David Fishwick
Re: David Fishwick
Although he is buying shares, the plan appears to be to buy existing shares from private shareholders, not a share issue, so it won't see any money going to the club. Given the relatively small number of shares that aren't owned by the directors it will more likely be a token shareholding.
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: David Fishwick
If there's one thing David Fishwick is good at, it's getting in the papers
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 47 times
- Has Liked: 13 times
Re: David Fishwick
Is it just me? What is the appeal of Fishwick? He reinforces the negative stereotype of our area with his faux down-to-earth act. He's a white sock sales guy, who got lucky. Fair play to him for that, but other than selling more small-fry sponsorship to locals, what is he going to do? We already have white sock sales guys at the club who'd pimp their grandmothers given a chance.
I'm glad his name won't be on a stand and I think it's regrettable that the pervasive small town mentality means that he is somehow perceived as somebody who can make a contribution. Every time he's on TV I cringe - he sets us back.
As for the plumbers - some are suggesting they may have got a good deal due to nepotism. However, the fact is that in the Premier League if your pitch side advertising/sponsorship is anywhere but the three sides that form the TV arc, you've either wasted your money, or the ad is just a vanity package.
I'm glad his name won't be on a stand and I think it's regrettable that the pervasive small town mentality means that he is somehow perceived as somebody who can make a contribution. Every time he's on TV I cringe - he sets us back.
As for the plumbers - some are suggesting they may have got a good deal due to nepotism. However, the fact is that in the Premier League if your pitch side advertising/sponsorship is anywhere but the three sides that form the TV arc, you've either wasted your money, or the ad is just a vanity package.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: David Fishwick
So you bought a dodgy minibus ?Ealing_Claret wrote:Is it just me? What is the appeal of Fishwick? He reinforces the negative stereotype of our area with his faux down-to-earth act. He's a white sock sales guy, who got lucky. Fair play to him for that, but other than selling more small-fry sponsorship to locals, what is he going to do? We already have white sock sales guys at the club who'd pimp their grandmothers given a chance.
I'm glad his name won't be on a stand and I think it's regrettable that the pervasive small town mentality means that he is somehow perceived as somebody who can make a contribution. Every time he's on TV I cringe - he sets us back.
As for the plumbers - some are suggesting they may have got a good deal due to nepotism. However, the fact is that in the Premier League if your pitch side advertising/sponsorship is anywhere but the three sides that form the TV arc, you've either wasted your money, or the ad is just a vanity package.
This user liked this post: ZizkovClaret
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 47 times
- Has Liked: 13 times
Re: David Fishwick
bfcjg wrote:So you bought a dodgy minibus ?


-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: David Fishwick
No way would club have approached him to relinquish his agreement. He might have found the cost of sponsoring a stand of a Premier League club a bit rich for his blood but that's his choice. He's put money into the club which I thank him for but he wouldn't of done it without the marketing that brought to his business, totally understandable.IanMcL wrote:Win-Win. Mr Fishwick - Dave to his friends - obviously had a reasonable deal stretching back some years, for his sponsorship of the Cricketfield stand. He was probably approached by the club to relinquish that sponsorship agreement, so they could make more money froma Prem league sponsor. To retain his exposure to the club and support for all to see, Mr F is asked to help increase or develop new revenue streams.
He retains his expected connection and also is able to help further.
Thanks Mr F. I have a lot of time for the man, having read his 'bank' book.
All this wanting to help by buying shares and blah blah sounds like a load of nonsense to me though.
Re: David Fishwick
I'm sure that the Longside was once sponsored by Skippers Ford of Burnley. Or at least it used to have an advertising board on the roof of it? Early 90s I'm thinking
-
- Posts: 19690
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4184 times
- Has Liked: 2240 times
Re: David Fishwick
I don't know the why's behind it but he's a business man that likes to make money, the only problem is that shareholders don't receive any dividends at Burnley.Rumbletonk wrote:No way would club have approached him to relinquish his agreement. He might have found the cost of sponsoring a stand of a Premier League club a bit rich for his blood but that's his choice. He's put money into the club which I thank him for but he wouldn't of done it without the marketing that brought to his business, totally understandable.
