Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
starting_11
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 936 times

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by starting_11 » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:16 pm

FactualFrank wrote: BT Sport will have get a much bigger share of the football, and improve their commentary and pundits before I considered paying for it. I bet they'd get a decent increase in business by letting Michael Owen, Gary Lineker, Jake Humphrey, Claire Balding, Rio Ferdinand, Steven Gerrard, Frank Lampard, Owen Hargreaves, Jermaine Jenas, Paul Scholes, and Steve McMananamanaman.
Sorted it out for you.

claret54
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 25 times
Has Liked: 277 times

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by claret54 » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:31 pm

John Mac wrote :Tax avoiding companies? Why should I lose sleep when there is nothing I can do to ever make a difference? I suspect millions of others are like me so there is never going to be a mass boycott of Amazon, Starbucks et al.

I agree its difficult to avoid Amazon. But Starbucks there is no need to use. There is Costa a British Company which also owns al Premier Inn. And lots of independent coffee shops. So absolutely no need to use Starbucks who are prime tax avoiders. So you can make a difference there.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19677
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4181 times
Has Liked: 2239 times

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by Quickenthetempo » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:56 pm

They haven't paid as much this time. 9.2m a game instead of 10.3m last time.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by Sidney1st » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:58 pm

Showing more games though so teams won't notice the difference.

piston broke
Posts: 5548
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1448 times
Has Liked: 1229 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by piston broke » Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:15 pm

http://www.skysports.com/share/11248738" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Sky bigging themselves up, as they do, but no mention of the midweek every match package.
Just read on another article there are 40 more matches in 2 packs covering midweek and BHs.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76614
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37341 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by ClaretTony » Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:36 am

piston broke wrote:http://www.skysports.com/share/11248738

Sky bigging themselves up, as they do, but no mention of the midweek every match package.
Just read on another article there are 40 more matches in 2 packs covering midweek and BHs.
The last two packages are for the midweek games. One package covers two sets of midweek games and the other one set of midweek games and one set of Bank Holiday games. All 40 matches will be shown. Sky can't win both those packages because they would go beyond the limit of games permissible for one broadcaster, and I don't think BT want them. I suspect this is where Amazon comes in.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by FactualFrank » Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:58 am

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43002985" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Package A - won by BT - 32 matches on Saturdays at 12:30
Package B - won by Sky Sports - 32 matches on Saturdays at 17:30
Package C - won by Sky Sports - 24 matches on Sundays at 14:00 and eight matches on Saturdays at 19:45
Package D - won by Sky Sports - 32 matches on Sundays at 16:30
Package E - won by Sky Sports - 24 matches on Mondays at 20:00 or Fridays at 19:30/20:00 and eight matches on Sundays at 14:00

Package F - to be decided - 20 matches from one Bank Holiday and one midweek fixture programme
Package G - to be decided - 20 matches from two midweek fixture programmes

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by claretandy » Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:13 pm

I can't see them getting much for the final 2 packages which would mean a fall in the overall revenue.

Wokingclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 367 times
Has Liked: 975 times

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by Wokingclaret » Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:16 pm

The oversees rights have gone up, but the big clubs want more of this pot than the others

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by FactualFrank » Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:17 pm

claretandy wrote:I can't see them getting much for the final 2 packages which would mean a fall in the overall revenue.
From what I've read, Sky can't get both remaining packages due to an upper limit of how many games they can buy. So they can only grab one of the two.

I've not read anywhere though that compares Sky's won packages vs what they currently have. Does anybody know how much better off they will be from 2019 vs BT Sports, than they are this season?

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by claretandy » Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:39 pm

FactualFrank wrote:From what I've read, Sky can't get both remaining packages due to an upper limit of how many games they can buy. So they can only grab one of the two.

I've not read anywhere though that compares Sky's won packages vs what they currently have. Does anybody know how much better off they will be from 2019 vs BT Sports, than they are this season?
Sky will have more games, and they have payed less for them as well.

simonclaret
Posts: 1240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:59 am
Been Liked: 284 times
Has Liked: 3712 times
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by simonclaret » Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:44 pm

ClaretTony wrote:I don't think BT want them.
They very much do:

The Premier League auction remains ongoing and BT will continue to engage with the Premier League regarding the remaining rights.

https://btplc.com/News/#/pressreleases/ ... on-2416049" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19677
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4181 times
Has Liked: 2239 times

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by Quickenthetempo » Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:58 pm

If all 10 games are shown live at once then you will have about 15k viewers for B'mouth Vs Huddersfield or similar. The audiences will be diluted so what will they be worth?

Longside4evr
Posts: 2502
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
Been Liked: 519 times
Has Liked: 266 times
Location: Malaga Spain

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by Longside4evr » Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:59 pm

If they got rid of Michael Owen, that would be a step in the right direction.
I dont even know who presenters are, that's how much I am interested in BT Sports involvement its the gray area of the game very underwhelming.
What would be a yearly subscription to have the privilege of this aring to view if one does not have the BT package.
Can imagine that they have bitten off more than they can chew with the kings ransom that they paid on the deal.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76614
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37341 times
Has Liked: 5702 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by ClaretTony » Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:51 pm

simonclaret wrote:They very much do:

The Premier League auction remains ongoing and BT will continue to engage with the Premier League regarding the remaining rights.

https://btplc.com/News/#/pressreleases/ ... on-2416049" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I must be reading the wrong newspaper sites - could it be that Sky & BT end up with one each of the other packages then?

JohnMac
Posts: 7683
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2565 times
Has Liked: 4134 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by JohnMac » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:59 pm

claret54 wrote:John Mac wrote :Tax avoiding companies? Why should I lose sleep when there is nothing I can do to ever make a difference? I suspect millions of others are like me so there is never going to be a mass boycott of Amazon, Starbucks et al.

I agree its difficult to avoid Amazon. But Starbucks there is no need to use. There is Costa a British Company which also owns al Premier Inn. And lots of independent coffee shops. So absolutely no need to use Starbucks who are prime tax avoiders. So you can make a difference there.
I don't actually do the 'coffee thing' more than once or twice a year.
I find it pretty pretentious all these people ordering anything other than a Nescafe :lol:

Chester Perry
Posts: 20120
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3296 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by Chester Perry » Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:24 pm

ClaretTony wrote:I must be reading the wrong newspaper sites - could it be that Sky & BT end up with one each of the other packages then?
Sky can have one more, BT can have them both should they bid that way - Can see Sky bidding for the Bank Holiday (Monday Night consistency) though both remaining packages fit BT's Midweek Football approach)

The thing limiting Sky is the overall 148 games maximum per season allowed under the rules - as demonstrated on the magic money tree thread - Sky have played a corker
This user liked this post: simonclaret

Putneyclaret
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:42 pm
Been Liked: 12 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Premier League TV rights 2019-2022

Post by Putneyclaret » Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:02 pm

JohnMac wrote:I don't actually do the 'coffee thing' more than once or twice a year.
I find it pretty pretentious all these people ordering anything other than a Nescafe :lol:
Some of us like coffee: that's why I avoid Starbucks and instant "coffee"
This user liked this post: JohnMac

Post Reply