Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
-
- Posts: 6712
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Welcome to Burnley, Manuel!
-
- Posts: 17419
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3922 times
- Has Liked: 4892 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I was hoping we’d announce it after Cornet to WHU was announced & the video was him walking up to the shirt printing desk, asking for “20 Benson please” and Maxwel handing the shirt over!claretandy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 5:49 pmCalled it !![]()
https://twitter.com/BurnleyOfficial/sta ... FPdSUh5gMQ
These 6 users liked this post: BurnleyFC Zlatan Juan Tanamera Matt_Whalley bobinho whiffa
-
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1247 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
When cornet goes that will take sales to 68Mil and then weghorst loan probs a couple of mil, then 17.5mil spent on 10 players to me is fantastic business, 50mil in transfer profit still without evening touch parachute payments.
All the released players wages comes to close to 12mil for the year, personally think there’s still 2 or 3 good money signings to come
All the released players wages comes to close to 12mil for the year, personally think there’s still 2 or 3 good money signings to come
This user liked this post: randomclaret2
-
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1460 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
CornetJakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 5:46 pmIndeed the signing which didn’t happen & the 1 that did which was disastrous, anymore success stories of APs forays into the transfer market you care to share?
Collins
Cullen
And that’s just the ones beginning with C !!
Listen….you have your very weird Captain Hindsight opinions and you are entitled to them.
We got relegated last season because of many different factors….Weghorst missed virtually any open net. Cornet missed an actual open net. Cornet missed a penalty. Collins got sent off….Collins inexplicable hand ball etc etc
But where were Barnes and Jay all season……where were Dwight’s goals and assists ?
To the lay the blame at AP and his transfers when so many established players failed to perform - and we were still one win from staying up…..is just a bit daft.
The way you are talking AP should be hanged - in public as voted by the public…..now who in their right mind would advocate that ?
These 8 users liked this post: tiger76 Juan Tanamera GodIsADeeJay81 Gordaleman evensteadiereddie nil_desperandum mybloodisclaret WiscoClaret
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
How have you arrived at that figure? Just assumed £1m (less than £20k per week) per player? Are you assuming relegation clauses are in effect for it to be so low?123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 6:53 pmAll the released players wages comes to close to 12mil for the year
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Given our business and that great showing on Friday I can't see why anyone would choose to take a negative view of things.
If we have a decent season and come out close to debt free I think most of us should be very happy
If we have a decent season and come out close to debt free I think most of us should be very happy
These 5 users liked this post: tiger76 GodIsADeeJay81 Gordaleman evensteadiereddie whiffa
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1841 times
- Has Liked: 2186 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Well said but we need to do a Fulham and blitz the Championship .Anything else is unacceptable.
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Cornet & Collins haven’t stuck about but we are including them as masterstroke signings? You could actually say the 2 were part of a relegated side although it’s unfair to blame them 2 it was a collective thing, regarding Cullen he’s had 1 good game against Huddersfield. The old team I include barnes & jay in this have done their bit throughout the years & that’s nothing to do with pace he wasn’t about when the 2 of them started out, service wise you could say throughout the years them 2 have done far more than anybody pace as brought into the club.Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 6:54 pmCornet
Collins
Cullen
And that’s just the ones beginning with C !!
Listen….you have your very weird Captain Hindsight opinions and you are entitled to them.
We got relegated last season because of many different factors….Weghorst missed virtually any open net. Cornet missed an actual open net. Cornet missed a penalty. Collins got sent off….Collins inexplicable hand ball etc etc
But where were Barnes and Jay all season……where were Dwight’s goals and assists ?
To the lay the blame at AP and his transfers when so many established players failed to perform - and we were still one win from staying up…..is just a bit daft.
The way you are talking AP should be hanged - in public as voted by the public…..now who in their right mind would advocate that ?
-
- Posts: 3284
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 737 times
- Has Liked: 64 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If we are to believe mr Nixon, in that we want a striker , a no.10, a winger and a centre back, then I have to say the first three positions on that list are exciting to think we may well have three new attacking threats incoming.
Presumably the winger will be right footed to balance things out.
Hopefully the striker possesses a bit of speed about him. It’s a lot to ask when you sign so many players at once, but I hope this group help relatively quickly because I feel if they do, is clarets may be in for a very entertaining season indeed.
