Brownhill
Brownhill
We miss him massively. He led our press even when not playing well and gave us a goal/assist threat.
Could be wrong but I think we'd have stuck with the midfield 3 if he'd stayed as It suited him perfectly. The problem we have now is our best 3 midfielders are all defensive types. Hannibal is the closest we have but he doesn't get the numbers.
Could be wrong but I think we'd have stuck with the midfield 3 if he'd stayed as It suited him perfectly. The problem we have now is our best 3 midfielders are all defensive types. Hannibal is the closest we have but he doesn't get the numbers.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
Re: Brownhill
Of all the things we miss, Brownhill isn't one.Goliath wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:37 pmWe miss him massively. He led our press even when not playing well and gave us a goal/assist threat.
Could be wrong but I think we'd have stuck with the midfield 3 if he'd stayed as It suited him perfectly. The problem we have now is our best 3 midfielders are all defensive types. Hannibal is the closest we have but he doesn't get the numbers.
These 7 users liked this post: fidelcastro RVclaret Sgt. Pepper NewClaret Caballo helmclaret tarkys_ears
-
- Posts: 9654
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2845 times
- Has Liked: 2832 times
Re: Brownhill
Brownhill wasn’t up to the Premier League. We do not miss him. We might next season though.
-
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 271 times
- Has Liked: 253 times
Re: Brownhill
If Brownhill is the answer, I'm not sure what the question is.
This user liked this post: tarkys_ears
-
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:43 am
- Been Liked: 139 times
- Has Liked: 96 times
Re: Brownhill
Hes gone. He didn’t want to play for us any more.
Move on.
Move on.
-
- Posts: 10746
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 5480 times
- Has Liked: 1045 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Brownhill
What we miss is Ugochukwu, Cullen and Florentino playing in the same team.
These 2 users liked this post: Holmechapel helmclaret
-
- Posts: 35126
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12764 times
- Has Liked: 6341 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Brownhill
we will miss him massively next season if we drop
-
- Posts: 9654
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2845 times
- Has Liked: 2832 times
Re: Brownhill
He might come back, if he's trousered enough dosh by then!

This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
-
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 271 times
- Has Liked: 253 times
Re: Brownhill
It depends who we keep. If the 3 of of Les, Cullen and Florentino were to stay, we'd boss the Championship.
Re: Brownhill
In his best position on the right of a 3 where Parker used him a lot last season and he got 18 goals with 6 assists?
-
- Posts: 9654
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2845 times
- Has Liked: 2832 times
Re: Brownhill
Where he sometimes played for us in the PL too.
I'm rather stating the obvious here, but his numbers wouldn't be anywhere close to those at this level.
-
- Posts: 3262
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 727 times
- Has Liked: 2603 times
Re: Brownhill
That was his 'monster' season. Not sure he'll ever repeat that. Parker allowed him to roam free when we had possession, to trust his instincts.
He'll probably never get that freedom again.
He'll probably never get that freedom again.
Re: Brownhill
When? He was either alongside Cullen/Berge or a number 10. We didn't really use a 433.fidelcastro wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:53 pmWhere he sometimes played for us in the PL too.
I'm rather stating the obvious here, but his numbers wouldn't be anywhere close to those at this level.
-
- Posts: 9654
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2845 times
- Has Liked: 2832 times
Re: Brownhill
He was effectively a number 10 last season... anyway, I saw more than enough of him in the PL to know he isn't the answer to our current predicament.
Re: Brownhill
Big Les can play Brownhills role absolutely fine, just hasn’t had the chance to yet.
Re: Brownhill
He's basically the polar opposite of Brownhill. Great on the ball but ambles round the pitch and doesn't make any of the off the ball runs Brownhill made to get into scoring positions
-
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 271 times
- Has Liked: 253 times
Re: Brownhill
It's not about whether he's the same type of player, it's whether he can replace him, which I agree I think he can.
Our next fixture is the perfect chance for Parker to start these 3 and go 4 at the back.
Let's see.
-
- Posts: 2588
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 912 times
- Has Liked: 11273 times
Re: Brownhill
Josh Brownhill has shown on numerous occasions that he is Burnley personified.
Not quite up to it in the Premier League but superb in the championship.
There weren't to many suitors queueing up for him once he made it clear he wasn't staying with us.
Not quite up to it in the Premier League but superb in the championship.
There weren't to many suitors queueing up for him once he made it clear he wasn't staying with us.
