Isak

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11727
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4763 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Isak

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:10 am

Ornstein reporting that Isak is refusing to play for Newcastle ever again, even if he is still there when the window closes.

What a really shoddy way for a player to conduct himself

Elizabeth
Posts: 5237
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1476 times

Re: Isak

Post by Elizabeth » Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:17 am

A bit of a media circus this. I doubt it

RVclaret
Posts: 16349
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4509 times
Has Liked: 3035 times

Re: Isak

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:17 am

It’s embarrassing for him. If I was Newcastle I’d do everything in power to make him sweat. Fines, train without coaches etc. Yes it’s going to cost them a lot of money but the owners are rich enough. Send a message.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11727
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4763 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Isak

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:19 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:17 am
It’s embarrassing for him. If I was Newcastle I’d do everything in power to make him sweat. Fines, train without coaches etc. Yes it’s going to cost them a lot of money but the owners are rich enough. Send a message.
In a normal world his conduct would put off potential buyers but this is football.

Liverpool fans who turned on Alexander Arnold for doing exactly what he agreed to do and helping them win things will gladly accept the signing of someone like this.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 10599
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 3105 times
Has Liked: 2472 times

Re: Isak

Post by Tricky Trevor » Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:26 am

He’s signed a contract. If he doesn’t honour it they can sue him. World Cup build up year so Sweden won’t be happy.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77260
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37765 times
Has Liked: 5747 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Isak

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:32 am

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:10 am
Ornstein reporting that Isak is refusing to play for Newcastle ever again, even if he is still there when the window closes.

What a really shoddy way for a player to conduct himself
I can't imagine that will happen given it could cost him his place in the World Cup team through not playing.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11727
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4763 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Isak

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:56 am

ClaretTony wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:32 am
I can't imagine that will happen given it could cost him his place in the World Cup team through not playing.
He will probably view it as Sweden couldn't leave him out, if it is a priority of his to play in the World Cup

ClaretTony
Posts: 77260
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37765 times
Has Liked: 5747 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Isak

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:57 am

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:56 am
He will probably view it as Sweden couldn't leave him out, if it is a priority of his to play in the World Cup
I've no idea whether it is but SSN were reporting last night that it is important to him.

We've had this at Burnley in the past with players, just not high enough profile to get all the media attention.

Clive 1960
Posts: 2020
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
Been Liked: 296 times
Has Liked: 553 times

Re: Isak

Post by Clive 1960 » Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:59 am

Said for many years football is ruined by players who are just plain greedy and there agents are the same, no loyalty in football anymore...

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2113 times
Has Liked: 1055 times

Re: Isak

Post by BurnleyFC » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:06 am

His agent has managed to convince him that he’s the next Cristiano Ronaldo.

He’s not.

Goody1975
Posts: 3359
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 1175 times
Has Liked: 286 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Isak

Post by Goody1975 » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:07 am

tantrum-kid.gif
tantrum-kid.gif (911.86 KiB) Viewed 1902 times

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8617
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1860 times
Has Liked: 2224 times

Re: Isak

Post by Woodleyclaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:11 am

Spuds are now allegedly sniffing around .I thought Frank would have more sense but Levy likes the idea that Tottenham are still a big club with deep pockets.

bobinho
Posts: 10616
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4633 times
Has Liked: 7281 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Isak

Post by bobinho » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:24 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:17 am
It’s embarrassing for him. If I was Newcastle I’d do everything in power to make him sweat. Fines, train without coaches etc. Yes it’s going to cost them a lot of money but the owners are rich enough. Send a message.
Love the idea, but I fear the message won’t be heard tho, because it’s only the absolutely massively rich clubs that can fight back. We couldn’t even think about sending a message.

Socrates
Posts: 956
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
Been Liked: 1021 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Isak

Post by Socrates » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:31 am

There’s no way he’s come up with this stance on his own.

Liverpool will absolutely be complicit in this stance to drive the price down.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 11727
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4763 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Isak

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:34 am

Socrates wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:31 am
There’s no way he’s come up with this stance on his own.

Liverpool will absolutely be complicit in this stance to drive the price down.

Which is what they did with Van Dijk

Procrastinate B
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 7:20 pm
Been Liked: 27 times
Has Liked: 32 times

Re: Isak

Post by Procrastinate B » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:35 am

I do get a perverse thrill in seeing Newcastle put in a position they’ve put other clubs in, clubs that don’t have the means to do what Newcastle are doing (and I think they’ll cave eventually).

