Taffy on the wing wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 1:42 am..........it's the hope that kills you!
..............ALL IS DROSS!!!!!!!!
All chat means nothing till you get Taffy’s evocative post. It’s more powerful than Jim’s yellow tie.
Taffy on the wing wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 1:42 am..........it's the hope that kills you!
..............ALL IS DROSS!!!!!!!!
I think there’s two teams that might struggle from the 17.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 4:56 amGenuine question - what qualifies as "a bit of an effort"
I looked at the table today with the new PL and asked myself who are any of the 3 promoted teams going to finish above. There are no weak teams, it's going to be a seriously tough ask for anyone imho.
If we go down, it isn't because we didn't try to stay up.
It closes on Tuesday watch the flapping that night.agreenwood wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 7:26 amYou’d think an entire lifetime of seemingly watching transfer windows unfold would ward some people on here against flapping in June.
Seemingly not.
I agree I hope we go for quality over quantity this summer.willsclarets wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:11 amWe actually don't need many incomings to make a good fist of staying up if we keep at least 4 of the back 5 together.
2 or 3 new signings that genuinely lift the quality of our first 11 would be a more efficient use of our money. I don't want to see a hive of activity, just focused signings that we get in before KO.
....but re-opens 6 days later and stays open until 1 September. Not quite sure why they have structured it in two parts this yearclaretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 7:55 amIt closes on Tuesday watch the flapping that night.
It was done to allow clubs to sign players for this club World cup thing starting next weekwarksclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:41 am....but re-opens 6 days later and stays open until 1 September. Not quite sure why they have structured it in two parts this year
This is one of the drawbacks of getting promoted to the PL where the only ambition and objective seems to be to try and finish 17th and to sign players with half an eye on getting promoted from the Championship the following season. In all other divisions (including the National League) the promoted teams have a fair crack at winning another promotion with the right investment, or at least finishing in the top 6/7.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 4:56 amGenuine question - what qualifies as "a bit of an effort"
I looked at the table today with the new PL and asked myself who are any of the 3 promoted teams going to finish above. There are no weak teams, it's going to be a seriously tough ask for anyone imho.
warksclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:41 am....but re-opens 6 days later and stays open until 1 September. Not quite sure why they have structured it in two parts this year
Assuming we keep the nucleus of the starting 11, we need to bring in a maximum of 6 imo,Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:15 amI agree I hope we go for quality over quantity this summer.
Would be happy with just 3/4 signings
If Esteve, CJ, Trafford and Brownhill leave it means we can't start the season with a better squad than one we finished last season.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 4:56 amGenuine question - what qualifies as "a bit of an effort"
I looked at the table today with the new PL and asked myself who are any of the 3 promoted teams going to finish above. There are no weak teams, it's going to be a seriously tough ask for anyone imho.
Best to wait until the start of the season and the end of the second transfer window before judging the club's efforts.Spijed wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 10:33 amIf Esteve, CJ, Trafford and Brownhill leave it means we can't start the season with a better squad than one we finished last season.
It's difficult to stop up but I would have expected to slightly improve in the team we already had, not go backwards, which will be the case if those four leave
Aren't players still contracted until the end of June - someone will correct me if I am wrong on thisboatshed bill wrote: ↑Wed Jun 04, 2025 9:40 pmIf they had signed surely the club would have announced it. There is no logical reason for holding back that sort of information.
Completely agree Vegas.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 4:56 amGenuine question - what qualifies as "a bit of an effort"
I looked at the table today with the new PL and asked myself who are any of the 3 promoted teams going to finish above. There are no weak teams, it's going to be a seriously tough ask for anyone imho.
I'd be shocked if Trafford went anywhere where he wasn't guaranteed number 1 status at the start of the season and told it was his shirt to lose.
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 6:28 amI think there’s two teams that might struggle from the 17.
Wolves and Bournemouth could have poor seasons given the talent there losing.
But similar we are weaker (on the assumption the lads don’t sign)
Sunderland are weaker and so are Leeds based on who’s already gone.
You've hit the nail on the head here. I totally agree that Wolves and Bournemouth will be weaker given player departures, but are they suddenly weaker than any of the promoted teams... I suspect not! Bournemouth achieved 56 points this season, Wolves 42.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 6:28 amI think there’s two teams that might struggle from the 17.
Wolves and Bournemouth could have poor seasons given the talent there losing.
But similar we are weaker (on the assumption the lads don’t sign)
Sunderland are weaker and so are Leeds based on who’s already gone.
It was not just the 13 points gap that emphasised the huge gulf between these clubs and safety but also the shocking goal differential Leicester (minus 47), Ipswich (minus 46), and Southampton (minus 60). The points difference to safety was effectively 14.jlup1980 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 12:42 pmYou've hit the nail on the head here. I totally agree that Wolves and Bournemouth will be weaker given player departures, but are they suddenly weaker than any of the promoted teams... I suspect not! Bournemouth achieved 56 points this season, Wolves 42.
Leicester were 13 points adrift of Spurs in 17th, nevermind Wolves or Bournemouth! Without the 4 point deductions the season before, Luton would have 10 points adrift of Forest That's the only evidence we need. The gap is huge. We're looking for clubs to drop significantly in order to give us a chance. 40 points is still the aim but that feels a lot more difficult to achieve than it was 10, or even 5, years ago.
I agree on this, although I would add that everyone appeared very together last time we were promoted.CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 1:28 pmWhat I do know though is that our chances are far higher having a culture where the players are happy, are one group, and respect the manager. So well done Scott for that.
I’d say it’s more realism than defeatism.
Well, it’s probably looking better for them than it is for us to be honestburnley007 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 3:35 pmToo many defenders being linked for my liking. Not looking good for Steeeve or CJ is it?
I'd hope the only return of Dara O'Turkey Teeth would be on the back of a 5-0 defeat for whichever team he is playing for.
That word bothers me too
No need for the personal insultsCoolClaret wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 4:23 pmI'd hope the only return of Dara O'Turkey Teeth would be on the back of a 5-0 defeat for whichever team he is playing for.
It's being linked