Liked: 1328 times

Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

Post by Spijed » Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:00 pm

Hibsclaret wrote:
Thu Oct 02, 2025 10:10 pm
I still think Sunderland go down. They have been incredibly lucky with the fixtures and more specifically when those games were played. They should have lost points to Brentford who missed a pen and Palace who missed an open goal. They beat West Ham with about 0.6 xg. They played Forest after a European trip in the midweek before and scored from a non free kick. Their best performance was with ten men against a poor Villa. They haven’t played a big 6 team whilst we have played 4.

No doubt they will get to play the big teams after European trips where we have had Liverpool and City after free weeks or international breaks or a season opener with a new manager (Spurs). They couldn’t have hand picked the start to the season any better.
Chris Wood missed an open goal for Forest as well.

Post Reply