General Election 2017 Mega Thread

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:25 pm

claretandy wrote:He's the alternative if the Tories fail, both manifestos state that we will leave the single market and end freedom of movement, have the yoof and remainers realized this ?
One thing I noticed during the election is that they tended to shut their ears on this point in particular.

The underlying theme of the major media outlets like Sky News and the BBC now seems to be that this election was a rebellion against Brexit. There is a reinvigorated push back against it and I think this time they may actually be successful under the guise of the fake term "soft brexit"

aggi
Posts: 9722
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by aggi » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:27 pm

claretandy wrote:If we don't come to an agreement within 2 years then there is no deal to put to parliament and we leave under WTO terms.
Or we agree to an extended negotiation period under transitional arrangements. Which is what most sensible people are expecting.

If we had any intention of no deal (as unrealistic as it is given how convoluted it would be) we'd have already started investing huge amounts in regulatory services, training, etc to take up the shortfall when it happened.

Look at EU nurses registering in the UK post-Brexit for instance, this hasn't been met with a huge investment into nursing training which suggests that there are expectations that it will be resolved in some other way (although you can't rule out incompetence at the moment). There is the same pattern in regulatory bodies too (e.g. atomic power, insurance). If there is a no deal or hard brexit the workload would hugely increase but there is no new investment suggested.
Image

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:40 pm

Brexit is happening, you two just don't seem to understand that as UKIP got 600,000 votes, no party can assume that its a vote winner to go for them anymore so they will listen to business, to the young, to Lord Buckethead (ok, maybe not him) but you get the picture.

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:42 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:One thing I noticed during the election is that they tended to shut their ears on this point in particular.

The underlying theme of the major media outlets like Sky News and the BBC now seems to be that this election was a rebellion against Brexit. There is a reinvigorated push back against it and I think this time they may actually be successful under the guise of the fake term "soft brexit"
It literally says in the manifesto that access to the single market is a priority. I don't know how many times it takes before you will actually believe reality but I suggest you make a ******* effort to stop being so much in denial.

You aren't entitled to your own facts. If you're not going to live in the same reality as the rest of us then I recommend you go and post on the Stormfront forums where the truth isn't relevant because you're wasting everyone's time here, including your own.

If it be your will
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
Been Liked: 500 times
Has Liked: 509 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by If it be your will » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:52 pm

.
Last edited by If it be your will on Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:54 pm

But how can that be?

We are constantly told that the EU is not a democracy?!?

All Merkel has to do is to say "Oi, do what you are told or remember what my grandfather did" surely*

*I'm channelling my inner UKIP ******** here, just in case anyone is wondering!

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by claretandy » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:55 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:Brexit is happening, you two just don't seem to understand that as UKIP got 600,000 votes, no party can assume that its a vote winner to go for them anymore so they will listen to business, to the young, to Lord Buckethead (ok, maybe not him) but you get the picture.
Where do you think them UKIP votes went ? They went to the Tories and Labour who's policy is to leave the single market and end freedom of movement, any backsliding and UKIP will be back on steroids.

Caballo
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:31 am
Been Liked: 463 times
Has Liked: 478 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Caballo » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:56 pm

Iibyw,

That's how I understand it too, based on an interview I watched on the Sunday politics show.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by claretandy » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:57 pm

If it be your will wrote:That's also what I assumed, but according to an article in the FT this weekend, it's not so clear cut. They appeared to suggest that because we have already invoked article 50, Brexit absolutely will happen in 2y unless all 27 EU countries agree to halt it, either temporarily or permanently. It would only take a single one of them to dig their heals in and over the cliff we go, ready or not. (Can anyone else confirm this is actually so?)

If this is true, then the act of invoking article 50 before calling an election was an act of complete lunacy. Why didn't they do it the other way round?
It is true, all 27 have to agree to an extension, that's why i say no deal is a real possibility.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:01 pm

Back on steroids?

Jobs done Andy.

They will get about 250,000 at the next election tops. Brexit is happening, the blue passports are back!

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by claretandy » Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:09 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:Back on steroids?

Jobs done Andy.

They will get about 250,000 at the next election tops. Brexit is happening, the blue passports are back!
If there is no backsliding.

