Middles(very low)brough versus Mighty Clarets

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Rileybobs
Posts: 18784
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7701 times
Has Liked: 1594 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Middles(very low)brough versus Mighty Clarets

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:16 pm

KRBFC wrote:Yeah you're right we had 2 attackers, 8 defenders and a keeper.
No we didn't, why do you make things up that are clearly untrue? We get it, you don't like Dyche's style of play - but when you come out and say ridiculous things like us parking the bus or playing with 8 defenders how can you expect people to take you seriously? You come across as a spoiled child.

We didn't play great but we attacked Middlesbrough as much as they attacked us. We had the best chance of the game and hit the bar. We set up just fine with our best available 11 players in our most successful formation. We went to win the game but were unable, and with 10 minutes to go, in our respective league positions, it wasn't worth risking an important point to try and get the 3.
These 2 users liked this post: PaintYorkClaretnBlue Quicknick

KRBFC
Posts: 19191
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 4003 times
Has Liked: 1079 times

Re: Middles(very low)brough versus Mighty Clarets

Post by KRBFC » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:44 pm

Rileybobs wrote:No we didn't, why do you make things up that are clearly untrue? We get it, you don't like Dyche's style of play - but when you come out and say ridiculous things like us parking the bus or playing with 8 defenders how can you expect people to take you seriously? You come across as a spoiled child.

We didn't play great but we attacked Middlesbrough as much as they attacked us. We had the best chance of the game and hit the bar. We set up just fine with our best available 11 players in our most successful formation. We went to win the game but were unable, and with 10 minutes to go, in our respective league positions, it wasn't worth risking an important point to try and get the 3.
Agreed.
"hit the bar" sounds promising when you put it like that but that doesn't tell the real story does it? Valdez knew it was never going in so let it clip the bar and go out for a goal kick.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18784
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7701 times
Has Liked: 1594 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Middles(very low)brough versus Mighty Clarets

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:47 pm

KRBFC wrote:Agreed.
"hit the bar" sounds promising when you put it like that but that doesn't tell the real story does it? Valdez knew it was never going in so let it clip the bar and go out for a goal kick.
It doesn't need that much context, unless you're trying really hard to make it appear like it wasn't close to being a goal, which it was.

KRBFC
Posts: 19191
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 4003 times
Has Liked: 1079 times

Re: Middles(very low)brough versus Mighty Clarets

Post by KRBFC » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:53 pm

Rileybobs wrote:It doesn't need that much context, unless you're trying really hard to make it appear like it wasn't close to being a goal, which it was.
It wasn't though.... the keeper knew it wasn't going in.

Chester Perry
Posts: 20231
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3308 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Middles(very low)brough versus Mighty Clarets

Post by Chester Perry » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:08 pm

KRBFC is right in saying Valdes had the fk covered all the way and left it so he could get a gk

IanMcL
Posts: 34820
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6950 times
Has Liked: 10370 times

Re: Middles(very low)brough versus Mighty Clarets

Post by IanMcL » Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:14 pm

Never going to be a goal, even if it was under the bar. Valdes was there.

Post Reply