
Someone must have hidden his phone because he's not spitting feathers on Twitter yet.
I think you'll find its correct name is "plucky little Israel"Damo wrote:Try visiting a Muslim country if you are from/have visited Israel
Are you saying his facts are incorrect?NRC wrote:You needed to start your own alternate fact thread, IT?
Damo wrote:Try visiting a Muslim country if you are from/have visited Israel
Certainly not. But I think more Muslims should aspire to the values of Western countries. If they want to live/visit themImploding Turtle wrote:Does that make it right? Do you really think western countries should aspire to the values of Muslim countries?
And what better way to demonstrate that you aspire to live by western values than emigrating to a western country?Damo wrote:Certainly not. But I think more Muslims should aspire to the values of Western countries. If they want to live/visit them
bobinho wrote:He's trying to protect his country from terrorism. He's trying to prevent his country from becoming like ours.
Those of you who think "eastenders" is indicative of multicultural Britain need to wake up. The east end of London is like a foreign country. There are other areas too, some of them not too far away from us here in Burnley.
Anyone tried moving to Islamabad/Tehran/Jeddah, build a Christian church and build exclusively Christian communities in the suburbs? Think it could happen?
Everything is one way. People see it. People are concerned about it. People are fed up with it. And people are scared to say anything for fear of being tagged a racist.
Trump campaigned with that wall. He got the job and is going ahead with it. He campaigned on restricting immigration. He got the job, and he's going ahead with it. I understand it may be difficult for some of you to see a politician actually carrying out his pre election promises. We aren't used to it after all.
Even you don't believe that!!Imploding Turtle wrote:And what better way to demonstrate that you aspire to live by western values than emigrating to a western country?
Are you waying there's a better way to demonstrate that you want to live by western values than being willing to relocate thousands of miles to live by them?PaintYorkClaretnBlue wrote:Even you don't believe that!!
bobinho wrote:He's trying to protect his country from terrorism. He's trying to prevent his country from becoming like ours.
Those of you who think "eastenders" is indicative of multicultural Britain need to wake up. The east end of London is like a foreign country. There are other areas too, some of them not too far away from us here in Burnley.
Anyone tried moving to Islamabad/Tehran/Jeddah, build a Christian church and build exclusively Christian communities in the suburbs? Think it could happen?
Everything is one way. People see it. People are concerned about it. People are fed up with it. And people are scared to say anything for fear of being tagged a racist.
Trump campaigned with that wall. He got the job and is going ahead with it. He campaigned on restricting immigration. He got the job, and he's going ahead with it. I understand it may be difficult for some of you to see a politician actually carrying out his pre election promises. We aren't used to it after all.
You said what a lot of us already know is true there, Islam is blatantly unconstitutional, but be careful, you will be labelled a 'racist' for saying it. But well done, very brave of youImploding Turtle wrote: he's discriminating against a religion which is blatantly unconstitutional.
Yes, I missed a comma. Well spotted. Just move one of my other, probably extraneous commas.morpheus2 wrote:You said what a lot of us already know is true there, Islam is blatantly unconstitutional, but be careful, you will be labelled a 'racist' for saying it. But well done, very brave of you
Yeah yeah yeah, Freudian slip, no getting out of it now it's too late - your subconscious can't hide your true feelings. Racist.Imploding Turtle wrote:Yes, I missed a comma. Just move one of my other, probably extraneous commas.
A judge hasn't frozen the ban at all, but it's a small step in the right direction. The judges have just issued a stay for those people who have valid visas and were already being detained on American soil.Imploding Turtle wrote:So this clown issues an immigration ban on 7 Muslims majority countries that have had nothing to do with any of the major terrorist attacks in the US since (and including) 9/11, by that I mean none of the attackers came from any of these countries, while every country the 19 hijackers came from went untouched. And now a federal judge has frozen the ban.I doubt he knew that judges could do this.
Someone must have hidden his phone because he's not spitting feathers on Twitter yet.
It's not extra security. It's a total block.Goalposts wrote:my only surprise on the list was that Pakistan was not on it.
Iran
Syria
Iraq
Libya
Yemen
somalia
all bastions of democracy , beyond me why anyone would want to put in extra security for visa entrys from the list above
You're right. I got carried away.Claretto wrote:A judge hasn't frozen the ban at all, but it's a small step in the right direction. The judges have just issued a stay for those people who have valid visas and were already being detained on American soil.
Spijed wrote:A few stats
Imploding Turtle wrote:You're right. I got carried away.
