Mighty Clarets versus 'Udders

Chester Perry · Post by **Chester Perry** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:42 pm

wovers equalise

4:20 · Post by **4:20** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:43 pm

That Lowe should've been booked, he's done a few this game

Sidney1st · Post by **Sidney1st** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:43 pm

Rovers equalised

IndigoLake · Post by **IndigoLake** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:44 pm

Burnley FK offside again

Croydon Claret · Post by **Croydon Claret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:44 pm

It's not happening at home this year. Not so far anyway

Chester Perry · Post by **Chester Perry** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:45 pm

IndigoLake wrote:Christ, as if I took him out my fantasy team this week (used the free hit thing where it changes your team just for the 1 week)

just missed 2 more good chances as well

starting_11 · Post by **starting_11** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:45 pm

Huddersfield are out-Burnley'ing us.

Chester Perry · Post by **Chester Perry** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:46 pm

Swans 1 - 2 Watford

HiroshimaClaret · Post by **HiroshimaClaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:46 pm

our problem is the bench is very much much of a muchness.

ClaretCanada · Post by **ClaretCanada** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:47 pm

Come on you Clarets give us that all important goal

IndigoLake · Post by **IndigoLake** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:47 pm

Defour is MOTM

4:20 · Post by **4:20** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:47 pm

Defour mom, well deserved.

Chester Perry · Post by **Chester Perry** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:47 pm

City 5 - 0 Palace - Delph joining the fun

watsonsclarets · Post by **watsonsclarets** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:47 pm

Brady today may has well not played

IndigoLake · Post by **IndigoLake** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:49 pm

Tarky booked. Hudds FK

Chester Perry · Post by **Chester Perry** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:49 pm

3 mins of Injury time

HiroshimaClaret · Post by **HiroshimaClaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:49 pm

One for the team from Tarkowski...had to do it.

SonofPog · Post by **SonofPog** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:49 pm

Defour made some excellent interceptions and tackles, but did nothing going forward, made a pass and stopped moving. But then there's not a lot of candidates today really,

Chester Perry · Post by **Chester Perry** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:50 pm

ft at Stoke

Croydon Claret · Post by **Croydon Claret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:51 pm

starting_11 wrote:Huddersfield are out-Burnley'ing us.

We don't play well against similar teams to us

Croydon Claret · Post by **Croydon Claret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:51 pm

FT. Change of plan needed

IndigoLake · Post by **IndigoLake** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:51 pm

FT. Poor. But a point is a point.

Chester Perry · Post by **Chester Perry** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:51 pm

ft - 0 - 0

4:20 · Post by **4:20** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:52 pm

Editors got a hell of a job with these highlights tonight.

SonofPog · Post by **SonofPog** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:53 pm

No spark. Another point, but need to win these games,

starting_11 · Post by **starting_11** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:53 pm

^^

There'll be no complaints about being last on MOTD will there!

Right_winger · Post by **Right_winger** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:53 pm

Shite. Struggling to think of a game this season where we've put in a performance apart from the 1st half against Chelsea. We're far too 1 dimensional as many predicted we would be.

Wexford_Claret · Post by **Wexford_Claret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:53 pm

We played like an away side today. Both sets of fans pretty poor too I thought.

Ah well.

ebby · Post by **ebby** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:54 pm

Highlights - were there any?

Croydon Claret · Post by **Croydon Claret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:56 pm

It's hard to know what to think. We've got 9 points so far and that's beyond my wildest dreams but there's something missing.

Reckon it's the old "plucky" Burnley giving it a real good go and losing with honour. Made you proud

.Drawing easily don't quite raise the same emotions even though it's a better result

starting_11 · Post by **starting_11** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:56 pm

Wexford_Claret wrote:We played like an away side today. Both sets of fans pretty poor too I thought.

Ah well.

Can you blame them?

