Barnes, most wasteful?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
CombatClaret
Posts: 4400
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1843 times
Has Liked: 933 times

Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by CombatClaret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:10 pm

Would have been amazed had he not picked up a red this season so not going to slag him off for doing what Barnes does and seems instructed to do, should have been subbed off.
Attacking stats from last 4 weeks put him 2nd overall, given this should we be expecting more returns from him?
barnes.jpg
barnes.jpg (128.09 KiB) Viewed 8287 times
Last 4 games returns
Siggurdson - 2 goals 2 Assists
Barnes - 1g 1a
Mane - 2g 0a (2 games played)
Lukaku - 4g 0a
Hernandez - 2g 0a
Denney - 3g 0a
Firmino - 2g 1a

Boyd gets stick for doing only part of what people consider his job so should we be expecting more from Barnes besides p*ssing of defenders.

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3297
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 664 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by BabylonClaret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:13 pm

He was less effective today . Caught offside too much, struggling with final ball and two stupid cards. He's a four or five on rating today. Amazed he wasn't hooked instead of Gray
These 2 users liked this post: HiroshimaClaret Crawley Claret

Cleveleys_claret
Posts: 3133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
Been Liked: 973 times
Has Liked: 593 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Cleveleys_claret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:15 pm

I understand we all disagree on players but Ashley is the one player I don't like. He is a poor man's Dickov who also was a nasty cretin. I know it's a man's game but he is a ticking time bomb. Often think we end up getting less decisions because refs have clocked onto his antics.

Great point though
These 2 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie The Enclosure

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 937 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by IndigoLake » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:17 pm

1 goal and 1 assist from the last 4 games isn't bad, particularly when you're comparing with quality players such as those listed above. Barnes does a lot more than just **** off defenders and I think that he distracts opposition defenders a lot, allowing a little more time and space for those around him. He has been good this season so I hope people won't jump on his back after a bad performance and a red card. I think we need to be turning to last season's top scorer for more - he should have done better with that big chance presented today.

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3297
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 664 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by BabylonClaret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:18 pm

No. I like Ashley. Every side has someone like him. Some have more.

But he can also have a good touch and be decent in front if goal.

Not today though. I'd have hooked him.for Sam with 20 to play

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34441
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12537 times
Has Liked: 6266 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:19 pm

I think we all know if we stay up that a better striker is a priority (and that's not a dig at Barnes because it isn't him I would replace first)
This user liked this post: KefkaClaret

Duffer_
Posts: 2353
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 805 times
Has Liked: 1387 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Duffer_ » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:20 pm

He's always on the edge and can have no complaints with the sending off today. However, he does get us up the pitch, whether it be his good first touch or tempting defenders into fouling him. He is not pretty but he is effective in our system.

UTC!

CombatClaret
Posts: 4400
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1843 times
Has Liked: 933 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by CombatClaret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:22 pm

IndigoLake wrote: I think we need to be turning to last season's top scorer for more - he should have done better with that big chance presented today.
My point is though people have accused Andre of being wasteful in front of goal and he's not even on that attacking table, which actually contains 23 players I just cropped it.

cutsy123
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 351 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by cutsy123 » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:23 pm

Both strikers dont kno wot to do with the ball
This user liked this post: claretfern

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 937 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by IndigoLake » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:23 pm

CombatClaret wrote:My point is though people have accused Andre of being wasteful in front of goal and he's not even on that attacking table, which actually contains 23 players I just cropped it.
I understand the point you're making, no problem there. But isn't being in that table a good sign? It means Barnes is creating chances for himself, or doing his best to make the most of him by getting shots in etc.

Giftonsnoidea
Posts: 1360
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 248 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Giftonsnoidea » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:24 pm

If we stay up we really need to upgrade our forwards, Barnes can play but he looks completely frustrated all the time, prob cos he fouls too much and refs blow him up all the time. He goes up elbows first in nearly all his aerial challenges and looks like he enjoys elbowing defenders. Shame really as its got him a bad reputation.
Last edited by Giftonsnoidea on Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Steve1956
Posts: 17888
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3071 times
Location: Fife

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Steve1956 » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:26 pm

Giftonsnoidea wrote:If we stay up we really need to upgrade our forwards, Barnes can play but he looks completely frustrated all the time, prob cos he fouls too much and refs blow him up all the time when he goes up elbows first in his aerial challenges.
Maybe we will shell out £30 million for Benteke!

