We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Not just them, but the type of player who can get in and mix things up on the defensive side. If you're going to see as little of the ball as we did today, you need somebody to clog the channels.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Thats a very good observation. Inclined to agree. Its those type of players who when we were up against it dug in and grafted.
-
- Posts: 5479
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 3227 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Missed them all season. They stopped the opposition's wingers getting a clear run on our full-backs.
Our shape defensively today was awful.
Our shape defensively today was awful.
-
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2262 times
- Has Liked: 1242 times
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Boyd cannot get in the Sheff Wed squad and Arfield was getting less and less game time with us. Had they both played today for us they would have been crucified on this Board
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
The point was about the type of player.warksclaret wrote:Boyd cannot get in the Sheff Wed squad and Arfield was getting less and less game time with us. Had they both played today for us they would have been crucified on this Board
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Shape? What shape? We were at sixes and sevens all day. It was the kind of game where Defour was next to useless. If he's not controlling the game in the midfield going forward, what exactly is is role?
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Thanks, taio.
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Boyd maybe. Arfield yes. Barton certainly. But even with a back four as poor as ours is at the moment they would have struggled. We need a midfield enforcer. Have for a while.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Who would people prefer?... Boyd and Arfield, or Brady and JBG? The same people that complain that we don't attack enough?
You can't have it both ways. Some people just enjoy complaining.
You can't have it both ways. Some people just enjoy complaining.
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
I'd prefer Brady and JBG but thought the OP raised a fair point. Similar could be said about when Barton was at his best for us because he gave us bite and presence.FactualFrank wrote:Who would people prefer?... Boyd and Arfield, or Brady and JBG? The same people that complain that we don't attack enough?
You can't have it both ways. Some people just enjoy complaining.
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
SMFH these are the types of players we don’t need. Our squad is full of them. We need technical players with pace and played in a system which allows them to actual venture forward and try to attack.
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
If we missed Boyd and arfield then God help us.One can't get in a poor Sheffield wed and the other cant get in a bang average Rangers team.Maybe bring back les Lawrence and Dave Jones.
-
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2343 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Now you're talking.
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Leave it to you lot to twist the words posted into something that wasn't meant. What I was saying was that on a day when we knew ahead of time that we weren't going to see a lot of the ball that a couple of wingers who knew how to play proper defence would have been very useful. Chelsea have world class attackers. We don't. Very simple.
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Op agreed.
We are in the midst of change, to a different system, which has to be given time. With luck we survive and prosper going forward. With no luck, we swap to 442 from the outset and win some matches that way.
We are in the midst of change, to a different system, which has to be given time. With luck we survive and prosper going forward. With no luck, we swap to 442 from the outset and win some matches that way.
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
For me we missed playing Vydra behind Vokes or playing Barnes behind Wood from the start. We had absolutely nothing up front so when we got the ball we had nowhere to go with it. This meant possession kept getting turned over and invited more pressure on us. We made the change at 3-0 down but the damage was already done.
I don’t think it was the wide players that would have made the difference, more the realisation that Hendrick and Vokes as a partnership doesn’t work and hasn’t since the early part of last season. This is not another go at Jeff, he has played well a number of times this season, more stating the blindly obvious that the system doesn’t work (the same goes for playing Sam with Ashley).
I don’t think it was the wide players that would have made the difference, more the realisation that Hendrick and Vokes as a partnership doesn’t work and hasn’t since the early part of last season. This is not another go at Jeff, he has played well a number of times this season, more stating the blindly obvious that the system doesn’t work (the same goes for playing Sam with Ashley).
-
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
- Been Liked: 913 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
When it came to protecting the back four, Dean Marney all day long for me. A terrible turn of fortune when he got injured.
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
- Been Liked: 389 times
- Has Liked: 166 times
- Location: York
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
Agree with the OP - Always got a minimum 100% from Boyd and Arfield. Players yesterday weren't pressing nearly as hard as they should - the space they gave them was suicide
Re: We Missed Boyd and Arfield Today
In a team with JBG and Brady as wingers, if Boyd and Arfield are the answer, then it’s a stupid question.
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81