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:18 pm

It's hilarious how scared you are that Brexit won't happen. It might not be the Brexit you like but it'll happen nonetheless. If it's a soft Brexit them that would be what the majority of us want. If it's a hard Brexit it will be against the wishes of the majority and Corbyn will be elected with a Blair-esque landslide. He might anyway.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7725
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4306 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by nil_desperandum » Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:43 pm

dsr wrote:I said they may be offered the chance - the corollary is that they may not. But as the ones who would accept the chance to be UK citizens would be the ones who don't want to be in the EU and the ones who are willing to work hard for minimum wage (as a generalisation), then I think there might be more Tory voters than you think.
Do I actually understand what you have written there?
You are saying that EU citizens who are currently living and working here "may not" be offered citizenship? (Only a current or former UKip supporter could countenance such a suggestion.)
(For anyone only just joining this debate, I am referring specifically to the 3 million EU citizens who live and work here who aren't currently allowed to vote in general Elections because they aren't British Citizens)
Post Brexit, (and assuming we have a hard border) there are only 3 options (I think):
1. Go home
2. UK citizenship (voluntary)
or as an alternative 3. Not apply for citizenship but live and work here under some form of visa system.

I don't think that the last option would be very popular, since it wouldn't guarantee their future security, and it might give them less rights than a UK passport holder, so the vast majority would opt for citizenship.

"But as the ones who would accept the chance to be UK citizens would be the ones who don't want to be in the EU and the ones who are willing to work hard for minimum wage (as a generalisation),"
You do realise that that's just a ridiculous thing to say don't you, just in order to try and make a political point?. [We are dealing with people's lives here, irrespective of their contribution to the economy].
There are already a large number of people in the UK with dual nationality. (Conversely there are currently potentially 5 million UK citizens who (e.g.) are eligible for an Irish EU passport, and large numbers are applying for one).

Just because you apply for British citizenship doesn't mean - as you state - that you don't want to be in the EU. Indeed the opposite is the case. I can't imagine any EU citizen currently living and working in the UK renouncing their Polish or French or Irish or whatever Citizenship. That would be plain daft since they would lose their right to free movement.
I find it hard to understand why you would assume that your less wealthy agricultural workers, (who probably haven't put down any roots here as yet), are more likely to apply for citizenship than the Jewish refugee who came over here and has lived here since 1945, or the Hungarian doctor who has been performing operation over here for the past 35 years and is settled with children and grandchildren, or the nurse whose wife also works for the NHS?
No promises have been made about their futures, but one assumes that a deal will be made with the EU as a priority. One would have to assume that the majority will opt for British Citizenship, and as I said the fact that they have been left in limbo since the referendum with a cloud hanging over their future is unlikely to make them want to rush out and vote Tory. (And vote in elections they will, because the majority having been brought up in Communist regimes, they absolutely understand the importance of democratic elections).

IanMcL
Posts: 34828
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6952 times
Has Liked: 10373 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by IanMcL » Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:44 pm

It's over May! The tory elite and the foxes have joined forces!

Image

Foshiznik
Posts: 3243
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 940 times
Has Liked: 2633 times
Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Foshiznik » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:00 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:Do I actually understand what you have written there?
You are saying that EU citizens who are currently living and working here "may not" be offered citizenship? (Only a current or former UKip supporter could countenance such a suggestion.)
(For anyone only just joining this debate, I am referring specifically to the 3 million EU citizens who live and work here who aren't currently allowed to vote in general Elections because they aren't British Citizens)
Post Brexit, (and assuming we have a hard border) there are only 3 options (I think):
1. Go home
2. UK citizenship (voluntary)
or as an alternative 3. Not apply for citizenship but live and work here under some form of visa system.

I don't think that the last option would be very popular, since it wouldn't guarantee their future security, and it might give them less rights than a UK passport holder, so the vast majority would opt for citizenship.

"But as the ones who would accept the chance to be UK citizens would be the ones who don't want to be in the EU and the ones who are willing to work hard for minimum wage (as a generalisation),"
You do realise that that's just a ridiculous thing to say don't you, just in order to try and make a political point?. [We are dealing with people's lives here, irrespective of their contribution to the economy].
There are already a large number of people in the UK with dual nationality. (Conversely there are currently potentially 5 million UK citizens who (e.g.) are eligible for an Irish EU passport, and large numbers are applying for one).