Giftonsnoidea
Posts: 1360
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 248 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Giftonsnoidea » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:27 pm

Steve1956 wrote:Maybe we will shell out £30 million for Benteke!
I wouldn't go that far lol

CombatClaret
Posts: 4400
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1843 times
Has Liked: 933 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by CombatClaret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:28 pm

IndigoLake wrote:But isn't being in that table a good sign?
Absolutely a good thing to be up there, but poor to get so little out of him from all those numbers, hence wasteful. Potentially the most wasteful player in the league.
Last edited by CombatClaret on Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Rodleydave
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:22 am
Been Liked: 269 times
Has Liked: 104 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Rodleydave » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:29 pm

a sort of Premier league Matt Rhead

Steve1956
Posts: 17888
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3071 times
Location: Fife

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Steve1956 » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:30 pm

Giftonsnoidea wrote:I wouldn't go that far lol
Precisely ! :D

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:30 pm

absolute madness and costs us next week and could have this

expect hendrick to come in for him and go 5 midfield. he should have been brought off today.

Giftonsnoidea
Posts: 1360
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 248 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Giftonsnoidea » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:32 pm

Steve1956 wrote:Precisely ! :D
I rate Barnes but he really does need to sort his discipline out, there is a good player in there if channeled correctly, the coaches should be telling him to calm down and get some shots off rather than trying to take peoples heads off all the time.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18559
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7616 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:35 pm

He was kept on for his aerial strength, the same reason Tark was brought on. Considering they only really threatened from corners which we seem incapable of defending, it was the correct decision by Dyche. The pointless sending off was Barnes' fault.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:38 pm

Not a Barnes fan at all. Spends more time trying to win free kicks than win headers. Okay, he's a handful for defenders but his qualities as a footballer are massively limited.
These 5 users liked this post: claretfern Cleveleys_claret LawsCanalJump 3putt Walton

RingoMcCartney
Posts: 10318
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2637 times
Has Liked: 2798 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by RingoMcCartney » Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:45 pm

With Barnes on a yellow, surely bringing him off for vokes would have been the better option.

Happy with the point though
These 2 users liked this post: The Enclosure Crawley Claret

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 295 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by SkiptonClaret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:12 pm

Limited bruiser who shouldn't be starting PL games. Ok to throw on for the last 10 minutes.
This user liked this post: Walton

Spijed
Posts: 17932
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3028 times
Has Liked: 1324 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Spijed » Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:16 pm

According to the BBC:

"Only Liam Noble (six) has been sent off more times in English league football than since August 2011 than Ashley Barnes (five)."

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Feb 25, 2017 9:22 pm

Those who criticise his football abilities are somewhat harsh. His touch is often first class and was today. He should hold the ball better than he does though rather than look for the foul every time. Refs and teams are wise to it.

If he channeled as much energy into being productive once he had it under control as he does looking for a foul or to make a foul he would be a top player.

CombatClaret
Posts: 4400
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1843 times
Has Liked: 933 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by CombatClaret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 9:34 pm

BabylonClaret wrote:But he can also have a good touch and be decent in front if goal.
cricketfieldclarets wrote:His touch is often first class and was today.
I don't dislike the guy, he's always given 100% but what good is his first touch when he's simply not converting enough of the myriad of chances he has. There are so many strikes doing equally well with about 80% fewer chances.

If only we had the first touch of Barnes and the pace of Gray in one player...

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Feb 25, 2017 9:55 pm

I dont disagree - he needs to focus on being more productive than being so much of a spoiler.

Morgan
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 62 times
Has Liked: 13 times
Location: Not Burnley

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Morgan » Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:01 pm

Barnes is a permanent red card waiting to happen. One assumes his instructions are to "rough 'em up a bit". Problem is that this is the sum total of his game these days. He rarely has a shot on goal and refs are wise to his antics. If he scored a few then this modus operandi could be forgiven. But he doesn't. He could quite easily have cost us a point today.

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 12182
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5988 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:02 pm

I like Barnes but he made the three most blatent fouls you could see on the first three minutes of the game today.

