Isak
-
- Posts: 11733
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4764 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Isak
Ornstein reporting that Isak is refusing to play for Newcastle ever again, even if he is still there when the window closes.
What a really shoddy way for a player to conduct himself
What a really shoddy way for a player to conduct himself
Re: Isak
It’s embarrassing for him. If I was Newcastle I’d do everything in power to make him sweat. Fines, train without coaches etc. Yes it’s going to cost them a lot of money but the owners are rich enough. Send a message.
-
- Posts: 11733
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4764 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Isak
In a normal world his conduct would put off potential buyers but this is football.
Liverpool fans who turned on Alexander Arnold for doing exactly what he agreed to do and helping them win things will gladly accept the signing of someone like this.
-
- Posts: 10602
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3106 times
- Has Liked: 2472 times
Re: Isak
He’s signed a contract. If he doesn’t honour it they can sue him. World Cup build up year so Sweden won’t be happy.
-
- Posts: 77285
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37769 times
- Has Liked: 5748 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Isak
I can't imagine that will happen given it could cost him his place in the World Cup team through not playing.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:10 amOrnstein reporting that Isak is refusing to play for Newcastle ever again, even if he is still there when the window closes.
What a really shoddy way for a player to conduct himself
-
- Posts: 11733
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4764 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Isak
He will probably view it as Sweden couldn't leave him out, if it is a priority of his to play in the World CupClaretTony wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:32 amI can't imagine that will happen given it could cost him his place in the World Cup team through not playing.
-
- Posts: 77285
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37769 times
- Has Liked: 5748 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Isak
I've no idea whether it is but SSN were reporting last night that it is important to him.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:56 amHe will probably view it as Sweden couldn't leave him out, if it is a priority of his to play in the World Cup
We've had this at Burnley in the past with players, just not high enough profile to get all the media attention.
-
- Posts: 2020
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
- Been Liked: 296 times
- Has Liked: 553 times
Re: Isak
Said for many years football is ruined by players who are just plain greedy and there agents are the same, no loyalty in football anymore...
-
- Posts: 8621
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1860 times
- Has Liked: 2225 times
Re: Isak
Spuds are now allegedly sniffing around .I thought Frank would have more sense but Levy likes the idea that Tottenham are still a big club with deep pockets.
-
- Posts: 10616
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4633 times
- Has Liked: 7281 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Isak
Love the idea, but I fear the message won’t be heard tho, because it’s only the absolutely massively rich clubs that can fight back. We couldn’t even think about sending a message.
-
- Posts: 11733
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4764 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 7:20 pm
- Been Liked: 27 times
- Has Liked: 32 times
Re: Isak
I do get a perverse thrill in seeing Newcastle put in a position they’ve put other clubs in, clubs that don’t have the means to do what Newcastle are doing (and I think they’ll cave eventually).
Petty? Absolutely.
Petty? Absolutely.
-
- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 392 times
- Has Liked: 217 times
Re: Isak
The problem here is Newcastle have behaved as if they are 1 of the really big clubs and right or wrong we all know how much power players have now. as soon as it was clear he wanted off and they weren’t going to sell it was only going 1 way and Newcastle would be the losers.
Re: Isak
Are clubs, in theory, allowed to put a player on gardening leave for the duration of a contract?
-
- Posts: 10632
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 5411 times
- Has Liked: 1034 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Isak
It might be a few years away but players cutting their contracts short to seek employment elsewhere could become the norm. If it does, it’ll be as big as the Bosman Ruling:
https://www.dw.com/en/the-lawsuit-that- ... %20because
https://www.dw.com/en/the-lawsuit-that- ... %20because
This user liked this post: Clive 1960
-
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1439 times
- Has Liked: 104 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Isak
Was fine when Tarkowski did it so I think it's also fine for Isak to do it. Comes across on here sometimes that some posters really dislike footballers.
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
- Been Liked: 542 times
- Has Liked: 189 times
Re: Isak
Yes, that is the appalling double standards of football fans....claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:19 amIn a normal world his conduct would put off potential buyers but this is football.
Liverpool fans who turned on Alexander Arnold for doing exactly what he agreed to do and helping them win things will gladly accept the signing of someone like this.
-
- Posts: 10602
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3106 times
- Has Liked: 2472 times
Re: Isak
Not necessarily. The owners are oil rich and can afford to park him. Their problem is needing cash to be psr compliant.JarrowClaret wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:50 amas soon as it was clear he wanted off and they weren’t going to sell it was only going 1 way and Newcastle would be the losers.
-
- Posts: 10602
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3106 times
- Has Liked: 2472 times
-
- Posts: 7997
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1200 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
Re: Isak
Isak is determined to leave Newcastle and sign for Liverpool whilst Wissa is determined to leave Brentford and sign for Newcastle.
What their clubs actually want is immaterial it seems if players are able to force these moves through.
