Team without Barton
Team without Barton
3 5 2?
Heaton
Tark Keane Mee
Lowton Hendrick Westwood Defour Ward
Gray Vokes
Dropping Brady and Boyd is harsh, but i cant see dyche playing Defour in a 2 man midfield meaning if it stays 4-4-2 Then it's Westwood Hendrick
Or..
4 5 1? Then the question is which striker is best suited up top on his own, none are good enough for me to play on their own, it's tough, but I'd edge towards Gray.
Heaton
Tark Keane Mee
Lowton Hendrick Westwood Defour Ward
Gray Vokes
Dropping Brady and Boyd is harsh, but i cant see dyche playing Defour in a 2 man midfield meaning if it stays 4-4-2 Then it's Westwood Hendrick
Or..
4 5 1? Then the question is which striker is best suited up top on his own, none are good enough for me to play on their own, it's tough, but I'd edge towards Gray.
-
- Posts: 8257
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2929 times
- Has Liked: 508 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Team without Barton
I imagine it'll be Defour/Hendrick or Westwood/Hendrick
-
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 45 times
Re: Team without Barton
Heaton
Lowton Keane Mee Ward
Westwood Defour
JBG Hendrick Brady
Gray
Subs: Pope, Tarkowski, Flanagan, Agyei, Barnes, Boyd, ???
Lowton Keane Mee Ward
Westwood Defour
JBG Hendrick Brady
Gray
Subs: Pope, Tarkowski, Flanagan, Agyei, Barnes, Boyd, ???
These 9 users liked this post: IAmAClaret simonclaret Young_Claret_91 jlup1980 DCWat KRBFC evensteadiereddie BertiesBeehole Holtyclaret
Re: Team without Barton
Any combination of two of our remaining centre midfielders now looks too weak for 4-4-2 to work. Might have to revert to 4-5-1, with Barnes the lone forward. Westwood will have known this opportunity would arise at some point, lets hope he's ready for it.
Re: Team without Barton
Is Mee not out with an injury? I'd expect this will be our starting 11 at Palace:
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Ward
Boyd Defour Hendrick Brady
Grey Barnes
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Ward
Boyd Defour Hendrick Brady
Grey Barnes
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Re: Team without Barton
I can't see it being anything but
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Ward
Boyd Westwood Hendrick Brady
Gray Barnes
but I wish it was
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Ward
Westwood
JBG Defour Hendrick Brady
Gray
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Ward
Boyd Westwood Hendrick Brady
Gray Barnes
but I wish it was
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Ward
Westwood
JBG Defour Hendrick Brady
Gray
-
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 357 times
- Has Liked: 312 times
- Location: Only in your Imagination
Re: Team without Barton
Needs to be a 451 for me, despite spending around £23m on 3 central midfielders, no combination is strong enough as a 2.
Re: Team without Barton
It will be Westwood for Barton.
Defour must have issues!
Defour must have issues!
-
- Posts: 19690
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2240 times
Re: Team without Barton
Dyche's ultra defensive line ups haven't worked away yet, so lets go for it.
Defour must come in and I'm praying Vokes is back from injury as we generally have a shot on target when Vokes plays.
Defour must come in and I'm praying Vokes is back from injury as we generally have a shot on target when Vokes plays.
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
Westwood is the straight replacement for Barton.
Defour or Arfield might come in alongside him and Hendrick, either playing to one side in a 442, or as the third midfielder in a 451.
Defour or Arfield might come in alongside him and Hendrick, either playing to one side in a 442, or as the third midfielder in a 451.
-
- Posts: 19690
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2240 times
Re: Team without Barton
He might be but it's about time we tried a midfield that are all comfortable on the ball that can actually create chances.claretspice wrote:Westwood is the straight replacement for Barton.
Defour or Arfield might come in alongside him and Hendrick, either playing to one side in a 442, or as the third midfielder in a 451.
We always concede possession and bucket loads of crosses in so the defensive side hasn't worked, nothing to lose going for it. Lots to gain.
Re: Team without Barton
Can't tell you how much I'd love to see that starting 11!!BurnleyPaul wrote:Heaton
Lowton Keane Mee Ward
Westwood Defour
JBG Hendrick Brady
Gray
Subs: Pope, Tarkowski, Flanagan, Agyei, Barnes, Boyd, ???
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
Westwood is comfortable in possession, no problem there.Quickenthetempo wrote:He might be but it's about time we tried a midfield that are all comfortable on the ball that can actually create chances.
