
Emily Thornberry at it again
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4645 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Emily Thornberry at it again
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6243889/l ... orth-less/ as the Shadow Foreign Secretary has this woman not got more pressing matters to attend to
.

Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
What she saying about Little Jack Horner?
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL Buxtonclaret
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
She’s commenting on a study.
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
I'd have to agree that the idea of the Mr Men getting to say more words than the Little Misses is wildly unrealistic. 

This user liked this post: bobinho
-
- Posts: 9811
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3226 times
- Has Liked: 10705 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
"Little" Burnley ? 

Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
in a world where bigger is generally considered better then I get where she is coming from.
See also this definition of little: small in size, amount, or degree (often used to convey an appealing diminutiveness or express an affectionate or condescending attitude).
This is just another example of the Sun trying to belittle the Labour Party and perfectly illustrates why they appeal to the chauvinistic and short sighted.
See also this definition of little: small in size, amount, or degree (often used to convey an appealing diminutiveness or express an affectionate or condescending attitude).
This is just another example of the Sun trying to belittle the Labour Party and perfectly illustrates why they appeal to the chauvinistic and short sighted.
-
- Posts: 10581
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4614 times
- Has Liked: 7257 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
The sun doesn’t need to waste its time doing that.
Two words... Diane Abbott. (Or three if you’re Diane Abbott)
Two words... Diane Abbott. (Or three if you’re Diane Abbott)
Last edited by bobinho on Thu May 10, 2018 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: ants_g
-
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1862 times
- Has Liked: 2716 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
This would be The Sun which, during its almost 49 years of publication has flitted about from Labour to Tory, back to Labour and then back to Tory so it obviously appeals to the chauvinistic and short sighted of both parties in a measure of 22 years of Labour to 26 years of Tory.Cryssys wrote:in a world where bigger is generally considered better then I get where she is coming from.
See also this definition of little: small in size, amount, or degree (often used to convey an appealing diminutiveness or express an affectionate or condescending attitude).
This is just another example of the Sun trying to belittle the Labour Party and perfectly illustrates why they appeal to the chauvinistic and short sighted.
All the media make efforts at belittling politicians, let's face it, the politicians do make it easy for them!
This user liked this post: Stayingup
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Spot on. There are small minded chauvinists on both sides of the divide and my guess is that the Sun readership is made up of equal measures of Labour and Tory supporters.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote:This would be The Sun which, during its almost 49 years of publication has flitted about from Labour to Tory, back to Labour and then back to Tory so it obviously appeals to the chauvinistic and short sighted of both parties
However the point about referring to women as little suggesting that they are worth less is valid and as such so are Emily Thornberry's comments.
bobinho wrote:Two words... Diane Abbott. (Or three if you’re Diane Abbott)
I'll see your Diane Abbott and raise you Boris Johnson
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 937 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Ok call them BIG Miss then.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4645 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
What would Louisa May Alcott think. 

This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46
-
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1862 times
- Has Liked: 2716 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
I eagerly await her comments with regard to Louisa May Alcott's novel which will obviously have to be renamed in order to appease Emily Thornberry.Cryssys wrote:However the point about referring to women as little suggesting that they are worth less is valid and as such so are Emily Thornberry's comments.
It is such a pity that politicians have nothing better to worry about. This attitude just typifies why we have had no leaders in politics for over 30 years, they are too embroiled in ensuring that they keep the right side of the PC divide to worry about the realities of what is happening in the country.
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Like the Sun, you're being deliberately obtuse. This is a book written in America in 1868 and there is no suggestion that its name should be changed. What's gone is gone. The point is that we live in a different world and attitudes have moved on.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote:I eagerly await her comments with regard to Louisa May Alcott's novel which will obviously have to be renamed in order to appease Emily Thornberry..
I suggest that you try and catch up.
Last edited by Cryssys on Thu May 10, 2018 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Deliberately frivolous, more like. I suspect Ashington's comment is more to do with emphasising how utterly trivial this issue is.Cryssys wrote:Like the Sun, you're being deliberately obtuse. This is a book written in America in 1868 and there is no suggestion that it's name should be changed. What's gone is gone. The point is that we live in a different world and attitudes have moved on.
I suggest that you try and catch up.
Anyway, Alcott wrote a book called "Little Men" as well, so she's in the clear. Unless they start an argument about "Good Wives".