All this wanting to help by buying shares and blah blah sounds like a load of nonsense to me though.
So what will be the benefit for him?
-
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:24 pm
- Been Liked: 588 times
- Has Liked: 203 times
- Location: Oldfield, West Yorkshire
Re: David Fishwick
Priority for FA cup final tickets come May?Quickenthetempo wrote:
So what will be the benefit for him?
These 2 users liked this post: Quickenthetempo Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 314 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: David Fishwick
I could be wrong but it just seems like a load of hot air. Fair play to what he's achieved in terms of his business but meh to this in general
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: David Fishwick
Whats the benefit to any of us? He probably doesnt do EVERYTHING as a business man. Maybe he is just a fan? Mayve its some publicity - its created some on here for a start.Quickenthetempo wrote:I don't know the why's behind it but he's a business man that likes to make money, the only problem is that shareholders don't receive any dividends at Burnley.
So what will be the benefit for him?
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: David Fishwick
Although he's going to have to get a move on if he wants to be the youngest person in the world to own a bank. The guy who owns Monzo is in his early thirties.
Re: David Fishwick
Apparently he wants to make a difference
Re: David Fishwick
No one was trashing his money put into the club when we really needed every penny and that day could come again. So I say thanks to him and let's see what he can bring. I don't think he has ever promised (and not delivered) compared with some of the Directors we have had.One never knows what ideas can come from folk-sometimes so obvious no one considered them before.
These 6 users liked this post: bfcjg cricketfieldclarets IanMcL Juan Tanamera califclaret Lord Beamish
Re: David Fishwick
Exactly Mdd2. He put a rate of the time into the club. There is an opportunity for a much larger rate from our Prem status and matches going global. David Fishwick is big in Burnley not the world. He is doing his bit for the town in which he has made his name. Not sure football is his thing. He was just helping out.
This user liked this post: califclaret
-
- Posts: 34443
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12537 times
- Has Liked: 6266 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: David Fishwick
Hopefully it'll be the bank of China stand with time remaining in the transfer window




Re: David Fishwick
Lucky, well timed escape.
-
- Posts: 8143
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2430 times
- Has Liked: 3469 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: David Fishwick
Apparently oak furnitureland are taking over for the fee of 260 new seats
Re: David Fishwick
On Twitter he is referring to it as "my stand".
Melt.
Melt.
-
- Posts: 13028
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3666 times
- Has Liked: 2112 times
- Contact:
Re: David Fishwick
I often wonder if visiting supporters think we had players called "James Hargreaves" & "David Fishwick"
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: David Fishwick
.
Last edited by If it be your will on Fri Oct 05, 2018 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: David Fishwick
Why wouldn't he ask the club for a new share issue and invest in the club properly if his reason for getting involved was to move us forwards?
Re: David Fishwick
That would watet down the gravy train of the other directors with all the shares.
-
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:40 pm
- Been Liked: 41 times
- Has Liked: 116 times
- Location: Solvang, California
Re: David Fishwick
Absolutely nothing wrong with being successful, Thank You Mr Fishwick
you could have done nothing.
you could have done nothing.
These 2 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets Lord Beamish
-
- Posts: 2492
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 885 times
- Has Liked: 11059 times
Re: David Fishwick
He's probably paid for that stand a few times over, so I'm not sure what your problem is with him.brigante wrote:On Twitter he is referring to it as "my stand".
Melt.
Re: David Fishwick
Lookersclaptrappers_union wrote:I think it was the Endsleigh Stand before David Fishwick Stand
-
- Posts: 13028
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3666 times
- Has Liked: 2112 times
- Contact:
Re: David Fishwick
Thought Lookers was Longside??bedfords wrote:Lookers
Re: David Fishwick
It's not "his stand" any more than the Bob Lord belongs to CWR Scaffolding.Juan Tanamera wrote:He's probably paid for that stand a few times over, so I'm not sure what your problem is with him.
-
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3455 times
- Has Liked: 2958 times
Re: David Fishwick
Aren't we getting a little hung up upon one man's figure of Speech?
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
Re: David Fishwick
PossiblyLord Beamish wrote:Aren't we getting a little hung up upon one man's figure of Speech?