We always concede possession and bucket loads of crosses in so the defensive side hasn't worked, nothing to lose going for it. Lots to gain.
Re: Team without Barton
Me too.jlup1980 wrote:Can't tell you how much I'd love to see that starting 11!!
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
Said before, there's not a team that plays with a front 4 who all want to run away from the ball when its behind them and exclusively want to get the ball facing the opposition's goal. They all have at least one player comfortable coming short and getting the ball with their back to goal or at least on the half turn.jlup1980 wrote:Can't tell you how much I'd love to see that starting 11!!
So i don't understand why folk want us to try that experiment.
This user liked this post: clerkenwell.claret
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Team without Barton
Defour has got to be straight in, but knowing Dyche it will be Westwood or Arfield.
Re: Team without Barton
Westwood Hendrick Defour
Boyd Brady
Vokes
other 5 a given Tarks for Mee if needed.
Boyd Brady
Vokes
other 5 a given Tarks for Mee if needed.
-
- Posts: 19690
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2240 times
Re: Team without Barton
If Vokes isn't fit then get Westwood in a 3 man midfield. But whatever happens we need to create chances.
Re: Team without Barton
Bring back loanees ?
-
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 489 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Team without Barton
With Barton gone we have to play five in midfield.
Re: Team without Barton
Maybe it's because things aren't going exactly swimmingly at the moment ?claretspice wrote:Said before, there's not a team that plays with a front 4 who all want to run away from the ball when its behind them and exclusively want to get the ball facing the opposition's goal. They all have at least one player comfortable coming short and getting the ball with their back to goal or at least on the half turn.
So i don't understand why folk want us to try that experiment.
And maybe one of the 5 midfield could do the "no 10" role ?
Either way we are getting very little from Barnes or Vokes in the last couple of months so it's a massive risk thinking things will change if we carry on playing the same style / tactics.
Re: Team without Barton
Me threeCOBBLE wrote:
Me too.
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Team without Barton
De-fourFez wrote:Me three
These 2 users liked this post: KefkaClaret BFCmaj
-
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 2012 times
- Has Liked: 2287 times
- Location: lismore co. waterford
Re: Team without Barton
Since his impact goal against Saints Joey has gradually fallen away.
It might have been time for a change anyway.
Heaton
Lowton-Keane-Mee(Tarks)-Ward
JBG-Westwood-Hendrick-Arfield
Vokes(Barnes)-Gray
Boyd and Brady have provided nothing since Georges winner against Stoke. It's time to get your balls out and prove your a man. Go for it.
It might have been time for a change anyway.
Heaton
Lowton-Keane-Mee(Tarks)-Ward
JBG-Westwood-Hendrick-Arfield
Vokes(Barnes)-Gray
Boyd and Brady have provided nothing since Georges winner against Stoke. It's time to get your balls out and prove your a man. Go for it.
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
Firstly, none of the midfield 5 being picked by most people have the skill set for playing as a no 10 picking the ball up with their back to goal. So they could try it, but they're no more likely to be good at it than Dean Marney is likely to make a centre forward.TVC15 wrote:Maybe it's because things aren't going exactly swimmingly at the moment ?
And maybe one of the 5 midfield could do the "no 10" role ?
Either way we are getting very little from Barnes or Vokes in the last couple of months so it's a massive risk thinking things will change if we carry on playing the same style / tactics.
Secondly, our form. 4 points from the last 4 matches, and this year weve taken 3 wins 3 draws and just 2 defeats from teams outside the top 7. So our results are actually a good deal better than common wisdom has us believe. Weve just stopped picking up points from the top teams.
Im not averse to tweaking our set up, perhaps by using Vokes ir Barnes as long striker and dropping Gray, or by using Barnes in a left sided role where we can still use him as a target. But we're a team that uses a target man, and have been successful playing that way - even this year, as those stats show - so we'd be total fools to bin all that as so many seem to want us to do.
-
- Posts: 11193
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3611 times
- Has Liked: 2230 times
Re: Team without Barton
Westwood and Defour in for Barton and Gray I reckon.
Then Barnes or Vokes.
Then Barnes or Vokes.
Re: Team without Barton
We have won one game since the end of Jan and failed to score a goal against the 2 worst teams in the division.
Our only win was fortunate in a game where we only made one chance.
"Common wisdom" as you call it would suggest that the form is not brilliant !!
Our only win was fortunate in a game where we only made one chance.