Just because you apply for British citizenship doesn't mean - as you state - that you don't want to be in the EU. Indeed the opposite is the case. I can't imagine any EU citizen currently living and working in the UK renouncing their Polish or French or Irish or whatever Citizenship. That would be plain daft since they would lose their right to free movement.
I find it hard to understand why you would assume that your less wealthy agricultural workers, (who probably haven't put down any roots here as yet), are more likely to apply for citizenship than the Jewish refugee who came over here and has lived here since 1945, or the Hungarian doctor who has been performing operation over here for the past 35 years and is settled with children and grandchildren, or the nurse whose wife also works for the NHS?
No promises have been made about their futures, but one assumes that a deal will be made with the EU as a priority. One would have to assume that the majority will opt for British Citizenship, and as I said the fact that they have been left in limbo since the referendum with a cloud hanging over their future is unlikely to make them want to rush out and vote Tory. (And vote in elections they will, because the majority having been brought up in Communist regimes, they absolutely understand the importance of democratic elections).

Personally, I think we will simply just enact Article 45 and tighten our quotas so that it is only available for certain specialised jobs to fill skill gaps, rather than anyone with a job.

On a separate note, I can't understand why remainers didn't absolutely stress this point. Nobody is legally coming to the UK as an EU National and taking free healthcare and benefits whilst not working. it's not possible, yet no media outlet seemed to question this when they heard all of the immigration myths thrown about by some brexiteers.

dsr
Posts: 16284
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4883 times
Has Liked: 2598 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by dsr » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:00 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:Do I actually understand what you have written there?
I suspect not; or else you're answering someone else's post. Where do the agricultural workers come in? Or the Hungarian doctor for that matter? I have never formed an opinion as to the relative likelihood of different sorts of immigrants applying for citizenship, so whatever conclusion you have reached about my views, it's wrong.

But since you mention him (or her), I suspect the rules for someone who escaped over the wall in 1982 will be different from the rules for someone who arrived yesterday.

Darthlaw
Posts: 3425
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1293 times
Has Liked: 449 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Darthlaw » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:03 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:Corbyn will be elected with a Blair-esque landslide. He might anyway.
Just needs a few more 'free' offers in his manifesto to buy enough voters to get him over the line. He's exhausted this with the youth's free tuition, parents with free school meals and workers with free extra bank holidays. Chuck in free SAGA coach holiday for all over 65 and he'll **** it. ;)

Don't forget the top 5% have got it covered.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:06 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:It's hilarious how scared you are that Brexit won't happen. It might not be the Brexit you like but it'll happen nonetheless. If it's a soft Brexit them that would be what the majority of us want. If it's a hard Brexit it will be against the wishes of the majority and Corbyn will be elected with a Blair-esque landslide. He might anyway.
Imploding Turtle wrote:It literally says in the manifesto that access to the single market is a priority. I don't know how many times it takes before you will actually believe reality but I suggest you make a ******* effort to stop being so much in denial.

You aren't entitled to your own facts. If you're not going to live in the same reality as the rest of us then I recommend you go and post on the Stormfront forums where the truth isn't relevant because you're wasting everyone's time here, including your own.
Oh look, it's IT lying about what Corbyn has said and what is in his manifesto again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4okLzPWPAE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - Here he is explicitly and publicly stating he will leave the single market.

Image

It literally doesn't once mention in their manifesto that they will stay in the single market or even aim to. So cut the lies pal.

Image
Last edited by ClaretMoffitt on Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:13 pm, edited 3 times in total.
These 2 users liked this post: Right_winger claretandy

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:09 pm

darthlaw - if you offer a manifesto that offers hope, rather than one that offers nothing, and then don't bother interacting with your voters, then you deserve what you get.

Andy - backsliding? We are leaving. That was on the voting ballot, and its being enacted. There is nowhere for them to go from here.
This user liked this post: Darthlaw

UpTheBeehole
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 496 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by UpTheBeehole » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:14 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:Oh look, it's IT lying about what Corbyn has said and what is in his manifesto again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4okLzPWPAE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Image

It literally doesn't once mention in their manifesto that they will stay in the single market or even aim to. So cut the lies pal.

