Today's footie 2/1/21

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4645 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Today's footie 2/1/21

Post by tiger76 » Sun Jan 03, 2021 3:37 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Sat Jan 02, 2021 2:52 pm
Leeds are, according to many pundits, having a fantastic season.

Had we had a referee last week and beaten them we would now be one point behind them with two games in hand.
Leeds last 9 games won 4 drawn 1 lost 4 13 points

Burnley last 9 games won 4 drawn 3 lost 2 15 points

So this would suggest there's little too choice between the sides, and of course these results include the travesty of our Elland Rd defeat.

Fortunately for Leeds they've already got points on the board, and a favourable looking run of games in January which they should collect points from.

It's difficult to see them being in trouble this season, next season might be a different story once teams work out how to combat them, as teams have with Sheff Utd this season, 2nd season syndrome is very possible in Leeds case.

As Chris Sutton asked on 606 last night does Bielsa have a plan B?

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11009
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 896 times

Re: Today's footie 2/1/21

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Jan 03, 2021 5:48 pm

Tall Paul wrote:
Sun Jan 03, 2021 1:22 pm
There's only one person "struggling with gambling concept" and it isn't who you think it is.
Please can you refrain from interjecting with my posts as I’m finding it quite disruptive :lol:

Tall Paul
Posts: 7421
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2650 times
Has Liked: 733 times

Re: Today's footie 2/1/21

Post by Tall Paul » Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:01 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Sun Jan 03, 2021 5:48 pm
Please can you refrain from interjecting with my posts as I’m finding it quite disruptive :lol:
What are you babbling on about? You were clearly talking about one of your posts that was in response to me.

Post Reply