"Common wisdom" as you call it would suggest that the form is not brilliant !!
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
But our results have been ok against the teams we're competing with, ie those outside the top 7. Weve only won 1 since the end of Jan, but weve only lost 2 - one of those when we played 85 minutes with 10 men, one in the last minute. Thats despite the vast majority of those games being away.TVC15 wrote:We have won one game since the end of Jan and failed to score a goal against the 2 worst teams in the division.
Our only win was fortunate in a game where we only made one chance.
"Common wisdom" as you call it would suggest that the form is not brilliant !!
We're a bit low on confidence and not at our best but there's nothing to justify completely ripping up our approach and starting from scarce. We tried it once and got trained by an out of form Leicester.
-
- Posts: 8257
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2929 times
- Has Liked: 508 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Team without Barton
Only lost two since the end of Jan?
-
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: Team without Barton
Almost certainlywhiffa wrote:Is Mee not out with an injury? I'd expect this will be our starting 11 at Palace:
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Ward
Boyd Defour Hendrick Brady
Grey Barnes
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
Outside the top 7, ie the teams we can realistically compete with. Puts a very different spin on things.ClaretAndJew wrote:Only lost two since the end of Jan?
This user liked this post: ClaretAndJew
-
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: Team without Barton
Right now we are only "realistically" competing with Hull and Swansea (2 points from 12?)claretspice wrote:Outside the top 7, ie the teams we can realistically compete with.
Re: Team without Barton
Bang on for meBurnleyPaul wrote:Heaton
Lowton Keane Mee Ward
Westwood Defour
JBG Hendrick Brady
Gray
Subs: Pope, Tarkowski, Flanagan, Agyei, Barnes, Boyd, ???
Re: Team without Barton
We've lost 6 games since the end of Jan.
When you look at who we have lost against - we beat 3 and drew against one of these in the first half of the season. We also played much worse against Spurs and United than we did earlier in the season.
Does not matter how you try and dress it up our form is relegation form
When you look at who we have lost against - we beat 3 and drew against one of these in the first half of the season. We also played much worse against Spurs and United than we did earlier in the season.
Does not matter how you try and dress it up our form is relegation form
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
But we're not. Thats my point. We're holding our own with everyone in the league outside that elite group. And we've taken 4 points from the last 4 games, despite those including 2 against those elite teams.boatshed bill wrote:Right now we are only "realistically" competing with Hull and Swansea (2 points from 12?)
-
- Posts: 5064
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1105 times
- Has Liked: 1014 times
Re: Team without Barton
Sssssshhhhhhhh. No mention of the 'R' word. It's not allowed on here.
Re: Team without Barton
With Mee possibly out and I know ward has been excellent but I'd attack them and try beady at LB.
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Brady
JBG Westwood Hendrick Defour
Barnes
Gray
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Brady
JBG Westwood Hendrick Defour
Barnes
Gray
Re: Team without Barton
Heaton
Lowton Keane Tark Ward
Westwood
Boyd Hendrick Defour Brady
Gray
Lowton Keane Tark Ward
Westwood
Boyd Hendrick Defour Brady
Gray
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
Right - so because we over performed in the first half of the season, and arent out performing now, we need to rip up the template that enabled us to out perform in the first half of the season?TVC15 wrote:We've lost 6 games since the end of Jan.
When you look at who we have lost against - we beat 3 and drew against one of these in the first half of the season. We also played much worse against Spurs and United than we did earlier in the season.
Does not matter how you try and dress it up our form is relegation form
Fair play.
Re: Team without Barton
Or put another way we got a lucky home win against a stoke side who have not even scored away from home since Lou Macari was their manager....claretspice wrote:But we're not. Thats my point. We're holding our own with everyone in the league outside that elite group. And we've taken 4 points from the last 4 games, despite those including 2 against those elite teams.
And we drew against a Boro side that have not won since Bernie Slaven notched for them.
We are not holding our own against anyone above us - and every single pointer is that it is 3 from us, Hull and Swansea.
If you want comparison of relegation and non relegation form from a team around us look at Palace.
Elite teams, non-elite, mid table etc - we are simply not playing that well against any of them in the last 2 months. Swansea should have beat us by 5.
Re: Team without Barton
Far from certain Boyd should be starting.
He's been hit and miss the last few games.
Quite like CFS's team with Brady at left back but that would leave out Ward
who seems to be playing reasonably well.