Image
You're looking at the wrong bit.
We will scrap the Conservatives’ Brexit White Paper and replace it with fresh negotiating priorities that have a strong emphasis on retaining the benefits of the Single Market and the Customs Union – which are essential for maintaining industries, jobs and businesses in Britain. Labour will always put jobs and the economy first.
http://www.labour.org.uk/index.php/manifesto2017/brexit
This user liked this post: Greenmile

Foshiznik
Posts: 3243
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 940 times
Has Liked: 2633 times
Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Foshiznik » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:16 pm

Darthlaw wrote:Just needs a few more 'free' offers in his manifesto to buy enough voters to get him over the line. He's exhausted this with the youth's free tuition, parents with free school meals and workers with free extra bank holidays. Chuck in free SAGA coach holiday for all over 65 and he'll **** it. ;)

Don't forget the top 5% have got it covered.
Coupled with his opposition being a robotic, uncharasmatic, easily led, mediocremental sociopath who is unable to speak without sounding like she is reading from a piece of paper leading a party who's best idea within their manifesto is to have a blue cover.
This user liked this post: Darthlaw

aggi
Posts: 9722
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by aggi » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:20 pm

I think the EU is just taking the mick now:

“We cannot allow ourselves to be sucked into this maelstrom,” a principal figure on the EU negotiating side said. “There is really nothing we can do but keep calm and carry on.”

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8277
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2938 times
Has Liked: 508 times
Location: Earth

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretAndJew » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:20 pm

"We will scrap the Conservatives’ Brexit White Paper and replace it with fresh negotiating priorities that have a strong emphasis on retaining the benefits of the Single Market and the Customs Union – which are essential for maintaining industries, jobs and businesses in Britain. Labour will always put jobs and the economy first."

http://www.labour.org.uk/index.php/manifesto2017/brexit" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:24 pm

UpTheBeehole wrote:You're looking at the wrong bit.



http://www.labour.org.uk/index.php/manifesto2017/brexit
No idea why that didn't come up in my CTRL F search but okay.



However it now raises more questions than answers.

1.) Why did he say on National TV that he intended to leave the single market as I have shown in my link if his manifesto states otherwise?
2.) Single market access is unacceptable without free movement, we all know this as Brussels have made it clear so why is he promising to remove freedom of movement but keep free access to the single market if we all know that is impossible?
Last edited by ClaretMoffitt on Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5293
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2964 times
Has Liked: 837 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by quoonbeatz » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:24 pm

aggi wrote:Or we agree to an extended negotiation period under transitional arrangements. Which is what most sensible people are expecting.

If we had any intention of no deal (as unrealistic as it is given how convoluted it would be) we'd have already started investing huge amounts in regulatory services, training, etc to take up the shortfall when it happened.

Look at EU nurses registering in the UK post-Brexit for instance, this hasn't been met with a huge investment into nursing training which suggests that there are expectations that it will be resolved in some other way (although you can't rule out incompetence at the moment). There is the same pattern in regulatory bodies too (e.g. atomic power, insurance). If there is a no deal or hard brexit the workload would hugely increase but there is no new investment suggested.
Image
massive problem this.

nursing applications form the eu are down 96%. applications from doctors are also taking and 60% of eu doctors currently practising here are looking at leaving.

all because of brexit.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:27 pm

quoonbeatz wrote:massive problem this.

nursing applications form the eu are down 96%. applications from doctors are also taking and 60% of eu doctors currently practising here are looking at leaving.

all because of brexit.
Perhaps we may start finally investing in our own people now instead of constantly relying on foreign imports just because its cheaper than training up our own kids. Or I guess none of our young people would want to be things like doctors, nurses and medical professionals, I mean they are such unattractive professions, right?

Spijed
Posts: 18068
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3055 times
Has Liked: 1327 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Spijed » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:28 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:No idea why that didn't come up in my CTRL F search but okay.



However it now raises more questions than answers.

