A meeting with the C.O.O of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
BurnleyFC ISA
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:43 pm
Been Liked: 13 times
Has Liked: 3 times

A meeting with the C.O.O of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator

Post by BurnleyFC ISA » Mon Sep 01, 2025 9:00 pm

This evening, we were very pleased to meet the Interim Chief Operating Officer of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator, Martyn Henderson (O.B.E), alongside some members of the Clarets Trust.

We had a lengthy discussion with Martyn and we are very grateful to him for sharing his time and expertise.

Moving forwards, the meeting has given us the confidence that democratic, independent and fan-led associations such as BFC ISA, will feed strongly into the consultation on how representative engagement should be defined.

We would now love to hear your thoughts.

Positive fan engagement is of significant importance to us!

UTC


PS. Please do get involved with BFC ISA if you’re keen. Join us today!

BurnleyFC ISA
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:43 pm
Been Liked: 13 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: A meeting with the C.O.O of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator

Post by BurnleyFC ISA » Tue Sep 02, 2025 6:41 am

Bringing this back up as it very quickly dropped down the messageboard in and amongst all the incomings and outgoings yesterday.

Orangebernard
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:39 am
Been Liked: 42 times
Has Liked: 6 times

Re: A meeting with the C.O.O of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator

Post by Orangebernard » Tue Sep 02, 2025 6:46 am

That’s very positive news from BFCISA. I believe that the Football Regulator is putting fan engagement right at the forefront of their mandate in order to protect football clubs as community assets and preserve their unique heritage.

BurnleyFC ISA
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:43 pm
Been Liked: 13 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: A meeting with the C.O.O of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator

Post by BurnleyFC ISA » Tue Sep 02, 2025 7:46 am

Orangebernard wrote:
Tue Sep 02, 2025 6:46 am
That’s very positive news from BFCISA. I believe that the Football Regulator is putting fan engagement right at the forefront of their mandate in order to protect football clubs as community assets and preserve their unique heritage.
We were impressed and encouraged.

aggi
Posts: 9713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2339 times

Re: A meeting with the C.O.O of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator

Post by aggi » Tue Sep 02, 2025 8:12 am

I was surprised to read that they are already employing 50 people or so as part of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator. Obviously planning on hitting the ground running, and a bigger department than I expected.

Orangebernard
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:39 am
Been Liked: 42 times
Has Liked: 6 times

Re: A meeting with the C.O.O of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator

Post by Orangebernard » Tue Sep 02, 2025 8:16 am

It does sound like the IFR will have genuine powers including removing owners, directors and senior staff from football clubs if they are threatening the existence of a club. Hopefully this will avoid the situations like at Bury and Morecambe.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 3775
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1485 times
Has Liked: 365 times

Re: A meeting with the C.O.O of the Shadow Independent Football Regulator

Post by Big Vinny K » Tue Sep 02, 2025 9:13 am

Orangebernard wrote:
Tue Sep 02, 2025 8:16 am
It does sound like the IFR will have genuine powers including removing owners, directors and senior staff from football clubs if they are threatening the existence of a club. Hopefully this will avoid the situations like at Bury and Morecambe.
Possibly would have avoided Morecambe situation - not sure about Bury. In both of these clubs situations the financial damage was already done and the regulator will be in very complex situation trying to remove owners or directors etc.What will that achieve if they are massively in debt and losing money and there isn’t anyone prepared to buy the club and take on the liabilities ?

A better role for the regulator would be to be more involved at the outset when a club is taken over and a far more robust process for looking at the background and structure of those wanting to buy a club. The guy at Bury would never have got in - and there would be other cases too. You would think there would be some kind of ongoing role for them to play too where they have some kind of oversight of how clubs are being run so that they can intervene somehow before it’s too much of a mess to do anything. Situations like Morecambe, Bury and others don’t just happen overnight - there are plenty of warning signs along the way as those close to these clubs will be aware of and highlighting to each other.

Post Reply