UTC
Presumably the winger will be right footed to balance things out.
Hopefully the striker possesses a bit of speed about him. It’s a lot to ask when you sign so many players at once, but I hope this group help relatively quickly because I feel if they do, is clarets may be in for a very entertaining season indeed.
UTC
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret
-
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1460 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Who said anything about masterstroke signings ?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:13 pmCornet & Collins haven’t stuck about but we are including them as masterstroke signings? You could actually say the 2 were part of a relegated side although it’s unfair to blame them 2 it was a collective thing, regarding Cullen he’s had 1 good game against Huddersfield. The old team I include barnes & jay in this have done their bit throughout the years & that’s nothing to do with pace he wasn’t about when the 2 of them started out, service wise you could say throughout the years them 2 have done far more than anybody pace as brought into the club.
But without Cornet’s goals and Collins’ performances after Mee was injured we would probably have been relegated by March……and then there is the small matter of the significant amount of profit we have made on both players….so i’m guessing they were not bad signings.
Do you not think they were decent players ? Or is it just because they left you don’t rate them ?
Actually don’t bother answering any of the above…….please
-
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1247 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
We released 12 players, When you look online at Burnley players wages they had
Mee - 70k a week (in and around)
Tarky - 60k a week
Vydra - 40k a week
Stephens 40k a week
Pieters - 35k a week
Hennessey- 30k a week
Lennon - 20k a week
Bardsley- 20k a week
If you add that up and then do it for the year it comes to more then 12mil in fact
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not quite. Based on your numbers, it's £16.4m and that's for 8, not the 12 you mentioned.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:54 pmWe released 12 players, When you look online at Burnley players wages they had
Mee - 70k a week (in and around)
Tarky - 60k a week
Vydra - 40k a week
Stephens 40k a week
Pieters - 35k a week
Hennessey- 30k a week
Lennon - 20k a week
Bardsley- 20k a week
If you add that up and then do it for the year it comes to more then 12mil in fact
Edit: my bad, it was me that mentioned 12 players but would be more useful in context of outgoings and incomings to include those that have been transferred.
-
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1247 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I said in and around 12mil, as a basic figure, I’ll endeavour to get the correct figures next time.
Was merely trying to show what a good summer it’s been in regards to transfers and working with the budgets we have
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Sorry, I wasn't trying to be a smart @rse. Was just curious.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:59 pmI said in and around 12mil, as a basic figure, I’ll endeavour to get the correct figures next time.
Was merely trying to show what a good summer it’s been in regards to transfers and working with the budgets we have
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Profit to pay off debt we shouldn’t have incurred in the first place that’s helpful, good evening.Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:45 pmWho said anything about masterstroke signings ?
But without Cornet’s goals and Collins’ performances after Mee was injured we would probably have been relegated by March……and then there is the small matter of the significant amount of profit we have made on both players….so i’m guessing they were not bad signings.
Do you not think they were decent players ? Or is it just because they left you don’t rate them ?
Actually don’t bother answering any of the above…….please
-
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1247 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Majority of clubs in England are in debt and therefore sell players to help pay off some debtJakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:06 pmProfit to pay off debt we shouldn’t have incurred in the first place that’s helpful, good evening.
-
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
That's true, but it looks like we are going to have a young, exciting, fast team playing pass and move football. Who knows what will happen, but it should get us all off our seats.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:06 pmProfit to pay off debt we shouldn’t have incurred in the first place that’s helpful, good evening.
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
That true but we have moved away from the well run sustainability model that was once established successfully for many years it’s not as if we have always been in debt. this is a new thing not self inflicted.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:08 pmMajority of clubs in England are in debt and therefore sell players to help pay off some debt
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
In truth the wage demands of our ageing squad were making financial sustainability tricky, particularly as we failed to cash in when some players were at the height of their value.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:11 pmThat true but we have moved away from the well run sustainability model that was once established successfully for many years it’s not as if we have always been in debt. this is a new thing not self inflicted.
OK, we weren't in debt, but we weren't attractive to any really big investors.
These 2 users liked this post: Colburn_Claret elwaclaret
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:08 pm
- Been Liked: 12 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I agree, brilliant business. Is it made public where the rest of the money goes? Would this go into paying off the loan? Or is this paid directly to the owners?123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 6:53 pmWhen cornet goes that will take sales to 68Mil and then weghorst loan probs a couple of mil, then 17.5mil spent on 10 players to me is fantastic business, 50mil in transfer profit still without evening touch parachute payments.
