Grosicki
-
- Posts: 3050
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 530 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: Grosicki
Had the privilege of speaking with the great Les Latcham during the weak. He reckons we should be using the width of the pitch instead of playing it down the middle all the time. Perhaps Sean thinks the same.
This user liked this post: roamingclaret
-
- Posts: 3300
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 746 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Grosicki
Nah . Alright but if he's a disruptive influence e he hasn't got enough to make it worthwhile
-
- Posts: 2656
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 970 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
Re: Grosicki
Maybe Boyd can swap his skates for Grosicki's shoes 

-
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:15 am
- Been Liked: 154 times
- Has Liked: 95 times
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grosicki
Boyd was very good today. Grosicki did have a good game.
Re: Grosicki
looked a decent player and will cause sides problems
-
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 982 times
- Has Liked: 1353 times
Re: Grosicki
Boyd was better than Brady today.
-
- Posts: 17959
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6643 times
- Has Liked: 3095 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Grosicki
Looked good today in a poor side,we will go back for him in the summer when Hull are back in the Championship,another good thing will be Hull will have paid the bookies off,so happy days all round 

-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 946 times
Re: Grosicki
Might have looked good today but he missed a couple of decent chances.
-
- Posts: 17959
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6643 times
- Has Liked: 3095 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Grosicki
Our record signing was abysmal today.

-
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 459 times
- Has Liked: 2306 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Grosicki
= Steve Macdonald
Bit of a player though.
Bit of a player though.
-
- Posts: 6412
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3169 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: Grosicki
Grosicki reminded me of Kightly today. Direct, fairly quick and threatening, but his end product was a bit inconsistent today. Boyd had a really good first half and dug in after the break. He was certainly much better than Brady, who showed he's still very unfamiliar with our system.
-
- Posts: 18707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7668 times
- Has Liked: 1590 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Grosicki
Very unlucky with a right foot curler towards the top corner and also came close with a free kick. He was quick and seemed equally happy to go down the line on his left foot as he did cutting in on his right foot which will keep defenders guessing. Looks like he would have been a good signing but I think Brady will prove equally useful when he beds in.
-
- Posts: 34707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12658 times
- Has Liked: 6302 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Grosicki
you can see with Brady though that when he settles in and finds form he will be a massive asset for us
Re: Grosicki
Was their 2nd best player behind Maguire.
Will tear up the championship should they go down.
Will tear up the championship should they go down.
Re: Grosicki
There were a few occasions where Brady failed to track back / follow his man. He needs to add this into his game quickly, but I've no doubt he will.
His deliveries were pretty inconsistent on the whole but still got an assist. He will be a good player for us, once he settles in.
His deliveries were pretty inconsistent on the whole but still got an assist. He will be a good player for us, once he settles in.
-
- Posts: 761
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:03 pm
- Been Liked: 343 times
- Has Liked: 86 times
Re: Grosicki
No he wasn't.Guller Bull wrote:Boyd was better than Brady today.
This user liked this post: MDWat
Re: Grosicki
He was by a clear mileKeighleyClaret wrote:No he wasn't.
Last edited by cutsy123 on Sat Feb 25, 2017 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:19 pm
- Been Liked: 141 times
- Has Liked: 95 times
- Location: Garforth doh!
Re: Grosicki
Loved it when he lined up to take a corner in front of us today and someone shouted "put a tenner on it". 