This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46
-
- Posts: 5050
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Cryssys wrote:Like the Sun, you're being deliberately obtuse. This is a book written in America in 1868 and there is no suggestion that it's name should be changed. What's gone is gone. The point is that we live in a different world and attitudes have moved on.
I suggest that you try and catch up.
Given it was written (published) in 1868 and the Nineteenth Amendment didn't appear until 1920, times were indeed different.
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Emily Thornberry has her own ingrained prejudices which she lets slip every now and then in that sneering patronising manner she has. The ordinary working man for starters.
This user liked this post: ClaretMoffitt
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Maybe she wouldn't be so annoyed if there was a Mr Anti-Semite.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
She's probably the best bet of the current Labour heavy hitters, but its a **** poor field to be honest.
Appalling lack of decent politicians in the top positions at the moment it has to be said.
Appalling lack of decent politicians in the top positions at the moment it has to be said.
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Emily Thornberry is everything that I despise about what has infected the Labour Party in recent years. They are no longer the party for working people, they are the London Party, living in their North London bubble abandoning their traditional heartlands for the concerns of metroman. They have zero idea about what working people are all about, what their hopes and concerns are.
These 2 users liked this post: CoolClaret bob-the-scutter
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Not a fan of Labour at all, but it would take a leader a lot more competent than Corbyn to unite all of it with the country we live in these days.
Same for the other lot as well
Same for the other lot as well
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
When Brexit is finally over and the dust has settled then maybe someone will emerge from the wreckage to provide some sort of leadership. Currently though the whole debate is too divisive, there is no room for any middle ground and any aspiring leader has to be in one camp or the other. Currently Corbyn is trying to slime his way around the edges but he will either cosy up to his metro friends and alienate what used to be Labour's powerbase, or recognise where Labour's roots were and give up his Saturday night quinoa parties. I don't think he has the gumption to do either.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
They have got a great chance of winning an election after Brexit.
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
I would love there to be a Labour government after Brexit, but not with Corbyn and the Islington set in charge.Lancasterclaret wrote:They have got a great chance of winning an election after Brexit.
-
- Posts: 11591
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4726 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
She will probably have her own range of books out very soon
Gender neutral tickle
Gender neutral happy
Little gender neutral
She is one of the perfect examples of sadly why we won't have labour in charge anytime soon.
Gender neutral tickle
Gender neutral happy
Little gender neutral
She is one of the perfect examples of sadly why we won't have labour in charge anytime soon.
-
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1862 times
- Has Liked: 2716 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
For your information, I caught up years ago which is why I look upon our current crop of politicians with disdain. I shall repeat my thoughts so that you can really understand what I am saying:-Cryssys wrote:Like the Sun, you're being deliberately obtuse. This is a book written in America in 1868 and there is no suggestion that its name should be changed. What's gone is gone. The point is that we live in a different world and attitudes have moved on.
I suggest that you try and catch up.
"It is such a pity that politicians have nothing better to worry about. This attitude just typifies why we have had no leaders in politics for over 30 years, they are too embroiled in ensuring that they keep the right side of the PC divide to worry about the realities of what is happening in the country."
I think I am probably ahead of the game, rather than trying to catch up, and I am happy that I no longer need to worry about it.
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Quinoa parties - maybe, who knows? But not in a Westminster bubble.Chobulous wrote:I would love there to be a Labour government after Brexit, but not with Corbyn and the Islington set in charge.
Corbyn has more unscripted conversations with ordinary members of the public than probably May, Cameron, Brown, and Blair did combined. By all means knock the guy, but at least stay within the bounds of reason.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4645 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
If MP'S took more interest in issues such as this regarding gender inequality http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-44062475 maybe they would earn the public's respect.
-
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
- Been Liked: 1218 times
- Has Liked: 807 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
We desperately need a new party, a proper working class party.
I refuse to listen to anyone who tries to tell me that is Labour.
I refuse to listen to anyone who tries to tell me that is Labour.
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Could you explain how Labour are no longer the party for the working class?ClaretMoffitt wrote:We desperately need a new party, a proper working class party.
I refuse to listen to anyone who tries to tell me that is Labour.
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
BNP?ClaretMoffitt wrote:We desperately need a new party, a proper working class party.
I refuse to listen to anyone who tries to tell me that is Labour.
-
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
- Been Liked: 1218 times
- Has Liked: 807 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
I could write you an essay if I could be bothered.AndrewJB wrote:Could you explain how Labour are no longer the party for the working class?
And Greenmile, are they still around? Is fat Nick still their leader?
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Strange isn't it how we now have a Labour executive whose policies are more left wing than any for decades (to the extent that they frighten most of us in the centre), and yet they are perceived by a minority as being "no longer for the working class".AndrewJB wrote:Could you explain how Labour are no longer the party for the working class?
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
I'm sure I saw Nick Griffin doing sign language for the BBC just a while ago.
Labour are still a workers party. That they sometimes behave like a pressure group for underrepresented minority groups (and sometimes over-do it, according to some, but I suppose that depends on the kind of propaganda you expose yourself to) doesn't change this fact. In fact, balancing he scales is the point of the Labour party. I suppose when a person believes they are losing status, them lashing out is unsurprising, even at a phantom enemy. Folk just want to use the word 'gay' pejoratively and without others thinking they're a bit of a c.unt, I think. Usually results in 'the gays' and those who give them voice being attacked for spoiling the party.
Labour are still a workers party. That they sometimes behave like a pressure group for underrepresented minority groups (and sometimes over-do it, according to some, but I suppose that depends on the kind of propaganda you expose yourself to) doesn't change this fact. In fact, balancing he scales is the point of the Labour party. I suppose when a person believes they are losing status, them lashing out is unsurprising, even at a phantom enemy. Folk just want to use the word 'gay' pejoratively and without others thinking they're a bit of a c.unt, I think. Usually results in 'the gays' and those who give them voice being attacked for spoiling the party.
This user liked this post: AndrewJB
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
KNEW IT!!!


