Video decision system

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Video decision system

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:48 pm

Handball in the verona derby. Ref stops game for two minutes before eventually giving the right decision.

Thankfully it was as the game stopped for some time. Would ruin the flow the game. How many times can teams or the ref contest or review it?

cutsy123
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 351 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by cutsy123 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:55 pm

On about italians again are we

The_Referee
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:12 pm
Been Liked: 12 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by The_Referee » Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:56 pm

Goal line technology has been a revelation but this is a step too far and referees have been let down by players and managers who stoke up the media and fans creating total disrespect and trust of a professional referees opinion.

The day opposition managers and opposition fans can watch a video replay and agree on the decision then maybe their is merit for using video replays but we are a long way away from that being the case
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Video decision system

Post by Imploding Turtle » Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:59 pm

The_Referee wrote:Goal line technology has been a revelation but this is a step too far and referees have been let down by players and managers who stoke up the media and fans creating total disrespect and trust of a professional referees opinion.

The day opposition managers and opposition fans can watch a video replay and agree on the decision then maybe their is merit for using video replays but we are a long way away from that being the case
Give referees a microphone like they do in rugby and let everyone hear what's being said, both by the referee and by the players to the referee. Soon enough things will change in terms of treating referees with respect.
These 2 users liked this post: Sidney1st Darthlaw

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:03 pm

cutsy123 wrote:On about italians again are we
You are very very strange

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:05 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Give referees a microphone like they do in rugby and let everyone hear what's being said, both by the referee and by the players to the referee. Soon enough things will change in terms of treating referees with respect.
Also they should do post match interviews. People can accept wrong decisions.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:06 pm

The_Referee wrote:Goal line technology has been a revelation but this is a step too far and referees have been let down by players and managers who stoke up the media and fans creating total disrespect and trust of a professional referees opinion.

The day opposition managers and opposition fans can watch a video replay and agree on the decision then maybe their is merit for using video replays but we are a long way away from that being the case
Good post.

The_Referee
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:12 pm
Been Liked: 12 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by The_Referee » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:10 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Also they should do post match interviews. People can accept wrong decisions.
I dont think referees should do post match interviews because they cannot lie and not comment like a manager can and it would just be a witch hunt and lead to even more disrespect for referees.

Instead why not make the managers be interviewed together and make them watch replays and answer awkward and difficult questions together. That would be a better step forward in my opinion
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Video decision system

Post by Imploding Turtle » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:11 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Also they should do post match interviews. People can accept wrong decisions.
If that's what they do in rugby then sure. Rugby referees seem to be treated with great respect, so i think football should steal their ideas.

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Video decision system

Post by Imploding Turtle » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:13 pm

The_Referee wrote: Instead why not make the managers be interviewed together and make them watch replays and answer awkward and difficult questions together. That would be a better step forward in my opinion
This is a good idea. A 10-15 minute post-match press conference (like in tennis). but with both managers.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Video decision system

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:14 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Give referees a microphone like they do in rugby and let everyone hear what's being said, both by the referee and by the players to the referee. Soon enough things will change in terms of treating referees with respect.
This.

We've all seen it on TV, clear as day what the players are saying to the ref.
If it could be heard and punished where required then it would soon stop.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:21 pm

Perfectly good goal now disallowed by decision system after ref gave it!

Its far too inconsistent in its use.
Last edited by cricketfieldclarets on Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6623
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1238 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by Lowbankclaret » Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:54 pm

Too many games are changed by incorrect decisions that needs to be corrected.

Our pen against West Ham being one.

piston broke
Posts: 5548
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1448 times
Has Liked: 1229 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: Video decision system

Post by piston broke » Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:17 pm

2 reviews per side would be fine.
I even think a referee could ask for clarification if he's not sure of himself.
Both codes of rugby have it spot on.

The other thing they could bring in from rugby is putting players on report. In football the award of a yellow card can't be overturned either way. Some shouldn't have been given some should be straight reds.

CFS
Posts: 1859
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 235 times
Has Liked: 120 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by CFS » Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:23 pm

Id have it me. Simple wood gets a pen in the west ham game we lose too many points with silly decisions.

superdimitri
Posts: 5120
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1046 times
Has Liked: 739 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by superdimitri » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:01 pm

I think the wait is a good thing. Adds to the suspense.

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2656
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 176 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by Belgianclaret » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:13 pm

I'm all for it. Too much depending on results nowadays.

As for the delay: what about the delays caused by players protesting against bad decisions? In that time, the review panel can reach a decision.

Barry_Chuckle
Posts: 1797
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:24 pm
Been Liked: 599 times
Has Liked: 205 times
Location: Oldfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Video decision system

Post by Barry_Chuckle » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:19 pm

Belgianclaret wrote: As for the delay: what about the delays caused by players protesting against bad decisions? In that time, the review panel can reach a decision.
Or the delay to treat a player who isn't injured but continues to hold his leg to throw the ref of the scent that he'd dived :(

boatshed bill
Posts: 17386
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3569 times
Has Liked: 7848 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:25 pm

Belgianclaret wrote:I'm all for it. Too much depending on results nowadays.

As for the delay: what about the delays caused by players protesting against bad decisions? In that time, the review panel can reach a decision.
I thought they were going to clamp down on this....they haven't really

Foulthrow
Posts: 2330
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:48 am
Been Liked: 716 times
Has Liked: 1536 times

Re: Video decision system

Post by Foulthrow » Mon Oct 23, 2017 11:20 am

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Also they should do post match interviews. People can accept wrong decisions.
The problem with this is that the media companies would only want to interview them after something had gone wrong or was 'controversial'. They wouldn't interview them about all of the correct decisions that they had made or if they had a good/quiet game. This would simply re-inforce the view of refs as all being 'bad'.

Post Reply