Tinned Food Count Sunderland v's Burnley 18.03.2017

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Tinned Food Count Sunderland v's Burnley 18.03.2017

Post by Diesel » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:01 pm

Purely because it is free and can't do any harm:

Princes Hot Dogs in Brine.

Not bothered about mml of juice just the number of 'Dogs' will do.

Image
Last edited by Diesel on Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
These 2 users liked this post: bodge minnieclaret

mdd2
Posts: 6949
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1835 times
Has Liked: 759 times

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by mdd2 » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:05 pm

Eight hot dogs and 120ml juice

Rick_Muller
Posts: 6815
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2868 times
Has Liked: 7043 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by Rick_Muller » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:07 pm

Ummmmm 8

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by Diesel » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:09 pm

Two good guesses so far, warm

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11138
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 825 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:11 pm

7 hot dogs and a strongly worded letter to Princes.
This user liked this post: Diesel

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 12230
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 6021 times
Has Liked: 226 times

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by TheFamilyCat » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:19 pm

Eight meat products of questionable provenance.

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 19680
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 4330 times
Has Liked: 8571 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by Buxtonclaret » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:50 pm

9 dogs, an apologetic reply to BoT from Prince's, followed by 153 mils of sticky joooooooooce.. :lol:

RalphCoatesComb
Posts: 8257
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
Been Liked: 2482 times
Has Liked: 2222 times

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by RalphCoatesComb » Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:28 pm

I went down to Asda, bought a tin and drained it off...

Spot, get down !

The Rossendale Result is as follows... NO HOT DOGS !
This user liked this post: Buxtonclaret

Longside4evr
Posts: 2502
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
Been Liked: 519 times
Has Liked: 266 times
Location: Malaga Spain

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by Longside4evr » Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:29 pm

eight dogs and an off cut floating about trying to make the first team in two hundred and twenty three milliliters of Jooooooocy loosey UTC

claretdons
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:25 am
Been Liked: 34 times
Has Liked: 19 times
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by claretdons » Fri Mar 17, 2017 10:52 pm

I think I'll go for 8 dogs that are hot and 3 that are average and 420 ml of jooose

claretblue
Posts: 6605
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
Been Liked: 1931 times
Has Liked: 1022 times
Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by claretblue » Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:13 pm

correction alert!

surely it should be Sunderland v Burnley!

:)

24 hot dogs in steel tin

bodge
Posts: 1735
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 789 times
Has Liked: 520 times

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by bodge » Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:33 pm

My best mate works for this company and i know what country it comes from, for a bonus point which country does this culinary delight come from ?

Just opening it out as the actual number is anyone's guess.

The Enclosure
Posts: 4486
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
Been Liked: 990 times
Has Liked: 3266 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by The Enclosure » Sat Mar 18, 2017 1:29 am

For the mainstream consumer of hotdogs in the United Kingdom fewer brands are more recognisable than that of Princes, here we take a look at one of their entry level hotdogs eight medium sized hotdogs in brine.
The ingredients include Mechanically Recovered Chicken, Hydrolysed Soya Protein and Beef Collagen, This tangential approach gives a very unique texture and flavour which i shall discuss in greater detail at a later point.
Once extracted from the tin a briny veneer remains on the surface and glistens in the light lending the hotdog an aura of enchantment, as I bite into the sausage smoky flavour envelopes me in a cloud of nostalgia taking me back to childhood dalliances with the transient dog.
As I mentioned earlier in the blog Princess have taken quite an avante garde approach to there production the end result of this animal product miscellanea is quite a titillating sausage, I can only award the Hot Dogs a sausage rating of 2 out of five as the quality of meat is questionable, personally I would give them a try purely for nostalgic reasons if nothing else.

Sausage rating 2/5;

minnieclaret
Posts: 6842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2012 times
Has Liked: 2287 times
Location: lismore co. waterford

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by minnieclaret » Sat Mar 18, 2017 1:44 am

Spades will correct me but shouldn't there be an apostrophe after Princes.

I'll have a wild stab at 8 dogs, I'm so glad there is no mention of sausage, and a bit of brine.
0-1. UTC. NNN.

gogogadgetlegs
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 48 times
Has Liked: 191 times

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by gogogadgetlegs » Sat Mar 18, 2017 1:51 am

minnieclaret wrote:Spades will correct me but shouldn't there be an apostrophe after Princes.

I'll have a wild stab at 8 dogs, I'm so glad there is no mention of sausage, and a bit of brine.
0-1. UTC. NNN.
It's what they call themselves so no apostophe is needed anywhere. Spelling is bollokcs and you know it.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3544
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 944 times
Has Liked: 582 times

Re: Tinned Food Count Burnley V's Sunderland 18.03.2017

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Sat Mar 18, 2017 2:15 am

8 Hot Dogs, or possibly 8 Princes.
141 mls of salmonella-ridden joosayyyyyyyy

Steve1956
Posts: 17959
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6643 times
Has Liked: 3095 times
Location: Fife

Re: Tinned Food Count Sunderland v's Burnley 18.03.2017

Post by Steve1956 » Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:30 am

8 turds in a tin of ****.

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Tinned Food Count Sunderland v's Burnley 18.03.2017

Post by Diesel » Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:47 am

Result then:

There were in in fact 8 Hotdogs in that tin, well done to everyone to who guessed correctly.

Right come on now Clarets, let's put this hoodoo to bed.

UTC.

Longside4evr
Posts: 2502
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
Been Liked: 519 times
Has Liked: 266 times
Location: Malaga Spain

Re: Tinned Food Count Sunderland v's Burnley 18.03.2017

Post by Longside4evr » Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:56 am

Thanks Diesel your a gentleman and a scholar. We shall prevail and fight without our false teeth in today, we are to embark on pure adrenaline and go through our strategies in an way that has not come about this season.
We shall be going their to blow the bloody doors off and succumb to an historic win up in the the realms of the North East.
Once again the mighty Claret & Blue army will in HUM BAH BAH lands of rapture leaving the Stadium Of Light a little heavier and our Club one big step near to our quest UTC NNN

Post Reply