Snodgrass to have medical at West Ham

cutsy123 · Post by **cutsy123** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:04 pm

At West Ham in the morning

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:17 pm

No surprises here.

Croydon Claret · Post by **Croydon Claret** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:19 pm

Hull will be a lot weaker without him which is the only silver lining

Quickenthetempo · Post by **Quickenthetempo** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:21 pm

We would still need Brady if we signed Snodgrass in my eyes. More of a 2nd striker for me.

cutsy123 · Post by **cutsy123** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:22 pm

Croydon Claret wrote:Hull will be a lot weaker without him which is the only silver lining

West Brom are after Hernandez too

Planning for next season springs to mind

Sidney1st · Post by **Sidney1st** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:23 pm

I'm not surprised, they'll blow us out of the water with wages and this will be his last big money move.

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:25 pm

I think the title is a bit misleading. It suggests he's having a medical at Burnley

claretandy · Post by **claretandy** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:30 pm

cutsy123 wrote:At West Ham in the morning

Source ?

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:32 pm

FactualFrank wrote:I think the title is a bit misleading. It suggests he's having a medical at Burnley

did you really for one second expect the o/p's first line to say anything other than "At West Ham in the morning" ?

Tall Paul · Post by **Tall Paul** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:35 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:did you really for one second expect the o/p's first line to say anything other than "At West Ham in the morning" ?

I expected it to say something like "at wst hm in th mrnin" given the identity of the OP.

KRBFC · Post by **KRBFC** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:36 pm

Link?

lrac · Post by **lrac** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:38 pm

never mind .

Pearcey · Post by **Pearcey** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:40 pm

Once West Ham came in it was obvious we had no chance of competing. We are miles apart in club size.

claptrappers_union · Post by **claptrappers_union** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:56 pm

I think the announcement of the accepted bid was to entice West Ham to make their move. I doubt he was never really wanted a move to Burnley in the first place.

ablueclaret · Post by **ablueclaret** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:58 pm

Would have been a good temporary fix but we can do better.

kentonclaret · Post by **kentonclaret** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:02 pm

Paying just a peppercorn rent for the stadium, and with all of the modifications being paid out of the public purse, allows the Hammers to splash out big time on transfer fees and player wages.

Rileybobs · Post by **Rileybobs** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:03 pm

Thank god for that, never rated him anyway.

COBBLE · Post by **COBBLE** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:08 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Thank god for that, never rated him anyway.

With you there. Injury prone and getting older. We can do better now or in the summer.

Tinribs · Post by **Tinribs** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:09 pm

No great loss,10 mill for someone whos thirty in Septenber.Hes starred in a poor Hull side and thats about it.Had two rwlegations on his cv already and Hull would have been a third.Not exactly been a huge influence.

CnBtruntru · Post by **CnBtruntru** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:10 pm

I think West Spam are hoping they get rid of Payet in this window, they also have stalled on their Hogan transfer at the moment.

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:17 pm

"West Ham are hoping to complete deals for Hull City star Robert Snodgrass and Brentford striker Scott Hogan before the January transfer window closes on Tuesday.
However, according to the Evening Standard, the £25m double-deal is completely dependent on Marseille meeting West Ham's asking price for Dimitri Payet.
The Hammers have already rejected their £22.5m offer and are holding out for £30m. If and when Payet is sold, a £10m deal for Snodgrass can go ahead while West Ham can also meet the £15m price tag for Hogan."

Taken from Dailymail

Rileybobs · Post by **Rileybobs** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:27 pm

Bilic has already said that they won't sell Payet so I guess that deal is off the table.

taio · Post by **taio** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:30 pm

I'd be stunned if Payet is still at West Ham after this transfer window

KRBFC · Post by **KRBFC** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:35 pm

So the OP was making up that Snodgrass is having a medical Tomorrow? I don't see no link

IanMcL · Post by **IanMcL** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:36 pm

Will Payet actually go for £30m? Lots of smoking mirrors to justify everything to both sets of supporters and shareholders. Payet = £20m + lots of if's, ands and buts!

Clarettintedlense · Post by **Clarettintedlense** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:40 pm

Good player and would undoubtedly improve us now. But not unduly worried if we dont get him. Unless we sign nobody.

Said the other day. Preference is Grosicki then brady then snodgrass for me.

Even better if we could hound inter not for nagatomo but perisic but thats unlikely.

ablueclaret · Post by **ablueclaret** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:48 pm

Grosicki stay well clear of.

Duffer_ · Post by **Duffer_** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:50 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:"West Ham are hoping to complete deals for Hull City star Robert Snodgrass and Brentford striker Scott Hogan before the January transfer window closes on Tuesday.
However, according to the Evening Standard, the £25m double-deal is completely dependent on Marseille meeting West Ham's asking price for Dimitri Payet.
The Hammers have already rejected their £22.5m offer and are holding out for £30m. If and when Payet is sold, a £10m deal for Snodgrass can go ahead while West Ham can also meet the £15m price tag for Hogan."