All the released players wages comes to close to 12mil for the year, personally think there’s still 2 or 3 good money signings to come
-
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
We won't know until the accounts are released in two years.Grandpa Claret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:20 pmI agree, brilliant business. Is it made public where the rest of the money goes? Would this go into paying off the loan? Or is this paid directly to the owners?
This user liked this post: Grandpa Claret
-
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1247 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
To kick on any further garlick would of had to take us into debtJakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:11 pmThat true but we have moved away from the well run sustainability model that was once established successfully for many years it’s not as if we have always been in debt. this is a new thing not self inflicted.
-
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1460 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Yes well done…..you’ve cracked it nowJakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:06 pmProfit to pay off debt we shouldn’t have incurred in the first place that’s helpful, good evening.
…..but just imagine if they were rubbish signings. How would we repay the debt then ?
Or is this another of your Captain hindsight arguments ? Because I kind of agree that if Garlick would not have sold the club the way he did and took his huge profit then we would not be in this state.
In fact do we go back and blame Kilby for bringing Garlick on to the board ?
TEASDALE OUT TEASDALE OUT
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I see that Verda has announced on his Instagram account that he won’t be taking up Burnley’s offer of another contract and is returning to Czechoslovakia to complete his rehabilitation.
This is what Kompany more or less alluded to in today’s press conference when asked about Vydra’s recovery situation
This is what Kompany more or less alluded to in today’s press conference when asked about Vydra’s recovery situation
-
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 3054 times
- Has Liked: 4794 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It presumably offsets the shortfall between what we were receiving from the broadcasting deal as a Premier League team , with what Year 1 parachute payments are.Grandpa Claret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:20 pmI agree, brilliant business. Is it made public where the rest of the money goes? Would this go into paying off the loan? Or is this paid directly to the owners?
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
We should not have been in debt in the first place. It hurts me personally that some of our star players have been sold to service that. But as you say lets hope for a decent season.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:00 pmGiven our business and that great showing on Friday I can't see why anyone would choose to take a negative view of things.
If we have a decent season and come out close to debt free I think most of us should be very happy
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
For sure the spending would have slowed or stopped with garlic but the cash reserves were there, 2 choices garlic in the championship with the cash reserves intact or pace with untried & untested with possibly more potential but haemorrhaging cash hand over fist, to be honest both scenarios don’t fill me with glee but I’d opt for the safe bet but that’s just me.Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:25 pmYes well done…..you’ve cracked it now
…..but just imagine if they were rubbish signings. How would we repay the debt then ?
Or is this another of your Captain hindsight arguments ? Because I kind of agree that if Garlick would not have sold the club the way he did and took his huge profit then we would not be in this state.
In fact do we go back and blame Kilby for bringing Garlick on to the board ?
TEASDALE OUT TEASDALE OUT
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not a rumour but...
Noticed Gilmour hasn't been given a number at Chelsea. He'd be excellent for us on loan to alternate with Cullen and Cork. Think we could do with another deeper central midfielder.
Noticed Gilmour hasn't been given a number at Chelsea. He'd be excellent for us on loan to alternate with Cullen and Cork. Think we could do with another deeper central midfielder.
-
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1460 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
What the hell are you talking about ?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:46 pmFor sure the spending would have slowed or stopped with garlic but the cash reserves were there, 2 choices garlic in the championship with the cash reserves intact or pace with untried & untested with possibly more potential but haemorrhaging cash hand over fist, to be honest both scenarios don’t fill me with glee but I’d opt for the safe bet but that’s just me.
Garlick sold the club, took the money and ran.
You are stating the bleeding obvious that every one of us would rather we be debt free. But we ain’t….and the reason we ain’t is because Garlick sold the club.
You’re argument is at the kind of intellectual level of saying we should score more goals than we concede.
-
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1247 times
- Has Liked: 293 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Or choice 3 champ football under garlick and Dyche, 12 players leaving and no players wanting to buy into the project of trying to get Burnley back up so resigning Lennon and probs wood back on loan from NewcastleJakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:46 pmFor sure the spending would have slowed or stopped with garlic but the cash reserves were there, 2 choices garlic in the championship with the cash reserves intact or pace with untried & untested with possibly more potential but haemorrhaging cash hand over fist, to be honest both scenarios don’t fill me with glee but I’d opt for the safe bet but that’s just me.
