Bid rejected for chris wood

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ewanrob
Posts: 1331
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:52 am
Been Liked: 361 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by ewanrob » Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:14 pm

FactualFrank wrote:You've taken that the wrong way. I just meant, what he said is agreeing what I've been saying.
Apologies FF.....did read that totally wrong!

Blyclaret
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Blyclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:18 pm

I'm a supporter for 45 years.
You constantly are on here arguing with people
You complain constantly about everything the manager does
Every player we have bought you have a problem with it

Blyclaret
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Blyclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:19 pm

Your and that other weirdo ablue

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by KRBFC » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:10 pm

Blyclaret wrote:I'm a supporter for 45 years.
You constantly are on here arguing with people
You complain constantly about everything the manager does
Every player we have bought you have a problem with it
The signings I have moaned about: Bardsley, Juke, Reid, Sordell.
The signings I didnt moan about: Hendrick, Cork, Brady, JBG, Pope, Taylor, Lowton, Gray, Ward, Wood, Defour.

I moan about every signing? You're a fkn idiot.

Blyclaret
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Blyclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:15 pm

Keyboard warrior.....you think that bothers me
Your annoyed cos you know I'm right ....

Blyclaret
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:51 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Blyclaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:16 pm

Don't be a spoiled brat throwing toys out of pram when someone questions you

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by KRBFC » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:34 pm

Blyclaret wrote:Don't be a spoiled brat throwing toys out of pram when someone questions you
You said I moan about every signing which clearly isn't true, you are full of sh**e. Just like when you said I made up the Wood to West Brom story, which is also more b*llocks from yourself.

Steve1956
Posts: 17885
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3069 times
Location: Fife

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Steve1956 » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:37 pm

Come on children play nicely ......arguing like this is childish.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34432
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6264 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:38 pm

Image
These 4 users liked this post: fidelcastro Rick_Muller SussexDon1inIreland tally

Damo
Posts: 4570
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:04 pm
Been Liked: 1798 times
Has Liked: 2776 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Damo » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:39 pm

He can be a bit awkward. Not sure why he was given abuse on this thread for posting something he had read though

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by KRBFC » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:39 pm

I repost information posted in an article online claiming WBA had a bid accepted and still it turns into an argument. Some people are just weird.

Caernarfon_Claret
Posts: 5050
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
Been Liked: 1475 times
Has Liked: 634 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Caernarfon_Claret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:40 pm

KRBFC wrote:The signings I have moaned about: Bardsley, Juke, Reid, Sordell.
The signings I didnt moan about: Hendrick, Cork, Brady, JBG, Pope, Taylor, Lowton, Gray, Ward, Wood, Defour.

I moan about every signing? You're a fkn idiot.
Are you a 4th or 5th generation Burnley supporter?

I know your grandad was well known.

Don't always agree with you, but I know you're sincere in your opinions.

claretsforever
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:47 am
Been Liked: 70 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by claretsforever » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:43 pm

Well look like he coming sky ask their manager have we agreed a fee he said yes and ask him if he expected him to be a burnley player he said yes

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by KRBFC » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:43 pm

Caernarfon_Claret wrote:Are you a 4th or 5th generation Burnley supporter?

I know your grandad was well known.

Don't always agree with you, but I know you're sincere in your opinions.
Season ticket holder since 2001

fidelcastro
Posts: 9266
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2748 times
Has Liked: 2740 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by fidelcastro » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:49 pm

Apparently the mix up with the two Clubs came from an unknown source who would only give his name as bfccrazy.
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller

1968claret
Posts: 1050
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 520 times
Has Liked: 639 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by 1968claret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:56 pm

Leeds manager confirmed that fee agreed just medical to be sorted tomorrow

Caernarfon_Claret
Posts: 5050
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
Been Liked: 1475 times
Has Liked: 634 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Caernarfon_Claret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:44 pm

He might have a dodgy hip.

Pearcey
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 1438 times
Has Liked: 1786 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Pearcey » Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:36 am

I can't say I'm excited about this signing. Just hope he gets off the mark sharpish so he settles in. A rapid attacking player and centre half next and I'll be happy.

ExistentialWanderer
Posts: 1117
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:24 am
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by ExistentialWanderer » Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:20 am

Downing tools as he effectively has doesn't sit well with me as a fan of football. He's contracted to Leeds so should honour that. If he is successful with us and downs tools again, we'll feel equally aggrieved. I just think there's a better way of going about it. He didn't even hand in a transfer request did he? Oh well! All will be forgotten if he hits a hat trick at Deadwood.

Long Time Lurker
Posts: 1313
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 603 times
Has Liked: 420 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Long Time Lurker » Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:22 am

We look ready to pay top dollar for Chris, seems like a decent bloke, good player, interested to see how he does in a new league and team, would have preferred a different type of striker to give us a wider variety of tactical options.

