Andre Gray

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Thu Mar 16, 2017 1:49 pm

Lithiania arent great. Their manager is one of their best ever players though. Jankauskas. He won the champions league at Porto under Mourinho. He ended up at Hearts with a load of other Lithuanians when Romanov took charge.

IanMcL
Posts: 34697
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6929 times
Has Liked: 10329 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by IanMcL » Thu Mar 16, 2017 3:52 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Gray is yes. But when he goes we should improve on him. Jay isnt an improvement in my opinion, certainly as a goalscorer.
Excellent header of the ball, skilful, good football brain, sharp in front of goal, loyally local and passionate Claret.

He's in my team!

KefkaClaret
Posts: 1545
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 489 times
Has Liked: 195 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by KefkaClaret » Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:05 pm

Would rather have Austin then Rodriguez. Rodriguez's injury ruined him.

Tall Paul
Posts: 7413
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2644 times
Has Liked: 731 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Tall Paul » Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:17 pm

KefkaClaret wrote:Would rather have Austin then Rodriguez. Rodriguez's injury ruined him.
Whereas Austin has never been affected by injury.
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL Rick_Muller

KefkaClaret
Posts: 1545
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 489 times
Has Liked: 195 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by KefkaClaret » Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:34 pm

Tall Paul wrote:Whereas Austin has never been affected by injury.

Did you actually read what I said? I said Rodriguez's injury ruined him as he has scored 8 goals in 38 appearances in the last 3 seasons meanwhile Austin has 20 in 40 appearances on just the last two seasons. Austin is still a good player, Rodriguez is limited now.

IanMcL
Posts: 34697
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6929 times
Has Liked: 10329 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by IanMcL » Thu Mar 16, 2017 11:27 pm

Rodriguez does not appear to be limited when he plays for Saints. He is just not foreign!

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Fri Mar 17, 2017 12:17 am

IanMcL wrote:Excellent header of the ball, skilful, good football brain, sharp in front of goal, loyally local and passionate Claret.

He's in my team!
Fiercely loyal? He left to the first club that came in for him.

Was a good player for is and is a very decent lad. But lets not kid ourselves that Burnley is more important to him than his career. He couldn't have moved further away.

Funny thing is, if we stay up we would be perfect for him but he wont be perfect for us. We need to look to the future.

Before his injury he was destined for very good things. Unfortunately we cant have sentiment. Or we would still have Chris McCann!

If we lose Gray we need to replace him with someone who scores at least as many goals as he does.
This user liked this post: Sidney1st

MACCA
Posts: 15627
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4376 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by MACCA » Fri Mar 17, 2017 7:57 am

Sadly Gray is not as good as Austin, Jay or Ings.

That's not a bad thing, but Gray least suits our style the of all 4 strikers, so would have any of them ahead of him at the moment.

We will see just how much Gray wants to be here over the next 6 months.
If he stays, great.
If he doesn't not bothered.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8668
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1867 times
Has Liked: 2231 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Woodleyclaret » Fri Mar 17, 2017 1:58 pm

The only other forward we can match his pace and goals is Vardy.Andre suffers when he had to shake off the illegal attentions of defenders before scoring due to passes he gets.
Play the ball on the ground for him to sprint onto and he will score.As witnessed by hattrick v Sunderland.
He will be mom tomorrow.

Spijed
Posts: 18023
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3044 times
Has Liked: 1326 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Spijed » Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:01 pm

MACCA wrote:Sadly Gray is not as good as Austin, Jay or Ings.

Based on what? He's got a far better goals to games ratio than Jay-Rod had.

MACCA
Posts: 15627
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4376 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by MACCA » Fri Mar 17, 2017 4:30 pm

Spijed wrote:Based on what? He's got a far better goals to games ratio than Jay-Rod had.

Based on skill, finishing, price tag, time in top flight, goals in the top flight, international recognition, wages or which ever top flight stat you wish to use.

Spijed
Posts: 18023
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3044 times
Has Liked: 1326 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by Spijed » Fri Mar 17, 2017 4:46 pm

MACCA wrote:Based on skill, finishing, price tag, time in top flight, goals in the top flight, international recognition, wages or which ever top flight stat you wish to use.
You can only do a like for like comparison in the top flight with a similar number of games. Looking at Wiki, in his 1st season Jay-Rod scored 6 goals in 35 appearances for Southampton. Gray has got 8 in far less games.

And since when have wages been a good indicator on how good a player is? Wayne Rooney is one of the world's highest paid players yet he's a long way behind the best strikers.

MACCA
Posts: 15627
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4376 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by MACCA » Fri Mar 17, 2017 5:45 pm

Jay was younger. Probably less minutes, probably didn't take pens, probably wasn't main forward.

I'm only guessing I don't know.
But I'd say 90%+ of managers and fans would have had a fit firing Jay over Andre every day of the week.

He was immense before that injury at City and possibly England squad bound ( when it was an acheivment to get called up )
This user liked this post: Spijed

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Andre Gray

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:18 pm

But he isnt now. And hasnt been since that City game. And even then Andres Stats outweight Jays.

Jay was 23. Andre is 25. Hardly much between them.

Andre is a consistent goalscorer. Jay isnt and never has been.

If we replace Andre with Jay (which we wont) then we will massively struggle.

Post Reply