Post
by SingaporeClarets » Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:59 am
Blue Peter even peddled that tosh about water changing direction. I don't know who it was but they flew her to Kenya and she stood 1m either side of the equator and on the equator to demonstrate. Waste of money.
This I propose is the biggest fraud, not this flat earth nonsense.
For the "Coriolis Force" to have any noticeable effect then you would need to scale up this experiment so that the bowl was at least 2km in diameter.
In reality this force does not exist, it's one of many apparent forces. However all the great minds who came up with rather simple rules and equations to describe the world we live in did so by assuming the world we live in doesn't move relative to anything else and then invented fictitious forces to compensate for this, like the Coriolis Force.
Its why still to this day, physicists are still trying to come up with a standard model that can describe all of time and space without the need for fictitious forces.
Brian Cox has many a choice word about these flat earthers, if your interested in these things at an introductory level, get his latest book for Christmas.
Science has always been about pushing boundaries and testing theories. If some of these people are serious then they are just doing what scientists have done for centuries, regardless of how silly it is, we should encourage scientific theories to be questioned and refined, it's how we got to where we are today. Scientists have always been a political bunch too, preventing the publication of scientific papers which don't match certain agendas only for decades later when the evidence is overwhelming it is shown that no justification existed for this. Let these people stand by their theories and evidence and see how it stands up to scrutiny. To be a great scientist you have to be wrong many times before you can be right, even then right just means you have a theory which at this point in time stands upto scrutiny but in years to come, new experiments, thoughts theories may prove to be better, nothing is 100% certain. Go read his book.
Too much of my work is technically and scientifically underpinned by a roundish lumpy rock but I look forward to reading any well written scientific paper which argues otherwise, published or unpublished.