This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
Foshiznik
- Posts: 3159
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 918 times
- Has Liked: 2552 times
- Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100
Post
by Foshiznik » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:20 pm
Shame it's not Pep Slothgate.
-
South West Claret.
- Posts: 5904
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
- Been Liked: 788 times
- Has Liked: 511 times
- Location: Devon
Post
by South West Claret. » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:24 pm
Foshiznik wrote:Shame it's not Pep Slothgate.
How unkind

-
thatdberight
- Posts: 3748
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
- Been Liked: 937 times
- Has Liked: 716 times
Post
by thatdberight » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:25 pm
If I had to guess, a conversation went...
"Well, that's OK. Mark's in the clear over the Aluko thing."
"Yes; hopefully there's nothing else in his past"
"Do you remember that fuss over inappropriate behaviour a few years back?"
"Yes. He was cleared. I never saw the details. Did you?"
"No."
"Did anybody?"
"Errr... no.... oh ****!. Get me the details... ****! Was he okayed to continue after this?"
"Yes"
"Why?"
"Pre-Bennell. Different time."
"What would we do now?"
"Sack him"
"Right then......"
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
tim_noone
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4385 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Post
by tim_noone » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:28 pm
witch hunt ...
-
Leon C
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:25 pm
- Been Liked: 9 times
- Has Liked: 22 times
Post
by Leon C » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:29 pm
Tom Ace.
-
Foshiznik
- Posts: 3159
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 918 times
- Has Liked: 2552 times
- Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100
Post
by Foshiznik » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:31 pm
I always had something against him. I think it was the fact that he was Welsh.
This user liked this post: thatdberight
-
bf2k
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 337 times
- Has Liked: 1519 times
- Location: Burnley
Post
by bf2k » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:39 pm
What other job do you get cleared of wrong doing...twice and still get the sack?
Kick it out have too much say in the game. They have done good in the past but recent it seems they can't accept a not guilty verdict?
These 2 users liked this post: turfytopper tiger76
-
tim_noone
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4385 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Post
by tim_noone » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:42 pm
He's better off out of it.....an unfair dismissal claim will follow.
This user liked this post: turfytopper
-
thatdberight
- Posts: 3748
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
- Been Liked: 937 times
- Has Liked: 716 times
Post
by thatdberight » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:46 pm
bf2k wrote:What other job do you get cleared of wrong doing...twice and still get the sack?
Kick it out have too much say in the game. They have done good in the past but recent it seems they can't accept a not guilty verdict?
You have noticed the FA stressing it's not related to the Aluko thing, haven't you? If they wanted to sack him over that, they could have. While there are doubtless people who will now have an agenda against Sampson because of how he acted to the brave, fearless, noble truth-seeker Aluko (or the tawdry, brazen liar Aluko playing the race card because it's easier than winning your place back - your money, your choice), if they found something else that merited this action, so be it.
-
bluelabrador16
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:34 pm
- Been Liked: 79 times
- Has Liked: 125 times
Post
by bluelabrador16 » Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:05 pm
Might be connected:
Tweets by Eni Aluko....
"It goes without saying I'm delighted, relieved, blessed to be sat where I am right now. Blessings in disguise are often the best blessings."
8:02 PM - Sep 19, 2017
"For the most together team in the world tonight's "message" only shows a level of disrespect that represents division and selfish action."
8:08 PM - Sep 19, 2017
Eni Aluko hits out at 'selfish' England Women after public show of support for under-fire boss Mark Sampson
The exuberant scenes after Nikita Parris netted the 11th-minute opener against Russia were the clearest indication yet that Sampson has the full support of his players
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 56501.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Some interesting comments!
-
rufus lumley
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 233 times
- Has Liked: 7 times
- Location: standing like a clock on the shelf
Post
by rufus lumley » Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:12 pm
Time to bring not a Hope of winning anything Powell back men managers are all useless.
-
tim_noone
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4385 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Post
by tim_noone » Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:15 pm
rufus lumley wrote:Time to bring not a Hope of winning anything Powell back men managers are all useless.
Can we have that again...