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
You can only take the money when you’ve been paid he’s waiting. A debt doesn’t disappear until it’s been repaid.Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:53 pmWhat the hell are you talking about ?
Garlick sold the club, took the money and ran.
You are stating the bleeding obvious that every one of us would rather we be debt free. But we ain’t….and the reason we ain’t is because Garlick sold the club.
You’re argument is at the kind of intellectual level of saying we should score more goals than we concede.
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Big Vinny K wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:53 pmWhat the hell are you talking about ?
Garlick sold the club, took the money and ran.
Sold the club to someone who didn't have the money to buy it, isn't it?
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:24 am
- Been Liked: 983 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
No financial discussions please.
Start another thread if you want to discuss the financial side of the club.
Start another thread if you want to discuss the financial side of the club.
These 2 users liked this post: whiffa tiger76
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
clarethomer wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:02 pmNo financial discussions please.
Start another thread if you want to discuss the financial side of the club.
Oops.
Sorry.
-
- Posts: 8257
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2929 times
- Has Liked: 508 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If you can't be excited by this project then I fear for you honestly.
This restructure seems to have just as much passion as the decade long Dych project. Vincent Kompany is a manager on the up and we will be lucky to get 3 seasons out of him. His contacts, pull and reputation far exceed anything we've ever had at Burnley. This is a time to be excited.
This restructure seems to have just as much passion as the decade long Dych project. Vincent Kompany is a manager on the up and we will be lucky to get 3 seasons out of him. His contacts, pull and reputation far exceed anything we've ever had at Burnley. This is a time to be excited.
These 10 users liked this post: gawthorpe_view boatshed bill Yeovil1951 Woonderbah Juan Tanamera whiffa tiger76 mybloodisclaret bobinho Quicknick
-
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1460 times
- Has Liked: 358 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Spot on he did.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:02 pmSold the club to someone who didn't have the money to buy it, isn't it?
And he knew they didn’t have any money and were going to burden the club with debt and at the same time wipe out all our cash reserves.
And you know what…..he still went ahead and did it.
These 2 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin bobinho
-
- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 915 times
- Has Liked: 580 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Worst post I’ve ever seen on a Burnley messageboard. And I’ve been on here from the start and CM from 2004.forzagranata wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 5:14 pmPace needs to learn quickly how the football business works - its as simple as that.
Brighton signed Cucurelli for £16 million from Getafe last summer. One good season in the Premier League and they are selling him for more than £50 million to Chelsea or City. £34 million profit for a left-back with 12 months PL experience.
I take the point that the clause may have been added to secure the deal - but it was still a choice and it seems we are just weak when it comes to dealing with agents, clubs and players.
We 'had to' sell Nick Pope on the cheap because 'he wanted to leave' etc. Same with McNeil. Well Cucurelli wanted to go to City but Brighton have persuaded him to go to Chelsea - no doubt to their own benefit.
We now have a £12 million asset - purchased just in January - playing in the Turkish league where the risk is that his value could plummet even further.
The only decent bit of selling done this year was Collins - sold for a £9 million profit after one season.
Thankfully it appears that the recruiting side of things has been handed to Kompany and his people- and hopefully Benson turns out to be as good, if not better, than Cornet.
These 2 users liked this post: Vegas Claret Burnley1989
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
IF, and it’s very early to predict, despite a hugely promising start, we have a really good season, the value of some of these cheaply bought players is going to sky rocket.
Pace could have pulled a master stroke here, in bringing in Kompany and getting what appears to be some great value in the transfer market.
Conversely, if the season turns out to be a disaster, we’ve bugger all left to flip and it starts to look bleak.
If I had to call it right now, I’d say that the gamble might just pay off. I’m not calling it exciting times but I might just be daring to dream.
Anyway, back to transfers, who is next? It’s been a few hours now!!
Pace could have pulled a master stroke here, in bringing in Kompany and getting what appears to be some great value in the transfer market.
Conversely, if the season turns out to be a disaster, we’ve bugger all left to flip and it starts to look bleak.
If I had to call it right now, I’d say that the gamble might just pay off. I’m not calling it exciting times but I might just be daring to dream.