What their clubs actually want is immaterial it seems if players are able to force these moves through.
This user liked this post: Clive 1960
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:47 am
Re: Isak
Players have all the power now, the balance needs to be redressed. There should be real consequences for any players refusing to play for their clubs without good reason, such as the Sheffield Wednesday saga. I don't think Newcastle can let him rot in the reserves either. I think if they do that for a year the player is allowed to cancel his contract.
-
- Posts: 20471
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4528 times
- Has Liked: 2036 times
Re: Isak
Liverpool fans were fuming at Trent for sitting out his contract and leaving for free.
But are happy to get Isak, who is refusing to play for Newcastle.
And Newcastle fans are unhappy at Isak's behaviour, but are happy to get Wissa, who is doing exactly the same at Brentford.
But are happy to get Isak, who is refusing to play for Newcastle.
And Newcastle fans are unhappy at Isak's behaviour, but are happy to get Wissa, who is doing exactly the same at Brentford.
-
- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 392 times
- Has Liked: 217 times
Re: Isak
It is odd when they took over there was a lot of noise about what they are going to do and theee was lots of noise last season about the new stadium etc. this season it has gone very quiet don’t even mention the stadium anymore, not sure they have the finances that we think they do.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:48 amNot necessarily. The owners are oil rich and can afford to park him. Their problem is needing cash to be psr compliant.
Re: Isak
Tarks didn’t have 3 years left on his contractdaveisaclaret wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:00 amWas fine when Tarkowski did it so I think it's also fine for Isak to do it. Comes across on here sometimes that some posters really dislike footballers.
Re: Isak
It's not the same though is it ? Tarks had a gentlemans agreement with Brentford and they were trying not to honour it.daveisaclaret wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:00 amWas fine when Tarkowski did it so I think it's also fine for Isak to do it. Comes across on here sometimes that some posters really dislike footballers.
Also a member of his family (mum I think) was seriously ill at the time and he wanted to get back up North to be near them.
-
- Posts: 10923
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1336 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Isak
I wouldn't say that. Newcastle haven't backed down by accepting Liverpool's opening offer newcastle from the start I've steadfastly kept their valuation (high or low that's debatable). Newcastle are well within their rights to value their players however they wish & if that's perceived as behaving big that's just the way it is. More clubs should do it instead of letting other clubs ride roughshod.JarrowClaret wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:50 amThe problem here is Newcastle have behaved as if they are 1 of the really big clubs and right or wrong we all know how much power players have now. as soon as it was clear he wanted off and they weren’t going to sell it was only going 1 way and Newcastle would be the losers.
-
- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 392 times
- Has Liked: 217 times
Re: Isak
Never said Newcastle should back down on price, but they need to accept that if a bigger club comes in for a player and the player is interested in the move saying that a player is not for sale is never gonna wash and will 9/10 lead to situations like they have now. A sensible approach similar to how we dealt with Trafford should be usedJakubclaret wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:19 pmI wouldn't say that. Newcastle haven't backed down by accepting Liverpool's opening offer newcastle from the start I've steadfastly kept their valuation (high or low that's debatable). Newcastle are well within their rights to value their players however they wish & if that's perceived as behaving big that's just the way it is. More clubs should do it instead of letting other clubs ride roughshod.
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret
-
- Posts: 10923
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1336 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Isak
We'll see how the impasse is concluded.JarrowClaret wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:33 pmNever said Newcastle should back down on price, but they need to accept that if a bigger club comes in for a player and the player is interested in the move saying that a player is not for sale is never gonna wash and will 9/10 lead to situations like they have now. A sensible approach similar to how we dealt with Trafford should be used
-
- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 392 times
- Has Liked: 217 times
Re: Isak
Yes let’s see, what Newcastle don’t want is a player going through the motions for 6/12 months causing a toxic atmosphere. all football fans are fickle so if he starts scoring assuming he stays that is then the Newcastle fans will get behind him again.
-
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2018 4:08 pm
- Been Liked: 321 times
- Has Liked: 45 times
Re: Isak
Isak has a contract, honour it! Greedy barsteward
All contracts should be of one year duration.

-
- Posts: 10923
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1336 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Isak
Think it's more a question of when now not if.JarrowClaret wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:43 pmYes let’s see, what Newcastle don’t want is a player going through the motions for 6/12 months causing a toxic atmosphere. all football fans are fickle so if he starts scoring assuming he stays that is then the Newcastle fans will get behind him again.
-
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:07 pm
- Been Liked: 727 times
- Has Liked: 183 times
- Contact:
Re: Isak
This is where players can't win.exilecanada wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:45 pmIsak has a contract, honour it! Greedy barstewardAll contracts should be of one year duration.
1 - Player who honours his contract while not being in the team is stealing a living.
2 - Player honours his contract and leaves at the end of it is denying his club a transfer fee
3 - Player who wants to move mid-contract, guaranteeing his club a few is told he should honour his contract