Petty? Absolutely.

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1707
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 392 times
Has Liked: 217 times

Re: Isak

Post by JarrowClaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:50 am

The problem here is Newcastle have behaved as if they are 1 of the really big clubs and right or wrong we all know how much power players have now. as soon as it was clear he wanted off and they weren’t going to sell it was only going 1 way and Newcastle would be the losers.

Spijed
Posts: 17984
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3038 times
Has Liked: 1325 times

Re: Isak

Post by Spijed » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:53 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:17 am
It’s embarrassing for him. If I was Newcastle I’d do everything in power to make him sweat. Fines, train without coaches etc. Yes it’s going to cost them a lot of money but the owners are rich enough. Send a message.
Are clubs, in theory, allowed to put a player on gardening leave for the duration of a contract?

jdrobbo
Posts: 10630
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 5411 times
Has Liked: 1032 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Isak

Post by jdrobbo » Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:59 am

It might be a few years away but players cutting their contracts short to seek employment elsewhere could become the norm. If it does, it’ll be as big as the Bosman Ruling:


https://www.dw.com/en/the-lawsuit-that- ... %20because
This user liked this post: Clive 1960

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2753
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1439 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Isak

Post by daveisaclaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:00 am

Was fine when Tarkowski did it so I think it's also fine for Isak to do it. Comes across on here sometimes that some posters really dislike footballers.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3233
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 542 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Isak

Post by ClaretPete001 » Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:35 am

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:19 am
In a normal world his conduct would put off potential buyers but this is football.

Liverpool fans who turned on Alexander Arnold for doing exactly what he agreed to do and helping them win things will gladly accept the signing of someone like this.
Yes, that is the appalling double standards of football fans....

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 10599
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 3105 times
Has Liked: 2472 times

Re: Isak

Post by Tricky Trevor » Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:48 am

JarrowClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:50 am
as soon as it was clear he wanted off and they weren’t going to sell it was only going 1 way and Newcastle would be the losers.
Not necessarily. The owners are oil rich and can afford to park him. Their problem is needing cash to be psr compliant.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 10599
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 3105 times
Has Liked: 2472 times

Re: Isak

Post by Tricky Trevor » Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:50 am

jdrobbo wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:59 am
It might be a few years away but players cutting their contracts short to seek employment elsewhere could become the norm. If it does, it’ll be as big as the Bosman Ruling:
Clubs will be putting termination clauses into the contract.

kentonclaret
Posts: 7991
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1200 times
Has Liked: 248 times

Re: Isak

Post by kentonclaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:51 am

Isak is determined to leave Newcastle and sign for Liverpool whilst Wissa is determined to leave Brentford and sign for Newcastle.
What their clubs actually want is immaterial it seems if players are able to force these moves through.
This user liked this post: Clive 1960

Ptgclaret
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:31 am
Been Liked: 40 times
Has Liked: 14 times

Re: Isak

Post by Ptgclaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 11:05 am

Not the first, won't be the last.....

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.skyspo ... es-to-play

MarlonsGloves
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:47 am

Re: Isak

Post by MarlonsGloves » Tue Aug 12, 2025 11:06 am

Players have all the power now, the balance needs to be redressed. There should be real consequences for any players refusing to play for their clubs without good reason, such as the Sheffield Wednesday saga. I don't think Newcastle can let him rot in the reserves either. I think if they do that for a year the player is allowed to cancel his contract.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20469
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4528 times
Has Liked: 2035 times

Re: Isak

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 11:08 am

Socrates wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:31 am
There’s no way he’s come up with this stance on his own.

Liverpool will absolutely be complicit in this stance to drive the price down.
My thoughts exactly for a while now.

Casper2
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 463 times
Has Liked: 144 times

Re: Isak

Post by Casper2 » Tue Aug 12, 2025 2:24 pm

Liverpool fans were fuming at Trent for sitting out his contract and leaving for free.

But are happy to get Isak, who is refusing to play for Newcastle.

And Newcastle fans are unhappy at Isak's behaviour, but are happy to get Wissa, who is doing exactly the same at Brentford.

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1707
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 392 times
Has Liked: 217 times

Re: Isak

Post by JarrowClaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 3:43 pm

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:48 am
Not necessarily. The owners are oil rich and can afford to park him. Their problem is needing cash to be psr compliant.
It is odd when they took over there was a lot of noise about what they are going to do and theee was lots of noise last season about the new stadium etc. this season it has gone very quiet don’t even mention the stadium anymore, not sure they have the finances that we think they do.