1.) Why did he say on National TV that he intended to leave the single market as I have shown in my link if his manifesto states otherwise?
2.) Single market access is unacceptable without free movement, we all know this as Brussels have made it clear so is he promising to remove freedom of movement but keep free access to the single market if we all know that is impossible?
And yet upon leaving the EU we were promised by Boris & Nigel £350 million a week going towards the NHS.

A bit rich saying Corbyn won't keep his promises, isn't it?

UpTheBeehole
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 496 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by UpTheBeehole » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:28 pm

Well done d*ckwads on voting to leave the EU
Last edited by UpTheBeehole on Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Darthlaw
Posts: 3425
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1293 times
Has Liked: 449 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Darthlaw » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:28 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:darthlaw - if you offer a manifesto that offers hope, rather than one that offers nothing, and then don't bother interacting with your voters, then you deserve what you get.
I very much agree. My comment was tongue in cheek, hence the wink smiley.

I've not bothered getting involved in this thread since the result purely because I was so let down by the Tories 'campaign' rather than the result itself. I said time and time again beforehand that I admired Corbyn for his enthusiasm and passion for his cause, in fact his policies were very attractive which formed the overall package that did so well.

Maybe I'm one of the forgotten middle but the election gave me no real party with which to follow, with the Tories 'keep cutting' motives and Labours 'letter to Santa' policies. That was before you considered May's non-performance.

Nevertheless, I'm still of the opinion that Labours idealistic manifesto, which would have seen inflation go through the roof would have once again left future generations picking up the bill until the Tories got back in and started austerity again. With Liam Byrne's 'There's no money left' ringing in my mind I couldn't with a clear conscience vote in any way which would put Labour into power.

Hopefully someone can now find the middle ground between the left and the right to steer us through this debacle.

UpTheBeehole
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 496 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by UpTheBeehole » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:31 pm

The 'there's no money left' note was clearly a joke. Only a party as sourfaced as the Tories would release that as a stick to beat labour with

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7725
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4306 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by nil_desperandum » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:31 pm

dsr wrote:I suspect not; or else you're answering someone else's post. Where do the agricultural workers come in? Or the Hungarian doctor for that matter? I have never formed an opinion as to the relative likelihood of different sorts of immigrants applying for citizenship, so whatever conclusion you have reached about my views, it's wrong.
.

I would suggest you put your spade away. You know exactly where these generic descriptors of EU immigrants came from.
Ok, if you want to be ultra-pedantic, you didn't say agricultural workers, you said those on, (and by inference below), "the minimum wage" would be the ones who "would accept the chance to become UK citizens ..... ", so I selected a group who would obviously fit that descriptor, ("agricultural workers"). I then compared them with another typical EU group, (Hungarian doctors) who are clearly not on the minimum wage, and asked why it was you thought the doctors would be less likely to apply for citizenship, which is what in effect you wrote. (I’ll quote it just in case you want to move the goalposts):

Post by dsr » Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:42 pm “I said they may be offered the chance - the corollary is that they may not. But as the ones who would accept the chance to be UK citizens would be the ones who don't want to be in the EU and the ones who are willing to work hard for minimum wage (as a generalisation), then I think there might be more Tory voters than you think.”
Now look at what you just posted above.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:32 pm

Spijed wrote:And yet upon leaving the EU we were promised by Boris & Nigel £350 million a week going towards the NHS.

A bit rich saying Corbyn won't keep his promises, isn't it?
Correction, Nigel never recognized the 350m figure and never endorsed it. It was Boris and Gove.

However, the fact is we do pay 350m to them every week, we get 125m back, sure (though we have little say on where it's spent); but we do actually hand that money over so technically it wasn't a lie.

This with Corbyn however is a downright lie. He literally stood on national TV and said we would leave the single market. But now you say that's okay because you like that lie and Boris once did something you think is a bit similar?

jurek
Posts: 1829
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:38 pm
Been Liked: 315 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by jurek » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:32 pm

I think we have to be relatively pragmatic but also flexible about
what form of Brexit we wish to achieve and\or can actually achieve.

Following the recent election result it's clear that a hard Brexit isn't likely to be on the cards
and we will be looking for something much softer but that doesn't mean we will get it.
And even if we do it's almost certain to be a compromise and we will still likely to be worse off.
You can't be member of a club and then decide to leave but hope you can still retain most, if not
all of the benefits and pay much less for the privilege.

