Was the decision vindicated?
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Was the decision vindicated?
Changing fixtures against Liverpool came under a lot of fire at the time. I personally thought it was a bad decision and many others did too.
I still don't think we should bow down to other teams requests so easily.
3/4 of the way into our 4 away games in a row we have only gained one point. But the performances have been OK which give us confidence. I think the decision has been vindicated. An early and unexpected win against Liverpool after the disappointing Swansea defeat got us off to a good start and meant we have never been in the bottom three. Its always important to start well and the result meant we did. We caught Liverpool off guard as they weren't used to or expecting our style. Of the other top 5 teams we have played at home we haven't won. Against Liverpool we have gained 3 points and plus one goal difference in the games.
Had we played them away after the Swansea defeat and before the Chelsea away fixture we could have started adrift and very low on confidence.
Would anyone rather yesterday have been at The Turf as originally scheduled?
I still don't think we should bow down to other teams requests so easily.
3/4 of the way into our 4 away games in a row we have only gained one point. But the performances have been OK which give us confidence. I think the decision has been vindicated. An early and unexpected win against Liverpool after the disappointing Swansea defeat got us off to a good start and meant we have never been in the bottom three. Its always important to start well and the result meant we did. We caught Liverpool off guard as they weren't used to or expecting our style. Of the other top 5 teams we have played at home we haven't won. Against Liverpool we have gained 3 points and plus one goal difference in the games.
Had we played them away after the Swansea defeat and before the Chelsea away fixture we could have started adrift and very low on confidence.
Would anyone rather yesterday have been at The Turf as originally scheduled?
-
- Posts: 19761
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4198 times
- Has Liked: 2243 times
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
No, I was fully behind the fixture switch as it gave us the best possible start. After Dyches previous season in the top league we started badly and never got out of the relegation battle despite finishing the season better.
-
- Posts: 20495
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4532 times
- Has Liked: 2041 times
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
Think we all would have been happy with taking three points off Liverpool
at the start of the season.
Can't see the order they were played making much odds.
at the start of the season.
Can't see the order they were played making much odds.
-
- Posts: 12230
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 6021 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
Absolutely.
Would we have got a point at Anfield in August? Highly unlikely.
Would we have beaten Liverpool at home yesterday? Possibly but certainly not a given.
Add to that the psychological boost of beating Liverpool and it's definitely worked in our favour.
Edit: "Absolutely" in answer to the thread title, not the question at the end of the OP.
Would we have got a point at Anfield in August? Highly unlikely.
Would we have beaten Liverpool at home yesterday? Possibly but certainly not a given.
Add to that the psychological boost of beating Liverpool and it's definitely worked in our favour.
Edit: "Absolutely" in answer to the thread title, not the question at the end of the OP.
-
- Posts: 77504
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37902 times
- Has Liked: 5760 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
I think it worked out well and the decision wasn't really ours to make. I can't speak for any others let alone many others.cricketfieldclarets wrote:I personally thought it was a bad decision and many others did too.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
I know it wasnt our decision to make. Its a theoretical question. Your forum would be an empty place if it was only based on discussions of anything we have an impact or decision in. But you know that.
Plenty of people thought it was a bad decision. I can speak for them as they posted as much on here and said as much in 'real life' discussions...
Plenty of people thought it was a bad decision. I can speak for them as they posted as much on here and said as much in 'real life' discussions...
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
It's my forum.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Your forum would be an empty place.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 5495
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1474 times
- Has Liked: 3244 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
In answer to the o.p.
Yes!
Three points in the bank that might keep Prem football at 'Turf next season.
The added bonus of beating one of the big boys early on did wonders for our confidence.
Yes!
Three points in the bank that might keep Prem football at 'Turf next season.
The added bonus of beating one of the big boys early on did wonders for our confidence.
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
We played better yesterday than we did when we beat them.
Funny old game this football lark.
Funny old game this football lark.
This user liked this post: gawthorpe_view
-
- Posts: 9817
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3230 times
- Has Liked: 10711 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
Yea, fully vindicated - it's all working out rather well.
-
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:15 am
- Been Liked: 154 times
- Has Liked: 95 times
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
The decision was vindicated the moment we got a positive result at TM. Yesterdays result was irrelevant.
-
- Posts: 10211
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2418 times
- Has Liked: 3332 times
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
It was the right decision to switch when we were asked to switch.StuffyClaret wrote:The decision was vindicated the moment we got a positive result at TM. Yesterdays result was irrelevant.
Before we'd started the season there was a strong argument that we only had a chance of taking something from Liverpool if we caught them "unprepared" - and even then we could only do this at the Turf.
Before the start of season we had no track record of "fortress Turf Moor" and no track record of "no wins away." We had 2 previous Prem seasons when we went straight back down. In the accumulation of points, winning early in the season is important.
We are where we are today - played 28, 31 points, 12th and above the relegation scrap - because we beat Liverpool - and have repeated the great home form from then on - with the advantage of getting in one more home game in the first half of the season.
UTC
-
- Posts: 5245
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2129 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
Was a great decision - It also arguably got us Flanagan which was a brilliant acquisition !!!
-
- Posts: 34719
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12660 times
- Has Liked: 6302 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Was the decision vindicated?
cracking decision, that result gave us loads of confidence