Leyton Orient and Liverpool

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by ontario claret » Mon Apr 24, 2017 9:57 pm

What do these two clubs have in common? As CT pointed out a few weeks ago, they were both promoted to the old First Division after the 1962 season. one went on to bigger and bigger things, while the other withered away to irrelevance. The difference? Management. One had a progressive manager (Bill Shankly), who was never satisfied with the status quo. The other had a manager (I don't even know who he was), who was just happy with getting there, and never made any changes (and quickly paid the price). Liverpool never was a "big" club, as big clubs go (Anfield's capacity never exceeded 40,000 until recently), but they never stopped moving forward (or, at least, trying to.) If you want to step back a division, that's fine with me. Burnley's my club. End of story. But don't complain if we end up as the next Leyton Orient (again).

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4386 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by tim_noone » Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:05 pm

We wont......

basil6345789
Posts: 3054
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 531 times
Has Liked: 2435 times

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by basil6345789 » Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:59 pm

Remember them coming up 62/63 - Jimmy Bloomfield rings a bell but maybe still a player then?

Juan Tanamera
Posts: 2527
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 890 times
Has Liked: 11154 times

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by Juan Tanamera » Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:06 pm

Makes you wonder how Liverpool managed to fit 44000 or so into a 40000 capacity ground.

dsr
Posts: 16247
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4868 times
Has Liked: 2590 times

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by dsr » Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:59 pm

ontario claret wrote:What do these two clubs have in common? As CT pointed out a few weeks ago, they were both promoted to the old First Division after the 1962 season. one went on to bigger and bigger things, while the other withered away to irrelevance. The difference? Management. One had a progressive manager (Bill Shankly), who was never satisfied with the status quo. The other had a manager (I don't even know who he was), who was just happy with getting there, and never made any changes (and quickly paid the price). Liverpool never was a "big" club, as big clubs go (Anfield's capacity never exceeded 40,000 until recently), but they never stopped moving forward (or, at least, trying to.) If you want to step back a division, that's fine with me. Burnley's my club. End of story. But don't complain if we end up as the next Leyton Orient (again).
Liverpool in 1962-3 had had 47 seasons in division 1, five league championships, and an average gate of 39,200.
Orient in 1962-3 had never been in division 1, and an average gate of 14,700.

I would argue that Liverpool were, in fact, a bigger club.
This user liked this post: Quicknick

DCWat
Posts: 9964
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4495 times
Has Liked: 3912 times

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by DCWat » Tue Apr 25, 2017 12:05 am

Liverpool had a number of attendances above 60,000 in the fifties. They'd won as many titles as United had.

Aside from the fact that they were promoted together, the comparison pretty much ends there.

Quicknick
Posts: 6772
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1443 times
Has Liked: 9606 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by Quicknick » Tue Apr 25, 2017 1:20 am

Stupid thread.
These 2 users liked this post: randomclaret2 Paulclaret

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by ontario claret » Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:26 pm

Our top attendence was 55,000, back in the days of open terraces. Stated capacities were often a fuzzy thing. Deaths due to overcrowding put an end to that. Our average attendances before the Orient Game were just 2,300. The point is, either you have ambition or you don't. Not saying that it is wrong.

dsr
Posts: 16247
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4868 times
Has Liked: 2590 times

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by dsr » Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:34 pm

ontario claret wrote:Our top attendence was 55,000, back in the days of open terraces. Stated capacities were often a fuzzy thing. Deaths due to overcrowding put an end to that. Our average attendances before the Orient Game were just 2,300. The point is, either you have ambition or you don't. Not saying that it is wrong.
I think I understand. You're saying that spending like Burnley have done is not ambitious, because all we were hoping to do was solidify our place in the Premier League; we should have spent like Manchester City in the hope of finishing in the top 4?

The problem with a small club with small gates trying to spend like a big club with big gates (and a hugely rich owner) is that the small club would tend to go bust. If Leyton Orient had decided they were just like Liverpool in 1963, which is more likely - that they'd be like Liverpool now, or that they would have gone bust in 1964?

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by ontario claret » Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:41 pm

The problem isn't gates, because ALL clubs in the EPL get the majority of their funding from the TV deal. It's how Bournemouth, in the smallest stadium, stay up. The problem is small minds who think that IF we go down, we'll automatically be stable. There are no guarantees, other than that there will be a Burnley FC 50 years from now (hopefully).

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by ontario claret » Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:43 pm

Anybody heard of Emlyn Hughes? Shankly swept in and stole him from an unambitious club (Blackpool), and he became one of the prominent faces at Liverpool for a long, long time. Bill Shankly, football genius.

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by ontario claret » Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:08 pm

Bristol Manor Farm. One of the least-supported clubs in the Western League, but splashed the cash this year, and won the league in a walk. Lesson to be learned? Check in 5 years from now.

Silkyskills1
Posts: 6636
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1946 times
Has Liked: 2892 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Leyton Orient and Liverpool

Post by Silkyskills1 » Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:30 pm

Attempting to draw comparisons between the two clubs isn't that easy but as is often my wont I've gone back in time to try. Whenever we make a reference to Leyton Orient we invariably mention 1987 at Turf Moor. However, I recall two epic cup ties against them in 1962 on our way to Wembley. In the first game at home we absolutely 'battered' them all night but in the end were grateful for a Gordon Harris equaliser a few minutes from time to earn us a replay. We won the replay 1-0 with a goal from Brian Miller but the roles were reversed that night as we were under the cosh for long periods of the game.
A year later it was Liverpool at the Turf, again in the 4th round and another 1-1 draw with an equaliser from John Connelly. We eventually met up again for the replay and took the lead. Liverpool equalised and the game went to extra time. With just seconds left Adam Blacklaw hit a goal kick straight at Ian St. John and had to pull him down for a penalty,which was put away by the lately deceased Ronnie Moran. The Orient game was a major step forward to Wembley; the Liverpool defeat marked the end of an era. Tenuous link,I know but memorable nonetheless.

Post Reply