Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
BurnleyPaul
Posts: 521
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 170 times
Has Liked: 45 times

Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by BurnleyPaul » Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:34 pm

Really???? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/fo ... w-12421926" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Guller Bull
Posts: 3516
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 986 times
Has Liked: 1364 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by Guller Bull » Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:38 pm

Disjointed and difficult to read. Uninteresting as the game itself. Shite journalism

RalphCoatesComb
Posts: 8269
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
Been Liked: 2483 times
Has Liked: 2225 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by RalphCoatesComb » Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:44 pm

Just wasted 2 minutes of my life trying to read that shoite.

Just as well he doesn't play football or he'd be heading for relegation from the old 4th Division !

ClaretTony
Posts: 78271
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38224 times
Has Liked: 5810 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:53 pm

The Chronicle is the Newcastle paper,

This is the Sunderland Echo report

http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport/foo ... -1-8322593

what_no_pies
Posts: 1415
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 524 times
Has Liked: 99 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by what_no_pies » Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:54 pm

How did we only ha e 2 notable chances? Vokes early, Barnes late and hit the post. That's just off the top of my head and all 3 were excellent opportunities.

Man of Kent
Posts: 724
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:47 pm
Been Liked: 315 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by Man of Kent » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:32 pm

The second (of just two!) reader comments sums up how I feel abut that article. It is a poorly constructed, juvenile, ill-conceived, poorly-spelled waste of digital space. Does anyone actually pay to read that guff?!

CleggHall
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
Been Liked: 887 times
Has Liked: 1091 times
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by CleggHall » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:34 pm

So much for local papers in the north east.

dsr
Posts: 16330
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4892 times
Has Liked: 2608 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by dsr » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:36 pm

I don't agree with the Chronicle reporter that it's 1-0 Moyes because "his side showed character and pluck". Character and pluck may be so rare as to need special comment for Sunderland, I suppose.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18812
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7722 times
Has Liked: 1597 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:38 pm

Some bloke wrote:Be interesting to see to what extent. To see who, then, plays.

But that is then. For now, fair play.

They wanted to win, and went for it.
I believe he's to be appointed as Poet Laureate this year.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18812
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7722 times
Has Liked: 1597 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:40 pm

I need, a lie down, I've never, seen so many, commas in, one, place,.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

Silkyskills1
Posts: 6653
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1951 times
Has Liked: 2904 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by Silkyskills1 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:13 pm

When I was much younger I always read Granville Shackleton's report of our game in the Saturday evening 'Sports' and sometimes Alf Thornton on Blackburn games. At the end I'd always got an idea of what had gone on (away games especially). I suppose we can't stand in the way of progress though. I feel guilty of having travelled and paid to watch my favourite football team after that.

3putt
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:23 pm
Been Liked: 180 times
Has Liked: 245 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by 3putt » Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:48 pm

Dreadful report. I find it really difficult to comprehend that somebody is being paid to write such rubbish.

ralphc
Posts: 163
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 1:31 pm
Been Liked: 28 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by ralphc » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:20 pm

I think the fact that he has just over 2,000 tweets as a so called north east footballer reporter just about sums it up. Compare that to Chris Boden who keeps us well informed and has over 72k. Complete numpty.

Stan Tastic
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 477 times
Has Liked: 68 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by Stan Tastic » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:29 pm

The state of this.
Burnley are renew to the Premier League
Image

ksrclaret
Posts: 8098
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 3067 times
Has Liked: 869 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by ksrclaret » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:34 pm

I think it is to be commended when local newspapers run competitions like this allowing primary school children to have their work published.
These 2 users liked this post: 3putt ClaretTony

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4956
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1254 times
Has Liked: 1492 times

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:58 pm

A juxtapositinal interpretation of both clubs that lacks complete verisimilitude to reality.

CleggHall
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
Been Liked: 887 times
Has Liked: 1091 times
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Post by CleggHall » Mon Jan 09, 2017 9:25 am

The Guardian too are very negative about the game - "truly appalling tie, anything to relieve the tedium etc". Not how I saw it, a decent tie between 2 evenly matched teams which Burnley definitely shaded and should have won. You sometimes wonder whether reporters actually attend and watch matches!?

Post Reply