Alternatively BurnelyPaul's's team looks the best for me albeit Gray as
lone striker creates some concern.
Suspect Dyche might revert to tried and tested and bring Arfield
back and also play Boyd but that would worry me too.
He's been hit and miss the last few games.
Quite like CFS's team with Brady at left back but that would leave out Ward
who seems to be playing reasonably well.
Alternatively BurnelyPaul's's team looks the best for me albeit Gray as
lone striker creates some concern.
Suspect Dyche might revert to tried and tested and bring Arfield
back and also play Boyd but that would worry me too.
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
You're a lily-livered soul, arent you? Some serious emotive in those historical "statistics" youve created. Fair play.TVC15 wrote:Or put another way we got a lucky home win against a stoke side who have not even scored away from home since Lou Macari was their manager....
And we drew against a Boro side that have not won since Bernie Slaven notched for them.
We are not holding our own against anyone above us - and every single pointer is that it is 3 from us, Hull and Swansea.
If you want comparison of relegation and non relegation form from a team around us look at Palace.
Elite teams, non-elite, mid table etc - we are simply not playing that well against any of them in the last 2 months. Swansea should have beat us by 5.
Re: Team without Barton
I've not said "rip up" anything - I've said that what we are doing now is not working...so in my view (and lots of other fans) we need to change something.claretspice wrote:Right - so because we over performed in the first half of the season, and arent out performing now, we need to rip up the template that enabled us to out perform in the first half of the season?
Fair play.
Your patronising over analysis of everything does not make you right....most of us cannot even be f-ucked with reading half of your posts as they are articulated in a way that nobody else can have an opinion.
WTF do you mean by "fair play" ? Tosser of a comment.
What is it you are suggesting ? Do nothing and hope things just magically turn around ?
Fair play
Re: Team without Barton
We don't need things to turn around though. Our record against the quality of opposition we have left to play has been good enough that if it continues we'll collect the few points we need to stay up.
Obviously we're going to be forced into a change because of Barton's suspension, but to try and make radical changes could do more harm than good.
Obviously we're going to be forced into a change because of Barton's suspension, but to try and make radical changes could do more harm than good.
Last edited by Tall Paul on Wed Apr 26, 2017 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Team without Barton
Nice. Incidentally, if anyone is over analysing anyone, its you picking the bones out of the games we won or got points from, not me.TVC15 wrote:I've not said "rip up" anything - I've said that what we are doing now is not working...so in my view (and lots of other fans) we need to change something.
Your patronising over analysis of everything does not make you right....most of us cannot even be f-ucked with reading half of your posts as they are articulated in a way that nobody else can have an opinion.
WTF do you mean by "fair play" ? Tosser of a comment.
What is it you are suggesting ? Do nothing and hope things just magically turn around ?
Fair play
What am i suggesting? Tweak things perhaps, but keep faith with the basics of what we're doing and what has brought us success, and what the players are used to, and hold our nerve. As Taul Pall says, we dont really need to turn things around.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Team without Barton
Don't you think you might be exaggerated just a tad how bad we are?
This user liked this post: BertiesBeehole
-
- Posts: 4498
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Team without Barton
We need to up or game big style to get anything from CP away. The have pace, experience and power all over the pitch and can now defend.
For me it is time to go 352, even oddly if Mee is out. The following assumes that he is and Vokes as well. Lowton and Brady to play as wing backs and NOT 5 across the back.
Heaton
Tarks Keane Ward
Lowton Hendrick Westwood Defour Brady
Gray Barnes
Subs - Pope, Flanagan, JBG, K Long (if fit), Tendy, Arfield, Boyd.
For me it is time to go 352, even oddly if Mee is out. The following assumes that he is and Vokes as well. Lowton and Brady to play as wing backs and NOT 5 across the back.
Heaton
Tarks Keane Ward
Lowton Hendrick Westwood Defour Brady
Gray Barnes
Subs - Pope, Flanagan, JBG, K Long (if fit), Tendy, Arfield, Boyd.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Team without Barton
I'd understand changing to a 4-5-1, but not changing to something we have never used this season.
-
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:49 pm
- Been Liked: 151 times
- Has Liked: 4 times
Re: Team without Barton
Surely with Joey now gone and BM injured it gives a chance to brink Tarky through a bit more and also give Defour or Westwood a run out ,hopefully at least 2/3 of those will be a major part of next season
-
- Posts: 4498
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Team without Barton
Well we have a massive total of 4 points away with what we normally do. Can't get much worse.