Herrera

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Funkydrummer
Posts: 8753
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 3122 times
Has Liked: 2158 times
Location: Burnley

Herrera

Post by Funkydrummer » Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:39 pm

What a complete d!ck.

If his brains were made of gunpowder, he wouldn't have enough to blow his hat off. :D
This user liked this post: Sidney1st

taio
Posts: 12796
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3578 times
Has Liked: 403 times

Re: Herrera

Post by taio » Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:41 pm

Not a second yellow in my view. As said in commentary it was more about the timing following numerous fouls on Hazard, but that doesn't make it the right decision.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Herrera

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:42 pm

Never a red card. Not even a yellow.

JohnMac
Posts: 7723
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2577 times
Has Liked: 4164 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Herrera

Post by JohnMac » Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:43 pm

Silly foul at exactly the wrong moment.

Hazard always makes a meal of falling over and Conte is always remonstrating with the officials in order to get players booked.

Hope United turn them over now but doubt it will happen.

Stacky_claret
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:23 pm
Been Liked: 78 times
Has Liked: 227 times

Re: Herrera

Post by Stacky_claret » Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:57 pm

Was barely a foul never mind a yellow lol
Very poor refereeing decision which ruined what could have been a good game

cutsy123
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 351 times

Re: Herrera

Post by cutsy123 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:00 pm

The crowd pay a big part in it

JimmyRobbo
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
Been Liked: 683 times
Has Liked: 1241 times

Re: Herrera

Post by JimmyRobbo » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:01 pm

What did he think he was going to get? Nowhere near the ball. Was it a serious attempt to make a tackle?

Soft decision but gave the ref virtually no choice.

I also thought his first yellow was a bit naughty, he knew what he was doing. I think he should be given another yellow for grabbing the ref after the red. And another yellow for refusing to leave the pitch.

Can't stand him. Reminds me of many things I hate Moaninho for.
These 2 users liked this post: DAVETHEVICAR Leisure

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Herrera

Post by TVC15 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:07 pm

2 yellows - both deserved

Stupid challenge straight after referee had spoken to smalling and jones - what was he thinking of ?

I despise Mourinho - he wasn't such a gobsh-ite when Conte confronted him was he ?!!!

Kante and Hazard have been brilliant.

Pogba been average
Feliani is awful - why did he bring him on and take off Myk who was having a good game ? Feliani is embarrassing.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34719
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12659 times
Has Liked: 6302 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Herrera

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:11 pm

shambles from Oliver, never ever a yellow card, complete lack of understanding of the game he's refereeing, complete lack of understanding of how much Hazard (and Chelsea) falls over at every opportunity. I'm far from a Man Utd fan but it's ruined what could have been a good game.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Herrera

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:12 pm

Its two yellow card offences.

Like it or not, its the correct decision.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1

Dyched
Posts: 6521
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:34 am
Been Liked: 2041 times
Has Liked: 466 times

Re: Herrera

Post by Dyched » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:13 pm

No way was it a second yellow card. If that was Boyd away at Sunderland this weekend you'd all be disagreeing with the decision.

Costa has been pathetic all game

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34719
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12659 times
Has Liked: 6302 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Herrera

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:13 pm

we might as well pack it in if that second is a yellow

taio
Posts: 12796
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3578 times
Has Liked: 403 times

Re: Herrera

Post by taio » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:16 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:Its two yellow card offences.

Like it or not, its the correct decision.
How when there appeared to be no contact? If one of our players got sent off for that I'd be very annoyed.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8753
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 3122 times
Has Liked: 2158 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Herrera

Post by Funkydrummer » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:35 pm

Both deserved in my book. It's Manyoo anyway, so he should have had at least three cards IMO.

starting_11
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 946 times

Re: Herrera

Post by starting_11 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:37 pm

Oliver had completely bottled it after the sending off. I think I've totted up about 5 yellow cards for Valencia and 3 for rojo. Looked like a stamp just now too.
These 2 users liked this post: JimmyRobbo Leisure

conyoviejo
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
Been Liked: 2493 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates

Re: Herrera

Post by conyoviejo » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:38 pm

It doesn't matter as long as Utd lose..

starting_11
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 946 times

Re: Herrera

Post by starting_11 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:39 pm

Just watched it back and he's definitely stamped on hazard...

hampsteadclaret
Posts: 3235
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:25 am
Been Liked: 1110 times
Has Liked: 802 times

Re: Herrera

Post by hampsteadclaret » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:42 pm

Herrera was stupid.

It was a foul, never a booking, and it spoiled the match.

I hope City or Spurs win it..cannot stand Chelsea and their fans or ( these days) Arsenal.

minnieclaret
Posts: 6842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2012 times
Has Liked: 2287 times
Location: lismore co. waterford

Re: Herrera

Post by minnieclaret » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:13 pm

I don't like the interpretation of the first one. it should be like the basketball rule, where you stand is your ground. So I wouldn't give a yellow for that.
As opposed to making a movement across a player to obstruct him.