-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
She can only answer the questions that are put to her, no matter how trivial, or irrelevant to the more pressing matters.tiger76 wrote:https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6243889/l ... orth-less/ as the Shadow Foreign Secretary has this woman not got more pressing matters to attend to.
Given that she was asked that particular question, her answer is pretty unsurprising really. Not sure what you would expect her to say?
People like Morgan only ask questions like that because they know it's "click-bait" for some people.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4645 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Fair enough the standard of politicians is low,but the standards of journalism is even lower in the UK,Piers Morgan being a prime example.
There is just something about Emily Thornberry that makes her hard to warm towards,she is similar to the maybot they don't have a natural infinity with the public,If Labour form a government soon then will be the time to judge the likes of Thornberry,it's frightening that her and Boris have such senior roles within their parties.Speaks volumes about the dearth of talent in parliament.
There is just something about Emily Thornberry that makes her hard to warm towards,she is similar to the maybot they don't have a natural infinity with the public,If Labour form a government soon then will be the time to judge the likes of Thornberry,it's frightening that her and Boris have such senior roles within their parties.Speaks volumes about the dearth of talent in parliament.
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
.
Last edited by If it be your will on Sun Oct 07, 2018 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 5427
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
- Been Liked: 2590 times
- Has Liked: 1108 times
- Location: Ightenhill,Burnley
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Labour's problem is they instinctively pigeon hole people hence, the " working class " vote, the " LBGT " vote, the " BAME " vote, the " Green vote ", the " Youth vote " etc and have, for a number of years, adopted a strategy of attempting to win over Groups of minorities, which, together with mobilising the Unions, is expected to bring them success in the polls.nil_desperandum wrote:Strange isn't it how we now have a Labour executive whose policies are more left wing than any for decades (to the extent that they frighten most of us in the centre), and yet they are perceived by a minority as being "no longer for the working class".
They've forgotten that they're talking to " people ", a lot of whom do not necessarily wish to be defined by their education, colour, sexuality, religion etc. Some are conservative, some are liberal and so on. The other problem is that some of these " minority groups " have values that are diametrically opposed to each other, for example, the Pakistani heritage Asian community generally have views on homosexuality,and pre-marital relations that seem very " illiberal " to some of us.
Jeremy Corbyn's view of the world is about as far removed from the average white working class voter as it is possible to get, especially in the 45+ age group.... he drones on about Palestine & Venezuela whilst they want to see crackdowns on drug dealers, knife crime & foreign criminals ..
-
- Posts: 9811
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3226 times
- Has Liked: 10705 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
I've heard him "drone on" about the Tories' shocking disregard for rising crime rates, rising hospital waiting times, rising delays in cancer-sufferers being seen, rising dead-end, so-called "jobs", lower standards of living, a widening gap between the haves and have-nots. Wot a bore !
These 2 users liked this post: longsidepies AndrewJB
-
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
- Been Liked: 1218 times
- Has Liked: 807 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
- Tight immigration control where permanent residence is only granted to those who have skills we need to fill market gaps, while the government simultaneously make a conscious effort to incetivise training for it in the UK so we never stay dependent.If it be your will wrote:Okay, you've got me listening. What policies would they have? List, say, five (or more if you wish).
- Lower taxes by bringing down public spending in order to make a tax free threshold of up to the first 20k, truly bringing the working man/woman on low income out of tax entirely.
- Increase NHS efficiency by charging people who miss GP/specialist appointments more than once in 12 months, clamp down on health tourism and invest that more into things that matter, like services for serious illness.
- A cabinet made of people who have been there and done it, not pompous, rich, public school boys/girls who have been destined for public office since the day they went to nursery. A party made of of real men and women, who have worked, lived life and genuinely want to change things.
- A focus on traditional values, a more "Family, Flag, Faith" (despite me personally being an atheist) set of values rather than this current faceless, robotic pseudo-liberalism that is infesting all the liberal elite, not just politicians.
- A party that fights for not just workers rights, but for business rights too; one that doesn't jump into bed with the unions and communists, rather one with an authentic approach where workers and businesses are treated fairly and not set upon each other.
These 2 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland JohnMac
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
What interesting suggestions! You would be in the presidency) 