"Since 9/11" is fairly common on both sides of the political divide when talking about terrorism. Major events in history have often been used as a starting point to present facts, or should we start disregarding any sentence that contains "since the second world war", or "since the great depression" or "since the great recession".morpheus2 wrote:The citation (1) claims to be since 11th September 2001? It looks like it starts from the 12th of September 2001 to me. I can see what they are trying to do, but now maybe next time there is an Islamic terrorist attack, the far right can cite the stats from June 18, 2015 - the day after the Dylann Roof attack?
But surely you must agree that a terrorist attack in America is far less of an issue than the problems caused by guns and the NRA?morpheus2 wrote:The citation (1) claims to be since 11th September 2001? It looks like it starts from the 12th of September 2001 to me. I can see what they are trying to do, but now maybe next time there is an Islamic terrorist attack, the far right can cite the stats from June 18, 2015 - the day after the Dylann Roof attack?
How long have you lived in the east end ?bobinho wrote:He's trying to protect his country from terrorism. He's trying to prevent his country from becoming like ours.
Those of you who think "eastenders" is indicative of multicultural Britain need to wake up. The east end of London is like a foreign country. There are other areas too, some of them not too far away from us here in Burnley.
Anyone tried moving to Islamabad/Tehran/Jeddah, build a Christian church and build exclusively Christian communities in the suburbs? Think it could happen?
Everything is one way. People see it. People are concerned about it. People are fed up with it. And people are scared to say anything for fear of being tagged a racist.
Trump campaigned with that wall. He got the job and is going ahead with it. He campaigned on restricting immigration. He got the job, and he's going ahead with it. I understand it may be difficult for some of you to see a politician actually carrying out his pre election promises. We aren't used to it after all.
By a lawnmower?Spijed wrote:A few stats
I'm sceptical about the complete accuracy of that table. Maybe the creator of it means "americans killed in terrorist attacks on American soil".Claretto wrote:Enlightening
I suppose it's worth a shout out to Homeland Security for preventing many thousands more deaths on US soil by being vigilant and foiling the many plots by Islamic terrorists. They have done well to keep those annual figures down I think you'll agree?Imploding Turtle wrote:
"Since 9/11" is fairly common on both sides of the political divide when talking about terrorism. Major events in history have often been used as a starting point to present facts, or should we start disregarding any sentence that contains "since the second world war", or "since the great depression" or "since the great recession".
And yet absolutely nothing is done to keep loss of life down by the use of guns.morpheus2 wrote:I suppose it's worth a shout out to Homeland Security for preventing many thousands more deaths on US soil by being vigilant and foiling the many plots by Islamic terrorists. They have done well to keep those annual figures down I think you'll agree?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_u ... _post-9/11
Worth noting that the NRA is not a federal organisation with legislative powers, as you seem to imply. It's a non-profit organisation.Spijed wrote:And yet absolutely nothing is done to keep loss of life down by the use of guns.
Seems being killed by a terrorist must be stopped yet being shot dead is acceptable as the NRA do nothing to stem the flow of gun sales or who can use them.
Spijed wrote:And yet absolutely nothing is done to keep loss of life down by the use of guns.
Seems being killed by a terrorist must be stopped yet being shot dead is acceptable as the NRA do nothing to stem the flow of gun sales or who can use them.
Rileybobs wrote:Guns don't kill people, brown people do.
Considering republican senators get huge backing from the NRA I'd certainly say they DO have legislative powers.Claretto wrote:Worth noting that the NRA is not a federal organisation with legislative powers, as you seem to imply. It's a non-profit organisation.
Agree they are very powerful, but just wanted to make that distinctionSpijed wrote:Considering republican senators get huge backing from the NRA I'd certainly say they DO have legislative powers.
Top post that fella.bobinho wrote:He's trying to protect his country from terrorism. He's trying to prevent his country from becoming like ours.
Those of you who think "eastenders" is indicative of multicultural Britain need to wake up. The east end of London is like a foreign country. There are other areas too, some of them not too far away from us here in Burnley.
Anyone tried moving to Islamabad/Tehran/Jeddah, build a Christian church and build exclusively Christian communities in the suburbs? Think it could happen?
Everything is one way. People see it. People are concerned about it. People are fed up with it. And people are scared to say anything for fear of being tagged a racist.
Trump campaigned with that wall. He got the job and is going ahead with it. He campaigned on restricting immigration. He got the job, and he's going ahead with it. I understand it may be difficult for some of you to see a politician actually carrying out his pre election promises. We aren't used to it after all.
He also happens to have no business interests in the 7 affected countries. A coincidence, I'm sure.ClaretMoffitt wrote:The real hypocrisy here is not adding the likes of Saudi Arabia to that list, despite them being one of the worst culprits for state sponsored terrorism and responsible for the worst terrorist attack on America in living memory. Wouldn't want to upset the oil billionaires though eh?