-
cutsy123
- Posts: 4683
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 351 times
Post
by cutsy123 » Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:25 pm
Click bait
-
jdrobbo
- Posts: 10590
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 5400 times
- Has Liked: 1020 times
- Location: Leeds
Post
by jdrobbo » Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:31 pm
It might very well be a witch hunt but, yet again, it's the FA that are coming out of this with dirty hands. What on earth is going on? This is not someone who has sneaked through the system decades ago. This is a man that has been dismissed due to a serious safeguarding issue, in the modern era, whilst heading up the academy at Bristol. Regardless of what the issue is, the FA have turned their backs on the matter, to protect' (in their words) the innocent party. Heads should roll. Our Football Association is run by a group of corrupt officials. And we call FIFA fit to burn...
These 3 users liked this post: tim_noone Funkydrummer cloughyclaret
-
Walton
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
- Been Liked: 848 times
- Has Liked: 255 times
Post
by Walton » Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:37 pm
jdrobbo wrote:It might very well be a witch hunt but, yet again, it's the FA that are coming out of this with dirty hands. What on earth is going on? This is not someone who has sneaked through the system decades ago. This is a man that has been dismissed due to a serious safeguarding issue. Regardless of what the issue is, the FA have turned their backs on the matter, to protect' (in their words) the innocent party. Heads should roll. Our Football Association is run by a group of corrupt officials. And we call FIFA fit to burn...
The FA Committees who cleared him of wrongdoing in the racism case did such a whitewashing job that they've been called to report to Parliament over it.
And people still think Aluko is the one in the wrong. Stitch up.
-
Damo
- Posts: 4570
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1798 times
- Has Liked: 2776 times
Post
by Damo » Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:56 pm
Walton wrote:The FA Committees who cleared him of wrongdoing in the racism case did such a whitewashing job that they've been called to report to Parliament over it.
And people still think Aluko is the one in the wrong. Stitch up.
I'll take the word of the independent barrister thanks.
Not sure why you expect anyone to think your more clued up than her about this situation to be honest.
-
Walton
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
- Been Liked: 848 times
- Has Liked: 255 times
Post
by Walton » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:15 pm
Damo wrote:I'll take the word of the independent barrister thanks.
Not sure why you expect anyone to think your more clued up than her about this situation to be honest.
She didn't even take evidence from the player who he insulted, so I wouldn't take her word for it at all.
Whitewash from the outset.
-
agreenwood
- Posts: 4462
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2462 times
- Has Liked: 352 times
Post
by agreenwood » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:16 pm
Sounds like there's more than one instance of his having an inappropriate relationship with a member (or members) of a female U18 squad he was previously responsible for.
No laws broken apparently, but not exactly a healthy situation. Given that this was investigated before he got the England job, you have to wonder what kind of due diligence was done.
-
scouseclaret
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 897 times
- Has Liked: 270 times
Post
by scouseclaret » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:22 pm
Yet more breath-taking my inept conduct from the FA. When are these people going to admit that THEY are not up to the job?
-
superdimitri
- Posts: 5114
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Post
by superdimitri » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:25 pm
Good friends with Mike Jolly, apparently

-
thatdberight
- Posts: 3748
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
- Been Liked: 937 times
- Has Liked: 716 times
Post
by thatdberight » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:31 pm
Walton wrote:The FA Committees who cleared him of wrongdoing in the racism case did such a whitewashing job that they've been called to report to Parliament over it.
And people still think Aluko is the one in the wrong. Stitch up.
So, a Select Committee hearing being called means there was wrongdoing? I thought it was a process to understand the facts. Unless, of course, you've already made your mind up.
-
Steve1956
- Posts: 17888
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6634 times
- Has Liked: 3071 times
- Location: Fife
Post
by Steve1956 » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:34 pm

Bloody hell....I didn't see that one coming!
-
Caernarfon_Claret
- Posts: 5050
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Post
by Caernarfon_Claret » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:35 pm
Not very professional to be sleeping with members of your team. It's a different kind of team bonding I guess.
-
Steve1956
- Posts: 17888
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6634 times
- Has Liked: 3071 times
- Location: Fife
Post
by Steve1956 » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:42 pm
Really?