-
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
- Been Liked: 1218 times
- Has Liked: 807 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Oh, they'd dig up way too much dirt on me to even get close to public officeMaja wrote:What interesting suggestions! You would be in the presidency)

-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
What we need is a UK version of Donald Trump. Someone who has risen through the ranks of businesses and can grasp the real world, is head strong and has the gutts to take the bull by the horns and make things happen.
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
I don't have time(or inclination) to go through the current Shadow Cabinet, but my impression is that the make-up of the current Shadow Cabinet is just about the opposite of the cabinet you describe.ClaretMoffitt wrote: - A cabinet made of people who have been there and done it, not pompous, rich, public school boys/girls who have been destined for public office since the day they went to nursery. A party made of of real men and women, who have worked, lived life and genuinely want to change things.
.
Just to give one example: Keir Starmer, (who might be considered as one of the "poshest") was born to a working class family in Southwark - the second of four children of a toolmaker and a nurse. He was named after the founder of the Labour Party Keir Hardie.
Others: Rebecca Long - Bailey - daughter of an (Irish) Salford docker.
John McDonnell - son of a Liverpool bus driver. Educated at night school at Burnley College!
Dawn Butler - one of 6 children born to an immigrant Jamaican family in the East End.
Angela Rayner????
Check them all out.
These 2 users liked this post: If it be your will longsidepies
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
You mean the same Donald Trump who inherited all his money from his Father?Top Claret wrote:What we need is a UK version of Donald Trump. Someone who has risen through the ranks of businesses and can grasp the real world, is head strong and has the gutts to take the bull by the horns and make things happen.
-
- Posts: 10581
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4614 times
- Has Liked: 7257 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
You don't play cards do you?Cryssys wrote:I'll see your Diane Abbott and raise you Boris Johnson
When you call, you can't expect to take the pot with two pair against my royal flush...


-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Emily thornberry.
They should do a little miss character based on the smug fat fingered champagne socialist.
Little miss metropolitan bubble dweller.
They should do a little miss character based on the smug fat fingered champagne socialist.
Little miss metropolitan bubble dweller.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
I've heard stuff like that before, now what was it....oh I remember now"Family, Flag, Faith"
It was "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer"
-
- Posts: 10581
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4614 times
- Has Liked: 7257 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
Didn't seem to matter in Trumps case...ClaretMoffitt wrote:Oh, they'd dig up way too much dirt on me to even get close to public office
Like the ideas, I wonder how easy they'd be to implement?
Re: Emily Thornberry at it again
You're describing the Labour Party under Blair. One of the reasons Blairite Labour called Corbyn "unelectable" is he stepped away from this kind of politics. It is exactly how Corbyn rose in popularity, gained the leadership, and Labour membership doubled. How Labour won Canterbury and Plymouth, and a large share of the vote in the face of a deeply hostile press.Clarets4me wrote:Labour's problem is they instinctively pigeon hole people hence, the " working class " vote, the " LBGT " vote, the " BAME " vote, the " Green vote ", the " Youth vote " etc and have, for a number of years, adopted a strategy of attempting to win over Groups of minorities, which, together with mobilising the Unions, is expected to bring them success in the polls.
They've forgotten that they're talking to " people ", a lot of whom do not necessarily wish to be defined by their education, colour, sexuality, religion etc. Some are conservative, some are liberal and so on. The other problem is that some of these " minority groups " have values that are diametrically opposed to each other, for example, the Pakistani heritage Asian community generally have views on homosexuality,and pre-marital relations that seem very " illiberal " to some of us.
Jeremy Corbyn's view of the world is about as far removed from the average white working class voter as it is possible to get, especially in the 45+ age group.... he drones on about Palestine & Venezuela whilst they want to see crackdowns on drug dealers, knife crime & foreign criminals ..
As for Corbyn himself, what exactly do you know about his view of the world? I've been to see him speak, and he never said a word about Palestine or Venezuela. He just talked about making Britain a fairer place, and taking back control of important elements of our economy. His voice isn't magical or hypnotic, but his message is far more inspiring than what we get from the Tories (austerity for everyone except the rich).
How on earth can you say "Jeremy Corbyn's view of the world is about as far removed from the average white working class voter as it is possible to get" when Theresa May is in the midst of a scandal about trying to kick lots of ordinary British people out of Britain? Are you suggesting that Rees Mogg or Boris Johnson have a stronger link with the average working class voter? Go and see Corbyn speak.
This user liked this post: longsidepies