Casper2
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 463 times
Has Liked: 144 times

Re: Isak

Post by Casper2 » Tue Aug 12, 2025 3:47 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:00 am
Was fine when Tarkowski did it so I think it's also fine for Isak to do it. Comes across on here sometimes that some posters really dislike footballers.
Tarks didn’t have 3 years left on his contract

woody
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:17 am
Been Liked: 35 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Isak

Post by woody » Tue Aug 12, 2025 3:53 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 10:00 am
Was fine when Tarkowski did it so I think it's also fine for Isak to do it. Comes across on here sometimes that some posters really dislike footballers.
It's not the same though is it ? Tarks had a gentlemans agreement with Brentford and they were trying not to honour it.
Also a member of his family (mum I think) was seriously ill at the time and he wanted to get back up North to be near them.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10917
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1336 times
Has Liked: 886 times

Re: Isak

Post by Jakubclaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:19 pm

JarrowClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:50 am
The problem here is Newcastle have behaved as if they are 1 of the really big clubs and right or wrong we all know how much power players have now. as soon as it was clear he wanted off and they weren’t going to sell it was only going 1 way and Newcastle would be the losers.
I wouldn't say that. Newcastle haven't backed down by accepting Liverpool's opening offer newcastle from the start I've steadfastly kept their valuation (high or low that's debatable). Newcastle are well within their rights to value their players however they wish & if that's perceived as behaving big that's just the way it is. More clubs should do it instead of letting other clubs ride roughshod.

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1707
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 392 times
Has Liked: 217 times

Re: Isak

Post by JarrowClaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:33 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:19 pm
I wouldn't say that. Newcastle haven't backed down by accepting Liverpool's opening offer newcastle from the start I've steadfastly kept their valuation (high or low that's debatable). Newcastle are well within their rights to value their players however they wish & if that's perceived as behaving big that's just the way it is. More clubs should do it instead of letting other clubs ride roughshod.
Never said Newcastle should back down on price, but they need to accept that if a bigger club comes in for a player and the player is interested in the move saying that a player is not for sale is never gonna wash and will 9/10 lead to situations like they have now. A sensible approach similar to how we dealt with Trafford should be used
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10917
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1336 times
Has Liked: 886 times

Re: Isak

Post by Jakubclaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:35 pm

JarrowClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:33 pm
Never said Newcastle should back down on price, but they need to accept that if a bigger club comes in for a player and the player is interested in the move saying that a player is not for sale is never gonna wash and will 9/10 lead to situations like they have now. A sensible approach similar to how we dealt with Trafford should be used
We'll see how the impasse is concluded.

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1707
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 392 times
Has Liked: 217 times

Re: Isak

Post by JarrowClaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:43 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:35 pm
We'll see how the impasse is concluded.
Yes let’s see, what Newcastle don’t want is a player going through the motions for 6/12 months causing a toxic atmosphere. all football fans are fickle so if he starts scoring assuming he stays that is then the Newcastle fans will get behind him again.

exilecanada
Posts: 1260
Joined: Sat May 12, 2018 4:08 pm
Been Liked: 321 times
Has Liked: 45 times

Re: Isak

Post by exilecanada » Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:45 pm

Isak has a contract, honour it! Greedy barsteward :roll: All contracts should be of one year duration.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10917
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1336 times
Has Liked: 886 times

Re: Isak

Post by Jakubclaret » Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:47 pm

JarrowClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:43 pm
Yes let’s see, what Newcastle don’t want is a player going through the motions for 6/12 months causing a toxic atmosphere. all football fans are fickle so if he starts scoring assuming he stays that is then the Newcastle fans will get behind him again.
Think it's more a question of when now not if.

Bacchus
Posts: 1051
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 727 times
Has Liked: 183 times
Contact:

Re: Isak

Post by Bacchus » Tue Aug 12, 2025 6:19 pm

exilecanada wrote:
Tue Aug 12, 2025 4:45 pm
Isak has a contract, honour it! Greedy barsteward :roll: All contracts should be of one year duration.
This is where players can't win.

1 - Player who honours his contract while not being in the team is stealing a living.
2 - Player honours his contract and leaves at the end of it is denying his club a transfer fee
3 - Player who wants to move mid-contract, guaranteeing his club a few is told he should honour his contract

Post Reply