The second is a player going away from him towards goal and by modern reffing is a yellow every time.
He is an idiot for making that challenge with a yellow to his name.
This user liked this post: Hipper

Goobs
Posts: 4603
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1550 times
Has Liked: 1064 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Herrera

Post by Goobs » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:16 pm

cutsy123 wrote:The crowd pay a big part in it
This must be where we are going wrong. We need to all chip in before a game to bribe the ref.

burnleybonzo
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:15 am
Been Liked: 18 times
Has Liked: 15 times

Re: Herrera

Post by burnleybonzo » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:17 pm

His dissent at the first yellow card warranted a second. He is always at it...

chorleyhere
Posts: 2457
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 pm
Been Liked: 206 times
Has Liked: 257 times
Location: Chorley Lancs

Re: Herrera

Post by chorleyhere » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:21 pm

Would also have liked to have seen Oliver apply the rules and yellow card players for surrounding and jostling the ref and for numerous blatant dissension.
Only Man U got away with it when players from lesser clubs would have been booked e.g. Burnley for instance.
This user liked this post: DCWat

mdd2
Posts: 6949
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1835 times
Has Liked: 759 times

Re: Herrera

Post by mdd2 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:21 pm

I think Michael Oliver is an excellent ref, but that second yellow IMO was wrong.

chorleyhere
Posts: 2457
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 pm
Been Liked: 206 times
Has Liked: 257 times
Location: Chorley Lancs

Re: Herrera

Post by chorleyhere » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:25 pm

Oliver didn't apply the basic rules and it led to an increasingly ugly set of tackles. How Rojo and Valencia didn't get book I don't know. I hope we get a better set of decisions when Pukemanu come visiting.

Ashingtonclaret46
Posts: 3906
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 1869 times
Has Liked: 2727 times
Location: Ashington, Northumberland

Re: Herrera

Post by Ashingtonclaret46 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:26 pm

Only one person on the field and one off it to blame for spoiling the game -- and it wasn't the referee.
He gave the players plenty of chance to put their house in order, including not booking 4 or 5 United players when Herrera was sent off.
It was obvious from the start that United were targeting Hazard and he was fouled 5 times before the sending off.
Herrera has 11 cautions and 2 dismissals in 38 appearances this season.

DCWat
Posts: 9962
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4495 times
Has Liked: 3908 times

Re: Herrera

Post by DCWat » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:30 pm

I thought Keown's assessment of the Valencia challenge was generous to say the least. He left the ground with both feet to dive into the challenge.

Get the ball or not, come in sideways or not, that's a red card, these days, surely!?

jurek
Posts: 1841
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:38 pm
Been Liked: 315 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Herrera

Post by jurek » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:33 pm

Thought Herrera's second yellow was harsh and not necessary.
I think the ref. was trying to put his marker on the game but he could have given
him a final warning. If he had persisted afterwards then send him off.

Ruined the game to a certain extent.

Enola Gay
Posts: 914
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 am
Been Liked: 743 times
Has Liked: 792 times
Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha

Re: Herrera

Post by Enola Gay » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:50 pm

We've all seen yellow cards given before for those "blocking someone off and then pretending you couldn't get out of the way" challenges.

Similarly you're always risking a yellow card with those cynical little trips on someone who's gone past you.

And if you commit one of those sly little digs scant nanoseconds after the referee has finally got wise to your team's rotational fouling of a certain opponent and b*ll*cked one of your team-mates for a foul on the same player, you're only going to find sympathy in the dictionary between sh*t and syphillis.

Herrara has been a narky, dirty little prick just about every game I've seen him this season and could have been sent off rather more often than he actually has. All that's happened tonight is a referee tiring of his cockwomblery.
These 4 users liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46 JimmyRobbo Heathclaret Sidney1st

Tall Paul
Posts: 7413
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2644 times
Has Liked: 731 times

Re: Herrera

Post by Tall Paul » Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:07 pm

jurek wrote:Thought Herrera's second yellow was harsh and not necessary.
I think the ref. was trying to put his marker on the game but he could have given
him a final warning. If he had persisted afterwards then send him off.

Ruined the game to a certain extent.
Surely the first yellow card is the final warning.
This user liked this post: Sidney1st

gogogadgetlegs
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 48 times
Has Liked: 191 times

Re: Herrera

Post by gogogadgetlegs » Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:21 pm

cutsy123 wrote:The crowd pay a big part in it
The crowd didnt play any part in it Herrera played 100% of it displaying Mourinhos instructions to go out and stop Hazard.

FFS all the talk of not even a yellow ManU were zealous in their stopping of him by any means - nothing particularly bad but stop him.

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 946 times

Re: Herrera

Post by Hipper » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:45 am

Enola Gay wrote:We've all seen yellow cards given before for those "blocking someone off and then pretending you couldn't get out of the way" challenges.
Why should a defender have to get out of the way? It's up to the forward to go round him.

I've reffed at park level and in the heat of a game it is easy to give the benefit to the attacker - I've made that mistake - but it's wrong. If a defender moves into another players path to obstruct him that of course is a foul:

'IMPEDING THE PROGRESS OF AN OPPONENT WITHOUT CONTACT

Impeding the progress of an opponent means moving into the opponent’s path to obstruct, block, slow down or force a change of direction when the ball is not within playing distance of either player.

All players have a right to their position on the field of play; being in the way of an opponent is not the same as moving into the way of an opponent.'

http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-gov ... misconduct" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

Post Reply