Things change and always have done and we may end up in a scenario in a few years time
where Parliament can't agree on the deal and another election and/or referendum is required.
If that occurred I wouldn't wish to forecast what the result might be.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:32 pm

UpTheBeehole wrote:Well done d*ckwads on voting to leave the EU
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7725
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4306 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by nil_desperandum » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:34 pm

Darthlaw wrote:. With Liam Byrne's 'There's no money left' ringing in my mind I couldn't with a clear conscience vote in any way which would put Labour into power.
.
So - just to be clear - did you agree with the Labour Govt spending £850 billion to bail out the banks?. That's why there was no money left, and it makes Corbyn and McDonnell's spending plans seem like a drop in the ocean.

Spijed
Posts: 18068
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3055 times
Has Liked: 1327 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Spijed » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:37 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:Correction, Nigel never recognized the 350m figure and never endorsed it. It was Boris and Gove.

However, the fact is we do pay 350m to them every week, we get 125m back, sure (though we have little say on where it's spent); but we do actually hand that money over so technically it wasn't a lie.

This with Corbyn however is a downright lie. He literally stood on national TV and said we would leave the single market. But now you say that's okay because you like that lie and Boris once did something you think is a bit similar?
Nigel may never have endorsed it, but he was more than happy to have his picture taken in front of the bus - so guilty by association.

And yes, it technically wasn't a lie, but I think everyone knew what it was meant to imply.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:40 pm

Spijed wrote:Nigel may never have endorsed it, but he was more than happy to have his picture taken in front of the bus - so guilty by association.

And yes, it technically wasn't a lie, but I think everyone knew what it was meant to imply.
I really don't think he did. That was Boris and I can't find anything online to show that Farage did so too. I may be wrong there as I can't remember everything that went on in the campaign but I would have though if Farage did stand in front of the bus with that 350m figure, I'd have seen it online somewhere before.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:41 pm

So Nigel pictured if front of Syrian refugees was fine and dandy then?

Right ho, just so we know.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:43 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:So Nigel pictured if front of Syrian refugees was fine and dandy then?

Right ho, just so we know.
Well I think so yeah, but I recognize I'm in the minority who think that.

It wasn't fake, that is really what was happening across Europe.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:46 pm

Er, it was actually.

"Breaking point" was what he said. Which is ********.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7725
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4306 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by nil_desperandum » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:47 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:Correction, Nigel never recognized the 350m figure and never endorsed it. It was Boris and Gove.

However, the fact is we do pay 350m to them every week, we get 125m back, sure (though we have little say on where it's spent); but we do actually hand that money over so technically it wasn't a lie.
That is factually incorrect, and has been proven to be so time and time again. You can check the figures both with the Treasury and the ONS.
The money that we get as a rebate never leaves the treasury. So whilst we technically owe £350 million a week, we actually pay just under £250 million per week to Brussels. So we do not "actually hand that money over" as you stated.
However, of the £250 million a week we get a total of 4.5 billion per year back, (2.5 billion going to agriculture, which we will need to continue to support) and most of the rest going to the regions, (like e.g. North East Lancashire, who have gained massively).
So when you subtract the 4.5 billion from the actual amount sent to Brussels the actual net amount is approx. £8.6 billion / year or approx. £150 million per week. So that's £200 million less than was claimed.
Facts / stats can be verified with the Treasury or ONS and are for 2016.
This user liked this post: Greenmile

aggi
Posts: 9722
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by aggi » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:47 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:Perhaps we may start finally investing in our own people now instead of constantly relying on foreign imports just because its cheaper than training up our own kids. Or I guess none of our young people would want to be things like doctors, nurses and medical professionals, I mean they are such unattractive professions, right?
Well that was my original point. You can't become a nurse or doctor, nuclear plant inspector, etc overnight. If the intention is what you say, why are we not investing significant amounts in these areas at the moment? We don't want these immigrants coming over and doing the work but we don't want to invest to train up our own workers.