Re: Brownhill
I know it's early days but I can't imagine Florentino playing in the Championship, he looks a real quality addition who belongs at this level.ollieclarets8 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:49 pmIt depends who we keep. If the 3 of of Les, Cullen and Florentino were to stay, we'd boss the Championship.
But we can't be thinking about next season yet. We're one point off 17th after a really tough first 7 games, and are looking more competitive this time despite the results.
Re: Brownhill
He still makes those runs. We just won't find them as often naturally. He got 4 goals last time.out when he was in and out of the side and out of position.
We lack balance and he would have offered it. We've ended up changing system completely due to his exit.
Re: Brownhill
Cullen being our most advanced central midfielder in the first half shows how much we miss Brownhill’s pressing and much better eye for goal.
Club wanted to keep him and he didn’t want to stay.
We’ve got options but Parker chooses not to use them (Flemming, Edwards, Tresor, even Anthony as a 10).
Club wanted to keep him and he didn’t want to stay.
We’ve got options but Parker chooses not to use them (Flemming, Edwards, Tresor, even Anthony as a 10).
This user liked this post: Goliath
Re: Brownhill
We didn't replace him though, that's the problem. He was the leader and literally led the press and helped to get us on the front foot.Row Z wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 5:46 pmCullen being our most advanced central midfielder in the first half shows how much we miss Brownhill’s pressing and much better eye for goal.
Club wanted to keep him and he didn’t want to stay.
We’ve got options but Parker chooses not to use them (Flemming, Edwards, Tresor, even Anthony as a 10).
-
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 271 times
- Has Liked: 253 times
-
- Posts: 17750
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 4002 times
- Has Liked: 4943 times
Re: Brownhill
Jesus.
Find myself visiting this site less and less and this is why.
Find myself visiting this site less and less and this is why.
This user liked this post: Procrastinate B
-
- Posts: 18820
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7722 times
- Has Liked: 1597 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Brownhill
Florentino is on loan from Benfica, if we get relegated he’s gone.ollieclarets8 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:49 pmIt depends who we keep. If the 3 of of Les, Cullen and Florentino were to stay, we'd boss the Championship.
Re: Brownhill
Well Ugochukwu didn't start and Laurent did so it's not exactly outlandish. It doesn't really matter, one of the 3 would drop out because they do similar jobs.ollieclarets8 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 6:09 pmWe did, just not an exact replica.
Who does Brownhill replace out of Ugochukwu, Cullen and Florentino?
As it is I'd play those 3 together but I'm assuming that's why Parker hasn't done so far
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 7:20 pm
- Been Liked: 90 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
-
- Posts: 17750
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 4002 times
- Has Liked: 4943 times
Re: Brownhill
Crazy.Procrastinate B wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 6:35 pmOn second thoughts, let’s not go to Up the Clarets! ‘Tis a silly place.
Find its dead at the moment generally, but when you see threads like this it reminds me why I don’t open many anymore.
Re: Brownhill
It’s certainly much quieter than it used to be on here, but what is there to talk about? We’re crap every time we go up and we’re good when we go down. Only so many ways you can say it.
Re: Brownhill
Definitely doesn’t amble around. His introduction today was the main reason we managed to get higher up the pitch in the last 15-20 minutes. Is he going to play the number 10 role like Brownhill did, no. Nor should he. In the premier league we need 3 genuine central midfielders, as otherwise we will get overrun. But is he the midfielder that I think could be the most advanced of our 3, due to his ability to cover ground with the ball, absolutely.
Re: Brownhill
Well yes. If people just decide to not engage with things they don't agree with then it probably will be dead.
Not sure why people are suggesting it's such an outrageous opinion that our captain from last season who got 18 goals from midfield might have been of some assistance.
Re: Brownhill
He didn't want to stay so irrelevant
-
- Posts: 17750
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 4002 times
- Has Liked: 4943 times
Re: Brownhill
Think “we’re crap” is a somewhat simplistic assessment.
We have a much bigger budget relative to our competition when we go down, which is why you think we’re good, and a much lower one compared to our competitors when we come up. We’re not actually “crap” at all. We’re just a town club competing against some of the elite clubs in the world.
But yeah, maybe a reduced appetite amongst fans for watching that struggle.
Re: Brownhill
An unnecessary elaboration, but your last sentence is probably correct.NewClaret wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:08 pmThink “we’re crap” is a somewhat simplistic assessment.
We have a much bigger budget relative to our competition when we go down, which is why you think we’re good, and a much lower one compared to our competitors when we come up. We’re not actually “crap” at all. We’re just a town club competing against some of the elite clubs in the world.
But yeah, maybe a reduced appetite amongst fans for watching that struggle.