Set the tone for the rest of the game.

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 937 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by IndigoLake » Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:26 pm

Morgan wrote:He rarely has a shot on goal
But that's not true is it?

claretgimmer
Posts: 602
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:49 am
Been Liked: 163 times
Has Liked: 727 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by claretgimmer » Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:47 pm

Barnes has a dark side no doubt but it serves us well when he is subtle in it`s use, he upsets defenders and disrupts their rhythm, something unfortunately Sam doesn`t do, he`s to nice, and sometimes it`s up to other player ie Gray to take more advantage of this, the fact we don`t is down to others. As for the myriad of chances that apparently come his way I must be missing plenty, when he gets decent service from the wide men he is as good as anything we have at finishing them off Spurs away, Palace home great examples, also in championship season. Yes could at times be better but who in any team couldn`t, maybe now with Brady he might get a bit more of that hopefully. For me he is still our best option up front to hold the ball up and he gets a lot of stick in doing it so maybe his dark side is his form of levelling the playing field.

Morgan
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 62 times
Has Liked: 13 times
Location: Not Burnley

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Morgan » Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:48 pm

IndigoLake wrote:But that's not true is it?
Well according to Premier League stats website, in 17 apps this season, he's had 27 shots ie about one and a a half a game, and 14 on target, ie less than one per game.

So no, actually, it is true.

ten bellies
Posts: 677
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 10:53 pm
Been Liked: 237 times
Has Liked: 1283 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by ten bellies » Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:49 pm

I love Ashley's aggression. We need an edge and he has it.

LawsCanalJump
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:59 pm
Been Liked: 121 times
Has Liked: 62 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by LawsCanalJump » Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:57 pm

I'm sick of him trying to make the ref think he is being fouled every ball forward, very boring

lakesclaret
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:49 pm
Been Liked: 151 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by lakesclaret » Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:05 pm

He does what he does I guess ,though he's slow not very mobile a cheat,can't seem to hold the ball up and is no more than a moderate finisher.He shouldn't be anywhere near the prem but while he's in claret I'll back him 100%

nonayclaret
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 64 times
Has Liked: 76 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by nonayclaret » Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:02 am

How quickly some posters forget his superb quality goal against Crystal Palace at home and the extra 2 points that got us.
He is one of our top players, and one of the reasons we will stop up this time.
This user liked this post: longsidepies

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11136
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 823 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:28 am

I do wish sometimes that he would rein it in a little but he is what he is. And that has been pretty good for us up to press.

It's not the putting himself about or trying to 'win' free kicks, it's the hen pecking of the referee that I would like to see reined in a little.

Morgan wrote:Barnes is a permanent red card waiting to happen. One assumes his instructions are to "rough 'em up a bit". Problem is that this is the sum total of his game these days. He rarely has a shot on goal and refs are wise to his antics. If he scored a few then this modus operandi could be forgiven. But he doesn't. He could quite easily have cost us a point today.
(Your) Location - Not Burnley

We know and we're glad about that.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:30 am

nonayclaret wrote:How quickly some posters forget his superb quality goal against Crystal Palace at home and the extra 2 points that got us.
He is one of our top players, and one of the reasons we will stop up this time.
In fairness that was almost 4 months ago. He has since scored three more, 2 of which were penalties.

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 937 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by IndigoLake » Sun Feb 26, 2017 8:31 am

nonayclaret wrote:How quickly some posters forget his superb quality goal against Crystal Palace at home and the extra 2 points that got us.
He is one of our top players, and one of the reasons we will stop up this time.
Just what I was thinking. People have been singing his praises this season and he gets sent off and suddenly all he can do is resort to being a thug, apparently :lol:

Morgan
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 62 times
Has Liked: 13 times
Location: Not Burnley

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Morgan » Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:21 am

Bin Ont Turf wrote:

(Your) Location - Not Burnley

We know and we're glad about that.

How nice. Another anonymous keyboard warrior who resorts to unpleasantries if someone has a differing opinion.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11136
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 823 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:26 am

Aye, and that differing opinion is usually negative.