-
Rick_Muller
- Posts: 6786
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2856 times
- Has Liked: 7024 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Post
by Rick_Muller » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:44 pm
Caernarfon_Claret wrote:Not very professional to be sleeping with members of your team. It's a different kind of team bonding I guess.
Is that allegedly...? Or fact...?
-
Steve1956
- Posts: 17888
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6634 times
- Has Liked: 3071 times
- Location: Fife
Post
by Steve1956 » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:47 pm
Caernarfon_Claret wrote:Not very professional to be sleeping with members of your team. It's a different kind of team bonding I guess.
A bloke sleeping with a butch lesbian? Whatever for?
-
AlargeClaret
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1244 times
- Has Liked: 211 times
Post
by AlargeClaret » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:50 pm
Horrible witch hunt,though once the chip on shoulder woman played the race card the FA did all they could to sack Sampson but cleared twice they still didn't want even the merest whiff of any "sexism/racism " so found somat else to sack him for .Lets face it who Wouldn't be sh@gging the str8 ones in a woman's team ? Seems the teammates really backed him as well.More shocking FA generation snowflake behaviour .
Some of the righteous indignation and "feminazis" which were out in force on BBC radio 5 live yesterday just didn't want to know he'd been cleared twice really beggared belief .
-
Clarets4me
- Posts: 5427
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
- Been Liked: 2590 times
- Has Liked: 1108 times
- Location: Ightenhill,Burnley
Post
by Clarets4me » Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:52 pm
Who the hell's going to want the job after all this ?
Will they feel honour bound to bring Eni Aluko back into the Squad, and how will that play with the current players after what she's tweeted about them !
From what we've been told. it seems that only person to lose their job in all this, is the person who's been cleared in three seperate enquiries of wrongdoing !!
-
Caernarfon_Claret
- Posts: 5050
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Post
by Caernarfon_Claret » Wed Sep 20, 2017 9:13 pm
Steve1956 wrote:A bloke sleeping with a butch lesbian? Whatever for?
Well it was inappropriate but might not have been to that extent maybe a lesser form of inappropriate.
-
Caernarfon_Claret
- Posts: 5050
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Post
by Caernarfon_Claret » Wed Sep 20, 2017 9:20 pm
Clarets4me wrote:Who the hell's going to want the job after all this ?
Will they feel honour bound to bring Eni Aluko back into the Squad, and how will that play with the current players after what she's tweeted about them !
From what we've been told. it seems that only person to lose their job in all this, is the person who's been cleared in three seperate enquiries of wrongdoing !!
He's been sacked for inappropriate and unacceptable conduct at Bristol Academy - it's a report from 2015 which wasn't read in full by top brass until last week they deemed it too much But if you want to know more you'd have to ask one of the women who were in Bristol Academy's first team between about 2009 and 2012. - Unless someone leaks it to the press.
He essentially needed counseling in what was acceptable behavior of a football coach towards young women he was coaching.
They say he would have been sacked in 2015 if they'd read the report then.
-
Steve1956
- Posts: 17888
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6634 times
- Has Liked: 3071 times
- Location: Fife
Post
by Steve1956 » Wed Sep 20, 2017 9:26 pm
Caernarfon_Claret wrote:Well it was inappropriate but might not have been to that extent maybe a lesser form of inappropriate.
He might have been sleeping with two butch lesbian's then you mean?
-
The Enclosure
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
- Been Liked: 990 times
- Has Liked: 3266 times
- Location: Burnley
Post
by The Enclosure » Wed Sep 20, 2017 9:44 pm
Whatever the rights and wrongs the FA have made themselves look like incompetent fools.
-
DuckworthsEA
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 45 times
Post
by DuckworthsEA » Wed Sep 20, 2017 10:01 pm
Walton wrote:The FA Committees who cleared him of wrongdoing in the racism case did such a whitewashing job that they've been called to report to Parliament over it.
And people still think Aluko is the one in the wrong. Stitch up.
And how exactly is she in the right?