Anyway, back to transfers, who is next? It’s been a few hours now!!
-
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:03 am
- Been Liked: 362 times
- Has Liked: 414 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
ClaretAndJew wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:11 pmIf you can't be excited by this project then I fear for you honestly.
This restructure seems to have just as much passion as the decade long Dych project. Vincent Kompany is a manager on the up and we will be lucky to get 3 seasons out of him. His contacts, pull and reputation far exceed anything we've ever had at Burnley. This is a time to be excited.
I do agree that VK is our manager until Guardiola decides to call it a day but I'm going to enjoy the ride until then
-
- Posts: 14889
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3519 times
- Has Liked: 6411 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Didn't he have a crap loan spell at Norwich who utterly failed to utilise him correctly?
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Wow we just signed a potentially great player, just played some of the best football I have seen in a long time, plaudits from everywhere on how strong we look, and yet still negative ******** on here, and to think 1st home match of a new era in less than 48 hrs, god help us if we need a Turfmoor fortress if some on here are to go by.
These 3 users liked this post: elwaclaret Juan Tanamera tiger76
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 5:58 pmI agree but I would like to think that certain players are certain starters.
Benson, Maatsen etc… I would say are almost certain starters.
Does make you wonder where the likes of Twine will fit in (or will this season be primarily a season from the bench for him).
Maatsen looks a terrific player but I'm fully expecting rotation at full/wing back because Kompany's system demands for much of the role. Similar to Pochetino, who used to have midweek full backs and weekend full backs at Spurs. Taylor is also an excellent left back and I imagine he'll get plenty if game time.
This user liked this post: Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 761
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:43 am
- Been Liked: 298 times
- Has Liked: 149 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Mentioning Brighton as a success club you need to see their accounts for the last 5 years, their owner has said its got to start paying for its self, good luck with that…. 

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not pressured particularly, last Friday, as he will be against better opposition, but he had a great game at Huddersfield. Probably spent as much time at left back as he did at Centre half, which worked brilliantly in allowing Maatsen to push on.claretspice wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:41 pmMaatsen looks a terrific player but I'm fully expecting rotation at full/wing back because Kompany's system demands for much of the role. Similar to Pochetino, who used to have midweek full backs and weekend full backs at Spurs. Taylor is also an excellent left back and I imagine he'll get plenty if game time.
Fair play to you, Spice. You called it a while ago, playing Taylor at centre half. I must admit I was a tad sceptical about that and worried when I heard the line ups. I needn’t have been.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Do you not think that might be the reason we’ve got Vitinho? With perhaps CJ on the other side, slightly more tucked in? The initial viewpoint on the squad is that we’ve got a number of players, who can play a number of roles, which at first viewing seems very positive.claretspice wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:41 pmMaatsen looks a terrific player but I'm fully expecting rotation at full/wing back because Kompany's system demands for much of the role. Similar to Pochetino, who used to have midweek full backs and weekend full backs at Spurs. Taylor is also an excellent left back and I imagine he'll get plenty if game time.
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1841 times
- Has Liked: 2186 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It's all about successful scouting and recruitment
Brentford have it spot on ,buy cheap sell high and replace with further emerging talent.
We seem to be on the way with VK and his exciting signings
Brentford have it spot on ,buy cheap sell high and replace with further emerging talent.
We seem to be on the way with VK and his exciting signings
-
- Posts: 12179
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5987 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Time the clown/troll* was permanently banned.CharlieinNewMexico wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:14 pmNot going to help.
Been pointed out to JakubClaret relentlessly but here he is again.
Clearly a selfish **** who doesn’t give a flying **** about other people.
*Delete as applicable.
-
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1741 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
His attitude and application were heavily questioned by their fans. The fact he hasn’t been given a squad number at CFC appears to back it up. He may be worth a punt but he’s certainly lost his way.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:35 pmDidn't he have a crap loan spell at Norwich who utterly failed to utilise him correctly?
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81
-
- Posts: 10827
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1319 times
- Has Liked: 864 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
That’s not very nice a lot of time conversation steers off into that direction unintentionally you might start off somewhere innocently 10 posts later you end up talking about it, I’m no troll I support the club.TheFamilyCat wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 10:05 pmTime the clown/troll* was permanently banned.
*Delete as applicable.