-
- Posts: 6800
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1985 times
- Has Liked: 508 times
Re: Grosicki
Funny that, I was saying to Whentheballmoves on the train up that Grosicki reminded me of a Kightly upgrade.claretspice wrote:Grosicki reminded me of Kightly today. Direct, fairly quick and threatening, but his end product was a bit inconsistent today. Boyd had a really good first half and dug in after the break. He was certainly much better than Brady, who showed he's still very unfamiliar with our system.
After the game, I felt he hadn't done anything to worry us apart from one chance that he curled over.
Whereas Brady got an assist and set up the corner prior to it too - as you rightly say, before he is fully used to us.
I think we have made the correct choice.
-
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:59 am
- Been Liked: 284 times
- Has Liked: 3719 times
- Location: North Yorkshire
Re: Grosicki
Why did he get so much stick? I was under the impression Rennes had scuppered the deal not him.
-
- Posts: 17959
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6643 times
- Has Liked: 3095 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Grosicki
Haven't seen it mentioned anywhere but if the refs showed an consistency, Going of the Hendrick sending off Boyd should have been sent off today.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
-
- Posts: 17959
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6643 times
- Has Liked: 3095 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Grosicki
The referee didn't think so,but didn't send him off.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Boyd clearly took the ball.
-
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 7:15 pm
- Been Liked: 353 times
- Has Liked: 308 times
Re: Grosicki
I like him almost exclusively because he's quick.
Re: Grosicki
It was a worse tackle than the one Hendrick got sent off for, a straight red card all day long.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Boyd clearly took the ball.
-
- Posts: 17959
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6643 times
- Has Liked: 3095 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Grosicki
Agreed.KRBFC wrote:It was a worse tackle than the one Hendrick got sent off for, a straight red card all day long.
-
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:02 pm
- Been Liked: 174 times
- Has Liked: 132 times
Re: Grosicki
I've only seen the tackle once on replay but it looked to me he played the ball too. It looked similar to Lafferty's red card against Arsenal under Coyle where his foot bounced up off the top of the ball
-
- Posts: 5269
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2956 times
- Has Liked: 833 times
Re: Grosicki
Boyd's wasn't even a foul, he took the ball and their lad booted his foot.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grosicki
quoonbeatz wrote:Boyd's wasn't even a foul, he took the ball and their lad booted his foot.
Exactly right. From my view anyway. I stand to be corrected but I was right in line with it.
-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:59 pm
- Been Liked: 121 times
- Has Liked: 62 times
Re: Grosicki
He didn't do anything which was nice
Burnley fans booed a player who wanted to sign for us , the board decided against it so he got his premier league move to hull, well done
Burnley fans booed a player who wanted to sign for us , the board decided against it so he got his premier league move to hull, well done
Last edited by LawsCanalJump on Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:49 pm
- Been Liked: 151 times
- Has Liked: 4 times
Re: Grosicki
He had a good game against a relatively weak side (us) he was a bit wayward though and looks a poor tackler
Re: Grosicki
Somebody post a picture, it's a nailed on red card. Went over the ball = red card
-
- Posts: 5269
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2956 times
- Has Liked: 833 times
Re: Grosicki
Think we were about 5 rows behind you - is it you who has the Dean Marney flag?cricketfieldclarets wrote:Exactly right. From my view anyway. I stand to be corrected but I was right in line with it.
-
- Posts: 77468
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37887 times
- Has Liked: 5758 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Grosicki
Didn't look a foul from where I was standing but I believe Chris Boden tweeted that he was lucky not to be sent off.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grosicki
My nephew does yes. We were along the side of the pitch, about 8 - 10 rows back.quoonbeatz wrote:Think we were about 5 rows behind you - is it you who has the Dean Marney flag?
This user liked this post: quoonbeatz
Re: Grosicki
Never saw himcricketfieldclarets wrote:Boyd was very good today. Grosicki did have a good game.
He always had his shirt held in his face
-
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3455 times
- Has Liked: 2958 times
Re: Grosicki
Grosicki has a funny shaped head. This is accentuated by his ridiculous Barnet.
-
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:09 pm
- Been Liked: 80 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: Grosicki
Interesting how we think Brady will be OK when he gets used to our system and tracks back a bit better. I didn't see Grosiki do much tracking back at all today.
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Grosicki
Looked a real threat going forwards. Definitely not a Dyche type player though.
He has a weird head/face. Like some kind of mad professor. Looks about 40 aswel.
He has a weird head/face. Like some kind of mad professor. Looks about 40 aswel.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Grosicki
He's not a defensive wide midfielder though. He's there to do a job and that's to attack, attack, attack. He's exactly the sort of player we needed, hence why we went for him. He doesn't need to tackle if played in the correct system.lakesclaret wrote:He had a good game against a relatively weak side (us) he was a bit wayward though and looks a poor tackler
Re: Grosicki
I watched on a stream at first it didn't look a foul but the replay showed it should have been a red card, 100% worse than the Hendrick one.ClaretTony wrote:Didn't look a foul from where I was standing but I believe Chris Boden tweeted that he was lucky not to be sent off.
Re: Grosicki
I watched on stream as well. Boyd clearly took the ball, then his foot bounced up and hit Maguire. No intent at all. Hendrick took the player with no contact with the ball.KRBFC wrote:I watched on a stream at first it didn't look a foul but the replay showed it should have been a red card, 100% worse than the Hendrick one.
-
- Posts: 3729
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 693 times
- Has Liked: 207 times
Re: Grosicki
An extremely oddly shaped head. Alienesque. Mars attacks!!!Lord Beamish wrote:Grosicki has a funny shaped head. This is accentuated by his ridiculous Barnet.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish
Re: Grosicki
He made contact with the ball but went over the ball with studs up, a leg breaker of a tackle regardless of intent.jtv wrote:I watched on stream as well. Boyd clearly took the ball, then his foot bounced up and hit Maguire. No intent at all. Hendrick took the player with no contact with the ball.
Re: Grosicki
He looks like an ill receding berbatovLord Beamish wrote:Grosicki has a funny shaped head. This is accentuated by his ridiculous Barnet.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish
-
- Posts: 761
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:03 pm
- Been Liked: 343 times
- Has Liked: 86 times
Re: Grosicki
No he wasn't.cutsy123 wrote:He was by a clear mile
Re: Grosicki
Not sure what game u were watchin but brady was terrible bar the cross for the goalKeighleyClaret wrote:No he wasn't.