If we are going with the 4-5-1 this season another target man to cover and alternate with Vokes will be helpful. I really like Barnes, but I'm not sure about him operating up front as a lone striker. Should we revert to 4-4-2 we will be less dynamic with Wood, Barnes or Walters in place of Gray.

The potential pitfall of going with the 4-5-1 is that other teams could quickly find us out. Close down our lone striker, mark them out of the equation and we could be reliant on foraging for goals across the other team members. Which is arguably what happened to Leeds in the latter half of last season, although they had the benefit of their 4-2-3-1 formation to mitigate the damage.

We do have a number of players in the squad that can chip in with goals, but consistently out scoring our opponents could become more difficult. One of the downsides to the 4-5-1 is that it leaves more open space in the final third than the 4-2-3-1, unless you have a quick and tireless AM who can really shift through the gears and play through the centre (accompanied by rapid wingers). Which could be why we opted for something resembling a 4-4-1-1 against Chelsea.

Without the blistering pace of someone like Grey to split the pack and create pockets of space for other players to move into we might be looking at a tough season. No two strikers are ever identical, but they can be very similar in respect to their general functionality. Without a striker that can force the defenders of an opposing team to react and respond to a changing landscape (as a consequence of their quick movement or creative flair) our attacking movement could become predictable making it easier for other teams to defend against us.

Barnes and Wood have the ability to hold up play, which could give our other players time to move up the pitch. Barnes is also very good at frustrating defenders and drawing them out of position to create space or force mistakes (which might have been why we brought him on in the last game as we struggled to break their defence despite the chances we created). For his part Walters appears to be comfortable playing in the hole as well as up front. So even though we have four strikers that can be classed as "target men" they do offer something in the way of tactical diversity.

However, I do think that our current lack of pace and creative flair in the final third is a weakness. We have done well to increase our strength in positional depth (with at least two players for each position), but we appear to be lacking the diversity of player types that would give us strength in our tactical depth. At the moment our attacking options aren't one dimensional, but we aren't very far beyond that.

If the mirror article is completely accurate, which would be something of a rairty, their quote

"The Clarets were determined to land Wood after boss Sean Dyche told their board that the New Zealand striker was his No 1 choice to replace Andre Gray."

could signify the end to our pursuit of strikers in this window, unless another one of our current strikers has expressed his intention to move on. I'm not entirely sure how I would feel about that.

All told I'm ok with us signing Wood, but like I said earlier I would have preferred a different type of striker (which is not to say that I don't rate Chris as a player). We still have some way to go with this transfer window and making any fixed declarations about the wisdom of our signings is a little premature at this point. It's a judgement that can only be made when the window closes and all the pieces of our overall transfer strategy have fallen into place.

Caernarfon_Claret
Posts: 5050
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
Been Liked: 1475 times
Has Liked: 634 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Caernarfon_Claret » Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:26 am

ExistentialWanderer wrote:Downing tools as he effectively has doesn't sit well with me as a fan of football. He's contracted to Leeds so should honour that. If he is successful with us and downs tools again, we'll feel equally aggrieved. I just think there's a better way of going about it. He didn't even hand in a transfer request did he? Oh well! All will be forgotten if he hits a hat trick at Deadwood.
Apparently the club decided not to include him in the matchday squad on Friday.

The Leeds Manager says he hasn't got a problem with the way he acted.

I know CW's tweet seems as if it was him alone who made the decision to withdraw from the match just before kick off.
This user liked this post: Damo

Damo
Posts: 4570
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:04 pm
Been Liked: 1798 times
Has Liked: 2776 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Damo » Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:30 am

I wouldn't say he's downed tools. You can't blame him for refusing to play the night (or two nights perhaps) before a medical. The news was that a deal had been agreed yesterday, and all that was needed for completion was his terms and a medical. An Injury last night would of placed a massive hurdle in front of him career wise

ExistentialWanderer
Posts: 1117
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:24 am
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by ExistentialWanderer » Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:30 am

Caernarfon_Claret wrote:Apparently the club decided not to include him in the matchday squad on Friday.

The Leeds Manager says he hasn't got a problem with the way he acted.

I know CW's tweet seems as if it was him alone who made the decision to withdraw from the match just before kick off.
Ahh I see. As you say. Wood's tweet does suggest it was entirely his decision. Easy to misunderstand in this technological age. Thanks for that clarification.

Steve1956
Posts: 17885
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3069 times
Location: Fife

Re: Bid rejected for chris wood

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Aug 20, 2017 11:33 am

Will someone tell the club I've just had a trawl through Chris Wood's Twitter history .. nothing to report he's clean
This user liked this post: ClaretAL

Post Reply