Taken from Dailymail

Which was taken from my post last night:

Duffer_ wrote:Why are West Ham messing Brentford about over Hogan? Why haven't they done the Snodgrass deal? Just how dependent on the sale of Payet is their business? Are we the insurance policy for Snodgrass in the event of the chain breaking?

Tune in this time next week for the answers.

UTC!

It's an incestuous business is this transfer rumour lark.

UTC!

Reecey1987 · Post by **Reecey1987** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:51 pm

If the player wanted to he could refuse to come and have talks with burnley if he has his heart set on a move to west ham . Be a foolish thing to do but can he do that ?

Paul Waine · Post by **Paul Waine** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:52 pm

cutsy123 wrote:At West Ham in the morning

Thanks for editing the thread subject.

It's worth a like - though I'd like it more if the medical was at Burnley.

UTC

Tall Paul · Post by **Tall Paul** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:02 pm

Reecey1987 wrote:If the player wanted to he could refuse to come and have talks with burnley if he has his heart set on a move to west ham . Be a foolish thing to do but can he do that ?

Of course he can, he has no obligation to speak to us.

Reecey1987 · Post by **Reecey1987** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:03 pm

Would be a bit arrogant if he was to do that

kentonclaret · Post by **kentonclaret** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:10 pm

Just a few days ago the London Standard was reporting that West Ham had lost interest in signing Robert Snodgrass and would be very unlikely to match the £10m fee being offered by Burnley. See post 156 on the Snodgrass thread.

If the Daily Mail are relying on the London Standard for the inside news they could be well off message.

claretblue · Post by **claretblue** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:10 pm

after all this

....I need a medical!

ayrshireclaret83 · Post by **ayrshireclaret83** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:11 pm

Dyche seen in Tesco buying eggs

Firthy · Post by **Firthy** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:16 pm

ayrshireclaret83 wrote:Dyche seen in Tesco buying eggs

In preparation for the last minute scramble

mkmel · Post by **mkmel** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:18 pm

Firthy wrote:In preparation for the last minute scramble

Which is only to be eggspeckted

cutsy123 · Post by **cutsy123** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:49 pm

claretandy wrote:Source ?

All over sky sports u weapon

RammyClaret61 · Post by **RammyClaret61** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:09 pm

Apparently wants £75,000 a week!!!

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/ ... -on-wages/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Dyched · Post by **Dyched** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:13 pm

cutsy123 wrote:All over sky sports u weapon

Bit harsh. I think you should apologise

IanMcL · Post by **IanMcL** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:20 pm

It's not a medical...he's having his brains tested. Must be mad to want to play at that stadium every couple of weeks.

Estonhills · Post by **Estonhills** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:23 pm

RammyClaret61 wrote:Apparently wants £75,000 a week!!!

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/ ... -on-wages/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

He was always going to command a 50k plus wage with so many teams wanting him.

Guich · Post by **Guich** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:41 pm

I can't work out where he'd fit in with us, and he's nowhere near good enough to shoe horn in anywhere. And he did a shocking dive.
Nearly 30, good player in a poor team. I'll be delighted if he goes to West Ham and we sign Robbie Brady.
Win-win

minnieclaret · Post by **minnieclaret** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:47 pm

Pearcey wrote:Once West Ham came in it was obvious we had no chance of competing. We are miles apart in club size.

But at least we have some class. Turd of a club that they are.

joey13 · Post by **joey13** » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:52 pm

Won't his wages be subsidised by the tax payer

JohnMac · Post by **JohnMac** » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:34 am

Croydon Claret wrote:Hull will be a lot weaker without him which is the only silver lining

I'm not sure they could keep replicating last night's effort but this new manager seems to know what he is about, they may well shock a few yet.

RalphCoatesComb · Post by **RalphCoatesComb** » Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:20 am

JohnMac wrote:I'm not sure they could keep replicating last night's effort but this new manager seems to know what he is about, they may well shock a few yet.

They'll certainly shock me if they escape the quagmire that they're in at present !

They have Man U, Liverpool and Arsenal in the next month. If they come out of that unscathed, I'll change my tune

HiroshimaClaret · Post by **HiroshimaClaret** » Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:22 am

Guich wrote:I can't work out where he'd fit in with us, and he's nowhere near good enough to shoe horn in anywhere. And he did a shocking dive.
Nearly 30, good player in a poor team. I'll be delighted if he goes to West Ham and we sign Robbie Brady.
Win-win

He would, in my mind, be a HUGE upgrade on Arfield and would compete with a fit Gudmundsson for the right-hand side role.

After the awful news about Marney (even though he has been quiet for the last 3 or 4 games by his very own high standards) I really think central midfield needs an extra body + someone with pace on the wing for the away games against the bottom 5 sides.

Claretmatt4 · Post by **Claretmatt4** » Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:50 am

IanMcL wrote:Will Payet actually go for £30m? Lots of smoking mirrors to justify everything to both sets of supporters and shareholders. Payet = £20m + lots of if's, ands and buts!

Smoking mirrors. Love it.

cutsy123 · Post by **cutsy123** » Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:48 am

Dyched wrote:Bit harsh. I think you should apologise

With the posts this guy posts on a regular basis. i think not