She has behaved with no class. Twice proven not guilty and she still won't let it go. Pathetic
-
AlargeClaret
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1244 times
- Has Liked: 211 times
Post
by AlargeClaret » Wed Sep 20, 2017 10:20 pm
The FA truly are shambolic,gutless cowards ,and likely terrified of their own shadows .The way they act vaguely reminds me of one big HR department (in other words utterly useless knee jerk gossips with no idea of either the product or the public they serve .I imagine GregClarke only has to fart and Martin Glenn has the dump for him .
This user liked this post: lucs86
-
ClaretFelix
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:02 pm
- Been Liked: 174 times
- Has Liked: 132 times
Post
by ClaretFelix » Wed Sep 20, 2017 11:35 pm
Just heard the interview with the FA. Dear god they've left themselves wide open on this one and I fully expect it to cost them a lot of money when legal proceedings commence.
Basically been sacked by his current employer for something which happened at his old workplace, which was fully disclosed at the time of his new employment with England!!
This user liked this post: The Enclosure
-
tim_noone
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4385 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Post
by tim_noone » Wed Sep 20, 2017 11:41 pm
As I said he's better off out of, I'm sure a tribunal will find in his favour.
-
boatshed bill
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Post
by boatshed bill » Wed Sep 20, 2017 11:48 pm
ClaretFelix wrote:Just heard the interview with the FA. Dear god they've left themselves wide open on this one and I fully expect it to cost them a lot of money when legal proceedings commence.
Basically been sacked by his current employer for something which happened at his old workplace, which was fully disclosed at the time of his new employment with England!!
Well that shouldn't surprise anyone where the FA are involved. Daft, I call it.
-
ClaretEngineer
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:39 am
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 406 times
- Location: Chalfont St. Giles
Post
by ClaretEngineer » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:59 am
ClaretFelix wrote:Just heard the interview with the FA. Dear god they've left themselves wide open on this one and I fully expect it to cost them a lot of money when legal proceedings commence.
Basically been sacked by his current employer for something which happened at his old workplace, which was fully disclosed at the time of his new employment with England!!
I've just read the article on BBC Sport. I hope the FA gets taken to the cleaners by Sampson.
-
JohnMac
- Posts: 7683
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2565 times
- Has Liked: 4136 times
- Location: Padiham
Post
by JohnMac » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:43 am
The Football Association is nothing more than a Gentlemen's Club located in a plush building in London. Nearly everything they are involved in is a global joke, from football development to this saga.
-
Caernarfon_Claret
- Posts: 5050
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Post
by Caernarfon_Claret » Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:14 am
If Sampson has a case against his employers then so does Big Sam - he didn't do anything illegal either.
-
Shappie
- Posts: 761
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:53 am
- Been Liked: 145 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
Post
by Shappie » Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:20 am
Did sam resign tho? not sacked?
-
thatdberight
- Posts: 3748
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
- Been Liked: 937 times
- Has Liked: 716 times
Post
by thatdberight » Tue Sep 26, 2017 3:30 pm
Now being said that it was a six-month relationship with a player who was over 18. Not the club 18-30 shagathon that was being intimated last week. If it was undeclared to the Bristol Academy management, I can see the problem; otherwise I'm not sure what the problem is. There are plenty of people who end up dating someone who works for them. In itself, it's not a sacking offence. Perhaps more details will out.
-
piston broke
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Post
by piston broke » Tue Sep 26, 2017 3:54 pm
JohnMac wrote:The Football Association is nothing more than a Gentlemen's Club located in a plush building in London. Nearly everything they are involved in is a global joke, from football development to this saga.
My version of gentlemen and yours differs. These are just a bunch of business chancers who shouldn't be allowed near football.
This user liked this post: JohnMac
-
JohnMac
- Posts: 7683
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2565 times
- Has Liked: 4136 times
- Location: Padiham
Post
by JohnMac » Tue Sep 26, 2017 4:42 pm
2piston broke wrote:My version of gentlemen and yours differs. These are just a bunch of business chancers who shouldn't be allowed near football.
It's not far from my own Club old chap

This user liked this post: piston broke
-
GoldenClaret
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:16 pm
Post
by GoldenClaret » Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:24 pm
Mark Sampson is a terrible manager. About time he got sacked.