FCBurnley · Post by **FCBurnley** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:57 pm

Home form very worrying. Created nothing against an average well organized team,

HiroshimaClaret · Post by **HiroshimaClaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:58 pm

A point in the Premier League which is NOT to be sniffed at but that was so Dycheesque. Insipid at best with no option to change it from the bench. Whenever it is on us to take it to the opposition, Dyche always shows his (relative) shortcomings as a Premier League manager. He has shaped HIS squad but there is no `change` option on the bench. It does seem wrong to highlight shortcomings but there we are. 4-5-1 with the personnel we have is absolutely fine away, but it is not, I fear, gonna cut the mustard at home.

boiledclaret · Post by **boiledclaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:58 pm

Right_winger wrote:Shite. Struggling to think of a game this season where we've put in a performance apart from the 1st half against Chelsea. We're far too 1 dimensional as many predicted we would be.

Chelsea, 1st half vs WBA, responded well after Spurs scored, rode the luck v Palace.

We just don't sit comfortably with being favourites.

watsonsclarets · Post by **watsonsclarets** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:58 pm

the side lacks creativity if Brady is kept out of the game we simply do not create enough .

Hendricks and Brady for me very poor today.

That Mooy is some player.

Croydon Claret · Post by **Croydon Claret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:59 pm

Got to be 442 at home surely from now on

nyclaret · Post by **nyclaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:03 pm

1) We were the better side
2) We just lacked that killer ball in the final 3rd
3) We're NINTH in the Premier League

HiroshimaClaret · Post by **HiroshimaClaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:03 pm

Croydon Claret wrote:Got to be 442 at home surely from now on

Do we have the personnel?

4:20 · Post by **4:20** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:03 pm

Bradys got good inventiveness but either did too much or wanted to do too much but lacked the quality to begin to do too much.

Right_winger · Post by **Right_winger** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:04 pm

boiledclaret wrote:Chelsea, 1st half vs WBA, responded well after Spurs scored, rode the luck v Palace.

We just don't sit comfortably with being favourites.

Il give you West Brom although we created the square root of FA.

We are just a 1 dimensional hoof it and woof it side im afraid.

ClaretCanada · Post by **ClaretCanada** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:05 pm

Bye all from sunny Az off to the pool
Where was Taylor today?

watsonsclarets · Post by **watsonsclarets** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:05 pm

4:20 wrote:Bradys got good inventiveness but either did too much or wanted to do too much but lacked the quality to begin to do too much.

And I think that's why brady plays for us and not somebody better he a 1 in 3 player

overall good start to the season we battle hard as we always do.

roll on next game.

Croydon Claret · Post by **Croydon Claret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:06 pm

HiroshimaClaret wrote:Do we have the personnel?

Maybe not now that we've got rid of Gray

FCBurnley · Post by **FCBurnley** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:09 pm

I am just ****** I did not have a sizable bet on a very predictable 0-0. Never seen both teams playing for a point so early in the season before.

HiroshimaClaret · Post by **HiroshimaClaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:10 pm

Croydon Claret wrote:Maybe not now that we've got rid of Gray

We simply don`t until Wells is fit. Is he available this year?

HiroshimaClaret · Post by **HiroshimaClaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:11 pm

ClaretCanada wrote:Bye all from sunny Az off to the pool
Where was Taylor today?

He`d be a `home team` option for me in a 3-5-2.

4:20 · Post by **4:20** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:12 pm

I do like Brady though, just want him to deburr his game a little with a trusty file.

Croydon Claret · Post by **Croydon Claret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:35 pm

HiroshimaClaret wrote:We simply don`t until Wells is fit. Is he available this year?

Said he was almost fit on Clarets Player, not sure how accurate that opinion is though

boiledclaret · Post by **boiledclaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:39 pm

Right_winger wrote:Il give you West Brom although we created the square root of FA.

We are just a 1 dimensional hoof it and woof it side im afraid.

If Brady had been less wasteful and had an 8/10 performance we'd have sneaked the points. We get hoofy when we're desperate. TBF Rightwinger I am putting quite a bit of spin on this.

Both sides deserved a point. We were quite tidy in possession but the final third was turgid. We had plenty of the ball aswell.

Disappointing.

scouseclaret · Post by **scouseclaret** » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:47 pm

nyclaret wrote:1) We were the better side
2) We just lacked that killer ball in the final 3rd
3) We're NINTH in the Premier League

Better side? Really? Nothing in it for me.

It's very difficult to play killer pass as if you don't commit players going forward.lack of support for Wood today was embarrassing at times, as was the time it took to change things aroind.