dsr
Posts: 16284
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4883 times
Has Liked: 2598 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by dsr » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:49 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:I would suggest you put your spade away. You know exactly where these generic descriptors of EU immigrants came from.
Ok, if you want to be ultra-pedantic, you didn't say agricultural workers, you said those on, (and by inference below), "the minimum wage" would be the ones who "would accept the chance to become UK citizens ..... ", so I selected a group who would obviously fit that descriptor, ("agricultural workers"). I then compared them with another typical EU group, (Hungarian doctors) who are clearly not on the minimum wage, and asked why it was you thought the doctors would be less likely to apply for citizenship, which is what in effect you wrote. (I’ll quote it just in case you want to move the goalposts):

Post by dsr » Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:42 pm “I said they may be offered the chance - the corollary is that they may not. But as the ones who would accept the chance to be UK citizens would be the ones who don't want to be in the EU and the ones who are willing to work hard for minimum wage (as a generalisation), then I think there might be more Tory voters than you think.”
Now look at what you just posted above.
I would have thought that the majority of EU workers would be at the low end of the wage scale, not the high end, so when generalising the large scale impact it's the low paid workers we need to look at.

Incidentally, I didn't say it's the low paid ones who are likely to become UK citizens, I said that the people who applied to be UK citizens are likely to be low paid and willing to work hard. The reason why people who apply are likely to be low paid, is because the people who are eligible to apply are low paid. As a generalisation.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:50 pm

I think CM watches the Simpsons and thinks Dr Nick is the future!*

What is it, seven years for a doctor? At least

*actually, he probably doesn't as he's clearly an immigrant!

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Imploding Turtle » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:51 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:No idea why that didn't come up in my CTRL F search but okay.



However it now raises more questions than answers.

1.) Why did he say on National TV that he intended to leave the single market as I have shown in my link if his manifesto states otherwise?
2.) Single market access is unacceptable without free movement, we all know this as Brussels have made it clear so why is he promising to remove freedom of movement but keep free access to the single market if we all know that is impossible?
I believe I'm owed something from you.
This user liked this post: Greenmile

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7725
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1934 times
Has Liked: 4306 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by nil_desperandum » Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:55 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:Correction, Nigel never recognized the 350m figure and never endorsed it. It was Boris and Gove.
You are aware - no I suppose you aren't - that you can watch Farage on Youtube on Question time pledging 350 million for the health service. In fact he says it's more than £350 million.
I never understand why people post things as facts that are so clearly able to be ddiscredited. I'm all for opinions, and I'm as often as wrong as everyone else, but I always try to verify my facts before basing an opinion on them.

ClaretMoffitt
Posts: 3896
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
Been Liked: 1218 times
Has Liked: 807 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by ClaretMoffitt » Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:03 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I believe I'm owed something from you.
I'm man enough to admit where i am wrong.

However, it still doesn't change the fact that JC explicitly said we would leave the single market under his government on national TV.

aggi
Posts: 9722
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by aggi » Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:05 pm

To be fair, the Labour Manifesto doesn't say that they want to stay in the Single Market, it says they want to retain the benefits of the Single Market.

It's unlikely you can retain the benefits without remaining in it but I'd suggest it is a bit of sophistry in the manifesto.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:06 pm

Lord Ashcroft poll - 35-44s voted LAB 50%-CON 30%. That’s not kids, thats mortgages, car-owning, kids at school, mid-career.

Cons can't afford another election soon, they will lose if that is where the votes went. Austerity is probably dead as well.

Rick_Muller
Posts: 6876
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2894 times
Has Liked: 7084 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: General Election 2017 Mega Thread

Post by Rick_Muller » Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:06 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:I really don't think he did. That was Boris and I can't find anything online to show that Farage did so too. I may be wrong there as I can't remember everything that went on in the campaign but I would have though if Farage did stand in front of the bus with that 350m figure, I'd have seen it online somewhere before.
nil_desperandum wrote:You are aware - no I suppose you aren't - that you can watch Farage on Youtube on Question time pledging 350 million for the health service. In fact he says it's more than £350 million.
I never understand why people post things as facts that are so clearly able to be ddiscredited. I'm all for opinions, and I'm as often as wrong as everyone else, but I always try to verify my facts before basing an opinion on them.
This one...? I think he says £34M/day...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 02831.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by Rick_Muller on Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply