Moon tourism

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
normandeeley
Posts: 119
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:27 am
Been Liked: 112 times
Has Liked: 136 times

Moon tourism

Post by normandeeley » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:31 am

Apparently a firm called Space X say they are going to send two paying tourists up to the moon next year.
This will obviously be extremely hazardous and with a fair chance of the craft not making it back.
Given this, I would like to propose Ant and Dec as the first two passengers.
This user liked this post: Dazzler

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Sidney1st » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:34 am

Tony Blair and ABC

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2448
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 971 times
Has Liked: 233 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by duncandisorderly » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:35 am

Wallace and Gromit

IWOODLOVETT
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
Been Liked: 522 times
Has Liked: 245 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by IWOODLOVETT » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:42 am

Owen and Sandy.

Dyched
Posts: 6519
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:34 am
Been Liked: 2040 times
Has Liked: 466 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Dyched » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:45 am

Whats the luggage allowance?
This user liked this post: FactualFrank

NottsClaret
Posts: 4288
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2924 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Moon tourism

Post by NottsClaret » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:55 am

I'd do it, once Ryanair open a route. Maybe £99? Obviously not to the Sea of Tranquility itself, but close enough.
This user liked this post: lucs86

Chobulous
Posts: 2132
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:27 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Chobulous » Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:53 am

Rowls and Imploding Turtle - they can spend all eternity nipping and scratching each other and pulling each other's hair after HAL has woken them up each day.
These 2 users liked this post: Sidney1st Rowls

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Sidney1st » Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:56 am

Chobulous wrote:Rowls and Imploding Turtle - they can spend all eternity nipping and scratching each other and pulling each other's hair after HAL has woken them up each day.
We should make that a reality show.

box_of_frogs
Posts: 5070
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1105 times
Has Liked: 1016 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by box_of_frogs » Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:01 pm

I'd love to do that. Seriously!

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 19679
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 4330 times
Has Liked: 8571 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Buxtonclaret » Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:21 pm

I think there's a dark side to all this.
This user liked this post: cricketfield73

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:36 pm

Rowls : The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only. There is no stopping in the red zone.
IT : The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only. There is no stopping in the red zone.
Rowls: [later] The red zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only. There is no stopping in the white zone.
IT : No, the white zone is for loading of passengers and there is no stopping in a RED zone.
Rowls: The red zone has always been for loading and unloading of passengers. There's never stopping in a white zone.
IT : Don't you tell me which zone is for loading, and which zone is for stopping!
Rowls: Listen IT, don't start up with your white zone **** again.
[Later]
Rowls : There's just no stopping in a white zone.
IT : Oh really, Vernon? Why pretend, we both know perfectly well what this is about. You want me to have an abortion.
Rowls: It's really the only sensible thing to do, if its done safely. Therapeutically there's no danger involved.
These 3 users liked this post: bobinho Lord Beamish Goodclaret

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2656
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 176 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Belgianclaret » Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:44 pm

Its an Elon Musk company - AKA founding father of PayPal and Tesla

Has money to burn

john'sroseyspecs
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:14 pm
Been Liked: 364 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by john'sroseyspecs » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:20 pm

Has the rocket got the same technology as Tesla's self driving car? If so the passengers might become the first real men in the moon

bobinho
Posts: 10630
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4642 times
Has Liked: 7284 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Moon tourism

Post by bobinho » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:29 pm

On a serious note, I'd love to see the earth from space.

Imagine the feeling as you pulled away, and the most amazing thing we have ever experienced got smaller and smaller.

Think I'll book...

harpers_perm
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:42 am
Been Liked: 187 times
Has Liked: 27 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by harpers_perm » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:33 pm

As long as that amateur 'astronaut' Branson isn't involved I'd be tempted.

We all know what happens when Mr big teeth builds one of his rockets.

1968claret
Posts: 1051
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 520 times
Has Liked: 639 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by 1968claret » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:43 pm

bobinho wrote:
Imagine the feeling as you pulled away, and the most amazing thing we have ever experienced got smaller and smaller.
I think I would be calling a doctor :D
This user liked this post: bobinho

geopancake
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:07 am
Been Liked: 137 times
Has Liked: 37 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by geopancake » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:49 pm

If this happens I'll plait sawdust.