How is the weather in not Burnley this morning?

wilks_bfc
Posts: 13028
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3666 times
Has Liked: 2112 times
Contact:

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by wilks_bfc » Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:28 am

CombatClaret wrote:Would have been amazed had he not picked up a red this season so not going to slag him off for doing what Barnes does and seems instructed to do, should have been subbed off.
Attacking stats from last 4 weeks put him 2nd overall, given this should we be expecting more returns from him?
barnes.jpg
Last 4 games returns
Siggurdson - 2 goals 2 Assists
Barnes - 1g 1a
Mane - 2g 0a (2 games played)
Lukaku - 4g 0a
Hernandez - 2g 0a
Denney - 3g 0a
Firmino - 2g 1a

Boyd gets stick for doing only part of what people consider his job so should we be expecting more from Barnes besides p*ssing of defenders.

2nd overall based on what?
Considering it's my job to understand stats & tables I'm a little worried that I can't understand how it's been calculated that he's second

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Feb 26, 2017 11:17 am

Morgan wrote:How nice. Another anonymous keyboard warrior who resorts to unpleasantries if someone has a differing opinion.
I wouldnt worry. I think BOT is going through a midlife crisis. It is the only explanation for his recent inane ramblings!

oswyclaret
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 6:51 pm
Been Liked: 89 times
Has Liked: 431 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by oswyclaret » Sun Feb 26, 2017 11:26 am

Would you have rather sacked barnes off and used vokes,or are you not happy at our league position at present.

FFS some folk are never happy and get greedy and want that extra bit more!

Awesome point at Hull yesterday,lets keep it going.

Onwards and upwards!

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by KRBFC » Sun Feb 26, 2017 11:30 am

he's a good wrestler, needs some coaching from a striker who has been there and done it. A striker coach like Andy Cole/Owen/Shearer would help, because while Barnes' first touch is good, his build up play is ok but he offers absolutely no goalscoring threat really. Some say you either have that ''knack'' or you don't, I'm sure it can be coached. His movement in the box isn't good enough.

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by KRBFC » Sun Feb 26, 2017 11:32 am

oswyclaret wrote:Would you have rather sacked barnes off and used vokes,or are you not happy at our league position at present.

FFS some folk are never happy and get greedy and want that extra bit more!

Awesome point at Hull yesterday,lets keep it going.

Onwards and upwards!
That's life, I'm one of those people.
While I'm happy with where we are, I want more and more and more progress.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9064
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3429 times
Has Liked: 5646 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Colburn_Claret » Sun Feb 26, 2017 11:35 am

I'm a massive fan of our Ashley. He can be very awkward for defenders to handle, and it isn't any place for pussies. I think that most prem defenders are far more subtle than him when it comes to the dark arts, which is why referees target him. I wouldn't call him nasty at all, it's just the game has changed. If he was playing in the 60's or 70's he wouldn't even get a booking.
On the plus side, he is still far better with the ball at his feet than Sam, and plays far better passes and link play with those around him. He also is a lot better at holding the ball up and getting a shot off.
Do we need better going forward, probably yes, but then you can say the same about practically every player in the squad. For now I'm more than happy that he's ours.

CombatClaret
Posts: 4400
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1843 times
Has Liked: 933 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by CombatClaret » Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:22 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:2nd overall based on what?
Considering it's my job to understand stats & tables I'm a little worried that I can't understand how it's been calculated that he's second
Based on the table I included which amalgamates the various stats, I don't know how each is weighted, he's certainly 2nd or tied 2nd for several.
Credit to FantasyFootballScout.com who compiled the table and have a good record of being factually accurate.

PaintYorkClaretnBlue
Posts: 1842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:42 pm
Been Liked: 670 times
Has Liked: 1254 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by PaintYorkClaretnBlue » Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:35 pm

Crap decision for Barnes first yellow, he certainly didn't charge at the ref! Second was a defo yellow. Ref seemed to want to penalise him at every opportunity!

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Top Claret » Mon Feb 27, 2017 6:54 am

I really don't give a toss about the stats concerning Barnes. Barnes puts the fear of God into the opposition back 4 and he makes far more impact on a games than Vokes ever does.

Barnes and Gray up top for me every week

Grimsby Claret
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 38 times
Has Liked: 59 times
Location: Grimsby Lincolnshire

Re: Barnes, most wasteful?

Post by Grimsby Claret » Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:57 am

Barnes Makes Joey look a saint.

Post Reply