But I'd like to send Chris Evans and Matt Bacon or that rich farmer from countryside Adam whoever. Bear Grylls, Gary Lineker, Shearer, Sherwood, Paddy What's his face, Bono, him from Police, Kim kardwhatsissyon, Lily Allen, Lady Google, Madonna, Tom Cruise, Bob geldoff, Davina Dodah, Jezza Kyle, anybody from cast corrie, eastenders, or the yorkie one, strictly, anybody who prostitutes themselves reality TV, royalty, heredity peers, and this is just my shortlist.

However Elon will fail miserably.In fact he should be first up there.

Darthlaw
Posts: 3412
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1290 times
Has Liked: 449 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Darthlaw » Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:50 pm

That's no moon...
This user liked this post: bobinho

CombatClaret
Posts: 4401
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1844 times
Has Liked: 933 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by CombatClaret » Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:56 pm

Space X are clever cookies, I follow this kind of stuff with an armchair interest. Utterly incredible that they can boost a payload to the ISS then guide the spend rocket engine to a safe vertical landing on a moving barge in the ocean.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLTe3G86XG0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The orbit to the moon bit isn't really the hard, just no one's been making a rocket big enough to get all the hardware up there in one go since Apollo.

Flatline
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:57 pm
Been Liked: 99 times
Has Liked: 130 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Flatline » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:14 pm

CombatClaret wrote:Space X are clever cookies, I follow this kind of stuff with an armchair interest. Utterly incredible that they can boost a payload to the ISS then guide the spend rocket engine to a safe vertical landing on a moving barge in the ocean.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLTe3G86XG0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The orbit to the moon bit isn't really the hard, just no one's been making a rocket big enough to get all the hardware up there in one go since Apollo.
Proof that NASA are the biggest lying turds going.
This user liked this post: geopancake

dermotdermot
Posts: 3729
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 693 times
Has Liked: 207 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by dermotdermot » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:26 pm

Imploding Turtle as trialist astronaut for me. He needs a change of scenery.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3544
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 944 times
Has Liked: 582 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:38 pm

Brian Jensen, because he was always dropping Clangers

conyoviejo
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
Been Liked: 2493 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates

Re: Moon tourism

Post by conyoviejo » Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:32 pm

"On a serious note, I'd love to see the earth from space"

Take a trip to the the IMAX cinema at Bradford .. Cheap as chips

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4401
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1621 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by LoveCurryPies » Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:46 pm

Corbyn & Trump. Communist & Capitalist. Both deluded.

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 3020 times
Has Liked: 1865 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by Wile E Coyote » Wed Mar 01, 2017 12:51 am

the moon is a nearby rock, great that it has been visited, but we need to get far more adventurous. Mars is useless too, ultimately, our species has to be far, far away to avoid destruction when our sun burns out,when it does, the solar system will be destroyed.Mars will be snuffed out immediately.
Problem is, the distances required to be traversed,are incredible. The moon is no more than a fannying about expedition for ultra wealthy morons.

CombatClaret
Posts: 4401
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1844 times
Has Liked: 933 times

Re: Moon tourism

Post by CombatClaret » Wed Mar 01, 2017 12:28 pm

Wile E Coyote wrote:the moon is a nearby rock, great that it has been visited, but we need to get far more adventurous. Mars is useless too, ultimately, our species has to be far, far away to avoid destruction when our sun burns out,when it does, the solar system will be destroyed.Mars will be snuffed out immediately.
Problem is, the distances required to be traversed,are incredible. The moon is no more than a fannying about expedition for ultra wealthy morons.
The sun burns out in 5 billion years, man in it's physical form has been around 200,000 years so we're only 0.004% there. If we do make it that far without destroying ourselves I think we just pat ourselves on the back, stick a museum to our achievements on Pluto and die with dignity having beaten all the odds.

Besides climate change and all associated events (flood, famine), a big old rock hitting us is a more pressing concern. To quote sci-fi author Larry Niven
"The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!"

Flatline wrote:Proof that NASA are the biggest lying turds going.
NASA just got bloated, as more contractors got involved they push for mission which involve them, presidents come and go with different aims. A private company is more like the NASA of old with one single minded goal, a determined man in charge and a shed load of cash (but no congress to argue or tax payers to please).

Post Reply